Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0322
Original file (FD2002-0322.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
1 

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD 

NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MlDDLE INITIAL) 

GRADE 

AFSNISSAN 

I 

TYPE 

Honorable  1  X  PERSONAL APPEARANCE 

NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORCANIMIION 
; - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -  

A1C 

RECORD REVIEW 

ADDRESS Iwn OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL 

----------------------------. 

COUNSEL 

NO 

YES 
X 

I 

I 

C-....-.-......-.-.-----------m 

MEMBERS SITTING 

VOTE OF THE BOARD 

'? 

HON 

/  GEN 

UOTHC 

OTHER 

I DENY 

ISSUES 
A01.17, A01.31, A01.39, 
A01.49, A94.21 

INDEX NUMBER 
A46.03 

HEAIUNG DATE 
012303 

CASE NUMBER 
FD2002-0332 

1 
2 
3 
4 

I 
m ~ m m  sttBhltm~w TQ TI$$ M A R ~  3 

I 

I 

ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 

I 

APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DJSCHARGE 

LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 
BRIEF OF PERSOI'WEL FILE 
COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD 
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT  TIME OF 
PERSONAL APPFARANCE 

A p p L I c m r s  ISSUE AND THE B O A R W ~ ~ B C ~ ~ T O N A L  

I 
I 
I Case heard at Washington, D.C. 
* Change narrative reason for discharge to "Personality Disorder" 

REMARKS 

  .i 

rl 

i

,

p

RATIONAL ARB WS~USSED ON THE A~TACHED AIR MRCE DISCWROE  REVIEW m e  DECISION& WITONALE. 

I 

I 

I 

/  TAPE RECORl3ING OF PERSONAL APPERANCE IIEARING 

1 
- 
I 

** Change narrative reason for discharge to "Secretarial Authority" 

Advise the applicant of the decision of the Board and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR 

SAFN JBR 
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78 1504742 

SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL 
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVlEW BOARD 
1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3"  FLOOR 
ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 

(EF-V2) 

Previous edition will be used. 

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE 

CASE NUMBER 

FD200t0322 

GENERAL:  The applicant appeals for a change to the narrative reason for his separation.  The applicant 
appeared and testified before the Board, with counsel, at Andrews AFB, MD, on January 23,2003. 

The applicant submitted a three-page personal statement, a copy of AF Form - - - - - - - - - - - -  
a copy of a January 17, 2002 mental health evaluation of the applicant by Drj - - - - - - - - - - - -  1 Progress Notes 
dated October 17,2002 and December 3,2002 concerning the applicant by Dr; - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - -  :, 
health report signed by Dr l- - - - - - _ -  - - - - - - : ; and  Dr 1 ----------. 
were assembled together and entered into evidence as Exhibit #6. 

1 186 dated October 29,  1998, 
, _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _  

;dated December 18,2002.  All of these items 

, _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _  

I - - - - - - - - - - - '  

I  and a mental 

The attached brief contains the available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the 
discharge. 

FINDINGS:  The applicant's request to change the narrative reason for his separation is denied.  The board 
finds neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an inequity or 
impropriety which would justify the requested change.  The applicant raised the following issues for the 
board's  consideration: 

Issue #1:  The applicant claims his Area Defense Counsel (ADC) did not properly advise him concerning 
the conditional waiver of his discharge board and the type of characterization he would receive.  The DRB 
noted the waiver the applicant signed provided that, if approved, he would receive no less than an honorable 
discharge.  The governing instruction requires members who submit a conditional waiver to specify the 
service characterization they will accept (AFI 36-3208, para 6.25).  The ADC properly advised the 
applicant to request the best possiblc service characterization (viz. honorable).  This issue is without merit. 

