Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00203
Original file (FD2005-00203.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
N A M F  OF 9 F R V I C ' F   M F M R F R   I I   A C T  

r r n r T - - - - - -  

IITIAL) 

G l U D E  

AFSNISSAN 

AIR FORCE I)TSCHAKCl? REVIEW BOARD HEARING mCC)KD 

YES 

No 

I 

I 

.  1  -

. --  .. 

-

._  - 

. - . - -- 

1 

 
I 
ADDRFSS AND O R  ORGANILAIION Ofi  COUNSEL 
I 

. >  -.- ." 

-- 

, 

MEhlBER SITTING 

.a1 @$PI: 

, 

+ ,  

110N 

a ,  

I 

VOTE f)l? '~k~~~p&&$bf{g&' 
I  DENY 

I  O.ILHbK 

IJOTHL' 

'*<, 

'  T:e' 

t 

, 

GFN 

ISSliES 

A94.53 

INDEXNIIMBER 

A67.10 

I 

I 
EXHIBI'I'S SUBhlITI'ED 'TO THE BOARD 

I 

I 

0IU)EII AI'POINTING  THE BOARD 

+ i ~ n ~ F v I E w  
3  1  LFTTFR OF NOTIFICATION  - . " 
4  i  BRIFF OF PERSONNEL I  ILL 

OF D I s C H A R m  

C'OUNSEI.'S  REI.EASE TO THE BOAKU 

EXHIBITS SURMI'I'TED  A'I-'I'IME  OF 

PERSONAL APPEARANCE 
I  TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPbARANCE 

APl'L.CAK  T'S ISSL'E AND THE BOARD'S  DEClSlONM RATIONAL AKE DISCUSSED ON THE A'JTA('HF.D  AIR FOKCE DISCHARGE  REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL  RAJlONAl F: 

I 

I 

CASE NUMBER 

FD-2005-00203 

I 

Case heard at Washington, D.C.  The appl  cant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Kevicw Board 
between Andrews AFB, Maryland and St. Augustme FL vla video teleconference but failed to exerclse this right. 

Advlse appl~cant of lhc decision of the Board, and the right to submit an appl~catlon to the AFBCMK 

Names and votes w ~ l l  be made available to the applicant at the applicant's request. 

.

I 

I 

  - 

-
10 

, 

--  -- 

- --  - 

1 

?- 

SAbIMICUR 
550 (' S I REET WES r, SlJlTE 40 
RANDOLPH AIU, 1X 78150-4742 

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 

I 

I 
(EF-V2) 

NEI. COUNCIL 

ANDREWS AhB, M D  20762-7002 

Previous edition will be used 

I 

I 

I 

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE 

CASE NUMBER 

FD-2005-00203 

GENERAL:  The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. 

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but failed 
to appear for his hearing.  The DRB considered the applicant's request for upgrade by records review. 

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge. 

FINDINGS:  Upgrade of discharge is denied. 

The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and 
after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justify  a change of 
discharge. 

ISSUE:  The applicant submitted no issues with his application for upgrade of discharge, however the Board 
considered  the  issues  raised  by  the  applicant  in  his  original  response  to  discharge  action  including 
upbringing, motivation to serve, acceptance of responsibility for his conduct and his request for an honorable 
characterization of service. 

The applicant was discharged with an under honorable conditions (general) discharge for minor disciplinary 
infractions after 7 months and 4 days of service.  The applicant successfully completed basic training, 
however during technical training, the member received 3 AETC Forms 173 (records of counseling for 
minor infractions while in training), 2 Letters of Counseling and 8 Letters of Reprimand for various 
infractions including failure to complete homework, late for duty, communicating a threat, insubordination, 
unprofessional conduct, poor attitude, multiple training phase violations, failure to obey lawfid orders, and 
academic failure.  The Board noted the applicant was notified of discharge action one week after completing 
6 months of active duty and observed that members discharged prior to 6 months typically receive a 
characterization of service as "uncharacterized" under provisions for entry level separation.  The Board 
reviewed the evidence of the record showing that the applicant's training supervisors and chain of command 
expended considerable time and effort over nearly a four month time span in remediation and counseling to 
help the applicant conform to military and academic standards.  The applicant had ample opportunity to 
correct the recurring misconduct that was a significant departure from conduct expected of all military 
members and the DRB found no evidence of impropriety or inequity that would warrant an upgrade. 

CONCLUSIONS:  The  Discharge Review  Board  concludes that  the  discharge  was  consistent with  the 
procedural  and  substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and  was  within the  discretion of the 
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process. 

In view of the foregoing findings the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for 
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed. 

Attachment: 
Examiner's Brief 

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR  FORCE 

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW  BOARD 

ANDREWS  M B ,  MD 

(Former A 1 C )   (HGH A 1 C )  

1  MATTER  UNDER  REVIEW:  A p p l   rec'd a GEN Disch fr Lackland AFB, TX on 2 7   Sep 04 
U P   A F I   3 6 - 3 2 0 8 ,   para 5.49  (Misconduct -  Minor Disciplinary Infractions).  Appeals 
for Honorable Discharge. 

2.  BACKGROUND: 

a. DOB: 1 2   Sep 8 5 .   Enlmt Age: 18 5 / 1 2 .   Disch Age: 1 9   0 / 1 2 .   Educ: H S   DIPL. 

G - 3 6 ,   M-29.  PAFSC:  3 P 0 1 1   -  Security Forces Helper. 

AFQT:  N/A.  A - 5 7 ,  
DAS: 12 Apr 0 4 .  

E - 5 1 ,  

b.  Prior Sv: None. 

3.  SERVICE UNDER REVIEW: 

a.  Enlisted as A1C  24 Feb 04 for 6 yrs. Svd: 0   Yrs 7  M o   4 Das, all M S .  

b.  Grade Status:  A1C  -  9 Apr 04 

c.  Time Lost:  None. 

d.  Art 1 5 ' s :   None. 

e.  Additional: AETC 125A, 1 6  AUG  0 4   - Removed from training due to 

academic failure. 

LOR, 13 AUG 04 -  Smoking in room. 
LOR,  25 JUL 0 4   -  Late for duty. 
LOR, 2 5   J U L   0 4   -  Violation of phase by being in civilian 
clothing and failing to sign out of the 
dormitory. 

LOR,  1 6   JUL  04 -  Insubordinate behavior. 
LOR,  0 6   JUL  0 4   -  Speeding on base and failure to obey a 

direct order. 

AETC  1 7 3 ,   1 5   JUN  0 4   -  Unprofessional conduct. 
LOR, 08 JUN 0 4   -  Late for duty. 
LOR, 0 6   JUN 0 4   -  Late t o   accountability and poor attitude. 
LOR, 26 MAY 04 -  Insubordinate conduct. 
LOC, 2 9   APR 0 4   -  Talking and moving around while at the 
position of attention. 
LOC, 27 APR 0 4   -  Communicating a  threat. 
AETC 173, 2 3   APR  0 4   -  Failing to complete homework. 

f .   CM:  None. 

g.  Record of SV: None. 

h.  Awards &  D e c s :   AFTR, NDSM. 

i.  S t m t   of  Sv:  TMS: 

( 0 )  Yrs  (7) Mos  (4) Das 
TAMS:  ( 0 )   Yrs  (7) Mos  ( 4 )   Das 

4 .   BASIS ADVANCED FOR  REVIEW:  Appln  (DD  Fm  2 9 3 )   d t d   1 6  M a y   0 5 .  

(Change  Discharge  t o  Honorable) 

NO ISSUES SUBMITTED. 

ATCH 
N o n e .  

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE 

AIR  EDUCATION AND TRAINING COMMAND 

MEMORANDUM FOR AB 

FROM:  343 TRSDOM 

SUBJECT: Notification Memorandum 

1. I am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for Minor Disciplinary 
Infractions.  The basis for this action is AFPD 36-32 and AFI 36-3208, paragraph 5.49.  If rny 
recommendation is approved, your discharge will be described as Honorable, Under Honorable 
Conditions (General), or Under Other Than Honorable Conditions (UOTHC) discharge.  I am 
recommending your service be characterized as General and you may be ineligible for 
reenlistment in the Air Force. 

