AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)
\
JTYPE HON
I
1
PERSONAL APPEAKANCE
GRADE
A l C
1
I
X
AFSNISSAN -
1
RECORDREVIEW
ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL
MEMBER SITTING
I
1
HON
1
GEN
VOTE OF THE BOARD
1 UOTHC
1 OTHER
I
1
I
I
ISSUES
A01.27
A01.37
1
I
I
INDEX NUMBER
A46.00
HEARING DATE
CASE NUMBER
I
I
EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD
I
I
ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
1
1 2 1 APPLlCATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 1 LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
' COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
1 BRIEF O F PERSONNEL FILE
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
I TAPE RECORDING O F PERSONAL APPEARANCE
I
10 Oct 2005
APPLICANT'S ISSI'E hhl, T t E BOARD'S DECISIONAL MTlONAL /\RE DISCUSSED ON TIIE ATI'ACIIID AIR tORCt DISCIIARGE RtVlliW f3OARD UECISIOXL RATIONA1.E
FD-2005-00108
I
I
Case heard at Washington, D.C.
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance withlwithout counsel, and the right to
submit an application to the AFBCMR.
Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant's request.
SAFIMRBR
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742
SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
1535 COMMAND DR. EE WING, 3RD FLOOR
ANDREWS AFB, M D 20762-7002
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00
(EF-V2)
Previous edition will be used
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER
FD-2005-00108
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for change the reason and authority for the discharge and to change the
reenlistment code.
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined to
exercise this right.
The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.
FINDINGS: Change of reason and authority for discharge and change of reenlistment code are denied.
The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an
inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge.
ISSUE:
Applicant contends discharge was inequitable because of a false accusation of his admission to
homosexuality. He also contends many people first asked if he was homosexual and then accused him of
complying with an admission to homosexuality--breaking the first rule of "Don't AskIDon't Tell."
In
addition, he alleges he endured many occasions of prejudice, inequity, bias, and discrimination. Lastly, the
member states he was questioned without any suggestion for a lawyer to assist him and never given the
opportunity to fully present his case or himself. The records indicated the applicant received an honorable
discharge with the narrative reasoning of homosexual admission. The member was notified of discharge
action on March 7, 2002, and scheduled to consult counsel (Area Defense Counsel) on March 8, 2002.
Additionally, member consulted counsel on March 15, 2002, and submitted a conditional waiver of his
rights to a board hearing contingent upon receiving a discharge characterization no less than an honorable
discharge.
AFI 36-3208, Chapter 5, Section G, paragraph 5.36.1 indicates a basis for discharge exists if the member
makes a statement that demonstrates a propensity or intent to engage in homosexual acts. The applicant
made statements that fit the criteria set out in paragraph 5.36.1. While he denied such statements, three
credible witnesses signed sworn statements asserting that such statements were made. The characterization
of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate.
CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.
In view of the foregoing findings the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.
Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
AFI36-3208 9 JULY 2004
85
working conditions that are often spartan, primitive, and characterized by forced intimacy with little
or no privacy.
5.35.13. The prohibition against homosexual conduct is a long-standing element of military law that
continues to be necessary in the unique circumstances of military service.
5.35.14. The armed forces must maintain personnel policies that exclude persons whose presence in
the armed forces would create an unacceptable risk to the armed forces' high standards of morale,
good order and discipline, and unit cohesion that are the essence of military capability.
5.35.15. The presence in the armed forces of persons who demonstrate a propensity or intent to
engage in homosexual acts would create an unacceptable risk to the high standards of morale, good
order and discipline, and unit cohesion that are the essence of military capability.
