Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01681
Original file (BC-2013-01681.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-01681
		
		COUNSEL:  NONE

		HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He believes it is unjust that his transfer of entitlements had 
to be done while on active duty.  He was not made aware of this; 
therefore, he was unable to make the transfer.

In support of the appeal, the applicant submits his DD Form 214, 
Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at 
Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant retired from the Air Force on 31 July 2008 in the 
grade of technical sergeant.

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of 
primary responsibility which is listed at Exhibit B.

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial.  Any member of the Armed Forces, 
active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted, on or 
after 1 August 2009, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, 
has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date 
of election, and agrees to serve a specified additional period 
in the Armed Forces from the date of election (if eligible), may 
transfer unused Post-9/11 benefits to their dependents pursuant 
to service regulations 38 U.S.C. 3319(b)(1).  The transfer must 
be initiated while the member is serving in the Armed Forces.
The applicant retired on 31 July 2008.  The program for the 
transfer of benefits began on 1 August 2009.  There has been no 
injustice to the extent the member did not receive adequate 
counseling as required by law and Department of Defense 
regulation.

The complete DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit B.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 3 May 2013, for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit C).  As of this date, this office has received no 
response.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.	The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.	The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.	Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of this case; however, we find insufficient evidence of 
an error or injustice to warrant corrective action.  Most 
notably, that the program was not in effect at the time of the 
applicant’s retirement.  Therefore, we find no basis to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2013-01681 in Executive Session on 10 December 2013, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:


The following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dtd 30 Mar 13, w/atch.
	Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIT, dtd 18 Apr 13.
	Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dtd 3 May 13. 

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02710

    Original file (BC 2013 02710.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's complete submission is at Exhibit A. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04840

    Original file (BC-2012-04840.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial, indicating the member’s effective date of retirement was prior to the start of the Program for the TEB. Although, his retirement date was 1 July 2009, the guidance for the education offices to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00386

    Original file (BC-2013-00386.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Service members enrolled in the Post-9/11 GI Bill Program are able to transfer unused educational benefits to their dependent spouse or children. A complete copy of the DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit B. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02143

    Original file (BC-2012-02143.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02143 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post 9/11 Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) benefits to his children. __________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02521

    Original file (BC-2012-02521.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Any member of the Armed Forces, active duty, or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted, on or after 1 August 2009, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, had at least 6 years of service on the date of election may transfer unused Post-9/11 education benefits to their dependents. Service Secretary’s were required, as of 22 June 2009, to provide and document counseling regarding these benefits. The applicant retired on 1 February 2008, the Post-9/11 GI Bill Transfer of Educational...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03244

    Original file (BC-2012-03244.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Title 38 U.S.C., Chapter 33, Section 3319 (f) (1), DoD Directive Type Memo (DTM), and AFI 36-2306, Voluntary Education Program, state the transfer of educational benefits must be made while an individual is serving as a member of the Armed Forces when the transfer is executed.” The complete DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 27 August 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05596

    Original file (BC 2013 05596.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. There is no record in MilConnect or the Right Now Technology showing the applicant made any inquiry/attempt to apply for the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) prior to retirement. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03817

    Original file (BC-2012-03817.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    At no time was he briefed on any additional requirements to transfer Post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits to his dependents. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: According to documents provided by the applicant, he is a former member of the Regular Air Force who served from 3 September 1982 to 31 May 2009. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant's submission, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02439

    Original file (BC-2012-02439.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02439 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependent. A service member is considered retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of Reserve Service.” Per the eligible service...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04912

    Original file (BC 2013 04912.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Transferability of Unused Education Benefits to Family Members. The Secretary of the Air Force determined that the Air Force would offer the transfer of benefits feature. DTM 09-003, dated 22 June 2009 required the Military Departments to provide and document individual pre-separation or release from active duty counseling on Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits.