AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)
GRADE
I AIC
AFSNISSAN
MEMBER SITTING
I ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
1 1
1 2 1 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
1 3 1 LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
HEARING DATE
I
CASE NUMBER
Case heard at Washington, D.C.
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance withlwithout counsel, and the right to
submit an application to the AFBCMR.
TO:
I
SAFIMRBR
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 781 50-4742
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00
1
1
I
(EF-V2)
SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNClL
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REMEW BOARD
1535 COMMAND DR LE WING. 3RD FLOOR
ANDREWS AEB, ~ ~ ' 2 0 7 6 2 - 7 0 0 2
Previous edition will be used
I
1
1
I
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER
FD-2004-00162
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined to
exercise this right.
The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.
FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge is denied.
The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an
inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge.
ISSUE: Applicant was discharged for having a personality disorder. The records indicated the applicant
had also received an Article 15 for failure to go. Applicant now contends he was experiencing emotional
stress due to his wife's miscarriage while he was deployed, her infidelity while he was deployed, and the
subsequent dissolution of his marriage. His "reaction to these extreme events" was to "drink heavily." He
also claims he approached the chain of command for assistance without success. Unfortunately, member's
discharge processing files, personnel files, and medical record were all unavailable to the Board for review
due to being missing from the record. Because member's discharge file was unavailable to the Board for
review, the Board was unable to conclusively ascertain if there was more misconduct on member's part that
formed additional bases for the discharge. The Board also could not determine if at the time of the discharge
member consulted counsel, submitted statements on his own behalf, or waived those rights. The Board is
not able to substantiate any inequity or impropriety in the discharge actions, and lacking documented
evidence from the applicant to the contrary, the Board relies on the presumption of regularity and finds the
discharge proper and without basis for an upgrade.
If he can provide additional documented information to substantiate his issues, the applicant should consider
exercising his right to make a personal appearance before the Board. If he should choose to exercise his
right to a personal appearance hearing, the applicant should be prepared to provide the DRB with factual
evidence of the inequity and any exemplary post-service accomplishments as well as any contributions to the
community.
CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.
In view of the foregoing findings the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.
Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD
(Former A1C) (HGH A1C)
MISSING DISCHARGE DOCUMENTS
1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec'd a GEN Disch fr Scott AFB, IL on 15 Feb 91 UP
AFI 36-3208, para 5.11.1 (Personality is order) . Appeals for Honorable
Discharge.
2 . BACKGROUND :
a. DOB: 3 Nov 70. Enlmt Age: 17 2/12. Disch Age: 20 3/12. Educ: HS DIPL.
AFQT: N/A. A-Unknown, E-Unknown, G-Unknown, M-Unknown. PAFSC: Unknown.
DAS: Unknown.
b. Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 15 Jan 88 - 24 Nov 88 (10 months 10
days) (Inactive) .
3. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:
a. Enlisted as AB 25 Nov 88 for 4 yrs. Svd: 2 Yrs 2 Mo 22 Das, all AMS.
b. Grade Status: A1C - Unknown
A m - Unknown
c. Time Lost: None
d. Art 15's: (1) 14 Nov 89, Scott AFB, IL - Article 86. In that you
did, on or about 6 Nov 89, without authority, fail to go
at the time prescribed to your appointed place of duty.
Suspended reduction to AB. Seven days correctional
custody. (No appeal) (No mitigation)
e. Additional: Unknown.
f. CM: Unknown
g. Record of SV: Unknown.
h. Awards & Decs: NDSM, SWASM W/l BSS, SAEMR, AFTR
i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (3) Yrs (1) Mos (1) Das
TAMS: (2) Yrs (2) Mos (23) Das
4. BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 293) dtd 30 Apr 04.
(Change Discharge to Honorable)
ISSUES ATTACHED TO BREIF.
ATCH
1. Applicant's Issues.
2. Four Letters of Recommendation.
3. College Transcript.
4. Phi Cheta Kappa Certificate.
5. DD Form 214 (Member 1&4)
7. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS (Xas applicable) (Please print name and Social Security Number on each document-)
U WILL NOT BE SUBMITTED. PLEASE COMPLETE REVIEW BASED ON AVAILABLE SERVlCE RECORDS.
MI ARE LISTED BELOW AND ARE ATTACHED TO TWS APPUCATION: (Continue on a plain sheet ofpaper i f m m space h needed.)
I
I
PC( / ( . ~ t - n OF R c - t a ~ m ~ - w o ~ ; r ~ o ~ - ~ r / ~ o ~ ~
- /A/L CC,ARL-R
,
-
-
-
c. DOCUMENT 3:
-
8. ISSUES
The Board will consider any issue submitted by you prior t o closing the case for deliberation. The Board will also review the case to
determine whether there are any issues that provide a basis for upgrading your discharge. However, the Board is not required to respond in
writing to issues of concern to you unless those issues are listed or incorporated by specific reference below. Carefully read the instruaions
that pertain to Block 8 prior t o completing this part of the application. If you need more space, submit additional issues on an attachment.
THE ABOVE ISSUES SUPERSEDE ALL PREVIOUSLY S U B M m D .
9. CERTIFICATION
I make the foregoing statements as part of my application with full knowledge of the penalties involved for willfully making a false
statement. (U.S. Code, Title 18, Section 1001, provides that an individwlshall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than S p m ,
or both.)
ARMY
Army Review Boards Agency
Support Division, St. L w i s
ATTN: SFMR-RBR-SL
9700 Page Avenue
St. Louis, MO 63132-5200
(See http:llarba.army.pentagon.miI)
DD FORM 293, DEC 2000
NAVY & MARINE CORPS
AIR FORCE
COAST GUARD
Naval Council of Personnel Boards
720 Kennon Street, S.E.
Rrn. 309 (NDRB)
Washington Navy Yard, DC
20374-5023
SAFIMIBR
550-C Street West. Suite 40
Randolph AFB. TX 781 50-4742
Commandant (G-WPM)
2100 Second Street. S.W.
Washington. DC 20593-0001
Page 2 of 4 Pages
Application for Review of Discharge or Dismissal fi-om the Armed Forces of
the United States
7-d) Copy of Letter of Recommendation used for Tutoring Center-
7-e) Unofficial Cop of Hdlsborough Community Colleges Transcripts
7-0 Copy of Induction Certificate into the National Honor Society
7-h) Copy of DD Form 2 14
8) Issue 2
I would like my discharge changed fkom General Under Honorable
Conditions to Honorable. First, prior to my deployment for Desert Shield, I
was a member of the Scott Air Force Base Honor Guard and served at
several funerals. Second, during my deployment, I worked for the Electrical
Shop during the day which was my assigned duties, but I also volunteered to
serve for the Water Treatment Shop at night because they were short handed.
I do not believe these actions to be those of an average Airman, but one that
put the needs of the military ahead of his own. I would like my discharge to
be upgraded to reflect the character shown by these actions.
AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00120
However, based upon the record and evidence provided by applicant, the Board finds the applicant's reason and authority for discharge inequitable. (Change Discharge to Honorable) ISSUES ATTACHED TO BRIEF ATCH 1 . I have requested that temporary identification cards be issued IAW AFR 30-20, paragraph 2-9.
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00239
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING REuw._ NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) ; GRADE AFSN/SSAN aeons AB nie PERSONAL APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION TADORESS AND OR GRGANIZATION OF COUNSEL “VOTE OF THE BOARD MEMBERS SITTING oN GEN vorac Sree “DENY ISSUES A94.05 INDEX NUMBER A68.00 : EXHIBITS SUBMITTED 10: THE BOARD ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2004-00087
Although these disciplinary actions were not basis for applicant's discharge the Board took these into account when reviewing the applicant's service record. 'The applicant's record supports the fact that the applicant failed to progress satisfactorily in her 5-level upgrade training, therefore the Board concluded that the characterization and reason of the discharge received by the applicant to be appropriate. You show a lack in progress on your upgrade training, as evidenced by AF Form...
AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00082
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD ( AFSNISSAN NAME O F SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) Tl.PE GEN I 1 NAME O F COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION PERSONAL APPEARANCE I I MEMBER SITTING I 1 c-..-..-..-..-....--------------a ISSUES A94.06 A02.17 A92.22 A39.00 INDEX NUMBER A65.00 HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 1 GRADE 1 SRA I X I I I RECORDREVIEW ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION O F COUNSEL - - - HON GEN UOTHC VOTE OF'I HE BOARD - - - I OTHER ( I EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD 1 I ORDER...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2006-00059
Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE A I R FORCE A I R FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS A F B , MD (Former SSGT) (HGH SSGT) I n c o m p l e t e R e c o r d s & N o Disch Pkg 1. A2C (E3) - 01 Sep 58 c. Time Lost: 23 Feb 68 - 21 Jul 88 (20 years 4 months 29 days). Issue 1: On January 30, 2006, I submitted an application to re-open my clain (sic) for serivce connected disability, which was denied previously due to my discharge was other than honorable conditions.
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00205
The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justify a change of discharge. The records indicated the applicant received two Article 15's for misconduct. (Change Discharge to Honorable) Issue 1: 1 request an upgrade in order to use my benefits from the G.I.
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00077
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD VAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MlDDLE INITIAL) .------------------------, . Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2006-00077 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. APPLICANT DATA (The person whose discharge is to be reviewed).
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00273
The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justify a change of discharge. DAS: 20 Dec 02. b. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW: a. Enlisted as AB 18 Jun 02 for 4 yrs.
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00176
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance withlwithout counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant's request. ' d. Art 15's: (1) 11 Aug 00, Edwards AFB, CA - Article 125. The commander exercising special court-martial convening authority (SPCM) jurisdiction or a higher authority will decide whether you will be discharged or retained in the Air Force, and if you...
AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2003-00232
The applicant's records reveal medical issues, which if known by the separation authority at the time of the applicant's discharge, could have led to a different conclusion concerning characterization of the applicant's service. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former A1C) (HGH SRA) FD2003-00232 1. For this offense you received a Letter of Reprimand (LOR), dated 29 Mar 96 with an Unfavorable Information File (UIF) entry.