Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04264
Original file (BC-2012-04264.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2012-04264
		
			COUNSEL:  NONE

			HEARING DESIRED: NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His fitness assessment (FA), dated 24 August 2012, be removed 
from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

On 24 August 2012, he was administered a fitness assessment at 
Minot Air Force Base.  Upon arriving at the fitness assessment 
cell (FAC), he waited in the lobby until the Physical Training 
Leader (PTL) called him into the measurement room.  Once he 
arrived in the room, he was immediately told to take off his 
shirt.  He thought this was odd since his previous testers 
always asked him to hold his shirt while being measured.

The PTL then pressed on his side to find the top of his hip.  As 
the measurement began, he noticed the tape was not straight by 
looking through the mirror.  The tape was significantly lower on 
his hip than it had been in previous measurements.  The PTL 
stated that is where his hip bone is.  The PTL then grabbed his 
hand and placed it onto his own hip bone.  

The PTL pulled the tape for the second measurement.  Again, he 
told the PTL that the tape was too low.  The PTL stated that is 
where the first tape mark is and that is where the tape is 
staying.  They discussed the situation and the PTL told him that 
he is a trained PTL and that he would determine where the top of 
the bone is located.  The same issues were present during the 
third and final measurement.  When the PTL left the room, he 
showed the fitness score sheet to a female PTL and started to 
laugh.

He left the room and immediately asked who was in charge.  He 
also requested to be re-measured to validate the accuracy of his 
measurements.  The Officer in Charge (OIC) told him that it was 
too late for another measurement as had already left the 
measuring room.  The OIC further stated if he did not agree with 
the waist measurement, he could stop the test now with a zero 
and submit an Air Force military corrections form.  He explained 
the PTL’s actions, but was told there was nothing that could be 
done. 
He left the FAC and spoke with his superintendent.  He and his 
superintendent went back to the FAC and again, spoke with the 
OIC. The OIC maintained there was nothing he could do because 
the PTLs are in charge of the test.  The OIC did confide in his 
superintendent that the FAC has been having issues with the 
measurements and that the Chief’s Group has brought the issue up 
to the Assessment Teams attention.  The OIC further stated that 
PTLs are taught to get another PTL or the OIC if an issue 
arises.  The PTL did not follow those rules and did not get 
anyone else.  The policy of getting another trained person in 
the room was implemented because the Minot fitness cell had 
several problems since the switch from civilian to military 
testers.

In his 10 years of military service, he has never failed a FA, 
nor has he had any issues with the test administrator or the 
abdominal circumference.  His past four measurements have been 
37”, 36”, 37” and 37” respectively.  How could he have possibly 
measured a 39.5” on his 24 August 2012 test when his weight for 
the past 5 years has been within 4 pounds?  This test was 
administered significantly different than any of his previous 
assessments.

In support of his appeal, the applicant submits a personal 
statement, his fitness score sheet, AFFMS print out and a letter 
from the FAC officer in charge.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is currently serving in the Air Force in the grade 
of technical sergeant. 

On 24 August 2012, the applicant participated in the contested 
FA and attained an unsatisfactory score.  Information extracted 
from the AFFMS indicates the applicant failed the abdominal 
circumference component of the contested FA.

The applicant’s last five FA results are as follows:

	Date	Composite Score	Rating	

	16 Nov 12	    95.36	Excellent
 *24 Aug 12	    13.00	Unsatisfactory
	24 Feb 12	    90.56	Excellent
	15 Apr 11	     N/A	Exempt
	15 Dec 10	    81.70	Satisfactory

*Contested Fitness Assessment


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial.  AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, 
states all members will complete the abdominal circumference 
unless there is a composite exemption or, under rare 
circumstances, a component exemption determined by the EP/FPM 
upon recommendation by the provider.  It further states that the 
tester will determine final horizontal – vertical intersection 
point for landmark confirmation during the abdominal 
circumference measuring.  

The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit B.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 11 January 2013, for review and comment within 
30 days (Exhibit C).  As of this date, this office has received 
no response.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an injustice to warrant relief.  We 
considered the applicant’s complete submission and the OPR’s 
recommendation not to remove the fitness assessment score.  
However, we believe the applicant has provided sufficient 
evidence as to whether the abdominal circumference measurement 
was completed in a fair manner.  In this respect, we note the 
overall score of the contested assessment represents a 
significant regression when compared to his scores both prior 
and subsequent to the period under review.  Based on the 
foregoing, we recommend his records be corrected as indicated 
below. 

________________________________________________________________



THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air 
Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that the 
fitness assessment dated 24 August 2012, be removed from the Air 
Force Fitness Management System. 

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-04264 in Executive Session on 27 June 2013 under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

				Panel Chair
				Member
				Member

All members voted to correct the record, as recommended.  The 
following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 7 Sep 12, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 14 Dec 12, w/atchs.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 Jan 13.




                                                                    
Panel Chair







Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02245

    Original file (BC 2013 02245.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Other testers have been improperly measured at the same location. The tester will ensure tape is parallel to the floor at the level of the landmark (bottom edge of the tape just contacts landmark), is snug, but does not compress the bare skin. While the applicant has provided personal statements, a letter from her unit PTL, and an eyewitness statement from another Airman indicating that the AC measurement component of the contested FA may have been administered incorrectly, she has not met...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03418

    Original file (BC 2013 03418.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    If any of the measures differ by more than one inch from the other two, the tester will take an additional measurement. The tester will record this value as the AC measurement. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04720

    Original file (BC 2013 04720 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Airman may use one hand to initially assist the tester in anchoring the tape measure to the body, but must remove the hand from the tape measure before the official measurement is recorded. The tester will ensure tape is parallel to the floor at the level of the landmark (bottom edge of the tape just contacts landmark), is snug, but does not compress the bare skin. The tester will record this value as the AC measurement.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05753

    Original file (BC 2012 05753.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05753 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 11 Dec 12 Fitness Assessment (FA) results reflect an abdominal circumference (AC) measurement of 38 inches and a composite score of 76.2. The applicant’s most recent FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 21 Feb...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05629

    Original file (BC 2012 05629.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    She was re-measured a week later by a different FAC member [witnessed by the Unit Fitness Program Manager (UFPM)], and her measurements were, height (66 inches) and waist (30.5 inches). DPSIM states that the applicant has not provided sufficient evidence that would indicate the 5 Sep 12 AC measurement did not comply with the Air Force Instruction. The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03771

    Original file (BC 2013 03771.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03771 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 18 Jul 13 Fitness Assessment (FA) be declared void and removed from his records. Therefore, in view of the fact the evidence before us indicates the applicant’s AC measurement has never been above 35.5 inches (2006), and his AC measurement was recorded as 32.5 inches during an FA taking place only days after...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03388

    Original file (BC 2013 03388.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    After completing his FA, he requested his Unit Fitness Program Manager (UFPM) -re- accomplish an AC measurement. The tester will record this value as the AC measurement.” The applicant did not provide his fitness score sheet nor did he provide documentation from the FAC acknowledging the error and an invalidation memorandum from the Unit Commander indicating his/her decision to invalidate the FA. While we note the applicant's stated request to have the entire FA removed, we believe the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05596

    Original file (BC 2012 05596.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05596 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Fitness Assessments (FA), dated 11 Jun 12 and 6 Sep 12, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). While we note the applicant’s stated request to have the entire FA removed, the Air Force office of primary responsibility has...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00451

    Original file (BC-2012-00451.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    When his waist was measured, the landmark was an inch above the right uppermost hip bone. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02006

    Original file (BC-2012-02006.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His provider’s memorandum for record (MFR) stated he had a medical condition that prevented him from attaining a passing score on the walking component of his FA; however, the test was not removed from his records. Upon expiration of your 42 days reconditioning, you are cleared to test in all components of the AF Fitness Test.” On 29 May 12, a memorandum was sent to applicant requesting additional documentation for removal of his FA dated 29 Oct 10. While he contends that he was...