Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0076
Original file (FD2002-0076.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
|_“ HECURD REVIEW
oe eewen an UK URGANIZA TION ADDRESS AND OK ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL

 

 

MEMBERS SITTING

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

INDEX NUMBER
A67.90 1
2 | APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3% | LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
| HESRING DATE "| CASE NUMBER 4 | BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
21 AUG 02 FD2002-0076 COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
{| ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
r TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPERANCE HEARING

 

 

 

 

Case heard at Washington, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance, and the right to submit an application to
the AFBCMR.

 

 

 

   

SIGNATURE OF RECORDER SIGNATURE OF BOARD PRESIDENT

 

   
 
 

SAF/MIBR SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
530 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD

RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3°° FLOOR

ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002

 

 

 

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used.
CASE NUMBER

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD02-0076

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined to
exercise this right.

The attached brief contains the available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the
discharge.

FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge is denied.

The board finds that neither evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an inequity
or impropriety, which would justify a change of discharge.

The applicant's issues are listed in the attached brief.

ISSUE: The applicant believes his discharge was too harsh in that his supervisor provoked most of the
misbehavior. The record indicates the applicant received an Article 15 for being disrespectful in language
toward a SMSet and for being derelict in the performance of his duties for failure to clean the inside and
engine compartment of a vehicle. In addition, he received four Letters of Reprimand for being disrespectful
to a SNCO, failing a dormitory room inspection and disobeying a lawful order, and, six Letters of
Counseling for failure to go, disobeying lawful orders, uniform violation and being disrespectful to an
NCO. The applicant had several different supervisors and was not unfairly discharged. They found the
seriousness of the willful misconduct offset any positive aspects of the applicant's duty performance. The
Board concluded the discharge was appropriate for the reasons that were the basis for this case. No inequity
or impropriety in his discharge was suggested or found in the course of the records review. His misconduct
was a significant departure from conduct expected of all military members. The Board concluded that the
character and reason for discharge were appropriate due to his misconduct.

CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings the board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge or change the reason for discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be
changed.

Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
FD2002+-0076
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD

(Former AMN) (HGH Al1C)

 

1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec’d a GEN Disch fr USAF 01/12/05 UP AFI 36-3208,
para 5.50.2 (Misconduct - Conduct Prejudicial to Good Order and Discipline).
Appeals for HON Disch.

2. BACKGROUND:
a. DOB: 77/06/06. Enlmt Age: 22 6/12. Disch Age: 24 5/12. Educ:HS DIPL.
AFOT: N/A. A-69, E-43, G-52, M-28. PAFSC: 3E433 - Environmental Apprentice.
DAS: 00/08/10.
b. Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 99/12/23 - 00/02/08 (1 month 16 days) (Inactive) .
3. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:
a. Enlisted as AB 00/02/09 for 4 yrs. Svd: 01 Yrs 09 Mo 27 Das, all AMS.
b. Grade Status: AMN - 01/10/15 (Article 15, 01/10/15)
Alc - 01/06/09
AMN - Unknown

c. Time Lost: none.

d. Art 15’s: (1) 01/10/15, Ellsworth AFB, SC +- Article 91. You were, on
or about 18 Sep 01, disrespectful in language toward
SMSgt ------ , a senior noncommissioned officer, then

known by you to be a superior noncommissioned officer,
who was then in the execution of her office, by saying
to her, "don't let it go to your head," and "don't go
crazy on me now," or words to that effect. Article 92.
You, who knew of your duties, from on or about 11 Sep
O01 to on or about 12 Sep 01, were derelict in the
performance of those duties in that you negligently
failed to clean the inside and engine compartment of
vehicle 93B3708, as it was your duty to do. Reduction
to Amn, and a reprimand. (No appeal) (No mitigation)

e. Additional: LOC, 07 SEP 00 - Failure to go.
Loc, 12 OCT 00 ~- Disobeying a lawful order.
LOC, 18 OCT 00 - Disobeying a lawful order.
Loc, 15 NOV 00 - Uniform violation.
LOC, 20 DEC 00 - Disrespect to an NCO.
Loc, 03 JUL 01 —- Disobeying a lawful order.
LOR, 20 AUG 01 - Disrespect to a SNCO.
LOR, 12 OCT 01 - Dormitory room inspection failure.
LOR, 18 OCT 01 ~- Disrespect to an Officer and disobeying a
FD2002-0076
lawful order.
LOR, 24 OCT 01 —- Disrespect to an officer, SNCO, and

disobeying a lawful order.

