Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0264
Original file (FD2002-0264.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD

 

 

NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)

 

GRADE AFSN/SSAN

AB

 

TYPE
PERSONAL APPEARANCE

NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION

 

 

COUNSEL
YES

 

NO
x

 

 

 

 

 

ERS SITTING

 

 

X% RECORD REVIEW

 

ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL

 

VOTE OF THE BOARD

 

HON GEN VOTHC OTIEER DENY

 

   

ISSUES
A95.00

 

INDEX NUMBER

A67,10

 

HEARING DATE

5 NOV 02

CASE NUMBER

FD2002-0264

 

 

_——
REMARKS

Case heard at Washington, D.C.

 

the AFBCMR.

SIGNATURE OF RECORDER

INDORSEMENT

 

TO: FROM:
SAF/MIBR
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2)

 

URE OF BOARD PRESIDENT

 

 

 

re)

 

 

 

 

 

 

EXHIBITS SUBMITTED 7O THE BOARD
ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD

 

,

 

APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE

 

LETTER OF NOTIFICATION

BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE

COUNSEL’S REI-EASE TO THE BOARD

ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE

 

 

 

TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPERANCE HEARING

 

 

 

APPLICANT’S ISSUE AND THE BOARD'S DECISIONAL RATIONAL ARE DISCUSSED ON THE ATTACHED AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance, and the right to submit an application to

DATE:5 NOV 02

   

 

SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD

1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3°” FLOOR

ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002

—

 

 

Previous edition will be used.
CASE NUMBER

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD02-0264

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined to
exercise this right.

The attached brief contains the available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the
discharge.

FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge is denied.

The board finds that the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge,
and after a thorough review of the record, the Board was able to identify none that would justify a change of

discharge.

ISSUE: The applicant submitted no issues and requested that the review be completed based on the
available service record. The Board reviewed the entire record and found no evidence of impropriety or
inequity in this case on which to base an upgrade of discharge. The records indicated applicant had
received three Article 15’s, one for entering a dormitory living quarters of a female, one for driving while
drunk, and the third one for operating a vehicle when told not to. He also received a Letter of Reprimand
for having sexual intercourse with a woman not his wife. The DRB opined that through these
administrative actions, the applicant had ample opportunities to change his negative/repetitive behavior.
The Board concluded the disciplinary infractions were a significant departure from the conduct expected of
all military members. The Board found no evidence of impropriety or inequity in this case on which to base
an upgrade of discharge.

CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings the board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.

Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
FD2002-0264

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD

(Former AB) (HGH A1C)

 

1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec'd a GEN Disch fr USAF 93/11/24 UP AFR 39-10,
para 5-46 (Misconduct - Minor Disciplinary Infractions). Appeals for Honorable
Disch.

2. BACKGROUND:

a. DOB: 70/03/21. Enlmt Age: 21 5/12. Disch Age: 23 8/12. Educ: HS DIPL.
AFQT: N/A, A-76, E-54, G-82, M-54. PAFSC: 4Y051 - Dental Assistant
Journeyman. DAS: 92/04/27.

b. Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 91/08/29 - 91/12/09 (3 Mos 11 Days) (Inactive).

3. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:
a. Enld as AMN 91/12/10 for 4 yrs. Svd: 1 Yr 11 Mos 15 Das, all AMS.

b. Grade Status: AB - 93/06/23 (Vacation of Article 15, 93/08/18)
AMN - 93/06/23 (Article 15, 93/06/23)
Alc - 92/10/10

c. Time Lost: None.

d. Art 15’s: (1) 93/08/18, Vacation, Ellsworth AFB, SD, Article 90.
Preliminary investigation has disclosed that you,
having received a lawful command from Lt Col ----- i
your superior commissioned officer, then known by you
to be your superior commissioned officer, to not
operate a vehicle that possesses a state registration
in your name on any property within the jurisdication
of Ellsworth AFB without written permission from the
installation commander, or words to that effect, did,
on or about 30 Jul 93, willfully disobey the same.
Reduction to the grade of AB. (No appeal) (No
mitigation)

(2) 93/06/23, Ellsworth AFB, SD, Article 111. Preliminary
investigation has disclosed that you did, on or about
11 Jun 93, near the Main Gate, operate a vehicle, to
wit: a passenger vehicle, while drunk. Reduction to
the grade of AMN. Suspended reduction to the grade of
AB, and 45 days extra duty. (No appeal) (No
mitigation)

(3) 92/03/05, Sheppard AFB, TX, Article 92. You, did, on
or about 21 Feb 92, violate a lawful general
FD2002-0264

regulation, to wit: paragraph 2], Sheppard Technical
Training Center Regulation 52-2, Vol 1, dated 2 Oct 90,

by entering AB ---------- dormitory living quarters.
Suspended reduction to the grade of AB, forfeiture of
$100.00, and 30 days Correctional Custody. (No appeal)
(No mitigation)

e. Additional: LOR, 10 NOV 93 - Sexual intercourse with a woman not his

wife.

£. CM: None.

g. Record of SV: None.

(Discharged from Ellsworth AFB)

h. Awards & Decs: NDSM, AFTR.

i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (2) Yrs (2) Mos (26) Das
TAMS: (1) Yr (11) Mos (15) Das

4. BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appin (DD Fm 293) dtd 02/06/17.
(Change Discharge to Honorable)

NO ISSUES SUBMITTED.

ATCH
None.

02/09/27/cr
PP2e027-OR a

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
HEADQUARTERS 28TH BOMB WING (ACC)
ELLSWORTH AIR FORCE BASE, SOUTH DAKOTA

 

FROM: JA =

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0116

    Original file (FD2002-0116.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PEKSUONAL APPEARANCE _| X RECORD REVIEW NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION * ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBERS SITTING ae, PT {ISSUES INDEX NUMBER BITS SUBMITE DAR A94.06, A93.10 A67.10 1 | ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 | APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE — 3 | LETTER OF NOTIFICATION HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 4 | BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE ° 02-08-15 FD2002-0116 COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF ™ PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL...

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0132

    Original file (FD2002-0132.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD02-0132 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. The records indicated the applicant received an Article 15 for drinking under age and for failure to remain in his room on telephone standby. Separate Airman BasidiiiQiiiiiiiee under AFI 36-3208, par \ graph 5.49, with an under honorable conditions (general) discharge, without P & R. i Attachment: Case File FD2002 -2s2- DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2001-0300

    Original file (FD2001-0300.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN SRA TYPE " PERSONAL APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW . CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD01-0300 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. In addition, the applicant also received two Letter’s of Reprimand and two Letters of Counseling for failure to go, financial irresponsibility, altering an official document, and...

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0267

    Original file (FD2002-0267.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE | ¢p9992-0267 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. The reasons for the proposed discharge action include the following: (1) on 20 Sep 89 (Apis ws derelict in the performance of his duties by failing to follow Tech Order procedures; (2) on 22 Sep 89, he fell asleep while transporting a Priority A resource and components; (3) on 16 Aug 89, he + failed to go to his appointed place of duty; (4) on...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0188

    Original file (FD2002-0188.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD2002-0188 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. Attachment: Examiner's Brief FD2002-0188 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AMN) (HGH A1C) 1. For these actions, Respondent received a Letter of Counseling (LOC) on 11 Jul 00. b.

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0076

    Original file (FD2002-0076.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD02-0076 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. Attachment: Examiner's Brief FD2002+-0076 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AMN) (HGH Al1C) 1. You did, at or near Ellsworth Air Force Base, South Dakota, on or about 15 Oct 01, while in the office of Senior Master Sergeant .

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0198

    Original file (FD2002-0198.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD02-0198 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. The Board reviewed the entire record and found no evidence of impropriety or inequity in this case on which to base an upgrade of discharge, The records indicated applicant had four Letters of Reprimand for failure to pay a traffic fine, failure to go and failure to pay just debt (twice). Recommend to 8 AF/CC that the respondent be separated with...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0542

    Original file (FD2002-0542.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE | py9002-0542 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. The Board noted that applicant signed a statement (DD Form 2366, on May 5, 1997) that he understood he must receive an Honorable discharge to receive future educational entitlements. Article 15/UIF 22 Jun 98 c. DD Form 1408, Armed Forces Traffic Ticket - 14 Jun 99 d. Article 15/UIF - 5 Nov 99 e. LOR/Notice of Disciplinary Release — 10 Jul 01 2.

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00470

    Original file (FD2003-00470.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Cd, EST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1835 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE | ¢p2003-00470 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0448

    Original file (FD2002-0448.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD2002-0448 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. The applicant received three Article 15s, two Letters of Reprimand, one Letter of Counseling, one Letter of Admonishment, and two Records of Individual Counseling for financial irresponsibility, failure to obey, failure to go, and traffic, parking and speeding violations. Attachment: Examiner's Brief FD2002-0448 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR...