Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04530
Original file (BC-2012-04530.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04530 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

 _____________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

Her 11 September 2012 Fitness Assessment (FA) score be declared 
void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System 
(AFFMS). 

 
_______________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

The number of sit-ups she performed during the contested FA were 
inaccurately counted. The monitor/counter was making numerous 
adjustments to the way she was sitting which affected her 
properly counting the number of sit-ups performed. The Physical 
Training Leader (PTL) noted this during the assessment and 
advocated on her behalf to the Fitness Assessment Cell (FAC) 
staff, but to no avail. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 
________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant currently serves on extended active duty as a 
member of the Air National Guard (ANG) in the grade of master 
sergeant (E-7). 

 

On 11 September 2012, the applicant participated in the 
contested FA. She attained a composite score of 32.50 after 
receiving the following component scores: abdominal 
circumference – 20.00 points, push-ups – 8.20 points, sit-ups – 
4.30 points, and cardio – 0.00 points. 

 

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
described in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of 
the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial, indicating the applicant has 
presented no clear evidence of an error or injustice. While the 
applicant has provided a copy of her signed fitness assessment 


score sheet, a signed memo from her chain of command, and a memo 
outlining the facts and circumstances of her contested FA, she 
ultimately chose to self-terminate her test, resulting in the 
contested failure. 

 

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, 
is at Exhibit C. 

 

 ______________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

She was told that her signature on the fitness assessment score 
sheet was to document that she had self-terminated the test. 
She would not have signed the form if she had known it was 
agreeing to the validity of the test. She reiterates that the 
manner in which the counter let go of her feet and readjusted 
several times while she was performing her sit-ups caused her 
sit-ups to be mis-counted. She argues that the counter’s 
actions were so disruptive that she could not recover. As a 
senior non-commissioned officer, she would take personal 
accountability if the test outcome was due to her own error or 
shortcoming. Her command has shown their belief in her and the 
necessity to have the contested FA score removed from AFFMS. 

 

A complete copy of the applicant’s response is at Exhibit E. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an injustice. The applicant 
contends that she was unable to attain the minimum number of 
sit-ups due to the manner in which the contested fitness 
assessment (FA) was administered. We note the comments of the 
Air Force Office of primary responsibility indicating the 
applicant provided no clear evidence of an error or injustice; 
however, we believe a preponderance of the evidence indicates 
that corrective action is warranted. In this respect, we note 
the unequivocal support of the applicant’s commander and rating 
chain indicating that while the applicant’s FA failure was 
attributable to her decision to terminate the FA, she only did 
so because she was unable to attain the minimum number of sit-
ups for an overall passing score due to the manner in which the 
sit-up component of the test was administered. Although the 
physical training leader (PTL) noted this discrepancy during the 
assessment and advocated in the applicant’s behalf, the fitness 
assessment cell (FAC) staff was unable to resolve the situation 


at the scene. In our view, the applicant did everything she 
should have done to attempt to resolve the situation during the 
contested FA. Therefore, in view of the above, we recommend the 
applicant’s records be corrected as indicated below. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: 

 

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air 
Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that her 
11 September 2012 Fitness Assessment be declared void and 
removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-04530 in Executive Session on 13 June 2013, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 Panel Chair 

 Member 

 Member 

 

All members voted to correct the records as recommended. The 
following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 13 September 2012, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Military Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 11 October 2012, 

 w/atchs. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 October 2012. 

 Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 5 November 2012, 

 w/atchs. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00727

    Original file (BC 2013 00727.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The counter only counted 42 sit ups when he actually completed 55. An e-mail from the counter shows her error when counting the applicant’s sit ups. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show the fitness assessment dated 26 April 2012, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04659

    Original file (BC-2012-04659.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Upon completion of the sit-up assessment, the counter identified to the Fitness Assessment Cell that his sit- up count was off by 4. We took note of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we find insufficient evidence of an error or injustice to warrant removal of the contested FA in its entirety. We took note of the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility to correct the sit-up component of the contested FA to reflect 45 and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04264

    Original file (BC-2012-04264.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04264 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His fitness assessment (FA), dated 24 August 2012, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The Officer in Charge (OIC) told him that it was too late for another measurement as had already left the measuring room. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05369

    Original file (BC 2012 05369.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    DPSIM states that the applicant provided a memorandum from the Director, Fitness and Sports Complex at Kadena Air Base, Japan which states her staff was aware of the manufacturer’s guidance that HR monitors can cause erratic readings and have previously separated walkers after crossing the finish line to keep their distance to avoid syncing with other HR monitors worn by other walkers. After he completed the cardio component of the FA, he had a 20 minute argument with three of the FACs and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04891

    Original file (BC-2012-04891.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Her fitness assessment score sheet has an incorrect run time of 16 minutes and 23 seconds. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant's submission, we see no evidence of error or impropriety in the administration of the contested FA and subsequent score. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03983

    Original file (BC 2013 03983.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Additionally, the FAC waited until 45 seconds into the assessment to tell the applicant to “fix her body.” She has never failed an FA before or since the contested assessment. FAC augmentee or another member paired to accomplish muscle fitness components will monitor and count the correct number of push-ups. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 4 Mar 14.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03575

    Original file (BC 2013 03575.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The record also indicates the applicant did not complete the cardio component of the FA. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant’s details her account of the facts related to the contested FA; she highlights the fact that the fitness AFI in effect at the time (dated 20 Dec 10) did not stipulate how to address issues when military members disagree with FA assessments. In this respect, we note the Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05851

    Original file (BC 2012 05851.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 28 June 2012, the applicant’s alternate Unit Fitness Program Manager (UFPM) recommended her 30 May 2012 FA be voided due to the discrepancy in the manner of how her push-ups were counted and her re-test rating of excellent. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant’s complete submission, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) to correct AFFMS to reflect the applicant was exempt from the push-up...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05600

    Original file (BC 2012 05600.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05600 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 14 October 2012 Fitness Assessment (FA) score be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). On 16 October 2012, the applicant’s commander indicated he was aware that the applicant did not complete the FA and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00931

    Original file (BC 2013 00931.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating Push-ups/score 5 Feb 13 90.10 Excellent 39/6.50 *17 Jan 13 81.70 Unsatisfactory 35/0.00 26 Jan 12 94.90 Excellent 50/9.40 10 Jan 11 93.30 Excellent 49/9.00 19 Feb 10 90.00 Excellent 49/9.00 * Contested FA In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, to determine overall fitness the Air Force uses an overall composite fitness score and minimum scores per three component areas: Aerobic Fitness (1.5 mile run),...