£. CM: none.

g. Record of SV: none.

(Discharged from Ellsworth AFB)
h. Awards & Decs: AFTR.

i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (01) Yrs (11) Mos (13) Das
TAMS: (01) Yrs (09) Mos (27) Das

4. BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 293) dtd 02/02/14.
(Change Discharge to Honorable)

ISSUES ATTACHED TO BRIEF.

ATCH
1. Applicant's Issues.
2. Personal Statement.

02/06/05/ia
Pp Za0,Z- GO J

February 2, 2002

 

SAF/MIBR
550C Street West Suite 40
Randolph AFB, Texas 781501-4742

To Whom It May Concern:

I was stationed at Ellsworth AFB, SD from August of 2000 to December of 2001. I spent my entire tour
being tortured by my supervisor. He tried to make me out to be a troublemaker, but he was the one who
provoked most of the misbehavior. He felt comfortable doing it because he was of higher rank and‘he
knew he could do it easily without any punishment. He would tease, curse, laugh and mock at me in front
of the other workers of the shop. I was very embarrassed by his actions. I believe he was mentally
unstable and was clearly trying to mark his territory. He would-scrutinize every action I made and every
statement I made.

The situation was corrupt from the first day I met him. The first day I went to the shop for a visit before I
was being placed there, 1 was took info a room yelled at, provoked, interrogated and called a lie. The two
people involved in this incident later apologized, but the harassment continued. There were times when-1
overheard my supervisor talking about his personal life and past, and I wondered if it had anything todo |
with the way J was being treated. One time he mentioned being abused and neglected by one of his parents
and a stepparent. Our relationship was so negative that I unfortunately had to report him to Social Actions,
I reluctantly was sent to a temporary work location for two months. I unfortunately had to report back to
my original duty shop afterward, When I came back to the shop 1 was appointed to another supervisor, but
that really didn’t help. I till was receiving brutal mental abuse from my former supervisor for no apparent
reason. He was trying to retaliate by framing me into negative situations.

The civilian supervisor and a young female airman in thie shop also mistreated me. The civilian supervisor
threatened to discharge me from the Air Force for an unjust reason and told me I would have to go back
home to my parents. He would also scrutinize everything [ did. He would curse and yell at me. The female
airman of the shop would also tease and curse at me and tried getting me in trouble by lying on me to my
supervisors. She tried to accuse me of harassing her, but the allegations came up false.

During this whole brutal situation I always managed to conduct myself in a professional manner toward all
the members of the shop. I never mistreated anyone at Ellsworth AFB. I believe | am asarespectable ~
person as a person can possibly be. I have never got into any major trouble since I’ve been in the Air Force.
I never drunk alcohol, smoked, mistreated females, stole or started fights with anybody since I been on this
planet. You can check my records, There where airman on that base that done negative things worse than
me and they were never disciplined! “

The main point Pm trying to establish is that I felt that I was denied my freedom since I landed at my active
duty base. J felt like I was serving a jail sentence. The Air Force denied me of my rights as a loyal citizen
of the U.S.A and plotted certain situations to make every error appear to be my fault. I had the worst
supervisor in the history of the Air Force. He never tried to reason with me. I believe that it is quite
possible that his diabetes may have cause his stress level to rise. | had a double standard compared to
everyone else in my shop. The other workers in the shop made their fair share of mistakes and weré never
-£. PD1002 ~62 76

disciplined. If I made one minor mistake I was exploited incorrectly. He tried to make matters worse by
having other representatives in my chain-of-command discipline me by overemphasizing the situation.

My section commander ordered me to file a complaint with my Base I.G if I felt 1 was being mistreated. So
I filed a complaint against both of my supervisors. A week later my squadron tried to retaliate against me
by giving me an unnecessary Article 15. I felt like I was being punished for speaking out and if anybody
deserve to be punished, it was my supervisors. I filed a complaint against every Member in‘my chain-of-
command because I felt they where ignoring my problems, protecting my supervisors-and tried to shift all
the blame upon me, I believe my supervisors were submitting some type of prejudice against me. 90% of
their taunting seemed more personal than business. They made me feel like I didn’t belong there. The .
other three airman in the shop did weekend stand by duty, but for some reason I was never permitted to do
so. Why? My base I.G did an investigation on my situation to see if racism was possible since Iam .
African-American and my shop members and chain-of-command were Caucasian. In some ways. felt like
I was a cold-hearted criminal because of the unusual treatment 1 was receiving. I sincerely honor and
understand the Air Force rules and regulations of paying close attention to details. Please trust me; I am not
trying to deny my responsibilities because everyone make mistakes and the objective is to not make the -
same mistakes reoccur. I tried my best to uphold the Air Force standards. [ believe that many of my
supervisor’s allegations against me were inaccurate and exaggerated to make me look very irresponsible.

He tried to make me out to be a very serious troublemaker that didn’t care.

I believe [ also may have got a discharge for speaking out to the IG. I really wanted to stay in the Air
Force. It is so unfortunate that a young airman has to endure with a very negative supervisor at his very
first duty station. I am glad that I no longer have to endure the punishment from my supervisor, but I am
very surprise that the Air Force didn’t want to work with a young airman who displayed potential and
patience. If I can’t get justice from the Air Force than that just means God has a higher plan for me
because I Know J did my very best to become a great airman.. I had completed two sets of my CDS’s and
had one more set to complete, I hope that no other airman has to go through what I been through. There
was so much politics involved at Ellsworth AFB. J think the 28-CES Squadron of Elisworth AFB needs to
make some serious changes if they haven’t yet done so. If I was stationed at any other base I believed I
would have easily succeeded. I know I wasn’t in THE MARINES biit T’suffered “hell on earth.”

Thank you, so very much for listerting to me and I ask that you would please consider upgrading my
discharge so that I can work on making a positive future for myself which I planned on doing when I first
joined the military.
! @ Prez - x7
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

HEADQUARTERS 28™ BOMB WING (ACC)
ELLSWORTH AIR FORCE BASE, SOUTH DAKOTA

     

Cy

‘e
CS
i oF

     

MEMORANDUM FOR 28 BW/CC
FROM: 28 BW/JA

SUBJECT: Administrative Discharge — Airma

 

1. Ihave reviewed the proposed discharge action case file and find it legally sufficient to support a
decision to separate Respondent with an under honorable conditions (general) discharge without
Probation and Rehabilitation (P & R). ~ ’

2. Background:

a. Respondent is a 24-year-old Environmental Controls Apprentice assigned to the 28th Civil
Engineer Squadron. His TAFMSD is 9 Feb 00, and he began his four-year enlistment on 9 Feb 00.
He was assigned to his present unit on 10 Aug 00.

b. Respondent’s squadron commander properly notified Respondent of his recommendation to
separate Respondent under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, Chapter 5, Section H, paragraph 5.50.2,
for a pattern of misconduct, specifically, conduct prejudicial to good order and discipline, with an
under honorable conditions (general) discharge. Since Respondent is not entitled to a board heating,
this case has been properly pursued via the notification procedures of AFI 36-3208, Chapter 6,
Section B.

3. Evidence for the Government: Respondent has a history of disciplinary problems and has
failed to respond to any rehabilitative efforts.

a. Respondent did, at or near Ellsworth Air Force Base, South Dakota, on divers occasions
between on or about 6 Sept-00 and on or about 7 Sept 00 fail to go at the time prescribed to his
appointed place of duty to wit:.28" Civil Engineer Squadron’s Environmental Control, Building
8136. For this action, Respondent received a Letter of Counseling (LOC) on 7 Sept 00.

 

b. Respondent, having knowledge of a lawful order issued by Staff Sergeant jgjalaiaaaieeansaiaaaa
wit: to bring his CDCs after lunch and clean out the freezer, an order which it was Respondent’ S
duty to obey, did, at or near Ellsworth Air Force Base, South Dakota, on or about 12 Oct 00, fail to
obey the same by wrongfully failing to bring his CDCs and failing to clean out the freezer. For
these actions, Respondent received an LOC on 12 Oct 00.

 

c. Respondent, having knowledge of a lawful order issued by clic me i
it: “form up behind mé’so I can be sure you are here on time,” an order which it was Respondent’ s

Global Power for America
e @ Fr2c2- 2276

punished under Article 15, UCMJ, on 15 Oct 01. Punishment was reduction to the grade of airman
and a reprimand. This Article 15 established Respondent’s Unfavorable Information File (UIF).

j. Respondent did, at or near Ellsworth Air Force Base, South Dakota, on or about 15 Oct 01,

while i in the office of Senior Master Sergeant BI in the presence of Staff Sergeant
~% oe, iit, liar, Respondent also refused to leave

her office after being dismissed. For these actions, Respondent eeceived anLORon 18 OctOl.  .
This LOR was added to Respondent’s UIF.

    

k. Respondent did, at or near Ellsworth Air Force Base, South Dakota, on or about 22 Oct 01,
walk right up to Senior Master Sergean@iigaitmencroaching in her personal space, to the
point that she had to extend her arm at least twice during their conversation to keep Respondent at
normal distance from her. After Resp ondent had been in the office arguing with First Lieutenant

end Senior Master Sergeangifiiiiiamaaiiiiiiiis becoming more disrespectful and nearly

accusing First Licutenan S@@jjiitiwo f lying, Respondent was asked to leave. Respondent refused to
go and had to be told to leave three times. Also, on or about 23 Oct 01, during a conversation with
Senior Master Sergeant (RMIAGIN® she asked Respondent a question and he answered by
saying “yeah man.” For these actions, Respondent received an LOR on 24 Oct 01. This LOR was
added to Respondent’s UIF.

 

 

4. Evidence for the Respondent: Respondent’s unit properly notified Respondent of his rights to
consult legal counsel and submit statements in his behalf for your consideration (Tab D). On

29 Nov 01, Respondent consulted legal counsel and submitted a statement for your consideration
(Tab G). Respondent admits he has made mistakes, but feels he is maturing and improving as a
person and as an airman. Respondent requests you give him probation and rehabilitation or an

honorable discharge.

5. Discussion: During his military career, Respondent has engaged in a pattern of misconduct,
specifically, conduct prejudicial to good order and discipline, necessitating his administrative
discharge. He received five'LOCs, five LORs, three UIF entries and one Article 15. Respondent’s
conduct is prejudicial to good order and discipline due to his failure to adhere to standards and his
repeated blatant disrespect toward non-commissioned officers and a commissioned officer.
Respondent was given ample opportunities to rehabilitate himself and to adhere to standards.
Respondent’s conduct is clearly incompatible with further military service. With regard to the
characterization of his discharge, the negative aspects of Respondént’s service outweigh any
positive contributions he has made in his Air Force career. Accordingly, an under honorable
conditions (general) discharge characterization is warranted. Any further attempt to rehabilitate him
will not be beneficial to his unit or the Air Force. Therefore, I do not recommend P & R in
conjunction with this discharge.

6. Errors and Irregularities: I note no errors or irregularities prejudicial to the Respondent’s
substantive or procedural rights.