2.  My reasons for this action are: 

a.  On 12 Aug 04, you were in your room smoking in violation of yow SSIs, when you should 

have been working in Security Forces Supply.  As a result, you received a Letter of Reprimand 
(LOR), dated 13 Aug 04. 

b.  On 24 Ju104, you were late to call for quarters huntment.  As a result, you received an 

LOR dated 25 Jul04. 

c.  On 24 Jul 04, you violated.phase by being in civilian clothing and failing to sign out of the 

dormitory.  As a result, you received an LOR dated 25 Jul04. 

d.  On 15 Ju104, you refused to go back to your huntrnent after accountability.  You were told 

three times, became argumentative and called AlC 
A1C 
04. 

an AETC Form 341 when requested.  AS a result, you received an LOR dated 16 Jul 

a racist.  You also refused to give 

e.  On 3 Jul04, you were caught speeding on Lackland AFB,  In addition, you failed to obey a 
direct order to return the rental car and to report to the military training leader at Camp Bullis, in 
a taxi, as soon as possible.  As a result, you received an LOR dated 6 Jul04 

f.  On 15 Jun 04, you responded with a non-verbal expression (hard exhale) when directed to 

walk appropriately and quit dragging your feet.  When questioned, "what part of pick up your 
feet did you not understand," you responded with, 'hone of it."  As a result, you were counseled 
as reflected on the AETC Form 173, dated 15 Jun 04. 

g.  On or about 7 Sun 04, you were late for physical training.  As a result, you received an 

LOR dated 8 Jun 04. 

h.  On or about 2 Jun 04, you were late to accountability, and you had an attitude with your 

ropes.  As a result, you received an LOR dated 6 Jun 04. 

i.  On 26 May 04, you ordered an omelet fiom the grill after being told by MSgt 

that you 
were not to order any grilled items due to time constraint and the number of Airmen that had to 
eat.  As a result, you rcceived an LOR dated 26 May 04. 

j.  On or about 29 Apr 04, you lacked military bearing while talking and moving around when 

you were to be at the position of attention. As a result, you received a Letter of Counseling 
(LOC), dated 29 Apr 04, and a 7 day phase delay. 

k.  On or about 27 Apr 04, you communicated athreat to another airman.  As a result, you 

received an LOC dated 27 Apr 04, and a 7 day phase delay. 

1.  On 23 Apr 04, you reported to duty without your homework completed.  As a result, you 

were counseled as reflected on the AETC Form  173, dated 23 Apr 04. 

3.  Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this 
recommendation are attached.  The commander exercising SPCM jurisdiction, or a higher 
authority, will decide whether you will be discharged or retained in the Air Force. 

4.  You have the right to consult counsel.  If you wish to consult military counsel, an appointment 
will be made upon your rcquest and the date, time, and place will be provided.  You may retain 
civilian counsel at your own expense. 

5.  You have the right to submit statements on your own behalf.  Any statements you want the 
separation authority to consider must reach me by (3 workdays)  3  5 e  of 
request and receive an extension for good cause shown.  Your statements will be forwarded to 
the separation authority and will be made part of your case file that the separation authority will 
read. 

unless you 

6.  If you fail to consult counsel or to submit statements on your own behalf, your failure will 
constitute a waiver of your right to do so. 

7.  You have been scheduled for a medical examination. You must report to Bldg 6612, Room 
502, Monday - Friday between  1300 - 1500 hours with your medical, immunization, and dental 
records for the examination. 

8.  Any personal information you h i s h  in rebuttal is covered by the Privacy Act of 1974. A 
copy of AFI 36-3208 is available for your use in the Unit Personnel Office. 

