AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN
X RECORD REVIEW
ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL
MEMBER SITTING
ISSUES A94.06 INDEX NUMBER A69.00 a _ ExXees SUBMIPTED Te) THE BOA!
A93.19 A67.00 1 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD _.
A93.07 2 {APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
4 | BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING
HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER
29 Apr 2010 FD-2009-00023
. CANT'S ISSUE'AND THE BOARD'S DECISIONAL RATIONALE ARE DISCUSSED ON THE ATTACHED AIR FORCE DISCHARE OARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE: |
Aus
AUSSIE RA
Case heard in Washington, D.C.
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an
application to the AFBCMR.
Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant’s request.
TO: FROM:
SAF/MRBR. SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCH.
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7101
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous
CASE NUMBER
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2009-00023
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined
and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.
The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.
FINDING: The Board grants the requested relief.
The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by applicant substantiates an
impropriety that would justify a change of discharge. However, based upon the record and evidence
provided by applicant, the Board finds the applicant’s characterization for discharge inequitable.
ISSUE:
After a thorough and complete consideration of the information provided by the applicant and contained in
the records, the DRB concluded there was sufficient mitigation to substantiate upgrading the discharge.
Although the Board did not condone the applicant’s misconduct, the Board found that the characterization
was too harsh.
CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.
The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and
substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority
and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.
However, in view of the foregoing findings, the Board concludes that the overall quality of applicant’s
service is more accurately reflected by an Honorable discharge under the provisions of Title 10, USC 1553.
Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00023
GENERAL: Theapplicant appealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable andtochange thereason andauthorityforthedischarge. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompleted based ontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.
AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00023
S • BR550CSTREETWEST,SUITE40RANDOLPHAFB,TX781504742SECRETARYOfTHEAIRFORCEPERSONNELCOUNCILAIRFORCEDlSCHARCERCVIEW80ARI)1535COMMANDOR,£EWINC,JROFLOORANDREWSAFB,MD!07'1-7001AFHQFORM0-2077,JAN00 (EF-V2) Previous AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDDECISIONALRATIONALE CASENUMBER FD-2014-00023GENERAL: The applicant appeals forupgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authorityforthedischarge,andtochangethereenlistmentcode.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal...
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00070
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD AFSN/SSAN NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INETIAL) PERSONAL APPEARANCE RECORD REVIEW NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL EXHIBITS SUBMTTRED se ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING INDEX...
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00001
ISSUES A93.01 INDEX NUMBER A84.00 EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD A94,55 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 [LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL VILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 17 Dec 2009 FD-2009-00001 APPLICANT'S ISSUE-AND THE:BOARD'S DECISIONAL RATIONALE ARE DISCUSSED ON THE:ATTACHED AIR FORCEDISCHARGE REVIEW:...
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00082
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. However, based upon the record and evidence provided by applicant, the Board finds the applicant’s reason and authority for discharge inequitable. Based upon the information provided by the applicant, the Board concludes that the overall quality of applicant’s service is more accurately reflected by an...
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00071
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. After a thorough review of his record, the Board determined there was no evidence he was immature or did not know right from wrong. The DRB concluded that the characterization of the applicant’s discharge was appropriate due to the misconduct.
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00168
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR. The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. However, based upon the record and evidence provided by applicant, the Board finds the applicant’s reason and authority for discharge inequitable.
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00018
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AFSN/SSAN xX RECORD REVIEW ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL ISSUES A92,35 A94.05 VOTE OF THR BOARD: HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY INDEX NUMBER A67.10 rsa ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE...
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00055
RECORD REVIE' ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL UOTHC - T x ~ - - T x xX Xx t- Xx ISSUES INDEX NUMBER A93.01 A67.00 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER Of NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD PERSONAL APPEARANCE ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE 17 Jun 2010 CASE NUMBER FD-2009-00055 ee Case heard in Washington, D.C. application to the AFBCMR. The Board...
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00115
FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD PERSONAL APPEARANCE ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF ISSUES A93.01 INDEX NUMBER A93.01 A67.03 A00.29 HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER ° 24 Jun 2010 FD-2009-00115 Case heard in Washington, D.C. application to the AFBCMR. The Board concluded the discharge was appropriate for the reasons which were the basis for this case. The DRB concluded that the characterization of the applicant’s discharge was appropriate due to the misconduct.