Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02744
Original file (BC-2012-02744.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2012-02744
		
		COUNSEL:  NONE

		HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be allowed to accomplish a Post-9/11 GI Bill transfer of 
education benefits (TEB) to his dependent daughter.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He was recently made aware that he could not accomplish a Post-
9/11 GI Bill TEB to his dependent daughter because he did not 
complete any paperwork before he retired.  He was never informed  
or advised that the TEB paperwork had to be submitted and 
confirmed before his retirement.  He believes that the Post 
Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and depression that he was 
experiencing at that time, hindered his ability to take the 
necessary steps to transfer this important benefit.  

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is a former member of the Vermont Air National 
Guard who was permanently disability retired in the grade of 
Master Sergeant (MSgt), on 13 September 2011, per AFI 36-3212, 
Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, and Separation, 
with a compensable percentage for physical disability of 50 
percent.  

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, 
extracted from the applicant’s military personnel records are 
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of 
the Air National Guard at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________





AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

NGB/A1YR recommends approval if the Board finds there is an 
injustice.  A1YR states they contacted the retention office 
Manager (ROM) of the applicant’s former unit and the ROM stated 
that a month before the applicant retired, he received a Post-
9/11 GI Bill separation briefing and was given instructions on 
how he could apply for the benefit but unfortunately he was not 
given the Post-9/11 TEB briefing.  He was not informed of the 
requirement to complete a TEB to his dependents prior to his 
retirement.  

The complete NGB/A1YR evaluation is at Exhibit C.  

NGB/A1PS states they concur with the NGB/A1YR advisory.  

The complete NGB/A1PS evaluation is at Exhibit D.  

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the 
applicant on 30 August 2012 for review and comment within 30 
days (Exhibit E).  To date, a response has not been received.  

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.  

3.  Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an injustice.  In this respect, the 
Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR) have indicated 
that through no fault of the applicant it appears he may not 
have been afforded the opportunity to transfer his Post-9/11 GI 
Bill TEB to his dependents because he was not informed of the 
requirement to complete a TEB to his dependents prior to his 
retirement.  As such, we believe the applicant was the victim of 
an injustice and recommend his records be corrected as indicated 
below.  

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air 
Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 
25 January 2010, he elected to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill 
Educational Benefits.  

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered in Executive 
Session on 22 April 2013, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

			, Panel Chair
			, Member
			, Member

The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-02744 was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 5 June 2012, with atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant’s Master Personnel Record.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, NGB/A1YR, dated 25 July 2012.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, NGB/A1PS, dated 6 August 2012.
    Exhibit E.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 August 2012.




                                   
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00707

    Original file (BC-2012-00707.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 7 Nov 2011 the DVA sent a letter that restored his education benefits. The complete A1YR evaluation is at Exhibit C. NGB/A1PS concurs with A1YR and recommends approval of the applicant’s request to change his eligibility to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependent. 3 ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01533

    Original file (BC-2012-01533.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01533 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01300

    Original file (BC-2012-01300.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. For the first time in history, service members enrolled in thePost-9/11 GI Bill Program are able to transfer unused educational benefits to their dependent spouses or children. While we note the comments of NGB/A1PSindicating the applicant’s squadron did not receive the Post9/11 GI Bill Informational Briefing until after the applicanthad retired, we also note the applicant never out-processedthrough the Retention Office Manager (ROM),...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01106

    Original file (BC-2012-01106.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Any member of the Armed Forces who, on or after 1 August 2009, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, had at least 6 years of service on the date of election may transfer unused Post-9/11 benefits to their dependents. During that time frame, many members did not receive separation counseling on the TEB requirements and missed the opportunity to submit their TEB request prior to retiring from the Air National Guard. ________________________________________________________________ THE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02234

    Original file (BC-2012-02234.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02234 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill Educational benefits to his dependents. However, the Air Force did not engage in a Service-wide effort to seek out members who were already on terminal leave, or who had already completed their...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-01346

    Original file (BC-2012-01346.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The complete NGB/A1PS evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In an undated letter the applicant responds that he is submitting the letter to provide further explanation of his request to accomplish the Post 9/11 TEB. We note the Air Force office of primary responsibility recommends approval if the Board finds an injustice. However, based on the applicant's complete submission, we find no...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01685

    Original file (BC-2012-01685.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 2 the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Record Exhibit C. Letter,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 01270

    Original file (BC 2012 01270.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01270 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. He requests that the TEB be corrected to reflect his daughter and the 18 months of VA benefits he allocated to her in Aug 2009. He retired in Jun 2011 and submitted his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00413

    Original file (BC-2012-00413.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits B and C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1YR recommends approval. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02762

    Original file (BC-2011-02762.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of reserve service. If he can provide documentation showing he attempted to change his daughter's status in DEERs prior to retiring and the Board finds there was injustice, NGB/RS recommends approval of his eligibility to transfer his Post 9/11 GJ Bill education benefits to his dependent. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).