I
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)
GRADE
AFSNISSAN
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
I
I
X
I RECORDREVIEW
I
1 1 I ORDERAPPOMTMGTHE BOARD
1 2 1 APPLlCATlON FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 1 LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
4 1 BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
1
COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSON4 APPEARANCE -- --
1 26 Aug 2004
CASE NUMBER
FD-2004-00201
Case heard at Washington, D.C.
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance withlwithout counsel, and the right to
submit an application to the AFBCMR.
TO:
I
SAF/MRBR
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00
1
I
(EF-V2)
SECRETARY OF TEE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
1535 COMMAND D R EE WING, 3RD FLOOR
ANDREWS AFB. MD 20762-7002
Previous edition will be used
I
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER
FD-2004-00201
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board but declined to
exercise this right.
The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.
FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge is denied.
The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an
inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge.
Issue 1. Applicant was discharged for conduct prejudicial to good order and discipline. Member received
an Article 15, a vacation of suspended punishment, two Letters of Counseling, a Letter of Reprimand, and
pursuant to his guilty pleas, was convicted by Summary Court Martial for various acts of misconduct. His
offenses included driving while intoxicated, underage alcohol consumption, breaking base restriction on
two occasions, multiple incidents of failure to go, and failing to maintain his dormitory room within
standards. At the time of court martial, member entered into a Pre-Trial Agreement which kept his
proceeding in the Summary Court arena, and in which he also agreed to unconditionally waive his right to
an administrative discharge board if later recommended for discharge with an under other than honorable
conditions (UOTHC) separation. He was in hct recommended for a UOTHC, and in spite of unconditional
waiver of his right to a board hearing, he requested the convening authority consider characterizing his
service as general, under honorable conditions. That request was granted. Applicant now notes he used
poor judgment and made mistakes while in the service. The board noted he was age 18 to 19 when his
misconduct occurred, essentially the same age as other airmen who complete their enlistments without
disciplinary infractions, and there was no evidence he did not know right from wrong. Member had the
opportunity to change his negative behavior and was either unwilling or unable to do so. Therefore, the
Board found the record supports the characterization of service received.
Issue 2 applies to the applicant's post-service activities. Applicant contends that he should not be penalized
indefinitely for mistakes he made when young and notes his achievements since leaving the service. The
DRB was pleased to see that the applicant was doing well and has a good job. However, this does not
provide a basis of inequity or impropriety during his period of service that warrants an upgrade. The Board
concluded applicant's misconduct appropriately characterized his term of service.
CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.
In view of the foregoing findings, the board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.
Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD
(Former AE3) (HGH AMN)
MISSING MEDICAL RECORDS
1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec'd a GEN Disch fr Malmstrom AFB, MT on 24 Mar
00 UP AFI 36-3208, para 5.50.2 (Pattern of Misconduct - Conduct Prejudicial to
Good Order and Discipline). Appeals for Honorable Discharge.
2. BACKGROUND:
a. DOB: 18 Aug 80. Enlmt Age: 18 7/12. Disch Age: 19 7/12. Educ: HS DIPL.
AFQT: N/A. A-54, E-72, G-44, M-78. PAFSC: 3P031 - Security Apprentice.
DAS: 15 Sep 99.
b. Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 19 Mar 99 - 20 Apr 99 (I month 2 days) (Inactive) .
3. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:
a. Enlisted as AE3 21 Apr 99 for 4 yrs. Svd: 0 Yrs 11 Mo 4 Das, of which
AMS is 0 yrs 10 months 12 days (excludes 23 days lost time).
b. - Grade Status : AB - 14 Jan 00 (Article 15, 14 Jan 00)-
A m - 21 Oct 99
c. Time Lost: 24 Jan 00 thru 15 Feb 00 (23 days).
d. Art 15's: (1) 11 Feb 00, Vacation, ~ a l m s t r o r n ' ~ ~ ~ ,
MT - Article 134.
You, having been restricted to the limits of Malmstrom
AFB, MT, by a person authorized to do so, did, at
Malmstrom AFB, MT, on or about 24 Jan 00, break said
restriction. Forfeiture of $502.00 pay per month for 2
months. (No appeal) (No mitigation)
. .
.
. -
. .~
(2) 14 Jan 00, Malmstrom AFB, MT - Article 92. You, who
knew of your duties, on or about 28 Dec 99, were
derelict in the performance of those duties in that you
willfully failed to maintain your dormitory room in
accordance with MAFBI 32-6001, Resident Responsibility
Memorandum, as it was your duty to do. Reduction to AB,
suspended forfeiture of $502.00 pay per month for two
months, 30 days restriction, and 45 days extra duty.