5.36. Basis for Discharge:
5.36.1. Homosexual conduct is grounds for separation from the military service under the terms set
forth in paragraph 5.36.2. Homosex~~al conduct includes homosexual acts, a statement by a member
that demonstrates a propensity or intent to engage in homosexual acts, or a homosexual marriage or
attempted marriage. A statement by a member that demonstrates a propensity or intent to engage in
homosexual acts is grounds for separation not because it reflects the member's sexual orientation, but
because the statement indicates a likelihood that the member engages in or will engage in homosexual
acts. A member's sexual orientation is considered a personal and private matter, and is not a bar to
continued service unless manifested by homosexual conduct in the manner described in paragraph
5.36.2.:
5.36.2. A member shall be separated under this section if one or more of the following approved find-
ings is made:
5.36.2.1. The member has engaged in, attempted to engage in, or solicited another to engage in a
homosexual act or acts, unless there are approved fi~rther findings that:
5.36.2.1.1. Such acts are a departure from the member's usual and customary behavior;
5.36.2.1.2. Such acts under all the circumstances are unlikely to recur;
5.36.2.1.3. Such acts were not acco~nplished by use of force, coercion, or intimidation;
5.36.2.1.4. Under the particular circumstances of the case, the member's continued presence
in the Air Force is consistent with the interest of the Air Force in proper discipline, good order,
and morale; and
5.36.2.1.5. The member does not have a propensity or intent to engage in homosexual acts.
5.36.2.2. The member has made a statement that he or she is a homosexual or bisexual, or words
to that effect, unless there is a further approved finding that the member has demonstrated that he
or she is not a person who engages in, attempts to engage in, has a propensity to engage in, or
intends to engage in homosexual acts. A statement by a service member that he or she is a homo-
sexual or bisexual, or words to that effect, creates a rebuttable presumption that the service mem-
ber engages in, attempts to engage in, has a propensity to engage in, or intends to engage in
homosexual acts. The service member shall be advised of this presumption and given the opportu-
nity to rebut the presumption by presenting evidence demonstrating that he or she does not engage
in, attempt to engage in, have a propensity to engage in, or intend to engage in homosexual acts.
86
AFI36-3208 9 JULY 2004
Propensity to engage in homosexual acts means more than an abstract preference or desire to
engage in homosexual acts; it indicates a likelihood that a person engages in or will engage in
homosexual acts. In determining whether a member has successfully rebutted the presumption that
he or she engages in, attempts to engage in, or has a propensity or intent to engage in homosexual
acts, some or all of the following may be considered: NOTE: This list is not exhaustive; any other
relevant evidence may also be considered:
5.36.2.2.1. Whether the member has engaged in homosexual acts.
5.36.2.2.2. The member's credibility.
5.36.2.2.3. Testimony from others about the member's past conduct, character, and credibility.
5.36.2.2.4. The nature and circumstances of the member's statement.
5.36.2.2.5. Any other evidence relevant to whether the member is likely to engage in homo-
sexual acts.
5.36.2.3. The member has married or attempted to marry a person known to be of the same bio-
logical sex (as evidenced by external anatomy of the persons involved).
5.37. Types of Separation. discharge under this section for homosexual conduct may be:
5.37.1. Described as an entry level separation if:
5.37.1.1. The airman is in entry level status; and
5.37.1.2. Characterization as under other than honorable conditions is not warranted according to
paragraph 5.37.3.
5.37.2. Characterized as honorable or general according to Chapter I, Section lB, if:
5.37.2.1. The airman is not in entry level status; and
5.37.2.2. Characterization as under other than honorable conditions is not warranted according to
paragraph 5.37.3.
5.37.3. Characterized as under other than honorable conditions only if it is found that during the cur-
rent term of service the airman attempted, solicited, or committed a homosexual act:
5.37.3.1. By using force, coercion, or intimidation;
5.37.3.2. With a person under 16 years of age;
5.37.3.3. With a subordinate in circumstances that violate customary military superior-subordi-
nate relationships;
5.37.3.4. Openly in public view;
5.37.3.5. For compensation;
5.37.3.6. Aboard a military vessel or aircraft; or
5.37.3.7. In another location subject to military control under aggravating circumstances noted in
the finding that have an adverse impact on discipline, good order, or morale comparable to the
impact of such activity aboard a vessel or an aircraft.
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD
(Former A1C) (HGH A1C)
1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec'd a HON Disch fr Langley AFB, VA on 22 Apr 02
UP AFI 36-3208, para 5.36.2 (Homosexual Admission). Appeals for a Change to the
RE Code, and Change the Reason and Authority for Discharge.
2. BACKGROUND:
a. DOB: 16 Jun 81. Enlmt Age: 18 11/12. Disch Age: 20 10/12. Educ: HS DIPL.
