Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00249
Original file (FD2005-00249.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)

GRADE AFSN/SSAN

AIC

 

 

 

PERSONAL APPEARANCE

x RECORD REVIEW

 

 

NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION

  

ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

      

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case heard at Washington, D.C.

submit an application to the AFBCMR .

SIGNATURE OF RECORDER

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the ri

 

 

 

MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY
SC x
ay x
| x
Pl x
mw :
ISSUES 494 995 INDEXNUMBER 4 6 419 B E THE BOARD. -

] ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD

2 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE

3 LETTER OF NOTIFICATION

4 BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE

HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER
21 Dec 2005 FD-2005-00249
APPLIC ON Os ;

    

ght to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to

Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant’s request.

 

SAF/MRBR
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742

 

 

 

SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD

1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR

ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002

 

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00

(EF-V2)

Previous edition will be used
CASE NUMBER

FD-2005-00249

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined to
exercise this right.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge is denied.

The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an
inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge.

ISSUE: Applicant contends discharge was inequitable because it was too harsh. The records indicated the
applicant received two Article 15s for failure to go, being incapacitated for the proper performance of his
duties due to wrongful previous overindulgence of intoxicating liquor, and for stealing landscaping rocks on
two separate occasions. He also received a Record of Individual Counseling for being late for duty and an
Unfavorable Information File. The DRB opined that through these administrative actions, the applicant had
ample opportunities to change his negative behavior. The Board concluded the misconduct was a significant

departure from conduct expected of all military members. The characterization of the discharge received by
the applicant was found to be appropriate.

CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.

Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
FD2005-00249

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD

(Former A1C)’ (HGH A1C)

1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec’d a GEN Disch fr Nellis AFB, NV on 15 Nov 04

UP AFI 36-3208, para 5.49 (Misconduct - Minor Disciplinary Infractions) . Appeals
for Honorable Discharge.

2. BACKGROUND:

a. DOB: 6 May 80. Enlmt Age: 22 4/12. Disch Age: 24 6/12. Educ: HS DIPhL.

AFQT: N/A. A-69, E-74, G-68, M-85. PAFSC: 2A331A — Avionic Systems Attack
Control Apprentice. DAS: 13 Jun 03.

 

b. Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 5 Sep 02 - 9 Sep 02 (5 days) (Inactive).

3. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:

a. Enlisted as AB 10 Sep 02 for 6 yrs. Svd: 02 Yrs 02 Mo 06 Das, all Ams.

b. Grade Status: A1C - 03 Nov 02

c. Time Lost: None.

ad. Art 15’s: (1) 10 Jun 03, Sheppard AFB, TX - Article 86. You did, on
or about 20 Mar 03, without authority, fail to go at the
time prescribed to your appointed place of duty.
Article 134. You were, on or about 20 Mar 03, asa
result of wrongful previous overindulgence in
intoxicating liquor or drugs, incapacitated for the
proper performance of your duties. Suspended reduction
to Airman. Reprimand. (No appeal) (No mitigation)

(2) 01 Sep 04, Nellis AFB, NV - Article.121. You did, on
or about 22 Jun 04, steal landscaping rocks, military
property, of a value of $500.00 or less, the property of
the United States Government. You did, on or about 23
Jun 04, steal landscaping rocks, military property, of a
value of $500.00 or less, the property of the United
States Government. Suspended reduction to Airman.
Forfeiture of $150.00 pay, and a reprimand. (No appeal)

(No mitigation)

e. Additional: RIC/UIF, 29 MAR 04 - Late for duty.

£. CM: None.

g. Record of SV: 10 Sep 02 - 15 Apr 04 Nellis AFB 3 (HAF Dir)
F'D2005-00249

h. Awards & Decs: AFTR, NDSM, AFOUA.

1. Stmt of Sv: Tws: (02) Yrs (02) Mos (11) Das
TAMS: (02) Yrs (02) Mos (07) Das

4. BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appin (DD Fm 293) dtd 22 Jun 05.
(Change Discharge to Honorable)

Issue 1: I was discharged due to having two Article 15's (sic). I believe
I should receive an Honorable discharge because both Articles were more than a

year apart and were completely unrelated. I have aslo (sic) paid in full my
outstanding enlistment bonus.