(No appeal) (No mitigation)
e. Additional: LOR, 17 DEC 99 - Failure to go.
LOC, 15 DEC 99 - Failure to go.
LOCI 22 NOV 99 - Late returning from lunch.
f. CM: Summary Court Martial - 4 Feb 00
CHARGE I: Article 86.
Specification: Did, on or about 24 Jan 00, at the Main Gate on
Goddard Drive, physically control a vehicle, to wit: a passenger
car, while the alcohol concentration in his breath was 0.10 grams
of alcohol per 210 liters of breath or greater. Plea: Guilty.
Finding: Guilty.
CHARGE 11: Article 92.
Specification: Who knew of his duties, on or about 24 Jan 00, was
derelict in the performance of those duties in that he willfully
failed to refrain from drinking alcohol while under the age of 21
years, as it was his duty to do. Plea: Guilty. Finding: Guilty.
CHARGE 111: Article 134.
Specification 1: Having been restricted to the limits of
Malmstrom AFB, MT, by a person authorized to do so, did, on or
about 3 Jan 00, break said restriction. Plea: Guilty.
Finding: Guilty.
Specification 2: Having been restricted to the limits of
Malmstrom AFB, MT, by a person authorized to do so, did, on or
about 24 Jan 00, break said restriction. Plea Guilty.
Findings: Guilty. Sentence: Reprimand. To forfeit $500.00 of
your pay for one month. To be confined for 28 days.
g. Record of SV: None.
h. Awards & Decs: AFTR, AFOUA.
i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (0) Yrs (11) Mos (14) Das
TAMS: (0) Yrs (10) MOS (12) Das
4. BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 293) dtd 27 May 04.
(Change Discharge to Honorable)
ISSUES ATTACHED TO BRIEF.
ATCH
1. Applicant's Issues.
2. Two Letters of Support.
3. DD Form 214.
4. Copies of Civilian Law Enforcement Training, Certificates and Records.
7. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS (X as applicable) (Please print name and Social Security Number on each document.)
- - - ,
I WILL NOT BE SUBMKED. PLEASE COMPLETE REVIEW BASED ON AVAIU\BLE SERVICE RECORDS.
I
- - - - I
I X : ARE LISTED BELOW AND ARE AlTACHED TO THlS APPLICATION: (Continue on a plain sheet ofpaper if more space is needed.)
I
. - - - L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
a. DOCUMENT 1:
ALTAMAHA DRUG TASK FORCE, AGEN
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
b. DOCUMENT 2
- - - - - - - - - -
LETTER FRO
c. DOCUMENT 3.
. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
8. ISSUES
BI # 75( LETTER OF COMMENDATION FO
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SST. COMMANDER, M.A.C.E., JOB EVALUATION.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Board will consider any issue submitted by you prior to closing the case for deliberation. The Board will also review the case to
determine whether there are any issues that provide a basis for upgrading your discharge. However, the Board is not required to respond in
writing to issues of concern t o you unless those issues are listed or incorporated by specific reference below. Carefully read the instructions
that pertain to Block 8 prior to completing this part of the application. If you need more space, submit additional issues on an attachment.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
and* summarp.C-ourl Martid as a ~ e d l . - Orthemnina of the-24thd-huarv2000 E broke-baserestrictiw; which - - 1
I -While-I-was enlisted in the &S.-AirForce-Imade mistakes md used poor jw&ment-from-time-to time.- 1 ieceived an -
d c k - t 5 - f o r ~ s c s s i ; ; g an wrlitcz.de itr my dorm room; -Shfily-~e~afierE.=ei.id-a- DU I -oil-Mahs&sm-AiW -
1 wasimposed&a res&-ofmY-previous~ck-~,
-f waswasapprehended~sec&ty Poficc anddetainid for 23 bays.- - - -, (
I m-evenirrg due to my DU 1 and-bybreakmg-base-restrktion: -fperformed we1l-d&ng my training in both basic and- - I
I - b a ~ e - ~ b h ~ m ~ d d f i d
medicat and personakpm%1ems at thetime; how-ever,'~-make no-mnsism< 1 .&e-re~~onsibiiity for my hnmature- - - -
-d&iWes: Shce my se??ratfor f have -done me best-I-coald with my lifee aid my ~ e n e i a j asckarge uader-honorable- - -
arcohoKc beverages 'm Fom pear%: -1-have-also fmcti-d~ed-~-a eeitififie8Geargia - -
Z'IrZ-~~st~CeS:
Folic2-OffiCe~foi three yews-m-d fd1i?-manth3r mle-se~ing-&-a-Pafice OfPficer; I have been ~GgciecIfo the- - - - - - -
as a-?isiiCotiCs-hVeStightbi f6r-tWd yea3 %aXfiVe monE<.-I: h2ve icTcIeiVGdn6 -didcIpliriZQ- - -
-defectit%-mi€ f i H ~ t 1 ' ~ l g
- - . - - - . - - - - - - - - - -
-
- - - - - - - - - - -
acfions d - m g my law eriEorcemeni carecr. I l a v e confinued my eaucahon m the area oT c m a I juSfiicewh1C: - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
jCif iiiv%ifigati6ik~ii4d-theTBI.
