Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00385
Original file (FD2005-00385.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (l,ASI',  YIRSI' MIDDLE INI'I'IAL) 

GRAIIE 

AFSNISSAN 

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD 

,..-..-..-..-..-..-..-..-.-.I 

TYPE  UOTH  I 

PERSONAL APPEARANCE 

I 

I 
IX 

I 

I 

RECORDREVlEW 

I 

.................... 

COUN$EL 

Y h S  

No 

I 

1 

I 

NAME O F  COUNSEI. AND O R  ORGANIZATION 

ADDRFSS AND O R  ORGANIZATION O F  C O U N S E L  

MEMBER SlTTlNG 

A 

HON 

I 

V O ' ~ E  OF TV~F: BOARD 

I  LiOHC  I  OTHER 

"*.."....... 

+ " v  

CiEN 

1 
1 

I 

DENY 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

EXIfIBITS SUBMITTED TO TlIE BOARD 

1  I  ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 
2 
3  1  Lt'l  I t K  Ot NO111 ICAIION 
1  BRIEF OF PERSONNtL  FlLt 

APPLICA I'ION  I'OK  KLVIEW OF DISCHAKGL 

...................................... 

A94.06 

INDEX  NUMBER 

A66.00 

I 

I 

HYAHING  UA'I'E 

C A S E  NUMRER 

COUNSEL'S  REI,F,ASF. TO THE HOARD 
ADDI'TIONAL CXIIIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF 
PERSONAL  APPEARANCE 
I  TAPE RECORDWF OF PERSONAI. APPF:ARAN(:F. 

I 

24 May 2006 
4I'PLIC'Ahl"S 

FD-2005-00385 

I 

I C S l l t  h \ D   THE BOARD'S DECISIOKAL RATIONAL  ARE  DISCUSSED Oh' THE A'I  TACHED AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIOYAL  RATIONALE 

Case heard at Washington, D.C. 

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance withlwithout counsel, and the right to 
submit an application to the AFBCMR 

Names and votes will  be tilade available to the applicant at the applicant's  request. 

1 

I 

-...- 

,!!.fi!A.~9+?~.~~?~~~R 

-. . .-dm. -. -6. 6..6..6h -. . -. . -. . -. . -. . -. . - 1 -. .p. . . . -. . -. .&!. . - .z.. . . -. . -. -. . - 

SIGN  UREOI; 

*  IlOAHD I' 

IDENT 

n 

/ 

..-..-..-. 

SMIMRBR 
550 C'  $'TREE f  WkS.1 . SUI'IE  40 

10: 

I 

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 

~ R S E M E N T  

- . * 

DATE:  5/30/2006 

-- .- 
SFC HETAHY OF'I'HE  All1 BOHCE PLHSONNLL COUNCIL 
AIR F O R C E  DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 
1535 C O M M A N D  DR, FE WING, 3 R D  FI O O R  
ANDREWS AFB, MU 20762-7002 

. A  -a 

I 

(EF-V2) 

Previous edition will be used 

-2 

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE 

CASE NIJMBER 

FD~2005-00385 

GENERAL:  The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to general. 

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined to 
exercise this right. 

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge. 

FINDINGS:  The discharge is upgraded to general. 

The  board  finds  that  neither  evidence  of  record  nor  that  provided  by  the  applicant  substantiates  an 
impropriety, which would justify  a change of discharge.  However, after a thorough review of the record, the 
Board finds that the applicant's  character of discharge is inequitable. 

ISSUE:  Applicant contends his discharge was inequitable because  it was based on one isolated  incident in 
30  months  of  service.  The  records  indicated  the  applicant  received  an  Article  15  for  wrongful  use  of 
marijuana on one occasion.  He was punished with reduction  in rank to airman basic,  forfeiture of $400.00 
pay  and five days of extra duty.  This action led to his administrative discharge in accordance with AFI 36- 
3208.  The  records  indicate  no  other  infractions  or misconduct  by  the  applicant.  While the  DRB  did not 
condone the  applicant's  drug use,  they did  fccl  it  would  have  been  more  equitable to  give  him  a General 
discharge. 

CONCLUSIONS:  The  Discharge  Review  Board  concludes  that  the  discharge  was  consistent  with  the 
procedural  and  substantive  requirements  of the  discharge  regulation  and  was  within  the  discretion  of  the 
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process. 

However,  in  view  of  the  foregoing  findings,  the  Board  further  concludes  that  the  overall  quality  of 
applicant's  service  is  more  accurately  reflected  by  a  General  discharge.  Therefore,  the  applicant's 
characterization for discharge should be changed to General. 

Attachment: 
Examiner's Brief 

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR  FORCE 

AIR  FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW  BOARD 

ANDREWS AFB, MD 

(Former AB)  (HGH A1C) 

1.  MATTER UNDER REVIEW:  Appl recld a UOTH Disch fr Charleston AFB, SC on 29 Aug 
05 UP AFI 36-3208, para 5.54  (Misconduct -  Drug Abuse).  Appeals for General 
Discharge, 

2.  BACKGROUND: 

a. DOB: 10 Sep 82. Enlmt Age: 19 11/12. Disch Age: 22 11/12. Educ: HS DIPL. 

