ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01973
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His narrative reason for separation of personality disorder,
separation code of JFX, and reentry (RE) code of 2C
(involuntary separation with honorable discharge), be changed to
allow him to reenlist in the Air Force.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
A similar appeal was considered and denied by the Board on
3 January 2008. For an accounting of the facts and the
rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record
of Proceedings (ROP) at Exhibit F.
On 4 September 2012 the applicant submitted a request for
reconsideration. In support of his request, he provided a
Mental Health Outpatient Treatment Plan Note from a local
civilian staff psychiatrist and a 3 May 2002, citation for an
Air Force Achievement Medal.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit G.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
In earlier findings, the Board determined there was insufficient
evidence to warrant any corrective action. After thoroughly
reviewing the additional documentation submitted in support of
his appeal and the evidence of record, we do not believe the
applicant has overcome the rationale expressed in the previous
decision. Therefore, in view of the above, and in the absence
of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis upon which to
recommend favorable reconsideration of the applicants request.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application
in Executive Session on 6 June 2013, under the provisions of AFI
36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR
Docket Number BC-2007-01973-2:
Exhibit F. ROP, dtd 10 January 2008, w/Exhibits
A through E.
Exhibit G. Letter, Applicant dtd 21 August 2012, w/atchs.
Panel Chair
AFBCMR
1500 West Perimeter Road, Suite 3700
Joint Base Andrews NAF Washington, MD 20762
Dear:
After careful consideration of your request for reconsideration of your application for
correction of military records, AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2007-01973-2, the Board
determined there was insufficient evidence of an error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
Accordingly, your application was again denied.
This decision does not preclude an additional request for reconsideration, but such a
request must be accompanied by newly discovered relevant evidence that was not reasonably
available at the time of your original application. Absent such additional evidence, further
consideration of your application is not possible.
BY DIRECTION OF THE PANEL CHAIR
Chief Examiner
Air Force Board for Correction
of Military Records
Attachment:
Addendum to Record of Board Proceedings
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
WASHINGTON, DC
Office of the Assistant Secretary
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC 2007 01973 2
________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. Panel Chair AFBCMR 1500 West Perimeter Road, Suite 3700 Joint Base...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04234-2
For an accounting of the facts and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings (ROP) at Exhibit F. On 5 November 2012 the applicant submitted a request for reconsideration. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that...
AF | BCMR | CY1990 | BC 1990 02737 2
On 20 August 2009, a copy of the FBI report was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit L). _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: In earlier findings, the Board determined that there was insufficient evidence to warrant correcting the records to upgrade the applicants discharge. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03156 ADDENDUM
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: A similar appeal was considered and denied by the Board on 5 June 2012. After thoroughly reviewing the additional documentation submitted in support of his appeal and the evidence of record, we do not believe the applicant has overcome the rationale expressed in our previous decision. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 04310 2
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2011-04310 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reserve retirement be changed to a disability retirement. The applicant disagreed with the IPEB decision; however there is no evidence to show she sought further appellate review of the IPEB findings and recommended disposition. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-1990-02453-4
For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicants request; and, the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings (ROP) at Exhibit E. On 8 May 2006, 12 August 2011 and 13 September 2011, the applicant was notified that his requests for reconsideration were not favorably considered as he failed to submit new and relevant evidence. In support of his request, he submits a personal statement with several signatures and several...
AF | BCMR | CY1990 | BC 1990 02453 4
For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicants request; and, the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings (ROP) at Exhibit E. On 8 May 2006, 12 August 2011 and 13 September 2011, the applicant was notified that his requests for reconsideration were not favorably considered as he failed to submit new and relevant evidence. In support of his request, he submits a personal statement with several signatures and several...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-00402-2
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-00402 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Under Other Than Honorable Conditions (UOTHC) Discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. After again reviewing this application and the evidence provided in support of his appeal, we remain unpersuaded that the applicants...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2001-01784-3
His complete submission, with attachments is at Exhibit L. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: After again reviewing the evidence of record, the applicant’s prior submissions, and the additional evidence provided in support of his appeal, we are not persuaded the applicant’s records should be corrected to show he was awarded the Purple Heart medal. _________________________________________________________________ The following members...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2005-03220
________________________________________________________________ RESUME OF CASE: On 25 Apr 06, the Board considered and denied applicant’s original request for direct promotion to lieutenant colonel and continuation on active duty in that grade until 31 Mar 97. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the rationale of the decision by the Board, see the Addendum to the ROP at Exhibit N. In his latest submission, dated 6 Sep 09, the applicant requests reconsideration of...