servlng my commuiii~.- I hi?E 2xcened in mycivTlIi6pZf6~5roi-~d C-dGcctid
- - -
-ATF,DEA;UTS.-CG-t6Ks; UffiCe ~ T H ~ T ~ ~ ~ - S ~ C ~ ~ @ ~ - A ~ ~ ~ ~ C I D ~ - E ~
6thZ %fCtGf roZal5geh-cieC -1liiVe-Stfiii%l-t6 - -
b-e-anu- - - - - - ---- - - - -
- - - - fOrrxiiEEf&ir-jaid I % piissib16 -m-s-+quist?G&66foii&>-66Gd- -
m an attempt to correct an Immature mistake mad6 a~gX~XIdiSE,-GIfisK&>~i?l-m~life:
- - -
I my life due io immaturities during my youth. Thank you for the Board's consideration.
so that f mi?-Cdntiii~e-ti5-@i% ihkk%61ii h-i L* E26~imeni caDicitViid -ititbe 66Id-6ick-f&-&i it%ihiei 3- -
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
pstanhg citizen and m&-eed%b-eSf rift5
TaE m&g-tGs-Gqiieit-
-
I X j I HAVE LISTED ADDITIONAL ISSUES AS AN .AlTACHMENT TO THlS APPUCAllON.
: I PREVlOUSLY SUBMrrrED AN APPLlCAllON ON (Enter date)
I AND AM COMPLETING THlS FORM IN ORDER TO SUBMIT ADDITIONAL ISSUES.
: THE ABOVE ISSUES SUPERSEDE ALL PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED.
.
9. CERTIFICATION
statement. (U.S. Code, TTtle 18, Section 1001, provides that an individual shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, I
I - - - L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
I make the foregoing statements as part of my application with full knowledge of the penalties involved for willfully making a false
or both.)
I
I
I
a. DATE (WWMMDD)
I b. SIGNATU
5-27-04
.------------------
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
ARMY
Army Review Boards Agency
Support Division, St. Louis
A'TTN: SFMR-RBR-SL
9700 Page Avenue
St. Louis, MO 631 32-5200
(See http://arba.army.pentagon.mil)
I
DD FORM 293, DEC 2000
. .
NAVY & MARINE CORPS
! Naval Council of Personnel Boards I
: 720 Kennon Street, S.E.
; Rm. 309 (NDRB)
I Washington Navy Yard. DC
: 20374-5023
I
I
AIR FORCE
COAST GUARD
I SAFIMIBR
: 550-C Street West, Suite 40
: Randolph AFB; TX 781 50-4742 : Washington, DC 20593-0001
: Commandant (G-WPM)
: 21 0 0 Second Street, S.W.
I
I
I
I
I
I
Page 2 of 4 Pages
(
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FL.
HEADQUARTERS 341ST SPACE WING (AFSPC)
I
MEMORANDUM FOR 564 MS (ATTN
FROM: 564 MSICC
SUBJECT: Notification Memorandum - Board Hearing
1. Pursuant to AFPD 36-32 and AFI 36-3208, paragraph 5.50, I am recommending your
discharge fiom the United States Air Force for a pattern of misconduct--conduct prejudicial to
good order and discipline. If my recommendation is approved, your service will be characterized
as either honorable, general, or under other than honorable coditions. I am recommending an
under other than honorable discharge.
2. My reasons for this action are:
a. On 22 Nov 99, you failed to return fiom lunch break on time. For this misconduct you
received a Letter of Counseling (LOC) dated 22 Nov 99.
b. On 15 Dec 99, you failed to go to yourappointed place of duty at the appointed time. For
this misconduct you received an LOC dated 15 Dec 99.
c. On 17 Dec 99, you failed to go to your appointed place of duty at the appointed time. For
this misconduct you received a Letter of Reprimand (LOR) dated 17 Dec 99.
d. On 28 Dec 99, you failed to maintain your dormitory room in accordance with MAFBI 32-
600 1, Resident Responsibility Memorandum. For this misconduct you received an Article 15
dated 14 Jan 00.
e. On 24 Jan 00 you broke restriction on two different occa$ons, physically drove a vehicle
while the alcohol concentration on your breath was .10 grams of alcohol per 21 0 liters of breath
or greater and were derelict in your duties in that you willfully failed to refiain fiom drinking
alcohol while under the age of 21 years. For this misconduct you were tried by summary court-
martial and found guilty. Your punishment was confinement for 28 days, forfeiture of $500.00
pay for one month and a reprimand.
f. On 24 Jan 00, you broke restriction. For this misconduct you received a vacation of
suspended punishment dated 14 Feb 00.
