NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)
GRADE
AFSNISSAN
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
L..-....-..-..-..-.-------I
TYPE GEN
I
I
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
AMN
X I RECORDREVIEW
L
I
I
NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION
ADDRESS AND OR ORCANILATION OF COUNSEL
MEMBER SITTING
HEARING DATE
22 Feb 2007
CASE NUMBER
FD-2006-00264
Case heard in Washington, D.C.
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance witldwithout counsel, and the right to submit an
application to the AFBCMR
Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant's request.
x -Upgrade Discharge, change of RE Code, and Reason and Authority
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742
SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
AIR FORCE DISCIIARCE REVIEW BOARD
1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR
ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7W2
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00
(EF-V2)
Previous edition will be used
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER
FD-2006-00264
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable, to change the reenlistment code
and to change the reason and authority.
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined to
exercise this right.
The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.
FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge, change of reenlistment code, and to change the reason and authority are
denied.
The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an
inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge.
ISSUE:
The applicant did not submit any issues but did submit that since his discharge he has attended community
college and maintained a position working at Newport News Shipbuilders. The Board reviewed the records;
however, no inequity or impropriety in his discharge was suggested or found in the course of the hearing.
The record indicates that the applicant received four Records of Individual Counseling; a Letter of
Counseling; three Letters of Reprimand and an Article 15 for misconduct. The misconduct included being
late for duty (five times), failure to meet military standards (unshaven twice), failure to obey a lawful order,
leaving his line badge unattended, speeding on base (twice) and an Article 128 for Assault. The Board
concluded the characterization of the discharge to be appropriate.
CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.
In view of the foregoing findings the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.
Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD
(Former AMN) (HGH AlC)
1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec'd a GEN Disch fr USAF Langley AFB, VA on 12
Dec 03 UP AFI 36-3208, para 5.49 (Misconduct - Minor Disciplinary Infractions).
Appeals for Honorable Discharge, and Change the RE Code, Reason for Discharge.
2. BACKGROUND:
a. DOB: 28 Jul 80. Enlmt Age: 21 0/12. Disch Age: 23 4/12. Educ: HS DIPL.
AFQT: N/A. A-86, E-67, G-42, M-39. PAFSC: 2A331A - Avionics Systems Attack
Control Apprentice. DAS: 13 Jun 02.
b. Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 17 Aug 01 - 15 Oct 01 (I month 29) (Inactive).
3. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:
a. Enlisted as AB 16 Oct 01 for 6 yrs. Svd: 02 Yrs 01 Mo 27 Das, all AMS.
b. Grade Status: Amn - 5 Nov 03 (Article 15, 5 Nov 03)
A1C - 07 Dec 01
c. Time Lost: None.
d. Art 15's:
(1) 5 Nov 03, Langley AFB, VA - Article 128. You, did, on
Or about 30 Sep 03, assault AB 1 ................................
wrestling and pushing her. Reduction to Airman,
forfeiture of $350.00 pay, 14 days extra duty, and a
reprimand. (No appeal) (No mitigation)
: by
.--------------------------------
e. Additional: RIC, 01 OCT 03 - On Base speeding ticket.
LOR, 04 JUN 03 - Late for duty.
RIC, 19 MAY 03 - Failure to obey a lawful order.
RIC, 24 APR 03 - Security violation.
LOR, 22 APR 03 - Late for duty.
LOCI 17 APR 03 - Late for duty.
LOR, 13 DEC 02 - Failure to meet basic military standards,
and reporting to duty unshaven.
RIC, 25 OCT 02 - Late for duty.
f. CM: None.
g. Record of SV: 16 Oct 01 - 16 Jun 03 Langley AFB 3 (Initial)
h. Awards & Decs : NDSM, AFTR.
i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (02) Yrs (03) Mos (26) Das
TAMS: (02) Yrs (01) Mos (27) Das
4 . BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 293) dtd 06 Mar 06.
(Change Discharge to Honorable, and Change the RE Code, Reason for
Discharge)
Issue 1: After having received a General Discharge under Honorable
conditions from the United States Air Force, I have since attended community
college studying real estate, as well as learned the trade of carpentry. I have
also held down a position at the Newport News Shipbuilders shipyard. I request
that my discharge be reviewed, and that I be issued an upgrade on that discharge
from General under Honorable conditions to an Honorable discharge with a new
reenlistment code.
ATCH
None.
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
HEADQUARTERS I ST FIGHTER WING
LANGLEY AIR FORCE BASE VA
FROM: I AMXS/CC
SUBJECT: Notification Memorandum
1. I am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for minor disciplinary
infractions. The authority for this action is AFPD 36-32, Military Retirements and Separations,
and AFI 36-3208, Administrative Separation ofAinnen, Chapter 5, Section H, paragraph 5.49. If
my recommendation is approved, p u r discharge will be characterized as under honorable
conditions (General) and p u will be ineligible for reenlistment in the Air Force.
2. My reasons for this action are:
a. On 25 Oct 02, you failed to show at your appointed place of duty. For this incident, you
received a Record of Individual Counseling (RIC), dated 25 Oct 02.
b. On 13 Dec 02, you failed to meet military standards by reporting to duty unshaven and
without a shaving waiver despite being verbally counseled for this same issue two days prior.
For this incident, you received a Letter of Reprimand (LOR), dated 13 Dec 02.
c. On 17 Apr 03, you failed to report to your place of duty on time. For this incident, you
received a htter of Counseling (LOC), dated 17 Apr 03.
d. On 22 Apr 03, you failed to report to your place of duty on time. For this incident, you
received a LOR, dated 22 Apr 03.
e. On 24 Apr 03, you left your line badge unattended in the specialist flight office while you
were working on the flightline. For this incident, you received a RIC, dated 24 Apr 03.
f. On 16 May 03, you failed to obey a lawful order in that p u did not ensure your hair was
cut to militaq standards. For this incident, you received a RIC, dated 19 May 03.
g. On 2 Jun 03, you failed to report to your place of duty on time. For this incident, you
received a LOR, dated 4 Jun 03.
h. In late Sep 03, you received a speeding ticket, your second such ticket in two weeks. For
this incident, you received a RIC, dated 1 Oct 03.
i. On or about 30 Sep 03, you assaulted another airman by wrestling and pushing her. For
this incident, you received an Article 15, with a punishment of reduction to the grade of airman,
forfeiture of $350.00 pay, and 14 days extra duty, dated 5 Nov 03.
3. Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this
recommendation are attached. The commander exercising SPCM jurisdiction or higher authority
will decide whether you will be discharged or retained in the Air Force.
4. You have the right to consult counsel. Military lgga!lcgfigsel has been obtained to assist you.
I have made an appointment for you to consult^'- - - - - - -
z<"N& d #?, at o 4 3 6
hours, You may consurfiivilian counsel at your own expense.
' : r at AS&-
, o n
5. You have the right to submit statements in your own behalf. Any statements you want the
separation authority to consider must reach me by
unless you request a d
receive an extension for good cause shown. I will send them10 the separation authority.
@ 3
6. If you fail to consult counsel or to submit statements in your own behalf, your failwe will
constitute a waiver of your right to do so.
7. You have been scheduled for a medical examination. You must report to ) & S A . r ~
at
[3 9 0
hours on 5 > c ~ .fl for the examination.
8. Any personal information you furnish in rebuttal is covered by the Privacy Act of 1974. A
copy of AFI 36-3208 is available for your use at your Orderly Room.
9. Execute the attached acknowledgment and return it to me immediately.
-...-..-.-..-.-..-.
Commander, 6
...............................
-
b ~ ~
Attachments:
1. Supporting Documents
la. RIC, 25 Oct 02
1 b. LOR, 13 Dec 02
lc. LOC, 17 Apr 03
1 d. LOR, 22 Apr 03
le. RIC,24Apr03
If. RIC, 19 May03
1 g. LOR, 4 Jun 03
lh. RIC, 1 Oct 03
li. Art 15, 5 Nov03
2. Receipt of Notification Memorandum
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
HUDQUARTERS 1 ST FIGHTER WING
LANGLEY AIR FORCE BASE VA
DEC o 5 2003
MEMORANDUM FOR 1 FWICC
FROM: 1 FWIJA
SUBJECT: Administrative Discharge - Amn ! ----------------------------------------.
1. I have reviewed the proposed discharge action and find it legally sufficient to support a
decision to separate Respondent for minor disciplinary infractions with an under honorable
conditions (General) discharge, as soon as he is found medically fit for separation.
.........................................
2. BACKGROUND:
a. Respondent is a 23-year-old Avionics Systems Apprentice assigned to 1 AMXS. His
TAFMSD is 16 Oct 01 and he began his 6-year enlistment on 16 Oct 01. He was assigned to
his present unit on 13 Jun 02. Respondent has received the following overall rating on his
Enlisted Performance Report (EPR): 3 - 16 Jun 03.
b. On 24 Nov 03, Lt COIL ---------- !properly notified Respondent of his recommendation to
, - - - - - - - - - - a
separate Respondent with an under honorable conditions (General) discharge under the
provisions of AFT 36-3208, Chapter 5, Section H, Paragraph 5.49, Minor Disciplinary
Infractions. Because Respondent is not entitled to a board hearing, this case has been properly
processed in accordance with the notification procedures of AFI 36-3208, Chapter 6, Section B.