7. Options: As separation authority in this case, you may:
a. Direct retention, if you determine the evidence does not warrant discharge; or

b. Forward this case to 8 AF/CC with the recommendation that the Respondent receive an
honorable discharge with or without P & R; or

c. Return this case to the unit for re-initiation, with the recommendation that the Respondent
receive an under other. than honorable conditions discharge; or

d. Direct the Respondent’s separation with an under honorable conditions (general) discharge
with or without P & R.

8. Recommendation: Direct Respondent’s separation with an under honorable conditions

(general) discharge without P & R. A proposed memorandum to that effect is attached for your
signature.

 
     

{RUACOEMM IE, Colonel, USAF
Staff Judge Advocate

Attachments:
1, Proposed letter 8

2. Case file
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

HEADQUARTERS 28” BOMB WING (ACC)
ELLSWORTH AIR FORCE BASE, SOUTH DAKOTA

 

VbNov Ol

 

FROM: 28 CES/CC
SUBJECT: Notification Memorandum

1. [am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for a pattern of
misconduct, specifically, conduct prejudicial to good order and discipline. The authority for this
action is AFPD 36-32 and AFI 36-3208, paragraph 5.50.2. If my recommendation is approved,
your service will be characterized as honorable, or under honorable conditions (general). I am
recommending that your service be characterized as under honorable conditions (general).

2. My reasons for this action are:

a. You did, at or near Ellsworth Air Force Base, South Dakota, on divers occasions between
on or about 6 Sept 00 and on or about 7 Sept 00 fail to go at the time prescribed to your
appointed place of duty to wit: 28" Civil Engineer Squadron’s Environmental Control Building
# 8136. For this action, you received a Letter of Counseling (LOC) on 7 Sept 00.

 

b. You, having knowledge of a lawful order issued by Staff Sergeafft ie
wit: to bring you CDCs after lunch and clean out the freezer, an order which it was your duty to
obey, did, at or near Ellsworth Air Force Base, South Dakota, on or about 12 Oct 00, fail to obey
the same by wrongfully failing to bring your CDCs and failing to clean out the freezer. For these
actions, you received an LOC on 12 Oct 00.

c. You, having knowledge of a lawful order issued by Staff Sergean igigliaiieaiaiiias to wit:
“form up behind me so I can be sure you are here on time,” an order which it was your duty to

obey, did, at or near Ellsworth Air Force Base, South Dakota, on or about 18 Oct 00, fail to obey

the same by net forming up behind For this action, you received an LOC on
18 Oct 00.

d. You did, at or near Ellsworth Air Force Base, South Dakota, on or about 14 Nov 00, fail to
follow standards by not having your name tape and the U.S. Air Force tape sewn on your
uniform shirt. For this action, you received an LOC on 15 Nov 00.
yo a @ £02502-C076

  
 

e. You were, at or near Ellsworth Air Force B guth Dakota, on or about 19 Dec 00,
disrespectful in language toward Staff Sergean’i Saaeek a non-commissioned officer,
then known by you to be a non-commissioned officer, wiiO was then in the execution of his
office by saying to him, “What the hell are you doing here?” or words to that effect. For this

action, you received an LOC 6n 20 Dec 00.

f. You were, at or near Ellsworth Air Force Base, South Dakota, on or about 28 Jun O1, -
directed to be prepared for an in-shop Mobility Bag inspection which you failed to do. This was
not the first time you failed to follow orders. Also, you failed to ensure your uniforms were
serviceable at all times, and you lied to your supervisors when questioned whether your stripes
were on your uniforms. For these actions, you received a Letter of Reprimand (LOR) on

3 Jul 01.

g. You did, at or near Ellsworth Air Force Base, South Dakota, on or about 16 Aug 01, show
disrespect toward Senior Master Sergeantidip-by referring to her as “Miss” several times
during a counseling. session. You were informed by Senior Master Sergean iii that calling
any females in the military “Miss” was disrespectful and does not follow proper military customs
and courtesies. You continuously called Senior Master Sergeangigeaa Beven after she
corrected you several times. During the counseling session you frequently interrupted her and
had to be told to be quiet until she finished. You,tried to leave the office before Senior Master
Sergean tipi smissed you and continued to show disrespect through your comments and
gestures. For these actions, you received an LOR on 20 Aug 01.

 

h. You did, at or near Ellsworth Air Force Base, South Dakota, on or about 20 Sep 01, fail a
scheduled dormitory inspection. For this action, you received an LOR on 12 Oct 01.

i. You were, at or near Ellsworth Air Force Base, South Dakota, on or about 18 Sep 01,
disrespectful in language toward Senior Master —- a senior
non-commissioned officer, then known by you to be a superior non-commissioned officer, who
was then in the execution of her office, by saying to her, “don’t let it go to your head,” and
“don’t go crazy on me now,” or words to that effect. You, who knew of your duties, at or near
Ellsworth Air Force Base, South Dakota, from on or about 11 Sep 01 to on or about 12 Sep OJ,
were derelict in the performance of those duties in that-you negligently failed to clean the inside
and engine compartment of vehicle 93B3708, as it was your duty to do. For these actions, you
weré punished under Article 15, UCMJ, on 15 Oct 01. Punishment was reduction to the grade of
airman and a reprimand. This Article 15 established your Unfavorable Information File (UIF).

j. You did, at or near Ellsworth Air Force Base, South Dakota, on or about 15 Oct 01, while
in the office of Senior Master Sergeant . Wand in the presence of Staff Sergeant
all Senior Master Sergeant-Michell ie liar. You also refused to leave her
office after being dismissed. For these actions, you received an LOR on 18 Oct 01. This LOR
was added to your UIF.
Lo é @ PpZeoz -207 ©
oe

k. You did, at or near Ellsworth Air Force Base, South Dakota, on or about 22 Oct 01, walk
right up to Senior Master Sergeant Rie ncroachin g in her personal space, to the
point that she had to extend her arm at least twice during your conversation to keep you at |
normal distance from her. After you had been in the office arguing with First Lieutenan jigs

and Senior Master i Nm cone more disrespectful and nearly accusing

First Lieutenant f lying, you were asked to leave. You refused to go and had to be told
to leave three times. Also, on or about 23 Oct 01, during a conversation with Senior Master

Sergean SMa she asked you a question and you answered by Saying “yeah, man.”
For these actions, you received an LOR on 24 Oct 01. This LOR was added to your UIF.

3. Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this
recommendation are attached. The commander exercising SPCM jurisdiction or a higher
authority will decide whether you will be discharged or retained in the Air Force and, if you are
discharged, how your discharge will be characterized. If you are discharged, you will be
ineligible for reenlistment in the Air Force and any special pay, bonus, or education assistance
funds may be subject to recoupment.

4. You have the right to consult counsel. Military legal « counsel has been obtained to assist you.

I have made an appointment for you to consult Captain ae eine: - pArea Defense
Counsel, 385-2158, 1000 Ellsworth Street, Suite 1700 on 9 Voy Olat [O30 hours. You
may consult civilian counsel at your own expense.

      

5. You have the right to submit statements in your own behalf. Any statements you want the

separation authority to consider must reach me by? YANovo! at 1230 hours, unless you
request and receive an extension for good cause shown. I will send them to the separation

authority.

6. If you fail to consult counsel or to submit matters in your own behalf, your failure will
constitute a waiver of your right to do so.

_7, You have been scheduled for a medical examination. You must report to the Physical Exams
Section of the Base Clinic ond bd Movol at (JOO hours for the examination. This is a
mandatory appointment and you must be in uniform. You must report at least 15 minutes in
advance to this appointment to complete necessary paperwork.

8. Any personal information you furnish in rebuttal is covered by the Privacy Act of 1974. A
copy of AFI 36-3208 is available for your use in your orderly room.
9. Execute the attached acknowledgment and return it to me immediately.

 
      

ree Vaj, USAF
Commander, 28" Civil Engineer Squadron
Attachments:
1, Supporting documents
a. LOC — 07 Sep 00
b. LOC — 12 Oct 00
c, LOC - 18 Oct 00 -
d. LOC — 15 Nov 00
e, LOC — 20 Dec 00
f. LOR - 03 Jul 01
g. LOR — 20 Aug 01
h. LOR - 12 Oct 01
i. Article 15/UIF —.15 Oct 01
j. LOR/UIF ~ 18 Oct 01
k. LOR/UIF — 24 Oct 01
2. A

irman's Acknowledgment

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2001-0466

    Original file (FD2001-0466.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The records indicated the applicant received an Article 15 for violating a lawful instruction by entering the dormitory quarters of a member of the opposite sex, an Article 15 for disrespectful language toward a superior NCO, a Letter of Counseling for failing to use a Technical Order, a Letter of Counseling for not using the chain of command, a Letter of Counseling for using tobacco products in a military facility, and eight Letters of Counseling for being late for work. The award was...

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0132

    Original file (FD2002-0132.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD02-0132 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. The records indicated the applicant received an Article 15 for drinking under age and for failure to remain in his room on telephone standby. Separate Airman BasidiiiQiiiiiiiee under AFI 36-3208, par \ graph 5.49, with an under honorable conditions (general) discharge, without P & R. i Attachment: Case File FD2002 -2s2- DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0188

    Original file (FD2002-0188.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD2002-0188 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. Attachment: Examiner's Brief FD2002-0188 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AMN) (HGH A1C) 1. For these actions, Respondent received a Letter of Counseling (LOC) on 11 Jul 00. b.

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0341

    Original file (FD2002-0341.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMREK FD2002-0341 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change his reentry code. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AMN) (HGH A1C) 1. For this Respondent received an LOC on 29 Apr 98. e. On 6 Aug 98, Respondent was late for work.

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0542

    Original file (FD2002-0542.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE | py9002-0542 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. The Board noted that applicant signed a statement (DD Form 2366, on May 5, 1997) that he understood he must receive an Honorable discharge to receive future educational entitlements. Article 15/UIF 22 Jun 98 c. DD Form 1408, Armed Forces Traffic Ticket - 14 Jun 99 d. Article 15/UIF - 5 Nov 99 e. LOR/Notice of Disciplinary Release — 10 Jul 01 2.

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0241

    Original file (FD2002-0241.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The member was separated with a general discharge after receiving two Article-15’s and one Letter of Reprimand over the course of his 2 years and 14 days of military service, for two instances of underage consumption of alcoholic beverages (13 May 2000 and 10 August 2001), one charge of failure to go at the time prescribed to his appointed place of duty (Meade County Courthouse, Sturgis, South Dakota), and for failure to obey a lawful order to remove a healing post from his ear, and...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2001-0300

    Original file (FD2001-0300.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN SRA TYPE " PERSONAL APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW . CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD01-0300 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. In addition, the applicant also received two Letter’s of Reprimand and two Letters of Counseling for failure to go, financial irresponsibility, altering an official document, and...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00470

    Original file (FD2003-00470.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Cd, EST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1835 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE | ¢p2003-00470 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the...

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0264

    Original file (FD2002-0264.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD02-0264 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. The records indicated applicant had received three Article 15’s, one for entering a dormitory living quarters of a female, one for driving while drunk, and the third one for operating a vehicle when told not to. b. Grade Status: AB - 93/06/23 (Vacation of Article 15, 93/08/18) AMN - 93/06/23 (Article 15, 93/06/23) Alc - 92/10/10 c. Time Lost: None.

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0198

    Original file (FD2002-0198.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD02-0198 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. The Board reviewed the entire record and found no evidence of impropriety or inequity in this case on which to base an upgrade of discharge, The records indicated applicant had four Letters of Reprimand for failure to pay a traffic fine, failure to go and failure to pay just debt (twice). Recommend to 8 AF/CC that the respondent be separated with...