RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00998
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
1. His record be corrected to show he was not twice passed over to the grade of lieutenant colonel (O-5).
2. His grade be changed from major (O-4) to captain (O-3), with an appropriate date or rank (DOR) to O-3.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
When he transferred from the U.S. Navy Reserve (USNR) to the U.S. Air Force Reserve (USAFR), he retained the grade of 0-4 in error, resulting in his being unjustly twice passed over to O-5 and separated. He served in the USNR as a line officer in the grade of O-4. When he transferred to the USAFR, he became a non-line officer in a new competitive category (Judge Advocate). He should have entered the USAFR (Judge Advocate) as an O-3. In addition, the Air Force Instruction (AFI) stated that an officer transferring into the Air Force should not be given a DOR that subjects them to a promotion board within one year of the transfer or without a completed officer performance report (OPR) on file. When he inquired about these errors, he was told to just hope for the best on his O-5 promotion board, but he was subsequently passed over for promotion.
The applicants complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.
_________________ ______________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant served in the U.S. Navy Reserve in the grade of O-4.
On 3 Aug 10, the applicant was appointed to the USAFR Judge Advocate Corps in the grade of major (O-4) under Appointment Order PA-00048, dated 2 Nov 10.
The applicant was subsequently considered but not selected for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel (O-5) during the CY11 and CY12 LAF-J (Judge Advocate) promotion selection boards. As a result, his mandatory separation date (MSD) was established as 1 Mar 13.
On 3 May 13, the Air Force Personnel Counsel (SAFPC) approved the applicants request to extend his mandatory separation date (MSD) to 1 Mar 15.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is included at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
ARPC/DPA recommends approval, indicating there is evidence of an error. The applicant was assessed into the USAFR improperly through no fault of his own. On 3 Aug 10, the applicant transferred from the USNR to the USAFR in the same grade he held in the parent service in accordance with AFI 36-2005, Appointment in Commissioned Grades and Designation and Assignment in Professional CategoriesReserve of the Air Force and United States Air Force, Table 2.3. However, the cited reference does not apply to his type of transfer. He should have been commissioned as a direct competitive category appointment in the grade of O-3 (captain).
A complete copy of the ARPC/DPA evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
He concurs with the ARPC/DPA evaluation (Exhibit E).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case and agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that relief should be granted. Therefore, we recommend the applicants record be corrected as indicated below.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that:
1. On 2 August 2010, he was directly accessed to the Air Force Reserve (AFR) Judge Advocate career field in the grade of captain (O-3), with a date of rank (DOR) of 25 July 2001 and an effective pay date of 13 May 2005.
2. His non-selections to the grade of lieutenant colonel (O-5) on the CY12 and CY13 Line of the Air ForceJudge Advocate (LAF-J) promotion selection boards be declared void and removed from his records.
3. His Officer Promotion Reports (OPR) rendered after 2 August 2010 be corrected to show he held the grade of captain (O-3), instead of major (O-4).
It is further directed that his corrected records be considered for promotion to the grade of major (O-4) by Special Selection Board (SSB) for the V04011B, V0412B, and V0413B Major Central Selection Board for the Judge Advocate Corps. However, any nonselections for promotion to the grade of major prior to his having three OPRs on file closing out after 2 August 2010, each with a minimum of 250 days of supervision in the grade of captain, will be set aside.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-00998 in Executive Session on 12 Dec 13, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Panel Chair
Member
Member
All members voted to correct the records as recommended. The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-00998 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 22 Feb 13, w/atch.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPA, dated 1 Mar 13, w/atch.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSID, dated 8 Mar 13.
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 4 Apr 13.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00998
In addition, the Air Force Instruction (AFI) stated that an officer transferring into the Air Force should not be given a DOR that subjects them to a promotion board within one year of the transfer or without a completed officer performance report (OPR) on file. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is included at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00169
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00169 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His second non-selection to the grade of major (O-4) be declared void and removed from his record, and he be granted a Special Selection Board (SSB) for consideration for promotion to O-4. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00428
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTT recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The applicant separated from the Regular Air Force 31 Aug 04. When he met his second Reserve promotion board and was not selected for promotion, he incurred a MSD.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02838
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/PB recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The applicant contends he did not have sufficient time to prepare and be competitive for his major selection board. The applicant contends...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00385
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00385 INDEX CODE: 102.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 11 AUG 2007 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her corrected Reserve appointment date of 1 Apr 87 be changed to 6 Apr 93. She was appointed as a Reserve of the Air Force in the grade of captain with a promotion service date...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00222
An exception to policy be granted so that he may be considered by a retroactive Special Selection Board (SSB) for promotion to the grade of major after receiving his first officer performance report (OPR) following the relief granted in AFBCMR Docket No. He is not requesting an SSB for the FY01 promotion board. After being granted relief by this Board that has allowed the applicant to resume his career in the Air Force Reserves, the applicant asserts that to remedy the injustice he...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05134
His records were also corrected to show that he was recalled to active duty under the Limited Period Recall Program (LPRP) effective 1 Dec 09, and his records be considered by a SSB CY10 United States Air Force Reserve (USAFR) Line and Non-Line Colonels Promotion Selection Board. Per AFI 36-2504, Officer Promotion, Continuation and Selective Early Removal in the Reserve of the Air Force, Section 2.7.3, all ANG/USAFR officers serving on a Limited Recall to Extended Active Duty (LEAD) tour...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05455
On 26 Oct 04, the applicant was selected for promotion to the Reserve grade of major (O-4) with a date of rank and promotion effective date of 1 Oct 98. On 10 Apr 06, as a result of the applicants request before the AFBCMR (AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2004-03564) to restore lost points, lost pay, compensation for lost promotion opportunities, retirement consideration, correct his DD Form 214, and correct his reserve status after separation from the Regular Air Force, a directive was published...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00087
The office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) General Counsel determined the appointment date is the date SECDEF approves the appointment or the date the oath was administered, whichever is later. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant agrees with the recommendation in the advisory opinion; however, she believes that the errors in her record caused by the break in service may have led to her nonselection for...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-00089
This section states, “…a reserve officer’s years of service include all service, other than constructive service, of the officer as a commissioned officer of any uniformed service (other than service as a warrant officer).” The applicant believes that use of the time as a warrant officer should not count when computing time for establishing MSD. Applicant’s complete response to the additional Air Force evaluation is at Exhibit...