le

  
   
   
 
  

 

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD

 

NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN

ine AMN

X PERSONAL APPEARANCE RECORD REVIEW

  

 

NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL

 
 

 

 

 

 

Ta

OTHER

MBERS SITTING

 

 

 

 

 

 

      

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ay

    

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

REMARKS

Case heard at Washington, D.C,

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR.

 

SIGNATURE OP REQ

 

SAF/MIBR SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL

550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
RANDOLPH AFR, TX 78150-4742 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3°” FLOOR

ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used.

 

 

ISSUES INDEX NUMBER a EXHIBITS SUBNE p Coe a
A94,05/06 A42,00 1 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
2 | APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 | LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 4 | BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
8 MAY 2003 FD2002-0350 COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
CASE NUMBER

   

 

  

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE

 

FD2002-0350

  
     

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade a change in reason and authority for discharge and to
change his reenlistment code.

  
     
 

The applicant appeared and testified before the Discharge Review Board (DRB), without counsel, at
Andrews AFB, Maryland on 8 May 2003. The following witness also testified on the applicant’s behalf:
Master Gunnery Sergeant Retired USMC (applicant’s father-in-law)

 
   
 

The following additional exhibits were submitted at the hearing:

   

Exhibit 6: VA Medical Evaluation
Exhibit 7: Three internet documents on the allergic reactions to bee and wasp stings
:
The attached brief contains the available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the
discharge.

      
    
  

FINDINGS: The change in reason for discharge and change in reenlistment code are denied.

  
   

  

The Board finds that neither evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant, provides a sufficient
basis for a change in reason for discharge or a change in reenlistment code.

   

The applicant’s issues are listed in the attached brief.

  
     

Issues. The applicant received an Honorable discharge for an Adjustment Disorder, with mixed disturbance
of emotions and conduct, and a Personality Disorder, not otherwise specified. The central issue the
applicant has put forth in writing focuses on his contention that witnesses to the maladaptive behavior,
which he displayed after his discovery of a failing grade on his Block III examination, provided inconsistent
accounts of events which took place. Specifically the applicant opined the “inconsistencies in the statements
between personnel, did not warrant this [separation] action”. Although at least five witnesses provided
written statements, all with an identical reference to the applicant breaking his flashlight, then striking his
hand or wrist onto sharp or broken parts of the flashlight, the applicant contends “marks” identified on his
arms by medical personnel were the result of insect stings or bites, which he had sustained earlier, while
handling trash in a dumpster or other receptacle for the disposal of refuse. The DRB considered the
plausibility the” quarter-sized” markings identified on the applicant’s arms could have been the result of the
common cutaneous manifestation of an allergic reaction, such as hives. However, the Board found
compelling the witness statement from the health care professional who evaluated the applicant at the
82MDG hospital emergency room. This independent witness, with no reason to fabricate a story, provided
the following written statements regarding the applicant: “The patient voiced that he failed his block 3 test
today and that triggered a Jot of bad feelings inside of him. He states that in his anger he took his flashlight
and busted [it] up. After doing so he repeatedly slammed his arms down on the broken flashlight in an
attempt to make himself feel better, but it did not fork.” When asked specific questions by the DRB about
events surrounding his acts of self-injury, the applicant’s memory was selectively impaired. The
applicant’s witness for the DRB challenged the validity of the official mental health evaluation conducted, a
single-page document, citing an absence of supporting evidence of mental health records. It was explained
to the applicant’s witness the purpose of the single document was to transmit a diagnostic summary of the
applicant’s condition for consideration by the discharge authority. The applicant’s witness for the DRB
also challenged the notion the applicant was trying to commit suicide by striking his arms or wrists on
broken parts of a flashlight. The DRB concurs the applicant’s actions were unlikely an attempt to commit
suicide, based upon published data on suicide attempts among the male population. However, the DRB
opines, nonetheless, the applicant’s maladaptive behavior is consistent with the diagnostic conclusions

reached by the mental health professionals consulted in the applicant’s case.

CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

Examiner’s Brief
FD2002-0350

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD

= (Former AMN) (HGH AMN)

1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec’d a HON Disch fr USAF 17 FEB 98 UP AFI 36-
3208, para 5.11.1 (Personality Disorder). Appeals for a Change in RE Code and to
Change the Reason and Authority for Discharge.

2. BACKGROUND:

a. DOB: 29 Nov 79. Enlmt Age: 17 4/12. Disch Age: 18 2/12. Educ: HS DIPL.
AFOT: N/A. A-60, E-67, G-70, M-70. PAFSC: 2A313A - Tactical Aircraft

Maintenance Helper. DAS: 15 Sep 97.

b. Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 3 Apr 97 - 15 Jul 97 (3 months 13 days) (Inactive).
3. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:

a. Enlisted as AB 16 Jul 97 for 4 yrs. Svd: 0 Yrs 7 Mo 2 Das, all AMS.

b. Grade Status: AMN - 16 Jan 98

c. Time Lost: None.

d. Art 15’s: None.

e. Additional: None.

£. CM: None.

g. Record of SV: None.

(Discharged from Sheppard AFB)
h. Awards & Decs: AFTR.

i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (0) Yrs (10) Mos (14) Das
TAMS: (0) Yrs (7) Mos (2) Das

4. BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 293) dtd 9 Aug 02.
(Change RE Code and Change Reason and Authority for Discharge)

Issue 1: Request the narative (sic) reason for seperation (sic) be
changed/upgraded.

Issue 2: Reentry code be changed to allow me to go back on active duty in
the US military.
FD2002-0350

ATCH
1. DD Form 214,

21Nov02/ia —
Fp20e2- 055°

DEPARTMENT O} THE AIR FORCE

AIR EDUCATION AND TRAINING COMMAND

11 Feb 98
MEMORANDUM FOR 82 TRG/CC

FROM: 82 TRW/JAC

SUBJECT: Legal Review, Recommendation for Discharge Sama?

362 TRS

1. We have reviewed this discharge case file and find it to be legally sufficient to support
discharge. We recommend that you direct that the respondent be separated with an honorable
discharge in accordance with AFI 36-3208, paragraph 5.11.1 (mental disorder), without further
opportunities for probation and rehabilitation.

2. The basis for this action is that the respondent has been diagnosed by a psychiatrist as having
an adjustment disorder. This disorder is so severe that the respondent’s ability to function
effectively in the military environment is significantly impaired. The basis for discharge is
supported by a preponderance of evidence in the case file.

3. The respondent is 18 years old, began his enlistment on 16 Jul 97, and was assigned to his

‘ unit on 15 Sep 97. His academic test scores are average. The respondent is entitled to wear the

Air Force Training Ribbon. He has waived his right to consult counsel and has waived his right
to submit statements for your consideration.

4. We note no administrative errors of legal significance, and we concur with the squadron
section commander’s recommendation for an honorable discharge in this case.

   

5. If you have any questions on this matter, please contact me at ext 6-7 184.

Attachment:
Case File
PD 2002-0259

e” DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR EDUCATION AND TRAINING COMMAND

 

10 Feb 98

MEMORANDUM FOR e@gssiiiiiiseisaginginaliiigans aia naalaaaaiaaaonsanase

FROM: 362 TRS/CCQ
527 G Ave
Sheppard AFB TX 76311-2835

SUBJECT: Notification Memorandum

1. Iam recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for mental disorder.
The authority for this action is AFPD 36-32 and AFI 36-3208, paragraph 5.11.1. If my
recommendation is approved, your service will be characterized as honorable.

2. My reason for this action is on or about 2 Feb 98, you were diagnosed by a psychiatrist
as having an adjustment disorder with mixed disturbance of emotions and conduct, as
described in the Diagnostic and. Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV), which is
so severe that your ability to function effectively in the military environment is significantly
impaired. Your disorder is evidenced by your disorder of character, behavior, and
adaptability that 1s of such severity so as to preclude adequate military service. Copies of the
documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this recommendation are
attached. The commander exercising Special Court Martial jurisdiction or higher authority
will decide whether you will be discharged or retained in the Air Force. If you are
discharged, you will be ineligible for reenlistment in the Air Force and will probably be
denied enlistment in any component of the armed forces.

 

3. You have the right to consult counsel. Military legal counsel has been obtained to assist
you. I have made an appointment for you to consult gM. . Area Defense

Counsel, at Bldg 1638, room 110, on _11 Feb 98 _ at 0900 hours. You may
consult civilian counsel at your own expense. —

4. You have the right to submit statements in your own behalf. Any statements you want
the separation authority to consider must reach me by _13 Feb 98 ___, unless you request and
receive an extension for good cause shown. I will send them to separation authority.

5. If you fail to consult counsel or to submit statements in your own behalf, your failure will
constitute a waiver of your right to do so.

6. You were scheduled for a physical examination on 9 Feb 98.
LAA IT deen

PD 2002-0380

7. Any personal information you furnish in rebuttal is covered by the Privacy Act of 1974.
A copy of AFI 36-3208, is available for your use in the 362 TRS/Commanders Support Staff
office.

8. Execute the attached acknowledgment and return it to me immediately.

  

quadron Section Commander
362d Training Squadron

Attachments:
. 82 MDG/SGO Memorandum, 2 Feb 98
. DD Form 1569, 5 Feb 98
. AF Form 1168, SMM, 23 Jan 98
. AF Form 1168, @iem, 28 Jan 98

. AF Form 1168,
AF Form 1168,
10. AETC Form 125A, 10 Feb. 98
11. AETC Form 156, CL NR 971007TA
12. AETC Form 581, 28 Jan 98
13. AETC Form 173, 28 Jan 98
14, AETC Form 173, 29 Oct 97
15. Lackland AFB Form 205, 11 Sep 97
16. Airman’s Receipt of Notification Memorandum

OSI AMRWN
I
z
—
—_
in
oe
wR
oo
B
oO
oO

 

cc:

82 MSS/DPISF

362 TRS/CSS (File)
Individual