9.  Execute the attached acknowledgement and return it to me immediately. 

Commander, Military Training Flight 

, Capt, USAF 

Attachments: 
1. AETC Form  125A, dated 16 Aug 04 
2.  Student Training Report 
3.  Student Tracking Sheet 
4.  Letter of Reprimand, dated 13 Aug 04 
5.  Letter of Reprimand, dated 25 Jul 04 
6.  Letter of Reprimand, dated 25 Jul04 
7.  Letter of Reprimand, dated 16 Jul04 
8.  Letter of Reprimand, dated 6 Jul04 
9.  AETC Form 173, dated 15 Jun 04 
10.  Letter of Reprimand, dated 8 JunO4 
1 1.  Letter of Reprimand, dated 6 Jun 04 
12.  Letter of Reprimand, dated 26 May 04 
13. Letter of Reprimand, dated 29 Apr 04 
14. Letter of Counseling, dated 27 Apr 04 
1 5.  AETC Form 1 73, dated 23 Apr 04 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2006-00040

    Original file (FD2006-00040.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD 20162-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used ~ 1 I 1 AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2006-00040 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate. LOR, 19 JUL 04 - Late reporting to a scheduled appointment.

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00310

    Original file (FD2005-00310.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I , NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD I LOUWSEL L L I \ U U . - + I AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMnER FD-2005-00310 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable to change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code. As a result, you received a Letter of Reprimand (LOR), dated 14 May 04. c. On or about 5 Jun 04, you were derelict in...

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00374

    Original file (FD2006-00374.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    1 (TYPE CEN I I AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD I PERSONAL APPEARANCE GRADE 1 AIC 1 x I RECORDREV~EW MEMBER SITTING VOTE OF THE BOARD L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . 'The miscoilduct included failure to go, wearing civilian clothes during duty hours, failure to follow a direct order, dereliction of duty, conduct unbecoming, malingering, failure to complete assigned tasks, insubordinate conduct towards a noncommissioned officer. Because of...

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00298

    Original file (FD2005-00298.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    'She applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declincd to exercise this right. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT O F THE AIR FORCE A I R FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, M D (Former AMN) (HGH A l C ) 1. Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this recommendation are attached.

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00103

    Original file (FD2003-00103.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD03-0103 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. For this misconduct you received an LOR on 24 Apr 02. f. You did, at or near Sheppard AFB TX, on or about 23 Apr 02, fail to go at the time prescribe to your appointed place of duty, to wit: Physical Conditioning (PC). For this misconduct you received an AF Form 174, Record of Individual Counseling, on 17 Dec 01.

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0453

    Original file (FD2002-0453.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD02-0453 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. AETC Form 173, 8 Apr 02 . AETC Form 173, 5 Apr 02 .

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00190

    Original file (FD2006-00190.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Copies of Disciplinary Infractions Letters With Rebuttals. On or about 19 Nov 04, you wore an earring off-duty, but on-base when it was unlawful to do so, For this misconduct, you received: (1) a Letter of Reprimand (LOR), dated 1 Dec 04, which was filed in your Unfavorable Information File (UIF); and, (2) a Vacation of Suspended Punishment, dated 23 Dec 04, received from a prior Article 15, dated 8 Oct 04. b. I have made an appointment for you to consult with the Area Defense Counsel...

  • AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00134

    Original file (FD2005-00134.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The records indicated the applicant received an Article 15, four Letters of Reprimand, and six AETC Forms 173 for misconduct. Room 5500 Washington, DC 20593 ARMY AIR FORCE Air Force Review Boards Agency SAFIMRBR 550-C Street West, Suite 40 Randolph AFB, TX 78 150-4742 DD FORM 293, MAR 2 0 0 4 Page 2 of 4 Pages on 28 June 2004. For this infraction, you were counseled as documented on AETC Form 173, dated 22 June 2004.

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0382

    Original file (FD2002-0382.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, if the applicant can provide additional documented information to substantiate an issue, the applicant should consider exercising his right to make a personal appearance before the Board. d.. On 26 Jun 01, Respondent failed his room inspection for the fourth time, for which he received a Letter of Reprimand, dated 27 Jun 01. e. On 20 Jun 01, Respondent failed his room inspection for the third time. * c. If you determine this separation action is supported by the evidence, approve...

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00333

    Original file (FD2005-00333.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INI'l'lAI.) AETC 341, 04 APR 0 5 - Late to details three times. Letter of Admonishment, 28 Sep 04 2, AB Form 3070 (Article 15), 21 Apr 05 3.