AFQT: N/A.  A-55,  E-52,  G-47,  M-47. PAFSC: 2T251 -  Air Transportation 
Apprentice, DAS: 6 Apr 03. 

b.  Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 22 Aug 02 -  LO Dec 02  (3 months 19 days) (Inactive). 

3.  SERVICE UNDER REVIEW: 

a.  Enlisted as AB I1 Dec 02 for 4 yrs. Svd: 02 Yrs 08 Mo 19 Das, all AMS. 

b.  Grade Status:  AB  -  02 Jun 05  (Article 15, 02 Jun 05) 

A1C -  11 Apr 04 
Ann -  11 Jun 03 

c.  Time Lost:  None. 

d.  Art 15's:  (1) 02 Jun 05, Charleston AFB, SC -  Article 112a.  You, 

did, within the continental United States, between on or 
about 1 Jan 05 and on or about 1 Mar 05, wrongfully use 
marijuana.  Reduction to AB.  Forfeiture of $400.00 pay, 
and 5  days extra duty.  (No appeal)  (No mitigation) 

e.  Additional: None. 

f.  CM:  None. 

g.  Record of SV: 11 Dec 02 -  11 Aug 04  Charleston AFB  3  (Initial) 

h.  Awards &  Decs:  AFAM, GWOTSM, AFOUA. 

i.  Stmt of Sv:  TMS:  (03) Yrs  (00) Mos  (08) Das 
TAMS:  (02) Yrs  (08) Mos  (19) Das 

4.  BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW:  Appln  (DD Fm 293) dtd 06 Oct 06. 

(Change Discharge to General) 

ISSUES ATTACHED TO BRIEF. 

ATCH 
1. Applicant's Issues. 

i.  $ o s E p 2 0 0 5  

I 

I 

APPLICATION FOR THE REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 

FROM THE ARMED FORCES OF THE UNITED STATES 

(PIwu r#ad instrucrlons on Fa#-  3 and 4 BEFQRP camplettng Mk npp/Icmt/on.l 

F o m  A p p v d  
O m  No, 07tl.eoOW 
Erpirds Aug 31, 21X)6 

Tho w l c  rrponlw bwhn lor tW* cdlomlon M lnformnlon h r t l r n m d  to wu.ov  30 mhuum p.1 rupor*..  Includlrq (h tinu lor n u a w l w  I t u t r w t i m ,  rurchlno axlaeng dAta mmurar. 
#*lkvlw wd rn.Mdrna  ttu d e b  nwdM, a d  a ~ m p W w  and ndawlng tho rollretlan ol inlormMlon. Bend mrnmmtr rogatdird W budsn MIlmHm or any o t n u  m.prct  of h i s  edlwuon or 
hlomullmn.  Inoludhg wggrtlmm lor mdudns ch. bwdan to tkr Dapvtmvlt a l  Dmf*t18a,  Exseutlw  IL.~lfn srd CammuWertlms ~ ~ l r u t o r n m  (6704QOMI. Rrpundllra &OW  D. swam that 
n o t w l l h t d l w  bny  o t k u  pfovhlon d Irw. no pnon rMI bm  U C U  to any p.nrl(y  fw 1aIIIng ta tamply wllh a oolhmlln of Inforrmtlon I1 H doe. MI  &play  a curnmly vdld  O M  control 
wrnbmr. CUAU 00 HOT RElURN YOUR  FOlM lU T M  MOW  ORMlYLITlON.  rrm*w C-PI 

ADDREM OW  DACK OF T l U  PAPL 

FOdJ TO Tnr -RIATI 

AUTHOWIW:  10 U.S.C.1863:  E.O.  9397. 
PRINCIPAL WRPOSEM: To apply for a ohsngm in tho ohara$terlzatlon,or  remean for military dirohrr~a issumd to an individual. 
ROUTINE UHIIII: None. 

PRNACY ACT BTATEMENI 

7. (XftrpplIbeW  AN APPLICATION WAS PREVIOUSLY SUBMllTD ON (YWYMMDDI 

AND THIS FORM IS SUBMIlTED TO ADD ADDITIONAL ISSUES, JUSTIFICATION, OR  EVIDENCE.. 

8. IN SUPPMIT OF Till8 APPLlCAtlON, THE FOLLOWIND AlTACnED DOCUMENTS ARE  SUBM117ED AS EVIDENCE; (Continua h I t a  17. H m # b y  docummra or 

mdimi murrd. u o  mhwnt to pur eon. pkrro m d  t0pi1e.l 

NCY MUST ACCOMPANY WE APPLICATION. If 

appliint.  l n d k a t r  

d, FAX NUMaER (Inoluds Ar#  Codd 

- 

' 

j4. CONTINUAWON OF  ITEM I, l8SUES M a&lerbl4) 

I 

16. REMARKS  Illmisoricablal 

-,,.. 