ATCH
Lt. DD Form 149.

28JUL05/ia

1
”

{ 3 : ( 7
‘ OEPARTMENT OF THE AiR FORCE 02005 00 AFF
57TH AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE SQUADRON
NELLIS AIR FORCE BASE, NEVADA 89191

DS Oct of

 

MEMORANDUM FOR A1C Joann

. FROM: 57 AMXS/CC

SUBJECT: Notification Memorandum

1. Iam recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for misconduct: minor
disciplinary infractions. The authority for this action is AFPD 36-32 and AFI 36-3208, paragraph
5.49. If my recommendation is approved, your service will be characterized as an Under Honorable
Conditions (General) Discharge. I am recommending that your service be characterized as an Under

_ Honorable Conditions (General) Discharge.

2. My reason for this action is:

a. You did, at or near Sheppard Air Force Base, Texas, on or about 20 Mar 03, without

authority, fail to go at the time prescribed to your appointed place of duty, to wit: Building 920.
For your actions, you were punished under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) on

10 Jun 03 consisting of a suspended reduction to the grade of Airman, a reprimand, and an
Unfavorable Information File (UIF) was established; and

b. You were, at or near Sheppard Air Force Base, Texas, on or about 20 Mar 03, as a result
of wrongful previous overindulgence in intoxicating liquor or drugs, incapacitated for the proper
performance of your duties. For your actions, you were punished under Article 15 UCMJ on 10 Jun
03 consisting of a suspended reduction to the grade of Airman, a reprimand, and a UIF was

established; and

c. On 27 Mar 04, you reported late for duty. For your actioris, you received a Record of
Individual Counseling (ROIC) dated 29 Mar 04; and

d. You did, at or near Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada, on or about 22 Jun 04, steal

landscaping rocks, military property, of a value of $500.00 or less, the property of the United States
Government. For your actions, you were punished under Article 15 UCMJ on 1 Sep 04 consisting

of a suspended reduction to the grade of Airman, forfeiture of $150.00 pay, a reprimand, and this
action was placed in your existing UIF; and

e. You did, at or near Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada, on or about 23 Jun 04, steal

landscaping rocks, military property, of a value of $500.00 or less, the property of the United States
Government. For your actions, you were punished under Article 15 UCMJ on 1 Sep 04 consisting

of a suspended reduction to the grade of Airman, forfeiture of $150.00 pay, a reprimand, and this
action was placed in your existing UIF.

3. Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this
recommendation are attached. The commander exercising SPCM jurisdiction or higher authority
will decide whether you will be discharged or retained in the United States Air Force and, if you are
discharged, how your service will be characterized. If you are discharged, you will be ineligible or
reenlistment in the Air Force.and any special pay, bonus, or education assistance funds may be
ho | FD2005-9024-7

subject to recoupment. The separation authority will make the findings and recommendations
required under 10 U.S.C. Section 2005(g).

4. You have the right to consult counsel. Military legal counsel has been obtained to assist you. I
have made an appointment for you to consult Captain ay: Bldg 625, on
Abo Gch ©Y,at_ \OBO _ hours. You may consult civilian counsel at your own expense.

5. You have the right to submit statements in your own behalf. You have three (3) duty days
from the date/time served to submit statements in your behalf. Any statements you want the

separation authority to consider must reach me by 9 g Oct OY at OF0O hours unless you

request and receive an extension for good cause shown. I will send them to the separation authority.

6. In the event the. commander exercising special court-martial jurisdiction or a higher authority
approves your discharge, separations will out-process you. Your initial separations briefing is

scheduled for )) deloy on (130 hrs.

7. If you fail to consult counsel or to submit statements in your own behalf, your failure will
constitute a waiver of your right to do so.

8. You have been scheduled for a medical examination. You must report to 99th Medical Group,
222 Las Vegas Blvd on XI OCLOY , at_ WAS hours for the examination.

