Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02521
Original file (BC-2012-02521.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 
DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2012-02521 
 
COUNSEL:  NONE 
HEARING DESIRED:  NO 

IN THE MATTER OF: 
   
   
 
   
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 
 
He  be  allowed  to  transfer  his  Post-9/11  GI  Bill  Education 
benefits to his dependent. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 
 
He served in the Air Force for 26 years.  His wife was devoted 
to  him  and  the  service  for  23  of  those  years.    Throughout  his 
career,  their  plan  was  for  her  to  continue  her  education.    He 
was  never  briefed  that  he  could  transfer  his  Veterans  Benefits 
to her prior to retiring or he would have done so.  During his 
transition  assistance  program  briefing  he  recalls  specifically 
asking if he could transfer his benefits and the instructor told 
him yes.  
 
The applicant submits no supporting documentation.  
 
The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
STATEMENT OF FACTS: 
 
The  applicant  retired  from  the  Regular  Air  Force  on  1  February 
2008 in the grade of master sergeant. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
AFPC/DPSIT  recommends  denial.    For  the  first  time  in  history, 
service  members  enrolled  in  38  U.S.C,  Chapter  33  (Post-9/11 
Educational Assistance) were able to transfer their benefits to 
their  dependent  spouse  or  children.    Any  member  of  the  Armed 
Forces,  active  duty,  or  Selected  Reserve,  officer  or  enlisted, 
on or after 1 August 2009, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI 
Bill,  had  at  least  6  years  of  service  on  the  date  of  election 
may  transfer  unused  Post-9/11  education  benefits  to  their 
dependents.    Service  Secretary’s  were  required,  as  of  22  June 
2009,  to  provide  and  document  counseling  regarding  these 

benefits.  The  Air  Force  developed  a  communication  plan 
implementing  the  Post-9/11  GI  Bill  and  transfer  to  dependent 
program  using  external  media.    There  was  various  news  articles 
about  the  Post-9/11  GI  Bill,  most  noted,  the  requirement  to  be 
on active duty on the 1 August 2009 effective date of the Bill 
to be eligible to transfer benefits.   
 
The applicant retired on 1 February 2008, the Post-9/11 GI Bill 
Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) program was not in effect 
at that time. 
 
The complete DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit C. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
A  copy  of  the  Air  Force  evaluation  was  forwarded  to  the 
applicant on 16 July 2012, for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit  D).    As  of  this  date,  this  office  has  received  no 
response. 
 ________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 
 
1.  The  applicant  has  exhausted  all  remedies  provided  by 
existing law or regulations. 
 
2.  The application was timely filed. 
 
3.  Insufficient  relevant  evidence  has  been  presented  to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has 
not  been  the  victim  of  an  error  or  injustice.  The  applicant 
retired  effective  1  February  2008  and  the  Transfer  of 
Educational  Benefits  (TEB)  system  did  not  begin  accepting 
applications  until  27  June  2009,  with  an  effective  date  no 
earlier  than  1  August  2009.    Therefore,  in  the  absence  of 
evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting 
the relief sought in this application. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 
 
The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not 
demonstrate  the  existence  of  material  error  or  injustice;  that 
the  application  was  denied  without  a  personal  appearance;  and 
that  the  application  will  only  be  reconsidered  upon  the 

 

2 

 
 
 

  
  
 

, Panel Chair 
, Member 
, Member 

submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
The  following  members  of  the  Board  considered  AFBCMR  Docket 
Number  BC-2012-02521  in  Executive  Session  on  8  January  2013, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 
 
 
 
 
 
The following documentary evidence was considered: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                                   Panel Chair 

Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 5 May 12. 
Exhibit B.  Applicant’s Master Personnel Records. 
Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIT, dated 2 Jul 12. 
Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 16 Jul 12. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02521

    Original file (BC 2014 02521.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In reference to the timeliness of the application, the applicant states that he retired on 31 Dec 09 and submitted his application for Correction of Military Records on 5 Jun 2014, the time between those two dates is 4 years, 5 months and 3 days excluding the end date, still within this identified 5-year time period. He understands if there is no record of his TEB request; however, the Air Force has a record of his 23 years of service and who he had listed as his dependents. THE BOARD...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00026

    Original file (BC-2012-00026.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant indicated on his DD Form 2648, Pre-separation Counseling Checklist for Active Component Service Members, that he did not want counseling for education benefits prior to his retirement. ______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 30 September 2009 he elected to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill Educational Benefits. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04840

    Original file (BC-2012-04840.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial, indicating the member’s effective date of retirement was prior to the start of the Program for the TEB. Although, his retirement date was 1 July 2009, the guidance for the education offices to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03817

    Original file (BC-2012-03817.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    At no time was he briefed on any additional requirements to transfer Post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits to his dependents. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: According to documents provided by the applicant, he is a former member of the Regular Air Force who served from 3 September 1982 to 31 May 2009. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant's submission, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05012

    Original file (BC-2012-05012.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05012 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) benefits to his dependents. ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He had planned on retiring in April 2009;...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02143

    Original file (BC-2012-02143.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02143 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post 9/11 Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) benefits to his children. __________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04229

    Original file (BC-2010-04229.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She was never informed her benefits had to be transferred prior to her retirement in November 2009. The complete DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reiterates she was unable to transfer her benefits because the TEB system did not recognize her family members and there was no one to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02602

    Original file (BC-2012-02602.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In this respect, we note the applicant has provided documentation substantiating he was approved for the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) for one of his dependent daughters prior to his active duty retirement in October 2009. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 27 October 2009, he elected to transfer his Post-9/11 GI...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05696

    Original file (BC 2012 05696.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05696 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. DPSIT states that the applicant retired effective 31 Jul 2009. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03244

    Original file (BC-2012-03244.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Title 38 U.S.C., Chapter 33, Section 3319 (f) (1), DoD Directive Type Memo (DTM), and AFI 36-2306, Voluntary Education Program, state the transfer of educational benefits must be made while an individual is serving as a member of the Armed Forces when the transfer is executed.” The complete DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 27 August 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation...