Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00526
Original file (FD-2008-00526.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD

 

    
   

 

 

 

NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN
TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE x RECORD REVIEW
i: ; NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL

 

 

 

suceuaatta

 

 

HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY

 

X+

 

Xt

 

 

Xt+

~~ i es
+

 

 

{_——_—_————-
xX+

 

 

 

 

 

 

BMITTED, TO THE BOARD”

 

92.35 INDEX NUMBER A67.10 nS
ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD

APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
LETTER OF NOTIFICATION

BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE

) COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD

ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE

TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING

 

 

 

we pte fb |e

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  
 

HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER
25 Feb 2010 FD-2008-00526
APR PS ISSUE AND THE BOARD

 

PS DECISIONAL RATIONALE ARE DISCUSSELO

 

Case heard in Washington, D.C. -

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an
application to the AFBCMR,

Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant’s request.

+Reenlistment Code

 

 

 

 

SAF/MRBR SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001
AFHO FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous
CASE NUMBER

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2008-00526

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable and to change the reenlistment
code.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined
and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.
FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge and change of reenlistment code.

The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an
inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge.

ISSUE:

Issue. Applicant contends discharge was inequitable because his offenses were minor in nature. The records
indicated the applicant received an Article 15 and five Letters of Reprimand for misconduct during his seven
months on active duty. The DRB opined that through these administrative actions, the applicant had ample
opportunities to change his negative behavior. The DRB found that the instances of misconduct, when
considered separately, were fairly minor. However, the applicant continued to commit misconduct even
after being put on notice that his behavior was unacceptable. The DRB felt that the number of instances of
misconduct accrued by the applicant in his short period of service demonstrated that the applicant was
unwilling to abide by Air Force rules. The Board concluded that the negative aspects of the applicant’s
service outweighed the positive contributions he made in his Air Force career. The characterization of the
discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.

Attachment:
Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00073

    Original file (FD-2009-00073.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    EC LEEREe Ne ———— rites DATED 8/3/2010 FROM: SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND OR, FE WING, IRD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2009-00073 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code. FINDING: The Board denies...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00078

    Original file (FD-2009-00078.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    *Reason and Authority +Reenlistment Code EUR SOT a f s NE TO: FROM: ; SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL Ban EES AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD §50 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2009-00078 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason...

  • AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2008-00471

    Original file (FD2008-00471.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN AIC TYPE GEN | PERSONAL APPEARANCE x RECORD REVIEW NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL The American Legion . ~ see ee ees MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY X*+ L — _ | —__| [ xt X*t+ X*+ ISSUES A94.05 INDEX NUMBER A67.10 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION (a BRIEF OF...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00601

    Original file (FD-2008-00601.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DATE S0201017 TO: , FROM: SAF/MRBR SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL : AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1535 COMMAND Dk, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR RANDOLPH AFR, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2008-00601 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00538

    Original file (FD-2008-00538.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE x RECORD REVIEW COUNSEL NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL. The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed bascd on the available service record. FINDINGS: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge, to change...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00126

    Original file (FD-2009-00126.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EE-V2)_ Previous CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2009-00126 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code. FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge, change of...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2010-00334

    Original file (FD-2010-00334.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge, change of reason and authority for the discharge and change of reenlistment code. ISSUE: Applicant received a General discharge for Misconduct: Drug Abuse. After review of the record, the Board found no evidence to indicate that the applicant did not know right from wrong or that in his two years of service was unaware of the Air Force policy of zero tolerance to drug use.

  • AF | DRB | CY2011 | FD-2009-00522

    Original file (FD-2009-00522.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board finds evidence in the record to substantiate an impropriety that would justify a change of discharge. Applicant did provide evidence that he paid his government charge card in full on 27 January 2003. The DRB concluded that the characterization of the applicant’s discharge was appropriate due to the misconduct.

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00337

    Original file (FD-2008-00337.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD AFSN/SSAN AIC TYPE GEN RECORD REVIEW ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL VORDOP THE BOARD GEN UOTHC OTHER X#4 Xt Xt X*+ ISSUES INDEX NUMBER A94,06 A67.10 2 2 RXnBiTs SUBMITTED 10 THE BO: ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD [> (we [r fe ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00111

    Original file (FD-2009-00111.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    —_——_—_—_—— Trea SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001 Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an Previous CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2009-00111 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authority for the...