. 
.-I--.. 

.Y 

-- 

MAIL COMPLETED APPLICATIONS TO APPROPRIATE ADDRESS BELOW. 

.... ..--  .--.- 

... --. 

..... 

"Z'%?-.---z 

...............-.  -,.* 

..-,-.. 

.... - A - - r .   - .-.  --  . 

ARMY 

NAW AND MARINE CORPS 

Armv  Review Boards Aflency 
Support Division, St.  Louis 
9700 Page Avenue 
St.  Louis, MO 63 1 32-5200 
(Sea http:llarba.atmy.pantagan.mil) 

Naval Council of Personnel Boards 
720 Kennon Street,  S.E. 
Room 309 (NDRB) 
Washington Navy Yard,  DC  20374-5023 

AIR FORCE 

COAST GUARD 

Air  Force Review Boards Agency 
SAFIMRBR 
$50-C Street West, Suite 40 
Randolph AFB, TX  78 160-4742 

U.S. Coast Guard 
Commandant (G-WPM) 
21 00 Second Street,  S.W. Room 6600 
Washington,  DC  20593 

I 
DD FORM 293, MAR 2004 

I 

I 
Page 2 of 4 Pages 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2007-00012

    Original file (FD2007-00012.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The records indicated the applicant received two Article 15s and a Vacation for misconduct. Reduction to AB, restriction to the limits of Charleston AFB, SC, for 30 days, and 30 days extra duty. (No appeal) (No mitigation) (2) 01 May 06, Vacation, Charleston AFB, SC - Article 92.

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2005-00416

    Original file (FD2005-00416.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (1,AST. The records also show that the member was offered an administrative discharge board but waived his right to a hearing. Article 15, dated 14 Jan 05 w/ attachments

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00202

    Original file (FD2006-00202.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge rcgulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process. My name is; -------------- ;and I am applying for an upgrade of my General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge from the U.S. Air Force. I believe 1 was a casualty of the Air Forces reduction that took...

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00413

    Original file (FD2006-00413.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) ............................ A - - - ------a - - 1'YPE UOTH PERSONAL APPEARANCE , GRADE A1 C X APSNRSAN I ----------------- . 3RD FLOOR ANUREWS AFB, MD 20761-7002 Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DEClSlONAL RATIONALE C4SE NlJMEER FD-2006-00413 GENERAL: The applicant appeals fbr upgrade of discharge to honorable. CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes...

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00307

    Original file (FD2006-00307.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIKS'I' MIDDLE INI'I'IAL) CKADE AFSNISSAN AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - a I TYPE GEN 1 Y E S C o L ~ S E ~ n 1 NAME O F COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION PERSONAL APPEARANCE AB I X RECORDREVIEW ADDRESS AND OR ORGANI%A'l'ION O F C'CIIINSEI I 1 I MEMBER S I T T I N G I I HON I GEN VOTE OF THE BOARD I UOTHC I OTHER I DENY 1NL)ES NUMBER A66.00 1 CASENUMBER EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD 1 I ORDER...

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00069

    Original file (FD2005-00069.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    You, on or about 19 April 2004, failed to comply with a medical waiver in violation of Article 92, as evidenced by Letter of Reprimand, dated 28 April 2004. c. You, on or about 28 April 2004, were disorderly in violation of Article 134, as evidenced by AF Form 3070, Record of Nonjudicial Punishment Proceedings, dated 19 May 2004. e. You, on or about 16 July 2004, were disorderly violation of Article 134, as ,evidenced by AF Form 174, Record of Individual Counseling, dated 21 July 2004. d....

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00213

    Original file (FD2006-00213.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    M D 2fl762.70112 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2(,06-00213 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former SRA) (HGH SRA) 1. APPLICANT DATA /The person whose discharge is to be reviewed).

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2006-00016

    Original file (FD2006-00016.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    550 C STREET WEST, SUI'TF 40 RANDOLPH APB, TX 781 50-4742 AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW 1535 COMMAND DR. RE WING, JR ANDREWS APB, MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD~2006~00016 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. If he can provide additional documented information to substantiate an issue, the applicant should consider exercising his right to make a...

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00464

    Original file (FD2006-00464.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    1 1 1 1 1 NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRS'I' MIDDLE INITIAL) AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD 1 GRADE 1 AFSNISSAN PERSONAL, APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW NAME OF COllNbEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRFSS A N 0 OR ORLANIZAI ION Ok COUNbLL TYl'h CEN coUNS'L YES I No X L..-..-....-..-..-.----------- ISSUES A92.21 A93.01 - - - - - Ih'DEY hll3lBER A66.00 1 IIIARINC DA I E EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD 1 1 I ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 1 2 1 APPLICA'I'ION I'OK KBVIBW OI'...

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00471

    Original file (FD2006-00471.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The records indicated the applicant received two Article 15s, a Vacation, and two Letters of Reprimand for misconduct. In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed. Sleeping on Post During the time I was under investigation for the fire alarm incident, I was pulling guard duty.