3. GOVERNMENT'S CASE:
a. On 25 Oct 02, Respondent failed to show at his appointed place of duty. For this
incident, he received a Record of Individual Counseling (RIC), dated 25 Oct 02.
b. On 13 Dec 02, Respondent failed to meet military standards by reporting to duty
unshaven and without a shaving waiver despite having been verbally counseled for this same
issue two days prior. For this incident, he received a Letter of Reprimand (LOR), dated
13 Dec 02.
c. On 17 Apr 03, Respondent failed to report to his place of duty on time. For this incident,
he received a Letter of Counseling (LOC), dated 17 Apr 03.
d. On 22 Apr 03, Respondent failed to report to his place of duty on time, For this incident,
he received a LOR, dated 22 Apr 03.
e. On 24 Apr 03, Respondent left his line badge unattended in the specialist flight office
while he was working on the flightline. For this incident, he received a RIC, dated 24 Apr 03.
f. On 16 May 03, Respondent failed to obey a lawful order in that he did not ensure his hair
was cut to military standards. For this incident, he received a RIC, dated 19 May 03.
g. On 2 Jun 03, Respondent failed to report to his place of duty on time. For this incident,
he received a LOR, dated 4 Jun 03.
h. In late Sep 03, Respondent received a speeding ticket, his second such ticket in two
weeks. For this incident, he received a RIC, dated 1 Oct 03.
i. On or about 30 Sep 03, Respondent assaulted another airman by wrestling and pushing
her. For this incident, Respondent received an Article 15, with a punishment of reduction to
the grade of Amn, forfeiture of $350.00 pay, and 14 days extra duty, dated 5 Nov 03.
4. RESPONDENT'S CASE: Respondent was properly notified of his right to counsel and to
submit statements on his behalf for your consideration. On 1 Dec 03, Respondent submitted
matters in which he does not apologize for his actions, but admits he has had trouble fitting in.
He states that he prefers to remain in the military, as he has valued his time in the Air Force and
has learned a lot (Tab 2).
5. DISCUSSION:
a. A basis for discharge exists and the Respondent should be discharged under that
provislon. In accordance with AFI 36-3208, Chapter 5, Section H, Paragraph 5.49, a pattern of
misconduct consisting solely of minor disciplinary infractions in the current enlistment makes an
airman subject to discharge. Respondent's pattern of misconduct includes failure to go to
appointed place of duty on several occasions, failure to meet military standards by not shaving
and not having his hair cut properly, leaving his line badge unattended, speeding, and assault.
His misconduct began in Oct 02 and has continued until now. His misconduct has been
documented in 4 RJCs, 1 LOC, three LORs, and an Article 15. Based on the Respondent's
record of misconduct, he should be discharged.
b. The Respondent should be given a general discharge. Based on Respondent's overall
performance, 1 Ah4XS/CC recommends an under honorable conditions (General) discharge and I
agree. AFI 36-3208, Chapter 1, Section B, Paragraph 1.18.1, defines a sewice characterization
of honorable as "[tlhe quality of the airman's service generally has met Air Force standards of
acceptable conduct and performance of duty or when a member's service is otherwise so
meritorious that any other characterization would be inappropriate." In contrast, a service
characterization of under honorable conditions (General) discharge is appropriate according to
AFI 36-3208, Chapter 1, Section B, Paragraph 1.18.2, when "significant negative aspects of the
airman's conduct or performance of duty outweigh positive aspects of the airman's military
record." The Respondent's repeated and deliberate misconduct falls well below Air Force
standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty. The unit tried to rehabilitate the
Respondent through progressive discipline but he failed to positively respond. Moreover, the
Respondent's misconduct demonstrates a lack of motivation and desire to meet military
standards. Respondent's record of misconduct significantly outweighs the positive aspects of his
career. I recommend he receive a service characterization of under honorable conditions
(General) discharge.
c. Probation and Rehabilitation (P&R) is not appropriate in this case. 1 AMXSICC does
not recommend P&R in this case. Respondent shows poor rehabilitative potential based on his
continued disregard for military standards despite the unit's efforts to rehabilitate him.
Respondent received numerous rehabiliative measures to correct his behavior and continued to
fail to comply with military regulations and standards. He then received an Article 15 for more
severe misconduct. His blatant disregard for his commander's authority is evident in the
continued nature of and escalation of misconduct. Thus, Respondent has demonstrated that he is
a poor candidate for P&R. Therefore, I do not recommend P&R in conjunction with this
discharge.
6. ERRORS AND IRREGULARITIES: I note no errors or irregularities prejudicial to
Respondent's substantive or procedural rights.
7. OPTIONS: As separation authority in this case, you may:
a. Direct retention, if you determine the evidence does not warrant discharge; or,
b. Forward this case to 9 AF/CC with the recommendation that the Respondent receive an
honorable discharge; or,
c. Direct Respondent's separation with an under honorable conditions (General) discharge,
with or without P&R; or,
d. Return this case to the unit for re-initiation, with the recommendation that the
Respondent receive an under other than honorable conditions discharge.
8. RECOMMENDATION: Direct Respondent's separation with an under honorable
conditions (General) discharge, by siping the attached memorandum, If you have any
---- -- : Chief, Adverse Actions, or me at 764-3280.
questions, please contact Captl--- -- --- -- - - - - - a
---
1 - - -
C . . - . . . . - . - . . - . - . . . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - !
Staff Judge Advocate
Attachments:
1. Proposed Letter
2. Case File
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00462
(Change Discharge to Honorable, Change the RE Code, and Reason for Discharge) Issue 1: I would like the Air Force Review Board to change my code, because I'm wanting to return to the Air Force either as active duty as prior or as a reservist. for which you were punished under Article 15, c. On 7 Jan 05, you failed to report to work cm time, for which you received a Letter of Reprimand (LOR), dated 7 Jan 05, which was filed in your Personal Information File (PIF), d. On 15 Jul04, the wit was...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00433
.2IR FORCE DISCHAHGR REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WIKG.3RD FI.OOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVlEW BOARD DEClSlONAL RATlONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2006-00433 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. The records indicated the applicant received two Article 15s, two Letters of Reprimand, and two Records of Individual Counseling for misconduct. (Change Discharge to Honorable) ISSUES...
AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2004-00259
‘The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate. in view of the foregoing findings the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed, Attachment: Examiner's Brief FD2004-00259 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFE, MD {former AlC) (HGH A1G) 1. Commander, 90th Maintenance Operations Squadron Attachments: LOC,...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0240
The applicant’s record contains numerous counseling and reprimands for financial irresponsibility and two counselings for unsatisfactory duty performance. The Board also reviewed the two counselings the respondent received for failing to perform his duties. Options: As the Special Court-Mariial Convening Authority, you may: a. direc retention in the United States Air Force; b. direct de al discharged from the Air Force with a General discharge, with or without P&R, under AFI 36-3208,...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00061
The records indicated the applicant received seven Letters of Reprimand, two Letters of Counseling, and two Records of Individual Counseling for misconduct. Direct that Respondent be separated with an under honorable conditions (general) discharge, with or without an offer of probation and rehabilitation; c. Recommend Respondent be separated with an honorable discharge, with or without probation and rehabilitation, and fonvard this case to the general court-martial convening authority (8 W...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2006-00076
MD 20762 7W2 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 P r e v i o u s e d i t i o n w i l l be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER m)-2006-00076 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable general, change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code. Attachment: Examiner's Brief - DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AB) (HGH AMN) 1. (Change Discharge to Honorable,...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00103
CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD03-0103 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. For this misconduct you received an LOR on 24 Apr 02. f. You did, at or near Sheppard AFB TX, on or about 23 Apr 02, fail to go at the time prescribe to your appointed place of duty, to wit: Physical Conditioning (PC). For this misconduct you received an AF Form 174, Record of Individual Counseling, on 17 Dec 01.
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0245
CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE | gp 002-0245 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. For this, the Assistant Chief of Operations of the Fire Department gave him a letter of reprimand (LOR), 4 Aug 99. h. On 19 Sep 99, the respondent was derelict in the performance of his duties by failing to meet military dress and appearance standards. Direct the respondent be discharged with.a general discharge, with or without the...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00244
Supporting Documents LOC, 13 Sep 00 LOR/UIF, 5 Dec 00 LOR/UIF, 12 Dec 00 Armed Forces Traffic Ticket, 16 Jan 01 LOR/UIF/CR, 26 Jan 01 LOR, 9 Apr 01 LOR, 9 Apr 01 LOR, 18 May 01 Article 15, 2 Jul 01 LOR, 23 Jul 01 LOR, 23 Jul 01 LOR, 26 Jul 01 2s Receipt of Notification Memorandum Door og mo ao op NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) wane ‘ AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD GRADE AFSN/SSAN AIC wai. CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00190
Copies of Disciplinary Infractions Letters With Rebuttals. On or about 19 Nov 04, you wore an earring off-duty, but on-base when it was unlawful to do so, For this misconduct, you received: (1) a Letter of Reprimand (LOR), dated 1 Dec 04, which was filed in your Unfavorable Information File (UIF); and, (2) a Vacation of Suspended Punishment, dated 23 Dec 04, received from a prior Article 15, dated 8 Oct 04. b. I have made an appointment for you to consult with the Area Defense Counsel...