Issue #2:  The applicant claims his First Sergeant and Chaplain failed to exercise their proper roles by 
investigating the homosexual statements he made, reading him his Article 3 1 rights, and failing to seek 
medical assistance for him.  The DRB noted the applicant requested a meeting with his First Sergeant and 
Chaplain for the purpose of telling them of his homosexual or bisexual orientation.  He told the First 
Sergeant that he had contemplated suicide because of the conflict he felt over his homosexual feelings. 
Shortly after the applicant made his admissions, the First Sergeant read the respondent his Article 3 1 rights. 
The applicant placed his initials next to statements on the AF Form 1168 indicating he did not want a 
lawyer and agreed to make a statement that could be used in a later administrative proceeding.  The DRB 
considered whether the First Sergeant should have referred the applicant to mental health or another service 
provider after he mentioned the possibility of suicide.  The DRB noted that the applicant stated the source 
of his suicidal ideation was the conflict he felt between his claimed homosexual or bisexual lifestyle and his 
service in the Air Force.  However, since his commander did not believe there were any medical issues 
which would impact his pending separation and the fact a chaplain was present at the time the applicant 
made his admissions, the DRB did not believe there was an inequity or impropriety in not sending the 
applicant to a mental health provider. At the DRB, the applicant admitted he intended and expected his 
statements would be used to effect his separation &om the Air Force.  Because the applicant intended for his 
conversation with the First Sergeant and Chaplain to be communicated to others, the DRB did not find a 
violation of any privilege of confidentiality.  For these reasons, the DRB found this issue to be without 
merit. 

Issue #3:  The applicant claims his statements to his First Sergeant and the Chaplain did not definitively 
declare his intention to engage in homosexual conduct.  The DRB reviewed the statements and noted the 
applicant told his First Sergeant that the Air Force was preventing him from pursuing things he needed to be 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2011 | FD-2011-00004

    Original file (FD-2011-00004.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    + CHANGE REASON AND AUTHORITY TO SECRETARIAL AUTHORITY *CHANGE RE CODE SAF/MRBR 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2011-00004 GENERAL: The applicant appeals to change the reason and authority for the discharge and to change...

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0272

    Original file (FD2002-0272.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    At the time of the discharge, member waived his right to have his case heard by an administrative discharge board, or submit additional statements in his own behalf. waiver of his right to a board hearing and direct that the respondent be separated with an honorable discharge in accordance with AFI 36-3208, paragraph 5.36.2.2 (homosexual conduct). In addition to military counsel, you have the right to employ civilian counsel.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03328

    Original file (BC-2010-03328.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03328 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. On 8 Feb 03, the discharge authority approved the separation and on 13 Feb 03, the applicant received an uncharacterized entry- level separation, by reason of homosexual conduct. _________________________________________________________________ THE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0051

    Original file (FD2002-0051.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    However the Board found it inappropriate to characterize the applicant's Reason for discharge as a Personality Disorder, when in fact, his diagnosis is Adjustment Disorder. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMKNT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former 2LT) (HGH 2LT) 1. He was assigned t6 Nellis AFB, NV on or about 12 Oct 99.

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2006-00059

    Original file (FD2006-00059.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE A I R FORCE A I R FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS A F B , MD (Former SSGT) (HGH SSGT) I n c o m p l e t e R e c o r d s & N o Disch Pkg 1. A2C (E3) - 01 Sep 58 c. Time Lost: 23 Feb 68 - 21 Jul 88 (20 years 4 months 29 days). Issue 1: On January 30, 2006, I submitted an application to re-open my clain (sic) for serivce connected disability, which was denied previously due to my discharge was other than honorable conditions.

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00284

    Original file (FD2006-00284.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The records also indicated the applicant received an Article 15, a Vacation, a Letter of Counseling and two Records of Individual Counseling for misconduct. %APPLICANT DATA (The person whose discharge is to be reviewed). DATE OF DISCHARGE OR SEPARATION 1 4.

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0350

    Original file (FD2002-0350.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ISSUES INDEX NUMBER a EXHIBITS SUBNE p Coe a A94,05/06 A42,00 1 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 | APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 | LETTER OF NOTIFICATION HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 4 | BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE 8 MAY 2003 FD2002-0350 COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD2002-0350 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade a change in reason and authority for discharge...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00304_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00304_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforchangeofreasonandauthorityforthedischarge,andchangeof reenlistmenteligibility(RE)code. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2010-00394

    Original file (FD-2010-00394.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. The Board found the no impropriety to warrant upgrade of the discharge and opined the characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate. Issue #3 - Applicant contends her discharge was inequitable because the other individual was discharged under the force shaping program...

  • AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00108

    Original file (FD2005-00108.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The records indicated the applicant received an honorable discharge with the narrative reasoning of homosexual admission. Additionally, member consulted counsel on March 15, 2002, and submitted a conditional waiver of his rights to a board hearing contingent upon receiving a discharge characterization no less than an honorable discharge. In addition to military counsel, you have the right to employ civilian counsel.