Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0468
Original file (FD2002-0468.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
P .' 

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD  -7 

NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) 

NAME O F  COUNSEI. AND OR 0RI;ANIZATION >-- ADDRESS  AND OR OR(;ANlZATION  01.  COUNSEL 1 

PERSONAL APPEARANCE 

X  IiECORD REVlE W 

VOTE OF THE BOARD 

SRA 

GRADE 

AFSNISSAN 

COUNSEL 

I 

I 

HON 

I  GEN 

OTkiFR 

I  DENT 

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  

MEMBERS SITTING 

I 

J 

7 

7 

ISSUES 
A94.05 

INDEX NUMBER 
A84.00 

15'MAY 03 

CASE NUMBER 
FD2002-0468 

X 

X 

EXHlBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD 

ORDER AF'POIN'I'ING  THE  BOARD 

APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF UISCHAKCIE 

1 
2 
-- 
4  BRIEF OF PtRSONNEL FILE 
I  i  ADDITIONAI, EXHIBITS  SIJBMITTED A I'  TIME OF 

PERSONAL APPEARANCE 

APPLICANT'S ISSUE AND THE BOARD S DECISIONAL RATIONAL .4RE  DISCUSSED ON THE ATTACHED AIR FORCE DISCHARGE ILEVIEW BOARD DECISION4L RATIONALE 

TN'b  RECORDING OF PEKSONAL AI'PFRANC'E  HEARING 

REMAKKS 
Case heard at Washington, D.C. 

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to 
submit an application to the AFBCMR. 

TO: 

SAFIMIBK 
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 
RANDOLPH AFR, 1'X 78 150-4742 

INDORSEMENT 

PROM. 

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 

(EF-V2) 

DATE:  15 MAY 03 

SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEI, COUNCIL 
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 
1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FIOOR 
ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 

Previous edition will be used. 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00084

    Original file (FD2005-00084.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I I NAME O F SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD : E ~ : - 1 PERSONAL APPEARANCE NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION I AMN I RECORD RE -iKW X ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING I VOTE O F THE BOARD HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENT ISSUES A94.05 INDEX NUMBER A67.10 X* X* X X X * EXWIBlTS SUBMITTED T O THE BOARD ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICA'I ION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 1 2 1 3 1 LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 / BRIEF OF...

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00266

    Original file (FD2006-00266.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant cites he made a bad decision that caused his discharge; he has learned from his mistake and attempting to improve his life, but having difficulty finding employment and obtaining acceptance in some colleges. CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0411

    Original file (FD2002-0411.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I GRADE 1 AFSNISSAN AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD ~pq,s" ( NO YES PERSONAL APPEARANCE NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANUATION X RECORD REVIEW ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL . AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) - - - - - - - - - - - - - DATE: 15 APR 03 SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3* FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 Previous editjon will be used. Execute the attached acknowledgment and return it to...

  • AF | DRB | CY2011 | FD-2009-00088_Redacted

    The record indicates that the applicant was discharged for Misconduct—Drug Abuse. J am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for drug abuse. For the reasons set forth above, I recommend the Respondent be discharged from the United States Air Force for drug abuse under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, paragraph 5.54, with a General discharge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00135

    Original file (FD2003-00135.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD2003-00135 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable and change of reason for discharge. Attachment: Examiner's Brief FD2003-00135 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD iii. (Change Discharge to Honorable, and Change the Reason and Authority for Discharge) Issue 1: While assigned to Hurlburt Field, FLA (sic), I was charged with misconduct for being absent...

  • AF | DRB | CY2011 | FD-2009-00123_Redacted

    Applicant submitted no issues regarding the inequity or impropriety of his discharge. Attachment: Examiner's Brief APPLICATION FOR THE REVIEW OF DISCHARGE OMB No. For this misconduct he was counseled, as evidenced by LOC, dated 23 Oct 01. c. He did, on 29 Jan 02, without authority, report 55 minutes late for duty, for which he -was reprimanded, as evidenced by LOR, dated 1 Feb 01. d. He did, on 11 Jul 02, without authority, report approximately 4 hours late for duty, for which he received...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0478

    Original file (FD2002-0478.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE | pp9002.0478 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. Member received an Article 15 for stealing a 40 MM, M- 203 High Explosive round, and for unlawfully striking his wife on divers occasions between | Dec 2000 and 6 March 2002, a 15-month period. Attachment: Examiner's Brief FD2002-0478 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former A1C) (HGH SRA) 1.

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00242

    Original file (FD2003-00242.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD03-0242 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. In view of the foregoing findings the board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed. During my nine months of technical school, I maintained an "A" average.

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0488

    Original file (FD2002-0488.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition to military counsel, you have the right to employ civilian counsel. You have the right to submit statements in your own behalf. Atch 1 -5; Record of Individual Counseling, dated 9 September 1997.

  • AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00249

    Original file (FD2005-00249.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process. (Change Discharge to Honorable) Issue 1: I was discharged due to having two Article 15's (sic). For your actions, you were punished under Article 15 UCMJ on 1 Sep 04 consisting of a suspended reduction to...