Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0240
Original file (FD2002-0240.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
‘ AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD

 

 

 

NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN

AIC i.

GEN X PERSONAL APPEARANCE RECORD REVIEW

NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL

 

 

me: American Legion

 

MEMBERS SITTING

vOTHC

 

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

| issues ~~~ | INDEX NUMBER Po EXBIBITS SUBMITED (oO LEE BORED |
A93.09, A93,.33, A94.06 A 67.10 1 | ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD

2 «| APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE

3 | LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 4 | BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE

 

 

032003 FD20020240 | COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD

 

ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE

 

 

 

TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPERANCE HEARING

 

 

Case heard at Washington, D.C.

+ Change reason for discharge to "Secretarial Authority"
* Change re-enlistment code to permit re-entery into military

The AFDRB determined the applicant's reenslitment (RE) code will not be changed. The applicant can still apply for a
waiver from the branch of service he wishes to join or apply to the AFBCMR.

 

SIGNATURE OF BOARD PRESIDENT

   
 
 

  
 

SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD

1535 COMMAND DR, FE WING, 3°° FLOOR

ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002

SAF/MIBR
350 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742

 
 

 

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used.
CASE NUMBER

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
FD2002-0240

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for an upgrade of his general discharge to honorable. The applicant
and his wife, ilies appeared and testified before the Board, with counsel, at Andrews AFB, MD, on
March 20, 2003.

The applicant submitted the following documentary evidence: an Outstanding Teamwork certificate, an
18 Oct 96 memo fron ae an undated memo from ge. a 23 Apr 96 memo from

, minutes from the AGE Booster Club, a 2 Jul 96 memo from aaa al Jul 96 memo
,, his transcript from Chapman University, a copy of the Applicant’s Web Page, a school
ed 30 Jan 2003, a letter of appreciation from the Fuquay-Varina Police Department, and the
applicant’s resume.

The attached brief contains the available pertinent data on the applicant, the factors leading to the discharge,
and the issues he submitted for review.

FINDINGS: The applicant’s request to change the characterization of his discharge to honorable is
granted. The DRB changed the narrative reason for the applicant’s separation from “misconduct” to
“Secretarial Authority.”

Issue: The applicant contends that his overall service record is more deserving of a fully honorable
discharge rather than the general under honorable conditions discharge he received. The applicant’s record
contains numerous counseling and reprimands for financial irresponsibility and two counselings for
unsatisfactory duty performance. The Board noted the respondent’s problems centered on his inability to
pay his debts in a timely fashion. Even so, the Board observed the amounts involved were relatively small
and that the applicant ultimately paid what he owed. The Board also reviewed the two counselings the
respondent received for failing to perform his duties. While not condoning his misconduct, the Board also
noted the counselings he received were typical of the type received by first-term airmen and were resolved
at the lowest administrative level. The Board also was aware the respondent had nearly completed his first
term before he was involuntarily discharged. After a thorough and complete consideration of the
information provided by the applicant, the applicant’s compelling testimony, and the information contained
in the record, the DRB concluded there were sufficient extenuating and mitigating circumstances to
substantiate an upgrade to the applicant’s discharge. The DRB noted, however, the applicant’s record of
declining duty performance. This record, coupled with the misconduct noted above, convinced the DRB

that a change to his re-enlistment code would not be appropriate.

None of the applicant’s remaining issues will be addressed as their resolution in the applicant’s favor would
not result in greater relief than is being afforded by the Board.

The Board also reviewed and considered the applicant’s entire service record before making a decision.

CONCLUSIONS: The Board concludes the respondent’s discharge characterization should be upgraded
from general to honorable. The Board further concludes the narrative reason for the separations should be

changed from “misconduct” to “Secretarial Authority.”

Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
FD2002-0240
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD

(Former AlC) (HGH AlC) '

  

1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec’d a GEN Disch fr USAF 97/05/19 UP AFI 36-3208,
para 5.49 (Misconduct - Minor Disciplinary Infractions). Appeals for Honorable
Disch.

2. BACKGROUND:

a. DOB: 73/10/18. Enlmt Age: 20 3/12. Disch Age: 23 7/12. Educ: HS DIPL.
AFQT: N/A. A-89, E-87, G-74, M-83. PAFSC: 2A632 - Aerospace Ground Equipment
Apprentice. DAS: 96/01/24.

b. Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 94/02/14 ~ 94/03/29 (1 Mo 16 Days) (Inactive).

3. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:

a. Enld as AB 94/03/30 for 4 yrs. Ext: 96/04/04 for 23 months. Svd: 3 Yrs
1 Mo 20 Das, all AMS.

b. Grade Status: Al1C - 95/07/30
AMN - 94/09/30

ec. Time Lost: None.
d. Art 15's: None.

e. Additional: LOR, 15 APR 97 ~- Financial irresponsibility.
RIC, 4 Mar 97 ~- Dereliction to duty.
LOR, 9 DEC 96 - Failure to go.

OR, 2 DEC 96. =-Financial irresponsibitity.—_—————-—----------—

RIC, 12 Nov 96 - Poor duty performance.
RIC, 8 OCT 96 - Financial irresponsibility.
RIC, 2 OCT 96 ~ Financial irresponsibility.
RIC, 23 SEP 96 - Financial irresponsibility.
RIC, 11 Sep 96 - Late for work.

DD 1408, 16 JUL 96 - Illegal Parking.
£. CM: None.

g. Record of SV: 94/03/30 - 95/11/29 Cannon AFB 5 (Initial)
95/11/30 - 96/11/29 Lakenheath AB 2 (Annual) REF

(Discharged from Langley AFB)

h. Awards & Decs: AFAM, AFOUA, NDSM, AFLTR, AFTR.
FD2002-0240

i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (3) Yrs (3) Mos (6) Das
TAMS: (3) Yrs (1) Mo (20) Das

4. BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 293) dtd 02/05/10.
(Change Discharge to Honorable)

Issue: Before my arrival at Lakenheath my finances were in order. Just
completed a program by consumer counseling credit agency to pay off all bills.
I was up to date till (sic) I was informed that my wife & child was not going to
be in England for 6 months. I had to provide for 2 households. I later was
informed that my family could have traveled on my orders. When my finances were
failing I received a job offer with TOYS FOR US, which was 30 miles from base.
I was told it was too far and denied the approval to work there. Eight months
later I moved into base housing about 30 miles from base and applied again for
approval and was granted. After being on base for less than a year I was
nominated for BTZ and was awarded for my outstanding performance. 2 months
later I was called from home with word that my cousin was killed back home.
That same day I was brought before my First Shirt and Sgt (sic) Commander about
my finances, which they knew about before the BTZ promotion. I was accused of

_.._ being irresponsible of managing my. finances.._.1_brought-all_of.the-issues 1-3-- --~

listed above and was told I could have prevented it. It had been 20 minutes and
I was becoming highly irritated at the fact that I was, what appeared to me,
being snowballed. I got loud with the commander and the session was ended.
Later I was called to the commanders (sic) office and stripped of the BTZ.

ATCH

1. VA Appointment as Applicant's Representative.
2. DD Form 214.

3. Applicant's Request for Government Quarters.
4. Applicant's Statements on Financial Status.
5. Mental Health Evaluation.

02/09/12/er
FE 2002 ~ OZ2YO

 

i x :
remain in the Air Force. However, if you decide to discharge him, he Lequests that his discharge be characterized LA

as Honorable. An Honorable discharge is appropriate if iin. record is so meritorious that any other
characterization would be nara al service has been filled with incidents of misconduct, This

demonstrates that he has fallen short of the standards expected of airmen, and therefore his service should not be
characterized as Honorable. An Under Other Than Honorable Conditions (JOTHC) discharge is appropriate when
the airman’s pattern of behavior is a significant departure from the conduct expected of airmen, While

pattern of behavior departs from Air Force standards, these incidents do not rise to the level of misconduct
mandating an UOTHC discharge. The commander has considered —— conduct and entire surrounding
circumstances in this case. A General discharge is appropriate when sipnificant negative aspects of the airman’s
conduct or performance of duty outweigh positive aspects of the airman’s military record. Over the past nine
nortan: has been involved in numerous incidents of recurring misconduct. He has been counseled and
reprimanded on these problems on many occasions but has failed to take the necessary steps to correct his behavior.
His misconduct is definitely a significant negative aspect to his career, which outweighs any positives. Therefore,
a General discharge is an appropriate characterization [for his service.

