Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00157
Original file (FD2003-00157.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
I  NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) 

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD 

GRADE  AMN 

I  AFSNISSAN 

I 

TYPE 

IX 

I 

PERSONAL APPEARANCE 

1 

MEMBER SITTING 

I 

1 

I  RECORDREVIEW 

I 

HON 

I 

GEN 

I  UOTHC 

OTHER 

I  DENY 

1 

ISSUES  A94.06 

INDEX NUMBER 

A67.10 

I 

1  I  ORDER APPOINTING  THE BOARD 
1  2  1  APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 

LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 

PERSONAL APPEARANCE 

I  TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPERANCE 

I 

HEARMG DATE 

06 Dec 2003 

CASE NUMBER 

FD-2003-00157 

Case heard at Randolph AFB, Texas. 

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board. 

I + CHANGE REASON AND AUTHORITY TO SECRETARIAL AUTHORITY 

SAFMRBR 
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 
RANDOLPH AFB. TX 78 150-4742 

SECRETARY OF THE  AIR  FORCE PERSONNEL c o u N c n  
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW  BOARD 
1535 COMMAND DR, EE WMG, 3RD F'LOOR 
ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 

I 

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 

I 
(EF-V2) 

Previous edition will be used 

I 
I 

I 

I 

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE 

CASE NUMBER 

FD-2003-00157 

GENE=: 

The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. 

The applicant appeared before the DRB with counsel, ~ r . . l l ) h o m  
on December 6,2003. 

the Texas Veterans Commission 

The attached brief condins available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge. 

FINDINGS:  Upgrade of Discharge and change of reason and authority for discharge is approved. 

The  Board  finds  that  neither  the  evidence  of  record  nor  that  provided  by  applicant  substantiates  an 
impropriety that  would  justify  a  change  of  discharge.  However,  based  upon  the  record  and  evidence 
provided by applicant, the Board finds the applicant's reason and authority for discharge inequitable. 

ISSUE:  Applicant contends discharge was inequitable because it was too harsh.  The records indicated the 
applicant received an Article 15 for being derelict in the performance of his duties for driving a forklift off 
the road.  He also received one Letter of Reprimand and three Records of Jndividual Counseling for failure 
to go, being late for work, failure to follow established procedures by damaging a government vehicle and 
causing personal injury, and for violation of dress and appearance standards.  The DRB recognized the 
individual was going through a very difficult time due to family health issues and the applicant apply for and 
was denied a Humanitarian reassignment.  The applicant also had sufficient post-service that certainly 
impressed the DRB. 

CONCLUSIONS:  The  Discharge  Review  Board  concludes  that  the  discharge  was  consistent with  the 
procedural  and  substantive requirements  of  the  discharge regulation  and  was  within the  discretion of  the 
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process. 

However,  in  view  of  the  foregoing  findings,  the  Board  further  concludes  that  the  overall  quality  of 
applicant's service is more accurately reflected by an Honorable discharge and the reason for the discharge is 
more accurately described as Secretarial Authority under the provisions of Title 10, USC 1553. 

Attachment: 
Examiner's Brief 

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR  FORCE 

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 

ANDREWS AFB, MD 

(Former AMN)  (HGH A1C) 

1.  MATTER UNDER REVIEW:  Appl rec'd a GEN Disch fr USAF 13 APR 89 UP AFR 39-10, 
para 5-46 (Misconduct -  Minor Disciplinary Infractions).  Appeals for Honorable 
Discharge. 

2.  BACKGROUND: 

a. DOB: 23 Jan 70.  Enlmt Age: 18 3/12.  Disch Age: 19 2/12. Educ: HS DIPL. 
AFQT: N/A.  A-67,  E-63,  G-53,  M-65. PAFSC: 64531 -  Apprentice Material Storage 
and Distribution Specialist. DAS: 10 Sep 88. 

b.  Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 26 Apr 88 -  17 Jul 88 (2 months 22 days) (Inactive) . 

3.  SERVICE UNDER REVIEW: 

a.  Enlisted as A1C 18 Jul 88 for 4 yrs. Svd: 0 Yrs 8 Mo 27 Das, all AMS. 

b.  Grade Status: A M N  -  31 Mar 89 (Article 15, 31 Mar 89) 

c.  Time Lost:  None. 

d.  Art  15's:  (1) 31 Mar 89, Malmstrom AFB, MT -  Article 92.  You, who 

knew of your duties, on or about 21 Mar 89, were 
derelict in the performance of those duties in that you 
willfully failed to operate a forklift in the prescribed 
manner of driving only on hard surfaces, as it was your 
duty to do.  Reduction to Airman.  (No appeal) (No 
mitigation) 

e.  Additional: RIC, 08 MAR 89 -  Violation of dress and appearance 

standards. 

LOR, 10 FEB 89 -  Failure to follow establishd procedures by 
damaging a government vehicle and causing 
personal injury. 

RIC, 25 JAN  89 -  Late for work. 
RIC, 12 JAN  89 -  Failure to go. 

f.  CM:  None. 

g.  Record of SV: None. 

(Discharged from Malmstrom AFB) 

h.  Awards &  Decs:  AFTR 

i.  Stmt of Sv:  TMS: (0) Yrs  (11) Mos  (19) Das 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00056

    Original file (FD2003-00056.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ATR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN ma | TYPE PERSONAL APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW COUNSEL uj.) CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD03-0056 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. And, ten Records of Individual Counseling for driving an uninsured vehicle, violation of AFR 35-10 (four times), failure to meet physical fitness standards, failure to...

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00344

    Original file (FD2005-00344.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The records indicated the applicant had a General Court Martial Trial for misconduct in which he was found guilty on six Specifications. Specifications 1-4, he was found guilty of orally communicating to females certain indecent language; and Specifications 5 and 6, he was found guilty of wrongfully communicating a threat. (Change Discharge to General and the Change the Reason and Authority for Discharge) Issue 1: Character of discharge is inequitable because at "show cause" notification I...

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00325

    Original file (FD2006-00325.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2006-00325 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable and to change the reason and authority for the discharge. For failing to perform assigned duties properly, you received an RIC...

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00222

    Original file (FD2006-00222.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ...............2 RECORD REVIEW ADDRESS AND OR ORCANIZATIOY OF COUNSEL VOTE OF THE BOARD HON GEN UOTHC OTHER I DENY I I EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD I I 1 2 3 4 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HE HEARING DATE 1 13 Mar 2007 CASE NUMBER ( FD-2006-00222 I I I I I APPLICANT'S ISSUE AND THE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00030

    Original file (FD2003-00030.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD03-0030 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. He also received five Records of Individual Counseling for being late for work (5 times), violation of appearance standards, and for refusal to perform assigned duty and for being disrespectful. RIC, 03 SEP 87 - Refusal to perform assigned duty and disrespectful.

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00042

    Original file (FD2003-00042.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Member had one Article 15 for making a false official statement to civilian law enforcement officers about his car where he reported it stolen while he knew he had arranged for its disposal, one Article 15 for dereliction of duty for negligently failing to deliver priority work and LOGAIR in a timely manner as required, one Letter of Reprimand and a security violation for leaving classified cargo unattended without proper security measures, and one Record of Individual Counseling for running...

  • AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00120

    Original file (FD2004-00120.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, based upon the record and evidence provided by applicant, the Board finds the applicant's reason and authority for discharge inequitable. (Change Discharge to Honorable) ISSUES ATTACHED TO BRIEF ATCH 1 . I have requested that temporary identification cards be issued IAW AFR 30-20, paragraph 2-9.

  • AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00084

    Original file (FD2005-00084.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I I NAME O F SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD : E ~ : - 1 PERSONAL APPEARANCE NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION I AMN I RECORD RE -iKW X ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING I VOTE O F THE BOARD HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENT ISSUES A94.05 INDEX NUMBER A67.10 X* X* X X X * EXWIBlTS SUBMITTED T O THE BOARD ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICA'I ION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 1 2 1 3 1 LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 / BRIEF OF...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00170

    Original file (FD2003-00170.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE | gp9903-00170 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. Attachment: Examiner's Brief FD2003-00170 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD — (Former AB) (HGH AMN) 1. (LOC, 15 Feb 89, atch 4), (LOR, 15 Feb 89, atch 5), (UIF entry,15 Feb 89, atch 6) e. On 30 Apr 89 you operated a vehicle while drunk for which you received Article 15 punishment on 5 May 89.

  • AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00116

    Original file (FD2004-00116.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    B. hlD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2004-00116 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code. The Board did not change the Reason and Authority for discharge. c. Failure to go - Letter of Reprimnd, 6 May 88 d. m I -Article 15, 7 Aug 87 Copies of the damrents to be...