Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2003-00422
Original file (FD2003-00422.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
> 

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD 

NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) 

GRADE 

AFSNISSAN 

NELAT~ON OF COUNSEL 

X 

......................................... 

MEMBER SITTING 

* 

L 

2 

. , 

7 

-. 
- 

ISSUES  A94.01 

INDEX NUMBER  A67.70 

 j 

.

i

, . ,i;;.  . "'. 
, ,- 
HON 

~ @ q : ~ @ , ~ ; g o & ~ ;  
' .\.I  .,-7,. 
DENY 

'"  :;;.I::  ', :?$-:P>:r: 

.,: ...-, 
OTHER 

.  . , ,, 
UOTHC 

,  , 

-1.- 

: 

.I',:,.; 

. ., 
GEN 

X 

X 

X 

X 

..:<,,? 

, 

:,  3.. 

:*;-.; 

. .-  ,..-<., 
sgEEQ$R!f5L  :-,;:i,i2;i?;!.?- 

X 
',,$ ,,,,s  :.-  ,., 
$ ~ 4 p ; , : f i ; i : c ~ A ~ @ ~ $ x $ @ ~ @ ~ ~ i X Q  
1 
2 
3 
4 

ORDER APPOMTING  THE B O m D  
APPLICATION  FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 
LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 
BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE 
COUNSEL'S  RELEASE TO THE BOARD 
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF 
PERSONAL APPEARANCE 

HE.+RING  DATE 
15 Jan 2004 

CASENUMBER 

FD-2003-00422 

I Case heard at Washington, D.C. 

TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPERANCE 

. 

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance withlwithout counsel, and the right to 
submit an application to the AFBCMR 

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 

I 
(EF-V2) 

Previous edition will be used 

I 

I 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2003-00419

    Original file (FD2003-00419.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    VDTF;GF.T;igBQARD.I. ; GEN ---- , , ':: I . ' VBaWRGB .

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00471

    Original file (FD2003-00471.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    -. - - - AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE A1C AFSNISSAN PERSONAL APPEARANCE NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANLZI\TION RECORD REVIEW X ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OFCOUNSEL TYPE GEN !&,@.~s~;'. MEMBER SITTING 7 - -a -, .

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00262A

    Original file (FD2003-00262A.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    t I f you fail t-j consult counsel sr to submit s r a t e c e n t s i n y o u r f . Memo for Record, dtd 12 Aug 8 9 I5 .. Nemo far Record, d t d 1 2 Ang 89. Statement; dtd 1 3 Aug 9 9 , I 8 .

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0419

    Original file (FD2002-0419.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARlNG RECORD I --- t r X RECORD REVIEW -- AVURESS AND OR ORCANIL%TlON OF COUNSFI. VOTE OF TllE BOARD GLN OTIIFR DENY HON "4 I ~ I O T I I U -.- COIINSEI. AND OK ORGAN17ATION PERSONAL APPEARANCE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - & MEMBERS SITTING 7 4 7 i 7 X L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - , ISSUES A01.43, A92.35, A92.21 INDEX NllhlREX A67.90 X X X X EXHIBITS...

  • AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2004-00509

    Original file (FD2004-00509.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    -- - AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2004-00509 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, change the reason and authority for the discharge, and change the reenlistment code. Issue I: ISSUES ATTACHED TO BRIEF. < f ' v l i C f i ' f 5 b. I previously submitted an application on (Enterdate) and I am completing this form in order t o submit additional issues.

  • AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00156

    Original file (FD2004-00156.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ii . .,"':"','' 4. ,,,, '...,,, , , ,s x-.%:!fiEc$%. ~ ~ , g P : : ~ , % ORDER APPOINTNG THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERFONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 1 Case heard at Washington, D C Advise applicant of the decision ofthe Board, the right to a personal appearance withiwithout counsel, and the right...

  • AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00050

    Original file (FD2005-00050.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) / G R i D E AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD / AFSNISSAN I TYPE GEN I PERSONAL APPEARANCE N 4 M E OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANLZATION I MEMBER SITTING .- --. , , ~ D I S C Q S S ~ O N F M ATTACHED AIRFORCE D I S C H A + E ~ - E V I E W B O OECISIONAL RKTIONALE ~ Case heard at Washington, D.C. 'lhG.>RD FLOOR I (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used 1

  • AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00282

    Original file (FD2004-00282.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    , , HON I : . ~ o ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ $ ; ~ ; i j $ $ g ; ; $ & ~ $ ~ g G E N 'UOTHC DENY ,,,,. '~, 1 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 3 4 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTmCAllON BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TOTHE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHlBrrS SUBMIlTED AT T M E OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE I I =?.,.

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00464

    Original file (FD2006-00464.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    1 1 1 1 1 NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRS'I' MIDDLE INITIAL) AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD 1 GRADE 1 AFSNISSAN PERSONAL, APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW NAME OF COllNbEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRFSS A N 0 OR ORLANIZAI ION Ok COUNbLL TYl'h CEN coUNS'L YES I No X L..-..-....-..-..-.----------- ISSUES A92.21 A93.01 - - - - - Ih'DEY hll3lBER A66.00 1 IIIARINC DA I E EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD 1 1 I ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 1 2 1 APPLICA'I'ION I'OK KBVIBW OI'...

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00413

    Original file (FD2006-00413.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) ............................ A - - - ------a - - 1'YPE UOTH PERSONAL APPEARANCE , GRADE A1 C X APSNRSAN I ----------------- . 3RD FLOOR ANUREWS AFB, MD 20761-7002 Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DEClSlONAL RATIONALE C4SE NlJMEER FD-2006-00413 GENERAL: The applicant appeals fbr upgrade of discharge to honorable. CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes...