te

 

 

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE | AFSN/SSAN
TYPE *
GEN X PERSONAL APPEARANCE RECORD REVIEW
COUNSEL NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL
YES NO
x
VOTE OF THE BOARD
MEMBERS SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY
xX
X
x
x
x
ISSUES INDEX NUMBER EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO- THE BOARD
A01.03, 01.13, 93.01, 93.15, A67.10 1 | ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
93.33, 94.05, 94.11 2 | APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 | LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
| HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 4 | BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE |

 

20 MAR 03 FD2002-0099 r COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD

 

ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TINIE OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE

 

TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPERAN@E HEARING
APPLICANT’S ISSUE AND THE BOARD'S DECISIONAL RATIONAL ARE DISCUSSED ON THE ATTACHED AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONA

 

 

 

 

REMARKS

Case heard at Washington, DC.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board and OF the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR.

 

 

 

SIGNA TUAROF BOARD PRESIDENT. came

  

   

 

 -
INDORSEMENT DATE: MAR 03
TO: FROM:
SAF/MIBR SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNELCOUNCIL
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD

RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3" FLOOR
ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002

 

 

 

 

 

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) , Previous edition will bq@used.
CASE NUMBER

    
  
 

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE | ¢p3002.0099

     

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable and for a change in the

and the reason and authority for discharge.

    
  

The applicant’s case was considered by the Discharge Review Board (DRB), at Andrews AFB
March 20, 2003. The applicant appeared before the DRB but did not have counsel.

     
   
 
  
    
  
  
  
  
   
 

    
  

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the @scharge.

FINDINGS: The DRB denies the requested relief.

 
   
 

The DRB finds that the evidence of record and that provided by the applicant does not substantiatqjan
inequity or an impropriety that would justify an upgrade of the discharge and a change to the RE Gbde and
reason and authority for the discharge.

  
     
 
 
 
 

ISSUES: The applicant was discharged with a general service characterization from the Air Force for
misconduct or, more specifically, minor disciplinary infractions. He had three records of fAdividual
counseling, all for failure to go; two AF Forms 1048 (traffic ticket) for speeding on base; t¥fo verbal
counselings, one for failure to go and the other for failure to pay a just debt; two letters of reprimafid, one of
which concerned theft of government property and the other involved intentionally mishangfling and
damaging full mobility bags while loading an aircraft during an exercise; an Article 15 for uffing false
pretenses to get into the base club without paying the entrance fee; and four correctional cust@ly forms
evidencing numerous failures to conform to the rules and requirements of correctional custdHy. The
applicant complained because he was scparated after completing the entire 30-day correctional custody
period and because he felt the discharge was too harsh a sanction for the minor misconduct infivhich he
engaged. He also alleged racial discrimination and a personality conflict with his first serlfe
supervisor.

 
  
 
 

      
  

  
 

CONCLUSIONS: The DRB concludes that the discharge was consistent with the substa
procedural requirements of the discharge regulation and was not an abuse of discretion by the ff
authority.

    
  
 

  

for his other misconduct—the more serious incidents he either minimized his involvement
committing the misconduct. His attempt to deflect responsibility for his conduct was marked by |
that was generally inconsistent, improbable, and/or incredible.

 
   
   

For example, he initially claimed that his attempt to avoid paying the entrance fee for the club wg nothing
more than a joke and that he intended to pay the fee. He then noted that he had not intended to pa
it was simply bad judgment on his part. He then attempted to explain that he is often allowe
without paying. However, when questioned more closely about the incident and his claim that he
not required to pay, he related a set of circumstances the DRB found implausible. As for t
government property, he denied any intention to take the items. He averred they were “free isghe” items
that could be used for any purpose and did not have to be returned. The DRB was not convincfid by this
claim since such items are usually reserved for official use only and must be returned for propeg{disposal.
His explanation for keeping these items in a locked cubbyhole while he was deployed als
disingenuous. He claimed he intended to throw away some of the items because they were brok
inexplicably kept them for several weeks, locked them up while he was deployed, and never did q scard the
broken items. ‘The DRB was also perplexed by ms failure to secure any of his Valuables

 
  
     
   
   

 
 
   
  
 
  
  
  

baggage-handling incident, he tried to minimize his conduct by making it sound like nothing mae than an
accident. He attempted to persuade the DRB he simply missed when he tossed one bag to anothdf baggage
handler. His description of the events differed so much from the version set forth in the file Rat it was
impossible to reconcile the two versions. Presuming regularity, the DRB credited the version cagtained in
the file. Finally, although the applicant generally admitted his correctional custody deling
attempted to minimize his participation and motives in an effort to give the impression the cc
custody monitors simply overreacted to his behavior. The DRB was unconvinced by his interpret@fion.