“9. Any personal information you furnish in rebuttal is covered by the Privacy Act of 1974. A copy
of AFI 36-3208 is available for your use at 57 AMXS/CC.

10. Execute the attached acknowledgment and return it to me immediately.

 

Attachments:
1. Receipt of Notification Memorandum

2. Article 15, dated 10 Jun 03

3. ROIC, dated 29 Mar 04
4. Article 15, dated 1 Sep 04

5. AF Form 1137

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2006-00143

    Original file (FD2006-00143.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) -----------------------------------. The applicant had further misconduct and received his first Article 15 for being absent from his appointed place of duty. For your actions, you were punished yourself as an AFOSI agent to Mr.; ....................... undk Article 15, UCMJ, on 18 Mar 04 coniisting of reduction to the grade of airman basic, restriction to Nellis AFB, NV for 45 days, 45 days...

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00331

    Original file (FD2005-00331.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DRB noted that when the applicant applied for these benefits, he signed a statement (DD Form 2366) that he understood he must receive an Honorable discharge to rcceive future educational entitlements. S E W I C E UNDER REVIEW: a. Enlisted as A1C 28 Oct 98 for 6 yrs. (Change Discharge to Honorable) Issue 1: To receive MGI Bill benefits, I served the USAF honorably and was discharged for weight management.

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00470

    Original file (FD2003-00470.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Cd, EST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1835 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE | ¢p2003-00470 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the...

  • AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00111

    Original file (FD2004-00111.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    -- DCNY -1 -1 1 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 1 1 2 3 ( LETTER OF NO.I'IPICATION 4 1 BRIEF OF PERSONNEI. For your actions, you received an LOR on 2 Oct 02. For your actions, you received an LOR on 9 Jul03.

  • AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00159

    Original file (FD2005-00159.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DRR noted that when the applicant applied for these benefits, he signcd a statement (DD Forin 2366) that hc understood he must receive an Honorable discharge to receive Silture educational entitlements. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE A I R FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AMN) (HGH SRA) I. For your actions, you were punished under Article 15, UCMJ on 9 Aug 02 consisting of a suspended reduction to the grade of airman, forfeiture of $250.00...

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2006-00022

    Original file (FD2006-00022.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE A I R FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former A1C) (HGH SRA) 1 . (No appeal) (No mitigation) ( 4 ) 02 May 02, Tinker AFB, OK - Article 121. You were given an Article 15 dated 2 May 02, with a reduction to the grade of Airman suspended until 1 Nov 02, after which time it would be remitted without further action, unless sooner vacated.

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00413

    Original file (FD2005-00413.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    For his actions, he received an ROIC dated 8 Mar 05; and ..-.-..- -------- -------- g. On 7 Mar 05, Amn! For his actions, he was punished under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) on 18 Feb 05 consisting of a suspended reduction to the grade of Airman, ten days extra duty, a reprimand, and an Unfavorable Information File (UIF) was established; and i. Amn Morse did, at or near Nellis AFB, NV, on or about 8 Mar 05, without authority, fail to go at the time prescribed to his...

  • AF | DRB | CY2001 | FD01-00039

    Original file (FD01-00039.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-0 1-00039 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. The misconduct included wrongfully consuming alcoholic beverages while under the legal drinking age of 21, attempting to steal money from unlocked vehicles, derelict in his duties, receiving a traffic citation for reckless driving, and being disrespectful toward a senior enlisted member. Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00095

    Original file (FD2003-00095.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD03-0095 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. For your actions, you received a record of individual counseling (ROIC) on 23 Jun 98; f. On or about 3 Jun 98, you did, without authority, fail to go at the time prescribed to your appointed place of duty. For your actions, you received a LOR on 16 Sep 97; and 1.

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00094

    Original file (FD2003-00094.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I 1 AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2003-00094 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code. The records indicated the applicant received a General Discharge due to a Special Court Martial for falsely altering military identification cards. For your actions, you were verbally counseled and placed in remedial training on or about 19 Dec 97; h....