d. Probation and Rehabilitation: The initiating commander does not recommend Probation and
Rehabilitation (P&R) in this case. Paragraph 7.3 directs that P&R should be offered to airmen who have
demonstrated a potential to serve satisfactorily, who have the capacity to be rehabilitated for continued military
service, and whose retention on active duly in a probationary status is consistent with the maintenance of good
order and discipline in the Air roe a given nine different opportunities to rehabilitate himself. As
the commander states in his recommendation etter ga duty performance and work ethic have also
deteriorated over the past months. This airman has been given ample time to rehabilitate, if that was his intention

--—His-failure-to-respond-to-the rehabilitative actions taken, and-his continued misconduet and disregard, indicate an-
inability or unwillingness to behave in a way which is conducive with the Air Force. Therefore, P&R would be
inappropriate.

6. Errors and Irregularities: There are no errors or irregularities effecting the legal sufficiency of this package.

7. Options: As the Special Court-Mariial Convening Authority, you may:

a. direc retention in the United States Air Force;

b. direct de al discharged from the Air Force with a General discharge, with or without
P&R, under AFI 36-3208, paragraph 5.49:

c. forward a recommendation for separation under paragraph 5.49 with an Honorable discharge, with or
without P&R, to the General Court-Martial Convening Authority, 3_AE/CC (AFI 36-3208, paragraph 5:56.2-}}—er—_—------

d. direct reinitiation of the package to convene an administrative discharge board if you believe an under
other than honorable conditions discharge is warranted.

8. Recommendation: We recommend that you sign the attached lettcr at Tab A directing @Eaec
discharged from the Air Force with a General discharge without Probation and Rehabilitation.
) FED 200 2~ 02 YO

a

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
48TH FIGHTER WING (USAFE)

MEMORANDUM 50 gag anasaaaanaa tana: 2.4 APR 1997

FROM: 48 EMS/CC

SUBJECT: Notification Memorandum

1. Tam recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for Misconduct - Minor Disciplinary
Infractions. The authority for this action is AFPD 36-32 and AFI 36-3208, under the provisions of paragraph 5.49.
If my recommendation is approved, your service will be characterized as honorable, general, or under other than
honorable conditions discharge. I am recommending that your service be characterized as general.

2. My reasons for this action are:

a. On 15 Apr 97, you received a Letter of Reprimand for financial delinquency to AAFES;

b. On 4 Mar 97, you received a Letier of Counseling for dereliction to duty;

c, On 9 Dec 96, you received a Letter of Reprimand for failure to go toa scheduled appointment. For this —

a Unfavorable Information File was established;

d. On 2 Dec 96, you received a Letter of Reprimand for financial delinquency to the NCO club,
e. On 12 Nov 96, you received a Letter of Counseling for poor duty performance,

f. On 8 Oct 96, you received a Leticr of Counseling for returned checks to AAFES;

g. On 2 Oct 96, you received a Letter of Counseling for Financial Delinquency;

h. On 23 Sep 96, you received a Letter of Counseling for Financial Delinquency;

i. On 11 Sep 96, you received a Letter of Counseling for being late for duty, and

' §. On 16 Jul 96, you received a Armed Forces Traffic Ticket, DD Form 1408, for parking in a designated
“no parking” slot: ----—-—------ Simoes a

 

3. Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this recommendation are
attached. The commander exercising SPCM jurisdiction or a higher authority will decide whether you will be

discharged or retained in the Air Force. If you are discharged, you will be ineligible for reenlistment in the Air
Force.

4. You have the right to consult counsel. Military legal counsck iI Aca Defense

Counsel, Bldg 976, ext 3608, has been obtained to assist you. An appointment has been scheduled for you to
consult them at @9JdO  ,on 28 Aa 797 __. You may consult civilian counsel at your own expense.

>. You have the right to submit statements in your own behalf, Any statements you want the separation authority
to consider must reach me by__ 2% AV¢r 97 unless you request and reccive an extension for good cause
shown. I will send them to the separation authority.

6, If you fail to consult counsel or to submit statements in your own behalf, your failure will constitute a waiver of
your right to do so.
[2D 2,002~ 0240

7. You have been scheduled fc ra medical examination. You must repprt to 48th Medical Group, Physical Exam

Section at_CY7OO on 7]

._ 8. Any personal information you furnish in rebuttal is covered by the Privacy Act Statement. A copy of AFI 36-
3208 is available for your use in your unit orderly room.