At points during the hearing, the applicant claimed he was the victim of racial discrimination. Affhough he
did not raise the issue himself (questions by board members brought the issue to light), he prgvided no
evidence of discrimination and could not explain why he perceived such mistreatment. The DRE
credible evidence of discrimination in this case. Nor did the DRB find any evidence of impro
based on a personality conflict.

The applicant also claimed that the action was too harsh, unfair, and unwarranted since he
correctional custody. However, a careful review of the documents revealed that the applicant wa
a correctional custody failure. The applicant’s record substantiated that determination.

Given the nature and frequency of the applicant’s misconduct, the command’s decision to dis
applicant with a general service characterization was appropriate.

The DRB denies the requested relief.

Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
1.

para 5.49

2.

=

FD20¢
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD

MATTER UNDER REVIEW:
(Misconduct - Minor Disciplinary Infractions). Appeals for Hond
Discharge, Change in Reagon and Authority for Discharge, and Change the RG

BACKGROUND :

a.

DOB: 77/08/19.

AFQT: N/A. A-65, E-41,

Journeyman. DAS:

“3 .

~

b.

Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 95/07/14 - 95/11/20 (4 months 7 days) (Inactif}

SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:

a.

b.

ANDREWS AFB, MD

(Former SRA) (HGH SRA)

Appl rec’d a GEN Disch fr USAF 99/05/17 UP AFI

Enlmt Age: 17 10/12. Disch Age: 21 8/12. Educ:H§

G-42, M-08. PAFSC: 25051 -— Supply Management

96/03/29.

Enlisted as 95/11/21 for 4 yrs. Svd: 03 Yrs 05 Mo 27 Das, all A

Grade Status:

Time Lost:

Art 15's:

Additional:

SRA - 98/11/21

A1C - 97/03/21
AMN - 96/05/21

none.

(1)

99/03/12, Keesler AFB, MS - Article 134. You, d
er about 27 Feb 99, with intent to defraud, fals
pretend to ---~--- , an employee at the Vandenburg
Community Center, that you had already paid the

entrance fee, then knowing that the pretenses we
false, and by means thereof did wrongfully obtai
the Vandenburg Community Center, of a value of a
$3.00, to wit: the entrance fee. Forfeiture of

-_ pay per month for two months (forfeiture of $25.

ccl
ccrl

ccr

ccl

per month for two months suspended until 11 Sep
and 30 days correctional custody. (No appeal) (N
mitigation)

EVALUATION, 07 APR 99 - Failure to follow instr

2-0099

b- 3208,

able
Code.

DIPL.

d, on

from
out
50.00
O pay
9),

tions.

EVALUATION, 05 APR 99 ~ Failed to utter the progr

reporting statement.
EVALUATION, 31 MAR 99 -. Failed to utter the prog

reporting statement.
EVALUATION, 26 MAR 99 ~ Failed to utter the prog

reporting statement.

LOR, 18 FEB 99 ~ Failure to go.
DD FORM 1408, 10 DEC 98 - Traffic ticket.

VBC,

08 SEP 98 - Failure to go.

Pr

eo
FPD20@@-0099

LOR, 24 JUN 98 —- Stolen government property.
VBC, 25 APR 97 - Failure to pay just debt.

AF FORM 1408, 28 OCT 96 —- Ticket for speeding.
RIC, 23 APR 96 — Failure to go.

RIC, 23 APR 96 - Failure to go.

£. CM: none.

g. Record of SV: 95/11/21 - 97/07/20 Keesler AFB 4 (Initial)
97/07/21 - 98/07/20 Keesler AFB 3 (Annual)

(Discharged from Keesler AFB)
h. Awards & Decs: AFTR, NDSM, AFGCM.

i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (03) Yrs (10) Mos (04) Das
TAMS: (03) Yrs (05) Mos (27) Das

4. BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 293) dtd 02/03/13.
(Change Discharge to Honorable, Change the Reason and Authority, and Fhange
the RE Code)

LETTER ATTACHED TO BRIEF.

ATCH

DD Form 149.

Applicant's Letter to the Discharge Review Board.
. Article 15, 99/03/12.

Two Letters of Appreciation.

Letter of Commendation.

Letter of Evaluation.

Training Certificate.

Four Character References.

DD Form 214.

won nn bp Wh H

02/06/1f/ia
1 March 2002

Tam a three and a half-year Air Force veteran. I am originally from New Orleans,
LA. After my separation from the Air Force, I was employed by Swift Transportation
Trucking Company and am currently employed by Tulane University. I began working
for Tulane with the intent of attending the college, an opportunity I did not get in the
military. I am writing to correct my separation by general discharge under honorable
conditions to an honorable discharge so that ] may acquire my GJ Bill and continue with
my mission in life.

My current duty assignment was with the 81" Training Wing, 81° Supply
Squadron, Keesler AFB, MS. On 27 February 1999, defraud aaa
employee at the Vandenburg Community Center, by wrongfully walking past him
without paying the $3.00 entrance fee. First of all I feel this discharge was an extremely
severe punishment for one single minor offense. As you can clearly see, this $3.00
miscue at the club is the only infraction of Article 15 I committed. I reported to
Correctional Custody and completed my thirty-day sentence. Now, after I have
completed the program, I am being unceremoniously and suddenly discharged from the
Air Force. The narrative reason for my discharge was misconduct, which I feel is an
error or injustice in simple, direct terms. I have not had any opportunity to present any
statement of defense to my commanding officer. [am being denied my constitutional
rights,

I contend that the decision to discharge me from the United States Air Force was
altogether unjust, unfair, and is a direct violation of my constitutional rights. I intend to
irrefutably prove that I was clearly and totally denied my constitutional right of due
process. The record will show that since entering the Air Force in November 1995, I
have faithfully carries out my assigned duties with distinction, pride, and honor. I came
into the military at the age of 18. Again, I did initially make some mistakes while
adjusting to the military lifestyle. [ have also made some great strides and lasting
contributions to my unit’s effective mission accomplishment.
According to Air Force directives, CC is an avenue used by commanders to rehabilitate
young airmen who still have the potential to continue in valued service to their country.
It is intended to reiterate the Air Force core values, of Integrity, Service before self, and
Excellence in all we do. While in CC I was visited by my commander and first sergeant
every week, They told me that I was doing well and if I keep up the good work, I will be
returned to my workcenter to continue my career. The daily curriculum and routine was
arduous and challenging. I did make some mistakes, however I did complete my
sentence as opposed to other servicemen who were assigned to CC during my stay that
were thrown out of the program and prepared for immediate discharge.

Suddenly, after my completion of the CC program I am now being recommended for
discharge. I have not talked to my commander about this. ] was not given any chance to
refute any of the allegations or accusations levied against me. If 1 was doing so terribly
bad, and was incompatible, then why didn’t my commanding officer tell me so? Better
yet, why wasn’t I removed from the program and discharged a long time ago just like
others? Where is the justice in all of this? Admittedly, the image that the CC staff has
portrayed of me is not at all flattering. They have depicted me as a lazy, dishonest, and
worthless airmen. However, I must remind you that every airman sent to CC obviously
has had some problems. The whole purpose of this program is “rehabilitate” wayward
troops. I completed the program. I was given 30 days, I completed 30 days! How can I
be judged on what occurred in CC after I have completed the program? It’s tantamount
to judging a soldier for the mistakes he made during basic military training and then
using it to prosecute him after he graduates. No matter how many mistakes the troop has
made, the mere fact that he successfully graduates indicates to all that he’s qualified for
further service.

Attached to this letter are several statements and letters of appreciation that will directly
refute the insidious and improper image portrayed by the CC staff. I have been
recognized on several occasions for my outstanding efforts and service. I want to
continue my Air Force career. As you may well know, the military in general, and the
Air Force in particular are having a very hard time maintaining proper strength levels.
People are not staying in for various reason...i.e. the good economy, pursuing education,
fast paced and frequent TDYs, and for many other reasons. I willingly volunteered to go
to Saudi Arabia where I served faithfully and with distinction. I want to stay in the
United States Air Force and believe I have earned the right to do so.

They cannot touch me on my job performance. I completed my technical job-
proficiency upgrade training ahead of time and as you can see by the many letters sent in
my behalf, I have made many positive impressions on several NCOs and officers alike.
[p2c02~- po 77

I need your help. I am not a criminal. Should I be subjected to this type of injustice
simply because of an ill-advised and misguided $3.00 prank? I know of your service and
commitment to the armed services and I trust in your love and devotion to constitutional
principles. I am anxiously awaiting your response and effective intervention into this:

matter.
PoR2ozZ CO? 7

i

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR EDUCATION AND TRAINING COMMAND

7 May, 1999
MEMORANDUM FOR 81 TRG/CC

FROM: 81 TRW/JAJ
500 Fisher Street Rm 227
Keesler AFB, MS 39534-2553 ".

SUBJECT: Legal Review, Administrative Discharge —

  

SPy ee ee

1. ACTION: On 5 May 99, 81 LG/CC recommended that& Hecreafie
referred to as “Respondent”) be administratively separated for minor disciplinary infractions ith a
general discharge characterization. The authority for this recommendation is AFI 36-3208,
paragraph 5.49. Under paragraph 6.2.2, the respondent is not entitled to a board hearing.

2. PERSONAL DATA:
a. Date and Term of Enlistment: 21 Nov 95, 4 Years.
b. Total Active Federal Military Service Date: 21 Nov 95
c. Performance Reports: 3B, 20 July 98; 4B, 20 July 97

3. EVIDENCE FOR THE GOVERNMENT: On 9 Apr 99, Respondent was counseled for losi&g his
military bearing by constantly moving while in the positions of attention and parade rest. O

7 Ap 99, Respondent was counseled for failing to follow instructions given for checking his gail.
On 5 Apr 99, Respondent was counseled for failing to assume the position of attention whilaiving
a reporting statement, as well as not giving a proper reporting statement. On 31 Mar 99,
Respondent counseled for sleeping in the Clothing Exchange. On 26 Mar 99, Respondent vias
counseled for failing to give a proper reporting statement. On 11 Feb 99, Respondent was qrelict
in the performance of his duties in that he mishandled personal bags while assigned to augngentee
duty as a baggage handle for the Deployment Facility, for which he received a Letter of Repmand
on 18 Feb 99. On or about 27 Feb 99, Respondent, with intent to defraud, falsely pretendedito an
employee of the Vandenberg Community Center, that he had already paid entrance fees, th
knowing that such pretenses were false, and did wrongfully obtain his entrance fee, of a valu of
about $3.00, from the Vandenberg Community Center, for which he received nonjudicial
punishment under Article 15, UCMJ, on 12 Mar 99. On 4 Feb 99, Respondent was counselqd for
failing to go to his appointed place of duty. On 10 Dec 98, Respondent was issued a DD Fo

1408 (Armed Forces Traffic Ticket) for traveling 37 mph in a 25 mph zone, for which he was
counseled on 15 Dec 98. On 24 Aug 98, Respondent failed to go to his mandatory Preventite
Health Assessment appointment and received a no-show letter, for which he was counseledipn 8
Sep 98. On 17 Jun 98, Respondent wrongfully possessed government property of one fan ahd
three calculators, a value of $100.00, for which he was counseled on 24 Jun 98. On 22 Apr B8,
Respondent was notified that his Army and Air Force Exchange Service (AAFES) Delayed
Payment Plan (DPP) account was 60 days overdue, for which he was counseled on 25 Apr @.

ko al
FDp2c0R

On 27 Oct 96, Respondent received a DD Form 1408 (Armed Forces Traffic Ticket) for trav
30 mph in a 20 mph zone, for which he was counseled on 28 Oct 96. On 23 Apr 96, Respo
was counseled for failing to go to a mandatory dental appointment. On 22 Apr 96, Respond

failed to go to a mandatory “First Duty Station” appointment, for which he was counseled on|
Apr 96.

4, EVIDENCE FOR THE RESPONDENT: This 21-year old airman is in his first enlistment a
AQE scores as follows: A - 65, E - 41, G- 42, M-08. The respondent consulted counsel a
elected to submit matters for the commander's consideration. 81 LG/CC made comments t
respondent’ s written submission of matters in the recommendation memorandum and elect
proceed with the discharge with a general service characterization as he originally indicated

5. DISCUSSION: This file is legally sufficient. Respondent has shown a pattern of miscond
indicating he is unfit for continued military service. His repeated failures to go, his inability tq
standards of military conduct and courtesy, and fraudulent behavior strike at the very heart ¢
order and discipline. We concur with 81 LG/CC’s recommendation of a general discharge.

member’s service has been honest and faithful, a general discharge is warranted when sign
negative aspects of the member's conduct or performance of duty outweigh positive aspects
member's military record. Respondent's behavior warrants such a characterization. We als
concur with 81 LG/CC’s recommendation against offering respondent probation and rehabili
The respondent has been given numerous opportunities to improve, and failed to show any
improvement. Further attempts at probation and rehabilitation would likely prove unsuccess

6. OPTIONS: As the Separation Authority your options are:

a. If you determine this separation action is not supported by the evidence, direct that if
discontinued, and direct the respondent be retained in the Air Force.

b. If you determine this separation action has been brought under an inappropriate sec
AFI 36-3208, direct reinitiation under a more appropriate section.

c. If you determine this separation action is supported by the evidence, approve the
separation action and direct the respondent be given a general discharge, with or without
probation and rehabilitation, for misconduct under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, paragraph

d. If you determine this separation action is supported by the evidence, but believe an
honorable discharge is appropriate, make that recommendation and forward the file to 2 AF.
further disposition.

e. If you determine that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is appropri
under paragraph 5.49, direct a discharge board be convened, and forward the file to 332
TRS/TRM for processing.

7. RECOMMENDATION: That you approve respondent's separation with a general service
characterization, without probation and rehabilitation, for minor disciplinary infractions under

e 2 metre acm ten Pere .

OO?

ing
dent
nt
P3

d has

the
dto

ct
meet
good

icant
of the

ation.

on of

b.49.
C for

e

e
_Pp2002- 4p 7]

provisions of AFI 36-3208, Chapter 5, Section H, paragraph 5.49.

  
    

 

COIC, Administrative Actions Branch
Adverse Actions

| concur.
Actingromer Administrative Actions Branch
Adverse Actions

Attachment

Case File

 

*
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR EDUCATION AND TRAINING COMMAND

 

   

MEMORANDUM FOR 23 ApE?4

FROM: 81 LG/CC
SUBJECT: Notification Memorandum

1. lam recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for Minor Disciplin
Infractions. The authority for this action is AFPD 36-32 and AFI 36-3208, Chapter 5, Sectidh H,
. Paragraph 5.49. If my recommendation is approved, your service will be characterized as
Honorable or General. | am recommending your service be characterized as General.

2. My reasons for this action are:

a. On 9 Apr 99, you lost your military bearing in that you constantly were moving while @ the
position of Attention and Parade Rest, for which you were counseled on 9 Apr 99. (Atch 1,
Appendix A watch)

_ b. On7 Apr 99, you failed to follow the instructions given for checking your mail, for whigh
you were counseled on 7 Apr 99. (Atch 1, Appendix A w/atch)

c. On 5 Apr 99, you failed to assume the position of attention when uttering your reportifig
statement, for which you were counseled on 5 Apr 99. (Atch 1, Appendix A w/atch)

d. On 5 Apr 99, you failed to utter the proper reporting statement, for which you are
counseled on 5 Apr 99. (Atch 1, Appendix A w/atch)

e. On 31 Mar 99, you were found sleeping in the Clothing Exchange, for which you wer
counseled on 31 Mar 99. (Atch 1, Appendix A w/atch)

f. On 26 Mar 99, you failed to utter the proper reporting statement, for which you are vefbally
counseled on 26 Mar 99. (Atch 1, Appendix A w/atch)

g. On 11 Feb 99, you were derelict in the performance of your duties in that you were
observed mishandling personal bags while assigned augmentee duty as a baggage handleg at
the Deployment Facility, for which you were given a Letter of iReprimand on 18 Feb 99. (Ath 1,
Appendix B)

h. On or about 27 Feb 99, you, did, at or near Keesler AFB, MS, with intent to defraud, fAlsely -
pretend +iRies.an employee at the Vandenberg Community Center, that you had alfeady -
paid the entrance fee, then knowing that the pretenses were false, and by means thereof d
wrongfully obtain from the Vandenberg Community Center, of a value of about $3.00, to wifjthe
entrance fee, for which you were given an Article 15, UCMJ, non-judicial punishment on 12%Mar

