Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0188
Original file (FD2002-0188.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD

 

 

NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN

Ee AMN | Ripe.

PERSONAL APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW

‘| NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL

 

 

  
  
  

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MEMBERS SITTING TON on one Omen Tae

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

ISSUES INDEX NUMBER

Q FBLES SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD».

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

a
A93.01 67,90 1 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
2 +| APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 4 | BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
3 JUN 03 FD2002-0188 COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPERANCE HEARING
: APELICANT S ISSUE ANAT an S| 7 OLRERATONA SEE DISC ED NAAT DAR, F DISCHARG Review yO! Ra ene co
Pe . Q Q oe oe eee ss ee ae
REMARKS * :

Case heard at Scott AFB, Illinois.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to
submitt an application to the AFBCMR.

 

 

SIGNATURE OF BOARD PRESIDENT

 

 

SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL |
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3°” FLOOR
ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used.
CASE NUMBER

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD2002-0188

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance hearing before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but
declined to exercise this right.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge to Honorable is denied.

The Board finds that neither the evidence of record or that provided by the applicant substantiates an
impropriety or inequity that would justify upgrade of the discharge.

ISSUES: The applicant was discharged with a General Discharge for Misconduct — Conduct Prejudicial to
Good Order and Discipline. Member received two Article 15s, one for assault and the other for failure to
obey a lawful general regulation and communicating a threat. In addition, she received two Letters of
Reprimand for unprofessional behavior and failure to follow instructions. The applicant cited her desire to
receive the G.I. Bill benefits as justification for upgrade. The DRB noted that when the applicant applied
for these benefits, she signed a statement (DD Form 2366, on 19 Apr 99) that she understood she must
receive an Honorable discharge to receive future educational entitlements. The Board was sympathetic to
the impact the loss of these benefits was having on the applicant, but this is not a matter of inequity or
impropriety that would warrant an upgrade.

The DRB opined that through these administrative actions, the applicant had ample opportunities to change
her negative behavior. The Board concluded the misconduct was a significant departure from conduct
expected of all military members. The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was
found to be appropriate.

CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
FD2002-0188
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD

(Former AMN) (HGH A1C)

 

1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec’d a GEN Disch fr USAF 01/03/15 UP AFI 36-3208,
para 5.50.2 (Misconduct - Conduct Prejudicial to Good Order and Discipline).
Appeals for Honorable Disch.

2. BACKGROUND:

a. DOB: 80/12/11. Enlmt Age: 17 11/12. Disch Age: 20 3/12. Educ: HS DIPL
AFQOT: N/A. A~74, E-34, G-36, M-14. PAFSC: 2T051 - Traffic Management

Apprentice. DAS: 99/09/25.
b. Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 98/11/10 - 99/04/06 (4 Mos 27 Days) (Inactive).
3. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:
a. Enld as AB 99/04/07 for 4 yrs. Svd: 1 Yr 11 Mos 9 Das, all AMS.
b. Grade Status: AMN - 01/01/16 (Vacation of Article 15, 01/03/05)
A1cC - 00/08/07
AMN - 99/10/07

c. Time Lost: None.

da. Art 15’s: (1) 01/03/05, Vacation, Ellsworth AFB, SD, Article 128.
You, did, on or about 11 Feb 2001, assault Airman First
Class ------- by grabbing a knife and moving toward

him. Reduction to the grade of AMN, and forfeiture of
$500.00 pay per month for one month. (No appeal) (No
mitigation).

(2) 01/01/16, Ellsworth AFB, SD, Article 92. You, did, on
or about 22 Dec 2000, fail to obey a lawful general
regulation, to wit: Table 2.5. Item 7, Air Force
Instruction 36-2903 Attachment 3, dated 8 Jun 1998, by
wrongfully affixing jewelry through your tongue.
Article 134. You, did, on or about 18 Dec 2000,
wrongfully communicate to Airman ------~--- and Airman -
weccce a threat, to wit: "If I hear from you I will
beat you like a chicken bone in soup," and "If I catch
your suite mate putting her hands on my man, I'll kill
her too." or words to that effect. Suspended reduction
to the grade of AMN, forfeiture of $500.00 pay per
month for one month, suspended forfeiture of $500.00
pay per month for one month, and restriction to
Ellsworth AFB, SD, for 60 days. (No appeal) (No
mitigation).
FD2002-0188

