Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00041
Original file (FD-2009-00041.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
ATR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD

 

NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAI.) GRADE AFSN/SSAN

 
   
  
 

 

 

 

 

 

     

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TYPE PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW
COUNSEL: NAME-OF COUNSEIVAND OR'ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL
~ ae VORHOF THEBORD:
HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY
x
E+
xF+
M+
x*+
ISSUES A01.00 UINARON NUVI, A67.30 EXHIBITS SUBMIT RED CO THE BOARD
A95.00 1] ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARID ree
2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3. [LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
4 [BRIEF OF PERSONNELTILE
COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING
HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER
05 Aug 2010 FD-2009-00041

 

 

TAPRLICAND

   

Case heard in Washington, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an
application to the AFBCMR.

Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant’s request.

*Reason and Authority
+Reenlistment Code

 

|

 

DATE: 8/17/2010

   
 

ur
TO: FROM:
SAR SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
SA F/MRBR weather a AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
550 C STREET WKST, S$ E 40 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR
RANDOLPH AFB, F 150-4742 ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001

 

 

 

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous
CASE NUMBER

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2009-00041

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and
authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined
and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached bricf contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge, change of reason and authority for discharge,
and change of reenlistment code.

The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and
after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justify a change of
discharge.

ISSUE:

Applicant submitted no issues regarding the inequity or impropriety of his discharge. The applicant does
submit that he believes he deserves a second chance despite his discrepancies so that he may serve his
country in the Unites States Army. The record indicates the applicant assaulted two military members in a
civilian bar near an Air Force base. Both airmen suffered serious injuries as a result of applicant’s actions,
and the preponderance of the evidence showed that applicant committed the assaults. The Board found the
seriousness of the willful misconduct offset any positive aspects of the applicant's duty performance and
formed a legally sufficient basis for the discharge. The Board reviewed the entire record and found no
evidence of impropriety or inequity to warrant an upgrade of the discharge. The characterization of and
reason for the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.

Attachment:
Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00041

    Original file (FD-2015-00041.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable. Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischarge Review Board (DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinent dataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddenies theupgrade ofthedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2011 | FD-2010-00228

    Original file (FD-2010-00228.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant appeared and testified before the Discharge Review Board (DRB), with counsel, at Andrews AFB on 08 Mar 2012. The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge. The DRB concluded that the characterization of the applicant’s discharge was appropriate due to the misconduct.

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2010-00343

    Original file (FD-2010-00343.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    FINDING: The requests to upgrade the discharge, to change of reason and authority for discharge, and to change of reenlistment code are denied. Attachment: Examiner's Brief CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2010-00343 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable and to change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code. FINDING: The requests to upgrade the discharge, to change of reason and...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00143

    Original file (FD-2009-00143.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A94,05 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION OR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION alee [=] 5 {BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE 24 Jun 2010 ¥D-2009-001 43 PAP RUIC ANTS [S80 AND THE BOARD'S DECISIONAL RATION ALE ARE DISCUSSED ON JHEATTACHED AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONALRATIONAEB Geos: CASE NUMBER Case heard in Washington,...

  • AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2008-00152

    Original file (FD2008-00152.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SAF/MRBR 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001 (EF-V2) Previous CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2008-00152 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code. The...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00028

    Original file (FD-2009-00028.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL : : : AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFR, MD 20762-7001 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE- FD-2009-00028 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code. After a...

  • AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2008-00181

    Original file (FD2008-00181.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) PERSONAL APPEARANCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD GRADE AFSN/SSAN atc |__| x RECORD REVIEW ;] NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION a ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING OTHER DENY | x Xx x x Xx ISSUES 45 99 INDEX NUMBER A67.90 HEB A92.21 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD A01.00 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 13 | LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2011 | FD-2010-00183

    Original file (FD-2010-00183.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AFSN/SSAN RECORD REVIEW i L ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL X*+ Xt+ X*+ X*+ ISSUES A411 mom 6710 A92.21 A47,00 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD A93.11 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE A93.33 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE | _|COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00474

    Original file (FD-2008-00474.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    a rere er ISSUES A94.05 INDEX NUMBER A67.10 EXEUBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD 1 JORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD [2 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 18 Mar 2010 FD-2008-00474 IOARD 5 DECISIONAL RATIONALB'ARE DISCUSSED ON GE i ” ae Case heard in Washington, D.C. The applicant...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2010-00301

    Original file (FD-2010-00301.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Previous CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2010-00301 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code. The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge, change...