AFQT: N/A. A-50, E-62, G-55, M-35. PAFSC: 2S031 - Supply Technician.
DAS: 27 Nov 00.
b. Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 25 May 00 - 21 Jun 00 (28 days)(~nactive).
3. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:
a. Enlisted as AB 22 Jun 00 for 4 yrs. Svd: 1 Yrs 10 Mo 1 Das, all AMS
b. Grade Status: A1C - 22 Oct 01
Amn - 22 Dec 00
c. Time Lost: None.
d. Art 15's: None.
e. Additional: None.
f. CM: None.
g. Record of SV: 22 Jun 80 - 22 Feb 02 Langley AFB 4 (~nitial)
h. Awards & Decs: AFTR.
i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (1) Yrs (10) Mos (29) Das
TAMS: (1) Yrs (10) MOS (1) Das
4. BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 293) dtd 14 Feb 05.
(Change Discharge to the RE Code, and Reason and ~uthority for Discharge)
Issue 1: I was discharged from the Air Force because of a false accusation
of my admission to homosexuality. Many people first, asked me if I was a
homosexual and then accused me of complying with an admission to homosexuality.
Breaking the first rule of "Don't Ask/Donlt tell." During this period I endured
many occasions of prejudice, inequality, bias, and discrimination to which any
American citizen should have never encountered. I was questioned without any
suggestion for a lawyer to help me with the matter, and never given the
opportunity to fully represent my case and myself. Judgment was passed on me
based on another persons bias thoughts about myself, and after I was discharged
I was told that the matter should never have been allowed to progress because it
was based on accusations and not evidence. I am asking that my case be reviewed
and my Narrative reason for discharge/Reentry code be upgraded so that I can
ultimately be given the justice that was appropriate during my period of
inequality.
ATCH
None.
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
HEADQUARTERS 1ST FIGHTER WING
LANGLEY AIR FORCE BASE VA
FROM: 1 CSICC
SUBJECT: Notification Memorandum - Board Hearing
1. I am recommending your discharge fiom the United States Air Force for homosexual
conduct according to AFPD 36-32 and AFI 36-3208, Chapter 5, Section G, paragraph 5.36.2.
Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority to support this
recommendation are attached.
2. My reasons for this action are:
On or about 27 Sep 01, you made several statements to various individuals that indicate a
propensity or intent to engage in homosexual acts.
3. This action could result in your separation with an under other than honorable conditions
discharge. I am recommending that you receive an honorable discharge. The commander
exercising special court-martial jurisdiction or a higher authority will make the final decision in
this matter. If you are discharged, you will be ineligible for reenlistment in the Air Force and
will probably be denied enlistment in any component of the armed forces. Any special pay,
bonus, or education assistance funds you have received may be subject to recoupment.
4. You have the right to:
(a) Consult legal counsel.
(b) Present your case to an administrative discharge board.
(c) Be represented by legal counsel at a board hearing.
(d) Submit statements in your own behalf in addition to, or in lieu of, the board hearing.
(e) Waive the above rights. You must consult legal counsel before deciding to waive any of
your rights.
5. Military legal counsel has been obtained to assist you. I have made an appointment for you
to consult Captain
Area Defense Counsel, 54 Willow Street, Bldg. 147,
Ext. 5607 at --- 10 3b hours on 5 !-??.:-
2002. Instead of the appointed counsel, you may
have another, if the lawyer you request is in the active military service and is reasonably
available as determined according to AFI 51-201. In addition to military counsel, you have the
right to employ civilian counsel. The Air Force does not pay expenses incident to the
employment of civilian counsel. Civilian counsel, if employed, must be readily available.
6. Confer with your counsel and reply, in writing, within 7 workdays, specifying the rights you
choose to exercise. The statement must be signed in the presence of your counsel who also will
sign it. If you waive your right to a hearing before an administrative discharge board, you may
submit written statements in your own behalf. I will send the statements to the discharge
authority with the case file to be considered with this recommendation. If you fail to respond,
your failure will constitute a waiver of the right to the board hearing.
7. You have been scheduled for a medical examination. You must report to the 1 st Medical
2002. An
Group, Physical Exam Section at
additional examination will be scheduled if necessary. You must bring your medical records to
your scheduled appointment.