99. (Atch 1, Appendix C w/atch)
PD 260, P COFH

i. On 4 Feb 99, you failed to go at the time prescribed to your appointed place of duty, fpr
which you were counseled on 4 Feb 99. (Atch 1, Appendix D)

j. On 10 Dec 98, you were issued a DD Form 1408 (Armed Force Traffic Ticket) for

traveling 37 mph in a 25 mph zone, for which you were counseled on 15 Dec 98. (Atch 1,
Appendix E)

k. On 24 Aug 98, you failed to go to your mandatory Preventative Health Assessment

appointment, for which you received a No-Show Letter and were counseled on 8 Sep 98. (itch
1, Appendix F)

1. On 17 Jun 98, you were in possession of government property consisting of one oscillating
fan and three desktop calculators, a value of $100.00, for which you received a Letter of
Reprimand on 24 3 98. (Atch 1, Appendix G w/atch)

m. On 22 Apr 9a, you were notified that your Army and Air Force Exchange Service (AAFHBS)
Delayed Payment Plan (DPP) account was 60 days overdue, for which you were counseled off 25
Apr 97. (Atch 1, Appendix H)

n. On 27 Oct 96, you were issued a DD Form 1408 (Armed Forces Traffic Ticket) for

traveling 30 mph in a 20 mph zone, for which you were counseled on 28 Oct 96. (Atch 1,
Appendix 1)

o. On 23 Apr 96, you failed to go to a mandatory dental appointment, for which you we
counseled on 23 Apr 96. (Atch 1, Appendix J)

p. On 22 Apr 96, you failed to go to a mandatory “First Duty Station” appointment, for wgich
you were counseled on 23 Apr 96. (Atch 1, Appendix K)

3. Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this
recommendation are attached. The commander exercising SPCM jurisdiction or higher wil
decide whether you will be discharged or retained in the Air Force, and, if you are dischargeg,
how your service will be characterized. If you are discharged, you will be ineligible for reenlistghent

in the Air Force, and any special pay, bonuses, or education assistance funds may be subjectdd to
recoupment. 7

4. You have the right to consult legal counsel. Militapy legalueaunsel bz
you. | have made an appointment for you to consulta

102, on 23 haa 4 at 0909 hours. Your

expense.

been obtained to asqjst

; at Bldg 0701, Rabm
ay consult civilian counsel at your own

   
  

5. You have the right to submit statements on your own behalf. Any statements you want the
separation authority to consider must reach me by 23 ApA4 by 1630 hours unless yo

request and receive an extension for good cause shown. | will send them to the separation
authority.

6. If you fail to consult counsel or to submit statements in your own behalf, your failure will
constitute a waiver of your right to do so.
(Foz00a-po77e

7. You have been scheduled for a medical examination. You must report to 81" Medical
Group, Physical Exams on _ 2 apr 44 , 1999 at 0700 for the examination.

8. Any personal information you furnish in rebuttal is covered by the Privacy Act of 1974. A cipy
of AFI 36-3208 is available for your use in Bldg ,CQ.

9. Execute the attached acknowledgment and return it to me immediately.

 

Commander

Attachments:
1. Supporting Documents
. Memorandum for 81 Supply Squadron/CC, dated 10 Apr 99 wi/atch' >
. Letter of Reprimand, dated 18 Feb 99
AF From 3070, dated 12 Mar 99 w/atch
AF Form 174, dated 4 Feb 99
DD Form 1408, dated 10 Dec 98
Memorandum for 81 Supply Squadron/CC, dated 24 Aug 98
Letter of Reprimand, dated 24 Jun 98 w/atch
AAFES Letter, dated 22 Apr 97 -
DD Form 1408, dated 27 Oct 96.
AF Form 174, dated 23 Apr 96
. AF Form 174, dated 23 Apr 96.
2. Other Derogatory Data
a. Keesler AFB Form 280, dated 8 Apr 99 \
b. Keesler AFB Form 280, dated 3 Apr 99.
c. Keesler AFB Form 280, dated 1 Apr 99
d. Keesler AFB Form 280, dated 1 Apr99 °
e. Keesler AFB Form 280, dated 30 Mar 99°
f. Keesler AFB Form 280, dated 26 Mar 99
3. Airman’s Receipt of Notification Memorandum : =
4. Airman’s Statements

Fon TO PAN TD,

ATCH 1