3. This action could result in your separation with an under other than honorable conditions
discharge. The commander exercising SPCM jurisdiction or a higher authority will make the
final decision in this matter. If you are discharged, you will be ineligible for reenlistment in the
Air Force and will probably be denied enlistment in any component of the armed forces. Any
special pay, bonus or education assistance funds may be subject to recoupment.
1 1. Execute the attached acknowledgement and return it to me immediately.
I
I
I
I
Attachments:
1. Supporting documents:
a. LOC dated 22 Nov 99
b. LOC dated 15 Dec 99
c. LOR dated 17 Dec 99
d. AF Form 3070 dated 14 Jan 00
e. AF Form 1359 dated 4 Feb 00
f. AF Form 366 dated 14 Feb 00
2. Airman's Receipt of Notification Memorandum
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00222
...............2 RECORD REVIEW ADDRESS AND OR ORCANIZATIOY OF COUNSEL VOTE OF THE BOARD HON GEN UOTHC OTHER I DENY I I EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD I I 1 2 3 4 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HE HEARING DATE 1 13 Mar 2007 CASE NUMBER ( FD-2006-00222 I I I I I APPLICANT'S ISSUE AND THE...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00423
However, based upon the record and evidence provided by applicant, the Board finds the applicant's character of discharge is inequitable. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AB) (HGH A1C) 1. For this misconduct you received a letter of counseling (LOC) dated 26 Sep 02. b.
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00483
Attachment: Examiner's Hrief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AB) (HGH AMN) r-....-.-..-.-....--------J 1. I have reviewed the administrative discharge action against AB -------------------: I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - : The file is legally sufficient to process the discharge. b. AFI 36-3208, Table 1.3 and para 5.49, provide that if the reason for discharge is for minor disciplinary infiactions, the types of separation...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00393
In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed. LOR, 27 OCT 94 - Speeding. For this misconduct you received a LOR on 27 Oct 94. d. Between on or about 5 Aug 94 and 21 Oct 94, you failed to go to your appointed place of duty at the time prescribed on 3 separate occasions.
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2004-00081
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD 7 GRADE 1 AB I I . CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concluded that the applicant's punitive discharge by Special Court-Martial is appropriate undcr the facts and circumstances of this case and there is insufficient basis, as an act of clemency, for change of discharge. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AB) (HGH AlC) MISSING MEDICAL RECORDS 1.
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00234
If you need more space, submit additional issues on an attachment. For this misconduct, you received an LOR dated 25 Oct 02. f. On or about 5 Oct 02. vou failed to obey a lawful no contact order issued by myself to have no contact with 21 Nov 02, with the following punishment: reduction to the grade of airman basic, forfeiture of $552.00 (suspended), restriction to Malmstrom AFB, MT for 45 days, 45 days extra duty, and a reprimand. Supporting documents: a, LOR dated 30 Sep 02 b. GFPD...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00180
3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 10761-7W1 I (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2005-00180 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code. However, based upon the record and evidence provided by applicant, the Board finds the applicant's reason and authority for discharge inequitable. Applicant's Issues.
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0216
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD GRADE AFSN/SSAN AMN ae wen PERSONAL APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW | NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBERS SITTING ISSUES INDEX NUMBER A94.05, A92.21, A93.11 A67.90 2. CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE | gp2002-0216 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. Recommend to 20 AF/CC that...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00478
For this misconduct you received a Letter of Counseling (LOC) on 28 Mar 96. b. For this misconduct you received an Article 15 on 2 Jul96 which included a suspended reduction to airman basic, forfeiture of $100.00 pay for one month, and seven days correctional custody, This Article 15 was placed in your existing UIF. For this misconduct you received an Article 15 on 17 Apr 97 which included reduction to the grade of airman, with a new date of rank of 17 Apr 97 and restriction to Malmstrorn...
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0222
CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD02-0222 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. Attachment: Examiner's Brief FD2002-0222 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD —y (Former AMN) (HGH SRA) as 1. The Respondent departed the local area failing to obtain a leave number and notify the squadron leadership of her whereabouts, failed to go to her appointed place of duty on four occasions, and...