Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00413
Original file (BC-2012-00413.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00413 
COUNSEL: NONE 
HEARING DESIRED: NO 

IN THE MATTER OF: 
   
   
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 
 
He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his 
dependent. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 
 
On 14 Mar 11, he submitted an application to transfer his Post-
9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependent son.  He did not discover 
the error until 5 days after his son turned 23.  
 
In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of VA 
22-1990, Application for VA Education Benefits and a physician’s 
memorandum. 
 
The  applicant's  complete  submission,  with  attachments,  is  at 
Exhibit A. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
STATEMENT OF FACTS: 
 
The  applicant  is  currently  serving  on  active  duty  in  the  Air 
National Guard.  
 
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained  in  the  letter  prepared  by  the  appropriate  offices  of 
the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits B and C.  
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
NGB/A1YR recommends approval.   
 
A1YR  states  the  applicant  started  the  process  to  transfer  his 
Post-9/11  GI  Bill  benefits  to  his  son  prior  to  leaving  on  a 
deployment.    However,  the  request  was  submitted  through  the 
wrong TEB website.  By the time, the applicant returned from his 
deployment  and  became  aware  of  the  application  error,  he  was 
unable  to  process  the  correct  TEB  request  because  his  son  had 
turned 23 years old. 
 

The complete A1YR evaluation is at Exhibit B 
 
NGB/A1PS  concurs  with  the  NGB  Subject  Matter  Expert’s  (SMEs) 
advisory  and  recommends  approval  of  the  applicant’s  request  to 
transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits. 
 
The complete A1PS evaluation is at Exhibit C. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
Copies  of  the  Air  Force  evaluations  were  forwarded  to  the 
applicant  on  27  Mar  12  for  review  and  comment  within  30  days 
(Exhibit  D).    As  of  this  date,  this  office  has  not  received  a 
response. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 
 
1.  The  applicant  has  exhausted  all  remedies  provided  by 
existing law or regulations. 
 
2.  The application was timely filed. 
 
3.  Insufficient  relevant  evidence  has  been  presented  to 
demonstrate  the  existence  of  error  or  injustice.    We  note  the 
comments of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility that 
if  the  Board  finds  there  was  an  injustice,  they  recommend 
approval; however, we find the evidence provided is insufficient 
to  recommend  granting  the  applicant’s  request.    While  the 
applicant  states  he  submitted  an  application  to  transfer  his 
Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits on 14 Mar 11; however, ,it appears he 
did  not  exercise  due  diligence  in  transferring  his  benefits 
after  the  1 Aug  09  implementation  date  and  prior  to  his 
deployment  in  Mar  11.    The  applicant’s  VA  22-1990,  Application 
for  VA  Education  Benefits  reflects  he  had  been  on  continuous 
active  duty  for  the  prior  10 years  and  specifically  from 
1 August 2009 to at least 31 Jul 11.  Therefore, in the absence 
of  evidence  to  the  contrary,  we  find  no  basis  to  recommend 
granting the relief sought in this application 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

2 
 

 
 
 

Panel Chair 
Member 
Member 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 
 
The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not 
demonstrate  the  existence  of  material  error  or  injustice;  that 
the  application  was  denied  without  a  personal  appearance;  and 
that  the  application  will  only  be  reconsidered  upon  the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application.  
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
The  following  members  of  the  Board  considered  AFBCMR  BC-2012-
00413 in Executive Session on 13 Sep 12, under the provisions of 
AFI 36-2603: 
 

 
By  a  majority  vote,  the  members  voted  to  deny  the  request.     
voted to grant the request and elected not to submit a Minority 
Report.  The following documentary evidence was considered: 
 
    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 10 Jan 12, w/atchs. 
    Exhibit B.  Letter, NGB/A1YR, dated 9 Mar 12. 
    Exhibit C.  Letter, NGB/A1PS, dated 12 Mar 12. 
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 27 Mar 12  
 
 
 
 
                                   
                                  Panel Chair 
 

3 
 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02744

    Original file (BC-2012-02744.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military personnel records are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air National Guard at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1YR recommends approval if the Board finds there is an injustice. The complete NGB/A1YR evaluation is at Exhibit C. NGB/A1PS states they concur with the NGB/A1YR advisory. In this...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01106

    Original file (BC-2012-01106.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Any member of the Armed Forces who, on or after 1 August 2009, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, had at least 6 years of service on the date of election may transfer unused Post-9/11 benefits to their dependents. During that time frame, many members did not receive separation counseling on the TEB requirements and missed the opportunity to submit their TEB request prior to retiring from the Air National Guard. ________________________________________________________________ THE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01533

    Original file (BC-2012-01533.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01533 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01685

    Original file (BC-2012-01685.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 2 the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Record Exhibit C. Letter,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01300

    Original file (BC-2012-01300.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. For the first time in history, service members enrolled in thePost-9/11 GI Bill Program are able to transfer unused educational benefits to their dependent spouses or children. While we note the comments of NGB/A1PSindicating the applicant’s squadron did not receive the Post9/11 GI Bill Informational Briefing until after the applicanthad retired, we also note the applicant never out-processedthrough the Retention Office Manager (ROM),...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02234

    Original file (BC-2012-02234.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02234 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill Educational benefits to his dependents. However, the Air Force did not engage in a Service-wide effort to seek out members who were already on terminal leave, or who had already completed their...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01611

    Original file (BC-2012-01611.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01611 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. Any member of the Armed Forces on or after August 1, 2009, who, at the time of approval of the individual’s request to transfer entitlement to educational assistance under...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00672

    Original file (BC-2012-00672.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00672 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be entitled to the Post 9/11 GI Bill educational benefits. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). Therefore, we recommend the applicant’s record be corrected as indicated below.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01457

    Original file (BC-2012-01457.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He attempted to transfer his benefits to both of his sons before he retired. We note the Air Force office of primary responsibility recommends approval if the Board finds an injustice. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00707

    Original file (BC-2012-00707.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 7 Nov 2011 the DVA sent a letter that restored his education benefits. The complete A1YR evaluation is at Exhibit C. NGB/A1PS concurs with A1YR and recommends approval of the applicant’s request to change his eligibility to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependent. 3 ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that...