Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0484
Original file (FD2002-0484.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

       
 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

    

 

  
 
 

 

| NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0245

    Original file (FD2002-0245.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE | gp 002-0245 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. For this, the Assistant Chief of Operations of the Fire Department gave him a letter of reprimand (LOR), 4 Aug 99. h. On 19 Sep 99, the respondent was derelict in the performance of his duties by failing to meet military dress and appearance standards. Direct the respondent be discharged with.a general discharge, with or without the...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0509

    Original file (FD2002-0509.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE | pp 7002-0509 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. Attachment: Examiner's Brief FD2002-0509 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD qu”, (Former AMN) (HGH A1C) 1. Reduction to Amn, (No appeal) (No mitigation) (2) 11 Sep 00, Columbus AFB, MS - Article 121.

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0098

    Original file (FD2002-0098.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    For these acts of misconduct, the respondent received a verbal counseling, a letter of counseling (LOC), a memorandum for record (MFR), four letters of reprimand (LOR), an unfavorable information file (UIF), entry on the control roster, and punishment under Article 15, UCM. (Tab 1) 4, EVIDENCE CONSIDERED FOR THE RESPONDENT: The respondent is a 22 year old security forces journéyman who enlisted in the Air Force on 7 May 97. f. On or about 10 Aug 98, you failed to go at the time to your...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0542

    Original file (FD2002-0542.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE | py9002-0542 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. The Board noted that applicant signed a statement (DD Form 2366, on May 5, 1997) that he understood he must receive an Honorable discharge to receive future educational entitlements. Article 15/UIF 22 Jun 98 c. DD Form 1408, Armed Forces Traffic Ticket - 14 Jun 99 d. Article 15/UIF - 5 Nov 99 e. LOR/Notice of Disciplinary Release — 10 Jul 01 2.

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2006-00084

    Original file (FD2006-00084.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NlJMBER FD~2006-00084 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed. If you are discharged, you will be ineligible for reenlistment in the Air Force, and any special pay, bonus, or education assistance funds may be subject...

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0281

    Original file (FD2002-0281.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE | pnyo3-9291 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. Approve separation and direct that the respondent be discharged with a general discharge, or c. Approve the separation but suspend it subject to probation and rehabilitation under AFI 36-3208, Chapter 7, or d. Return the discharge package to the unit and direct that a discharge board be convened to determine whether an under other than...

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0154

    Original file (FD2002-0154.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD02-0154 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. BASIS FOR THE ACTION: Administrative discharge action is based on the respondent's pattern of misconduct during his current enlistment. However, the respondent did consult with his ADC via telephone prior to responding to this action.

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0188

    Original file (FD2002-0188.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD2002-0188 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. Attachment: Examiner's Brief FD2002-0188 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AMN) (HGH A1C) 1. For these actions, Respondent received a Letter of Counseling (LOC) on 11 Jul 00. b.

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0173

    Original file (FD2002-0173.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD02-0173 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. The records indicated the applicant received an Article 15 for driving on base with a suspended driver’s license and without authority, go from his appointed place of duty. Attachment: Examiner's Brief FD2002-0173 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AB) (HGH SRA) 1.

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0540

    Original file (FD2002-0540.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE | ¢p7002-0540 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. The Board noted that applicant signed a statement (DD Form 2366, on September 8, 1997) that he understood he must receive an Honorable discharge to receive future educational entitlements. For your actions, you received a Letter of Counseling (LOC).