Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-01984
Original file (BC-2012-01984.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 
DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2012-01984 
 
COUNSEL:  NONE 
HEARING DESIRED:  NO 

IN THE MATTER OF: 
   
   
 
   
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 
 
He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his 
dependent. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 
 
He  deployed  to  Afghanistan  from  April  to  December  2009.    He 
submitted his retirement request upon his return from deployment 
with  an  effective  date  of  1  July  2010.    In  December  2009,  he 
returned  to  Afghanistan  as  a  contractor  and  was  not  informed 
that he could transfer his benefits to any of his children.  
 
The applicant submits no supporting documentation.  
 
The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
STATEMENT OF FACTS: 
 
The applicant retired from the Air National Guard on 1 July 2010 
in the grade of master sergeant. 
 
Any member of the Armed Forces who, on or after 1 August 2009, 
who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, had at least 6 years 
of service on the date of election my transfer unused Post-9/11 
benefits  to  their  dependents.    Service  Secretary’s  were 
required, as of 22 June 2009, to provide and document counseling 
regarding these benefits.  The Air Force issued AFGMI on 23 July 
2009, which required pre-separation counseling be documented on 
DD Form 2648.  However, the Air Force did not seek out members 
who  were  already  on  terminal  leave,  or  had  already  completed 
separation counseling.   
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
 
 

 
 

 

 

 
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
NGB/A1YR recommends approval.  The applicant’s Retention Officer 
Manager confirmed that he did not receive the Post-9/11 GI Bill 
separation  briefing  and  he  was  not  notified  of  the  requirement 
to transfer his benefits to his dependents prior to retirement. 
 
The complete A1YR evaluation is at Exhibit C. 
 
NGB/AIPS concurs with the subject matter expert’s recommendation 
to approve the applicant’s request. 
 
The complete AIPS evaluation is at Exhibit D. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
Copies  of  the  Air  Force  evaluation  were  forwarded  to  the 
applicant on 16 July 2012, for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit  E).    As  of  this  date,  this  office  has  received  no 
response. 
 ________________________________________________________________ 
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 
 
1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 
 
2.  The application was timely filed. 
 
3.  Sufficient  relevant  evidence  has  been  presented  to 
demonstrate  the  existence  of  error  or  injustice.    In  this 
respect,  the  Air  Force  office  of  primary  responsibility  (OPR) 
has indicated that through no fault of the applicant it appears 
he  may  not  have  been  afforded  the  opportunity  to  transfer  his 
benefits to his dependent.  As such, we agree with the OPR and 
recommend his records be corrected as indicated below. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: 
 
The  pertinent  military  records  of  the  Department  of  the  Air 
Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 30 June 
2010,  he  elected  to  transfer  his  Post  9/11  GI  Bill  Educational 
Benefits. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 

 

2 

 
 

 

 

 , Panel Chair 
, Member 
 , Member 

 
The  following  members  of  the  Board  considered  AFBCMR  Docket 
Number  BC-2012-01984  in  Executive  Session  on  8  January  2013, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 
 
 
 
 
 
All  members  voted  to  correct  the  records,  as  recommended.    The 
following documentary evidence was considered: 
 
    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 26 Apr 12. 
    Exhibit B.  Applicant’s Master Personnel Records. 
    Exhibit C.  Letter, NGB/A1YR, dated 27 Jun 12. 
    Exhibit D.  Letter, NGB/A1PS, dated 3 Jul 12d. 
    Exhibit E.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 16 Jul 12. 
 
 
 
 
                                    
                                   Panel Chair 
 
 

 

3 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01106

    Original file (BC-2012-01106.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Any member of the Armed Forces who, on or after 1 August 2009, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, had at least 6 years of service on the date of election may transfer unused Post-9/11 benefits to their dependents. During that time frame, many members did not receive separation counseling on the TEB requirements and missed the opportunity to submit their TEB request prior to retiring from the Air National Guard. ________________________________________________________________ THE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01533

    Original file (BC-2012-01533.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01533 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02744

    Original file (BC-2012-02744.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military personnel records are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air National Guard at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1YR recommends approval if the Board finds there is an injustice. The complete NGB/A1YR evaluation is at Exhibit C. NGB/A1PS states they concur with the NGB/A1YR advisory. In this...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01685

    Original file (BC-2012-01685.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 2 the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Record Exhibit C. Letter,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00707

    Original file (BC-2012-00707.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 7 Nov 2011 the DVA sent a letter that restored his education benefits. The complete A1YR evaluation is at Exhibit C. NGB/A1PS concurs with A1YR and recommends approval of the applicant’s request to change his eligibility to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependent. 3 ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02234

    Original file (BC-2012-02234.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02234 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill Educational benefits to his dependents. However, the Air Force did not engage in a Service-wide effort to seek out members who were already on terminal leave, or who had already completed their...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01611

    Original file (BC-2012-01611.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01611 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. Any member of the Armed Forces on or after August 1, 2009, who, at the time of approval of the individual’s request to transfer entitlement to educational assistance under...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00413

    Original file (BC-2012-00413.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits B and C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1YR recommends approval. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01773

    Original file (BC-2012-01773.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01773 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the National Guard Bureau, which is at...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00006

    Original file (BC-2012-00006.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    AGRs were not eligible for the transfer of educational benefits at the time of his retirement. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibits C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1YR recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. While the passage of the Post-9/11 Veterans...