e. Additional: LOR, 30 AUG 00 - Unprofessional behavior.
LOR, 14 JUL 00 - Failure to follow instructions.
Loc, 11 JUL 00 - Abuse of government property.
f£. CM: None.
g. Record of SV: 99/04/07 - 00/12/06 Ellsworth AFB 3 (Initial)
(Discharged from Ellsworth AFB)
h. Awards & Decs: AFTR.

i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (2) Yrs (4) Mos (6) Das
TAMS: (1) Yr (11) Mos (9) Das

4. BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 293) dtd 02/04/23.
(Change Discharge to Honorable)

ISSUES ATTACHED TO BRIEF

ATCH

1. Applicant’s Issues.

2. Acceptance Letter from College of oie
3. Job Performance Survey.

4. Character References.

02/08/09/er
FOE 200 2~ Ol FS

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
HEADQUARTERS 28™ BOMB WING (ACC)
ELLSWORTH AIR FORCE BASE, SOUTH DAKOTA

 

MEMORANDUM FOR 28 BW/CC

FROM: 28 BW/JA

SUBJECT: Administrative Discharge — Amr QO seetinnmiia

1. I have reviewed the proposed discharge action case file and find it legally sufficient to support a
decision to separate Respondent with an under honorable conditions (general) discharge without
Probation and Rehabilitation (P & R).

2. Background:

a. Respondent is a 20-year-old Traffic Management Apprentice assigned to the
28" Transportation Squadron. Her TAFMSD is 7 Apr 99, and she began her four-year enlistment
on 7 Apr 99, She was assigned to her present unit on 25 Sep 99,

b. Respondent’s squadron commander properly notified Respondent of his recommendation to
separate Respondent under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, Chapter 5, Section H, paragraph 5.50.2,
for a pattern of misconduct, specifically, conduct prejudicial to good order and discipline, with an
under honorable conditions (general) discharge. Since Respondent is not entitled to a board
hearing, this case has been properly pursued via the notification procedures of AFI 36-3208,
Chapter 6, Section B.

3. Evidence for the Government: Respondent has a history of disciplinary problems and has
failed to respond to any rehabilitative efforts.

a. On or about 10 Jul 00, Respondent kicked the surface freight door open, resulting in the
doorknob slamming against the wall. Respondent just kept walking as if it were normal behavior.
On or about 11 Jul 00, Respondent opened the same door with such force that the door again hit the
wall. Both times Respondent failed to close the door behind her or show any concern that she may
have damaged Government property. When asked to close the door behind her, Respondent took
the door with her foot and slammed it shut. For these actions, Respondent received a Letter of
Counseling (LOC) on 11 Jul 00.

b. On or about 11 Jul 00, Respondent was instructed by her supervisor, Staff Sergeant fiiags
Zit to bring her Career Development Course (CDC) study material to work after her lunch
break. At approximately 1605 the same day, Respondent was instructed by SS to study,
which she failed to do. Respondent’s decision not to study was particularly poor because she was

Global Power for America
[FOb2€02~ O18E

on a commander-directed study program following an end of course examination failure and it
constituted insubordination. For this action, Respondent received a Letter of Reprimand (LOR) on
14 Jul 00.

c. On or about 28 Aug 00, Respondent was randomly stopped by Security Forces personnel for a
routine vehicle inspection. During the inspection, Respondent was unprofessional, argumentative,
and essentially non-compliant having to be told several times before following directions.
Respondent’s judgment during this incident was especially poor considering she was previously
counseled for having a poor attitude the preceding month and had pledged to avoid negative
incidents. For this action, Respondent received an LOR on 30 Aug 00. This LOR established
Respondent’s Unfavorable Information File (UIF).

