Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05195
Original file (BC-2012-05195.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05195 

 

 COUNSEL: 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS: 

 

His official records be corrected to show that he was medically 
retired from active duty. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

Due to his service related Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) 
and depression in the wake of the natural disaster “Katrina” he 
separated from the Air Force after 17 plus years of honorable 
service with the Regular Air Force, AF Reserve, and Air National 
Guard (ANG). He has now managed to get back on his feet and 
would like to rejoin the service to complete 20 years, but the 
Surgeon General told him he is unfit to reenlist. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________ ______________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force on 
19 May 83. 

 

On 31 Jul 85, the applicant separated from the Regular Air Force 
to attend AF Reserve Officer Training Corp (ROTC). 

 

On 22 May 87, the applicant received an Air Force Reserve 
commission and served on active duty. 

 

On 25 Mar 92, the applicant was released from active duty after 
being twice non-selected for promotion, and was commissioned in 
the Air National Guard. 

 

On 31 May 96, the applicant was discharged from the Air National 
Guard and transferred to the Air Force Reserve. 

 


On 4 May 10, the applicant voluntarily separated from the Air 
Force Reserve. 

 

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of 
primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

NGB/SGPF recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an 
error or an injustice. Based upon the documentation submitted 
by the applicant, the Air Force Reserve Command found the 
applicant medically disqualified for general service on 
19 Mar 12 due to PTSD, HTN (Hypertension), right shoulder 
issues, flat feet, sickle cell, chronic headaches, and chronic 
neck pain. There is insufficient documentation to support the 
applicant’s request. 

 

A complete copy of the NGB/SGPF evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

The applicant submits a personal statement outlining his prior 
military experience, asserting he is still mentally and 
physically capable, and repeating his desire for a medical 
retirement (Exhibit D). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case, to include his rebuttal response to the 
advisory opinion, in judging the merits of the case; however, we 
agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force 
offices of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale 
as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the 
victim of an error of injustice. While the applicant contends 
that he suffers from a variety of ailments, including PTSD, he 
has presented no evidence to indicate that the conditions for 
which he was found disqualified were incurred in the line of 


duty (LOD) and should have formed the basis for a disability 
retirement or separation. Therefore, in the absence of evidence 
to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the 
requested relief. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-05195 in Executive Session on 9 Aug 13, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 Panel Chair 

 Member 

 Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 31 Oct 12, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records 

 Exhibit C. Letter, NGB/SGPF, dated 25 Jan 13. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 22 Apr 13. 

 Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 29 Apr 13, w/atch. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01608

    Original file (BC 2013 01608.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01608 XXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His discharge be changed to a medical retirement with the associated back pay. In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of medical documents, orders, a letter written by the XXXX Space Operations Squadron commander dated 26 March 2013, stating the applicant should have been allowed to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-01911

    Original file (BC-2012-01911.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    At the time she was discharged she had no idea that she was permanently disqualified from reentering a military service. The medical discharge is a false representation of her service in the Air National Guard (ANG). The complete A1PP evaluation is at Exhibit F. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 20 Dec 12 for review and comment within 30 days.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03304

    Original file (BC-2011-03304.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She should have been discharged via a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) and should have received disability compensation given the severity of her medical conditions. The complete SGPF evaluation is at Exhibit B. NGB/A1PS concurs with the SGPF’s advisory and therefore recommends no action be taken unless the applicant can provide documentation showing her medical conditions were deemed service connected...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03663

    Original file (BC-2012-03663.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03663 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His regular Reserve retirement be changed to disability/medical retirement. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04516

    Original file (BC-2012-04516.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04516 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code 6P (medically disqualified/pending waiver) be changed to allow him to reenter the service. Conditions which may seriously compromise the near-term well-being if an individual were to deploy are disqualifying for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00920

    Original file (BC 2013 00920.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00920 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She receives Incapacitation (INCAP) Pay, for the period 9 February 2012 through 28 October 2012. In support of her request, the applicant submits copies of her letter of request for INCAP pay dated 31 Aug 12, with application for INCAP pay with final...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00429

    Original file (BC-2013-00429.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00429 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge from the Air National Guard be changed to a medical retirement. Although the applicant claims he presented medical documentation and treatment records to his unit, we note that other than his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03094

    Original file (BC 2013 03094.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03094 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive retirement points for the period 27 Sep 10 through 1 Apr 12 rather than Incapacitation Pay (INCAP Pay). In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a personal statement; active duty orders for the period, 2 Jun – 26 Sep...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00741

    Original file (BC 2013 00741.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    No further treatment records were included or available for review while this applicant was a member with the MT ANG. Thus, a medical condition that was not unfitting while in service, and was not the cause of separation or retirement, which may later progress in severity causing disability, or which was merely determined service connected by the DVA, is not a basis to retroactively grant a military medical retirement. Exhibit F. Letter, SAF/MRBC, 12 Dec 13.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00805

    Original file (BC-2013-00805.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, the MEDCON orders were not completed. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/SGPF recommends denial. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the...