9. Execute the attached acknowledgment and return it to me immediately.

 

Attachments:
1. Supporting Documents
a. LOR, w/atch, did 15 Apr 97
b. LOC, dtd 4 Mar 97
c. LOR, did 9 Dec 96
d. LOR, w/atch, dtd 2 Dec 96
e. LOC, dtd 12 Nov 96
f. LOC, dtd 8 Oct 96
g. LOG, dtd-2 Oct-96
h, LOC, dtd 23 Sep 96
i, LOC, dtd 11 Sep 96
j. DD Form 1408, dtd 16 Jul 96
2. Airman’s Receipt of Notification Memorandum

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2006-00001

    Original file (FD2006-00001.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    7 ~ 2 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVlEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2006-00001 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AB) (HGH AMN) 1. Between on or about 21 Aug 96 to on or about 27 Aug 96, you wrongfully made Automatic Teller Machine cash withdrawals and unauthori~d purchases...

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00500

    Original file (FD2005-00500.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD 1 AFSNRSAN 1 -..-............., RECORDREVIEW I ' TYPE GEN COUNSEL YES No I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I PERSONAL APPEARANCE 1 I SRA I I I IX NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING VOTE OF THE BOARD HON GEN UOTHC I OTHER I DENY 1 2 3 4 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0448

    Original file (FD2002-0448.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD2002-0448 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. The applicant received three Article 15s, two Letters of Reprimand, one Letter of Counseling, one Letter of Admonishment, and two Records of Individual Counseling for financial irresponsibility, failure to obey, failure to go, and traffic, parking and speeding violations. Attachment: Examiner's Brief FD2002-0448 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR...

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0166

    Original file (FD2002-0166.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    _ CASI ADMBERK AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE | pppo2-0166 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. e, Additional: LOR, 01 FEB 96 - Failed to obey order. For this infraction, you received a Record of Individual Counseling (RIC) on 23 Feb 96.

  • AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00101

    Original file (FD2005-00101.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    (Change Discharge to Honorable) Issue 1: My discharge is unsatisfying, and the nature of that title is due to my treatment while on active duty status. For this offense, you received an Article 15 dated 2 May 94, with punishment of 7 days extra duty and 7 days restriction to the limits of Sheppard AFB (Atch 1, Tab 1) b. of counseling (LOC) on 30 Aug 95 (Atch 6, Tab I).

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00207

    Original file (FD2003-00207.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The record indicates that the applicant served on active duty for 1 year and 6 months during which time he received nonjudicial punishment for making a false official statement and dereliction of duty, 7 letters of reprimand for various types of misconduct (including an arrest by civil authorities for public intoxication), 4 records of individual counseling, and a memo for record for counseling related to financial irresponsibility. Attachment: Examiner's Brief " % DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR...

  • AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2002-0370

    Original file (FD2002-0370.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    (Change Discharge to Honorable) Issue: I was issued an improper discharge because of seven minor incidents { ( 7 c ) five Letters of Reprimand and two Letters of ~ounseling}, which became a significant factor to the 4 0 0 t h Missile Unit at F.E. You received an LOR on 1 Apr 97. c. You, at or near Frailcis E. Warren Air Force Base, Wyoming, on or about 18 Fcb 97, failed to go to a Dental appointment. You received an Letter of Counseling (LOC) on 23 Peb 97 d. You were, at or near Cheyenne,...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0438

    Original file (FD2002-0438.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD02-0438 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. LOR, 27 MAY 99 - Late for duty. LOR, 21 Jul 99 13, AF Form 3070, 13 Aug 99 14, LOC, 8 Nov 99 15.

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00308

    Original file (FD2003-00308.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, he received a Letter of Reprimand, twelve Records of Individual Counseling and two Letters of Admonishment for financial irresponsibility, violation of Tech Data, dereliction of duty, violation of AFOSH Standards, failure to perform tool box inspection, failure to properly inspect vehicle, late for duty, substandard workmanship, and for dress and appearance violations. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB,...

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2006-00096

    Original file (FD2006-00096.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DRB noted that when the applicant applied for these benefits, she signed a statement that she understood she must receive an Honorable discharge to receive future educational entitlements. (Change Discharge to Honorable, and Change the RE Code, Reason and Authority for Discharge) Issue 1: I am a single Mom working full time and going to school. LOR, dated 3 1 Mar 99 13.