d. On or about 22 Dec 00, Respondent did, at or near Ellsworth Air Force Base, South Dakota,
fail to obey a lawful general regulation, to wit: Table 2.5. Item 7, Air Force Instruction 36-2903
Attachment 3, dated 8 Jun 98, by wrongfully affixing jewelry through her tongue. On or about
18 Dec 00, Respondent did, wrongfully communicate to Airman @ijaliM@iiiigand Airman
ei. threat, to wit: “If I hear from you I will beat you like a chicken bone in soup,” and
“If I catch your suite mate putting her hands on my man, 11] kill her too,” or words to that effect.
For these actions, Respondent was punished under Article 15, UCMJ, on 16 Jan 01. Punishment
was suspended reduction to the grade of airman, forfeiture of $500.00 pay per month for two
months, suspended forfeiture of $500.00 pay per month for one month and restriction to EAFB, SD,
for 60 days. This Article 15 was added to Respondent’s UIF.

e. On or about 11 Feb 01, Respondent did, at or near Ellsworth Air Force Base, South Dakota,

assault Airman First Class RRs Dy grabbing a knife and moving toward him. For
this action, Respondent’s suspended reduction to the grade of airman and suspended forfeiture of

$500.00 pay per month for one month which she received from Article 15 action on
16 Jan 01 was vacated on 5 Mar 01.

4. Evidence for the Respondent: Respondent’s unit properly notified Respondent of her nght to
submit statements in her behalf for your consideration (Tab D), On 12 Mar 01, Respondent
consulted counsel and submitted statements for your consideration (Tab H). Respondent states that
she thinks she can be a great asset to the Air Force and accomplish a lot of things. Respondent is
asking you to consider P & R so she can be a productive member of her squadron. Respondent also
requests an honorable discharge if P & R is not considered and her discharge is approved.

5. Discussion: During her military career, Respondent has engaged in a pattern of misconduct
necessitating her administrative discharge. She received two LORs, one LOC, one Article 15, one
vacation action and two UIF entries. Respondent’s conduct is prejudicial to good order and
discipline in that she has shown a continuous disregard for government property, disrespect for
authority, and an overall poor attitude. Further, Respondent has shown a progressive deterioration
of good judgment by communicating threats and assaulting her fellow airmen. Respondent’s
misconduct is clearly incompatible with further military service. With regard to the characterization
of her discharge, the negative aspects of Respondent’s service outweigh any positive contributions
she has made in her Air Force career. Accordingly, an under honorable conditions (general)
FOE2L002~O! §§

discharge characterization is warranted. Respondent’s cohtinued disciplinary problems, despite the
unit’s efforts, demonstrate her poor rehabilitative potential. Therefore, I do not recommend P & R
in conjunction with this discharge.

6. Errors and Irregularities: I note no errors or irregularities prejudicial to Respondent’s
substantive or procedural rights.

7. Options: As separation authority in this case, you may:
a. Direct retention, if you determine the evidence does not warrant discharge; or

b. Forward this case to 8 AF/CC with the recommendation that Respondent receive an honorable
discharge with or without P & R; or

c. Retum this case to the unit for re-initiation, with the recommendation that Respondent receive
an under other than honorable conditions discharge; or

d. Direct Respondent’s separation with an under honorable conditions (general) discharge with
or without P & R.

8. Recommendation: Direct Respondent’s separation with an under honorable conditions
(general) discharge without P & R. A proposed memorandum to that effect is attached for your
signature.

  
   

_ wets Lt Col, USAF
Staff Judge Advocate «

Attachments:

1. Proposed letter
2. Case file
[-D) 2-002" 0168
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

HEADQUARTERS 28" BOMB WING (AGC)
ELLSWORTH AIR FORCE BASE, SOUTH DAKOTA

 

0” MAR 2007
MEMORANDUM FOR AIRMAN

 

FROM: 28 TRNS/CC
SUBJECT: Notification Memorandum

1. Iam recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for a pattern of
misconduct, specifically, conduct prejudicial to good order and discipline. The authority for this
action is AFPD 36-32 and AFI 36-3208, paragraph 5.50.2. If my recommendation is approved,
your service will be characterized as honorable or under honorable conditions (general). I am
recommending that your service be characterized as under honorable conditions (general).

2. My reasons for this discharge action are the following:

a. On or about 10 Jul 00, you kicked the surface freight door open, resulting in the doorknob
slamming against the wall and just kept walking as if it were normal behavior. On or about
11 Jul 00, you opened the same door with such force that the door again hit the wall. Both times
you failed to close the door behind you or show any concern that you may have damaged
Government property. When asked to close the door behind you, you took the door with your

foot and slammed it shut. For these actions, you received a Letter of Counseling (LOC) on
11 Jul 00.

b. On or about 11 Jul 00, you were instructed by your supervisor, Staff Sergeant dala
ea, to bring your Career Development Course (CDC) study material after your lunch
break. At approximately 1605 the same day, you were instructed by SS oan to study,
which you failed to do. Your decision not to study was particularly poor because you were on a
commander-directed study program following an end of course examination failure and it

constituted insubordination. For this action, you received a Letter of Reprimand (LOR) on
14 Jul 00.

c. On or about 28 Aug 00, you were randomly stopped by Security Forces personnel for a
routine vehicle inspection. During the inspection, you were unprofessional, argumentative, and
essentially non-compliant having to be told several times before following directions. Your
judgment during this incident was especially poor considering you had just been counseled for
having a poor attitude the preceding month and had pledged to avoid negative incidents. For this
action, you received an LOR on 30 Aug 00. This LOR established your Unfavorable
Information File (UIF),

d. On or about 22 Dec 00, you did, at or near Ellsworth Air Force Base, South Dakota, fail to
obey a lawful general regulation, to wit: Table 2.5. Item 7, Air Force Instruction 36-2903
Attachment 3, dated 8 Jun 98, by wrongfully affixing jewelry through your tongue. On or about

18 Dec 00, you did, wrongfully communicate to Airman die 00 Airman digg
FO 2O002 ~- O16 E

ie. a threat, to wit: “If I hear from you I will beat you like a chicken bone in soup,” and “Tf I
catch your suite mate putting her hands on my man, [’ll kill her too” or words to that effect. For

‘ these actions, you were punished under Article 15, UCMJ, on 16 Jan 01. Punishment was
suspended reduction to the grade of airman, forfeiture of $500.00 pay per month for two months,
suspended forfeiture of $500.00 pay per month for one month and restriction to EAFB, SD for 60

days. This Article 15 was added to your UIF.

e. On or about 11 Feb 01, you did, at or near Ellsworth Air Force Base, South Dakota,
attempt to assault Airman First Class iat. 1 y grabbing a knife and moving
toward him. For this action, your suspended reduction to the grade of airman and suspended
forfeiture of $500.00 pay per month for one month was vacated on 5 Mar 01.

3. Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this
recommendation are attached. The commander exercising SPCM jurisdiction or a higher
authority will decide whether you will be discharged or retained in the Air Force and, if you are
discharged, how your discharge will be characterized. If you are discharged, you will be
ineligible for reenlistment in the Air Force and any special pay, bonus, or education assistance
funds may be subject to recoupement.

4, You have the right to consult counsel. Military legal counsel has been obtained to assist you.

I have made an appointment for you to consult the Captain QM, Area Defense
Counsel, 385-2158, 1000 Ellsworth Street, Suite 1700 on _ O1 at hours. You may

consult civilian counsel at your own expense.

5. You have the right to submit statements in your own behalf. Any statements you want the
separation authority to consider must reach me by [2¢mev_ 01 at_!§30_ hours, unless you
request and receive an extension for good cause shown. I will send them to the separation
authority.

 

 

6. If you fail to consult counsel or to submit matters in your own behalf, your failure will
constitute a waiver of your right to do so.

7. You have been scheduled for a medical examination. You must report to the Physical Exams
Section of the Base Clinic on §¥mar__ 01 at @72.0 hours for the examination. This is a
mandatory appointment and you must be in uniform. You must report at least 15 minutes in
advance to this appointment to complete necessary paperwork.

 

 

8. Any personal information you furnish in rebuttal is covered by the Privacy Act of 1974. A
copy of AFI 36-3208 is available for your use in your orderly room.
FOL2002-0) 6 &

9. Execute the attached acknowledgment ‘and return it to me immediately.

   

eR, M1350, USAF

Commander, 28" Transportation Squadron

 

Attachments:
1. Supporting documents
a. LOC - 11 Jul 00
b. LOR - 14 Jul 00
c. LOR/UIF — 30 Aug 00
d. Article 15/UIF ~ 16 Jan 01
e. Vacation Action - 5 Mar 01
2. Airman's Acknowledgment

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00470

    Original file (FD2003-00470.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Cd, EST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1835 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE | ¢p2003-00470 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the...

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0076

    Original file (FD2002-0076.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD02-0076 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. Attachment: Examiner's Brief FD2002+-0076 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AMN) (HGH Al1C) 1. You did, at or near Ellsworth Air Force Base, South Dakota, on or about 15 Oct 01, while in the office of Senior Master Sergeant .

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0542

    Original file (FD2002-0542.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE | py9002-0542 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. The Board noted that applicant signed a statement (DD Form 2366, on May 5, 1997) that he understood he must receive an Honorable discharge to receive future educational entitlements. Article 15/UIF 22 Jun 98 c. DD Form 1408, Armed Forces Traffic Ticket - 14 Jun 99 d. Article 15/UIF - 5 Nov 99 e. LOR/Notice of Disciplinary Release — 10 Jul 01 2.

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0132

    Original file (FD2002-0132.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD02-0132 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. The records indicated the applicant received an Article 15 for drinking under age and for failure to remain in his room on telephone standby. Separate Airman BasidiiiQiiiiiiiee under AFI 36-3208, par \ graph 5.49, with an under honorable conditions (general) discharge, without P & R. i Attachment: Case File FD2002 -2s2- DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR...

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0264

    Original file (FD2002-0264.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD02-0264 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. The records indicated applicant had received three Article 15’s, one for entering a dormitory living quarters of a female, one for driving while drunk, and the third one for operating a vehicle when told not to. b. Grade Status: AB - 93/06/23 (Vacation of Article 15, 93/08/18) AMN - 93/06/23 (Article 15, 93/06/23) Alc - 92/10/10 c. Time Lost: None.

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2001-0466

    Original file (FD2001-0466.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The records indicated the applicant received an Article 15 for violating a lawful instruction by entering the dormitory quarters of a member of the opposite sex, an Article 15 for disrespectful language toward a superior NCO, a Letter of Counseling for failing to use a Technical Order, a Letter of Counseling for not using the chain of command, a Letter of Counseling for using tobacco products in a military facility, and eight Letters of Counseling for being late for work. The award was...

  • AF | DRB | CY2001 | FD01-00046

    Original file (FD01-00046.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The records indicated the applicant received two Article 15s and a Vacation of Suspended Non-Judicial Punishment for failing to obey two separate lawful orders by wrongfully refusing to receive the Anthrax vaccination. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD FD-01-00046 (Former AB) 1. I reviewed the attached administrative discharge package FR2 14-23-6 189,28th Supply Squadron, and find it legally s supports the 28 SUPS/CC's...

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2006-00067

    Original file (FD2006-00067.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, based upon the record and evidence provided by applicant, the Board finds the applicant's reason and authority for discharge inequitable. For this action, your suspended reduction to the grade of Airman, received from the Article 15 imposed on 7 Apr 03 was vacated on 6 May 03. e. You, who knew of your duties, at Ellsworth Air Force Base, South Dakota, on 1 May 03, were derelict in the performance of those duties in that you willfully failed to maintain your government issued...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2001-0300

    Original file (FD2001-0300.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN SRA TYPE " PERSONAL APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW . CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD01-0300 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. In addition, the applicant also received two Letter’s of Reprimand and two Letters of Counseling for failure to go, financial irresponsibility, altering an official document, and...

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0247

    Original file (FD2002-0247.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD2002-0247 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable, change of reason for discharge and change of reenlistment eligibility code. (Change Discharge to Honorable and Change the Reason & Authority for Discharge) Issue 1: My discharge was inequitable because the alleged disciplinary infractions were very minor in comparison with the meritorious aspects of my service record. For this Respondent...