AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN
TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE x RECORD REVIEW
"COUNSEL" | .:| NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL,
VOTE. OF THE BOARD"
HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY
x
x
xX
x
x
SS eee = sett See eee — : a r =
SSUES TO!
ISSUES A93.01 INDEX NUMBER A67.90 mo HIBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD
A [ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
2. |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3_|LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE -
COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAI, APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING
HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER
13 Jan 2010 FD-2009-00002
APPLICANT'S ISSUR.AND THE BOARD'S. DECISIO \ FRATIONALE "ARE Disc ‘USSED ON THE ATTACHED AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE. .
‘ bee ad
Case heard in Washington, D.C,
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an
application to the AFBCMR.
Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant’s request.
SAF/MRBR SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
enn AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous
CASE NUMBER
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2009-00002
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined
and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.
The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.
FINDINGS: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge.
The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and
after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justify a change of
discharge.
ISSUE: The applicant stated that he took complete responsibility for his discharge, but would like to show
that he is “not the same, immature, aimless individual that entered BMT almost 7 years ago.”
The record indicated the applicant received the following corrective action:
1. 4 Feb 04: Letter of Reprimand (LOR) for failure to go.
2, 14 May 04: Letter of Counseling (LOC) for failure to go.
3. 14 Jun 04: Letter of Admonishment (LOA) for failure to go.
4. 8 Jul 04: LOR for failure to go.
5. 19 Jul 04: LOR for failure to obey a lawful order.
18 Aug 04: LOR for driving while alcohol concentration was .046/failing field sobriety test.
. 20 Sep 04: LOC for failure to go.
5 Oct 04: LOR for failure to go.
29 Nov 04: LOC for dereliction of duty.
10. 11 Feb 05: LOR for dereliction of duty by misusing government travel card.
Although the applicant did not raise any issue of inequity or impropriety, he focused on the fact that he made
numerous youthful mistakes and he is not the “same immature, aimless individual” when he entered Basic
Military Training (BMT). The DRB recognized the applicant was 19 years of age when he entered the
service and 21 years of age when the discharge took place. The record shows that the applicant’s unit took
numerous rehabilitative measures to correct the applicant’s failure to adhere to standards—but the applicant
failed to correct his behavior. The DRB concluded that the characterization of the applicant’s discharge was
appropriate due to the repeated nature of his misconduct.
CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.
In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.
Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00478
For this misconduct you received a Letter of Counseling (LOC) on 28 Mar 96. b. For this misconduct you received an Article 15 on 2 Jul96 which included a suspended reduction to airman basic, forfeiture of $100.00 pay for one month, and seven days correctional custody, This Article 15 was placed in your existing UIF. For this misconduct you received an Article 15 on 17 Apr 97 which included reduction to the grade of airman, with a new date of rank of 17 Apr 97 and restriction to Malmstrorn...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00361
He also received three Letters of Reprimand for disobeying a lawful order, making a false official statement and dereliction of duty; three Letters of Counseling for sleeping on duty, financial irresponsibility and reporting late to training; a Letter of Admonishment for failure to go to appointed place of duty; and a Record of Individual Counseling for misconduct. Attachment: Examiner's Brief - DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD -----------------------. (Change...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00148
JRD Fl 0 0 U AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used I I 1 I I AIR FORCE DlSCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASb N l l M R E R FD-ZU,)6-00148 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code. 'I'he applicant received an Article 15 for being derelict in the performance of duties by providing alcoholic beverages to someone under the age of 2 1. (Atch...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00403
I I I 1 I AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) 1 AFSNISSAN I I I GRADE I I 1 TYPE GEN 1 I x j NAME dF COUNSEL AND PERSONAL APPEARANCE RECORDREVIEW ORGANlZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION O F COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING I 1 HON I VOTE OF: THE BOARD GEN UOTHC OTHER 1 DENY .-----------------------------------, ISSUES INDEX NUMBER A67.10 A92.15 A92.21 X EXHIBITS SUB-ED TO THE BOARD 1 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 1 I ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 3 1 LETTER OF...
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00588
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN Pe AMN P| TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW . The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. The DRB concluded that the characterization of the applicant’s discharge was appropriate due to the misconduct, especially his unlawful...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00291
(Change Discharge to Honorable, and Change the RE Code, Reason and Authority for Discharge) Issue 1: An upgrade is requested because I would like a chance the (sic) operational Air Force, or any Branch for that matter. For this misconduct you received a Letter of Reprimand (LOR) and an Unfavorable Information File was established on 10 Jun 04. b. For this misconduct you received an AF Form 174, Record of Individual Counseling on 14 Jan 04.
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00055
Attachment: Examiner's Brief FD2003-00055 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD See (Former AB) (HGH A1C) 1. 21Mar03/cr F22003- 000 Ss- DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR EDUCATION AND TRAINING COMMAND MEMORANDUM FOR AB QQ ONIN SS2 TRS DEC 1 6 2007 FROM: 362 TRS/CC SUBJECT: Notification Memorandum 1. AF Form 3070, 18 Nov 02 Response to Article 15, 15 Nov 02 AF Form 1168, MS ete Nov 02 82 SFS/CCB Memo, 4 Nov 02 Correctional Custody Record of Individual...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2006-00138
Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former A1C) (HGH AlC) 1. For this incident, you received a Letter of Counseling (LOC), dated 15 Nov 04. e. On 18 Aug 04, you failed to go to your appointed place of duty at the time prescribed. Documents containing derogatory information -- which are not listed in the notification memorandum as the basis for discharge: None 3.
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00452
I AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD I NAMI. MI) 20762-7flOZ I AFlIQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DEClSIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2006-00452 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code. For this misconduct, you received a Letter of Counseling, dated 21 Jul03.
AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2004-00259
‘The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate. in view of the foregoing findings the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed, Attachment: Examiner's Brief FD2004-00259 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFE, MD {former AlC) (HGH A1G) 1. Commander, 90th Maintenance Operations Squadron Attachments: LOC,...