O F 3 0 hours on 12 H L ~ 02
8. Any personal information you furnish in rebuttal is covered by the Privacy Act of 1974. A
copy of AFI 36-3208 is available for your use in the unit orderly room.
If you request a board and you fail to appear without good cause, your failure to appear
9.
constitutes a waiver of your right to be present at the hearing.
10. If you received advanced educational assistance, special pay, or bonuses, and have not
completed the period of active duty you agreed to serve, you may be subject to recoupment.
11. Execute the attached acknowledgment and return it to me immediately.
Attachments:
1. Supporting Documents
a. Report of Fact-Finding Inquiry of Homosexual Conduct, dated 6 Nov 01
b. AF Form 1168/ Statement of S r A ' g l l l l l l l u
c. AF Form 1168/ Statement of SrA
d. AF Form 1168/ Statement of A1 C-
e. Memorandum from 1 CS/CC, dated 25 Feb 02
2. Receipt of Notification Memorandum
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00451
M D 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2005-00451 GENERAL: The applicant appeals to change the reason and authority for the discharge and to change the reenlistment code. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW: a. Enlisted as AB 13 Oct 99 for 6 yrs. In addition to military counsel, you have the right to employ civilian counsel.
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0272
At the time of the discharge, member waived his right to have his case heard by an administrative discharge board, or submit additional statements in his own behalf. waiver of his right to a board hearing and direct that the respondent be separated with an honorable discharge in accordance with AFI 36-3208, paragraph 5.36.2.2 (homosexual conduct). In addition to military counsel, you have the right to employ civilian counsel.
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0337
| NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION _— ~ ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL YES NO | x VOTE OF THE BOARD MEMBERS SITTING HON GEN VOTH OTHER DENY mL ME mL KL OK ISSUES INDEX NUMBER ~ EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD AOL.13, A92,37 A65.00 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD | APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE 03-14-02 FD2002-0337 I Arey Nolo COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03328
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03328 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. On 8 Feb 03, the discharge authority approved the separation and on 13 Feb 03, the applicant received an uncharacterized entry- level separation, by reason of homosexual conduct. _________________________________________________________________ THE...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02022
On 26 Aug 09 the applicant waived her right to a hearing before an administrative discharge board provided she received a no less than an honorable discharge. § 654), commonly known as "Dont Ask, Dont Tell (DADT). In a memorandum, dated 20 September 2011, the Under Secretary of Defense published guidance that Service Discharge Review Boards should normally grant requests to change the narrative reason for discharge (the change should be to "Secretarial Authority"), requests to...
NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00895
970710: BUPERS directed the applicant's discharge with characterization as type warranted by service record by reason of homosexual conduct. b. Homosexual conduct is grounds for separation from the naval service. However, upon receipt of credible information of homosexual conduct (as defined in subparagraph 2d), commanders or appointed inquiry officials may ask members if they engaged in such conduct.
USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-01433
(1) The member's commander is authorized to initiate fact-finding inquiries concerning homosexual conduct. (1) If the board recommends retention, the separation authority shall take one of the following actions: (2) If the board recommends separation, the separation authority shall take one of the following actions:
AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00065
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD I GRADE I AlC I AFSNISSAN 1 x 1 I I MEMBER SITTING I 1 2 3 4 I ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE I TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING DATE 19 May 2004 CASE NUMBER FD-2004-00065 Case heard at Washington, D.C. Applicant received an honorable discharge for making a...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00284
The records also indicated the applicant received an Article 15, a Vacation, a Letter of Counseling and two Records of Individual Counseling for misconduct. %APPLICANT DATA (The person whose discharge is to be reviewed). DATE OF DISCHARGE OR SEPARATION 1 4.
USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600331
Thank you J_ S_(Applicant)” Documentation In addition to the service and medical records, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Character Reference ltr from T_ Z. C_, dtd June 11, 2005Character Reference ltr from D_ B_, dtd June 1, 2005 Character Reference ltr from S_ J. M_, dtd September 2, 2004HQMC letter to The Honorable D_ D_, Member, U.S. House of Representatives regarding Applicant’s re-enlistment code, dtd July 20, 2004Applicant’s...