RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04264
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His fitness assessment (FA), dated 24 August 2012, be removed
from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
On 24 August 2012, he was administered a fitness assessment at
Minot Air Force Base. Upon arriving at the fitness assessment
cell (FAC), he waited in the lobby until the Physical Training
Leader (PTL) called him into the measurement room. Once he
arrived in the room, he was immediately told to take off his
shirt. He thought this was odd since his previous testers
always asked him to hold his shirt while being measured.
The PTL then pressed on his side to find the top of his hip. As
the measurement began, he noticed the tape was not straight by
looking through the mirror. The tape was significantly lower on
his hip than it had been in previous measurements. The PTL
stated that is where his hip bone is. The PTL then grabbed his
hand and placed it onto his own hip bone.
The PTL pulled the tape for the second measurement. Again, he
told the PTL that the tape was too low. The PTL stated that is
where the first tape mark is and that is where the tape is
staying. They discussed the situation and the PTL told him that
he is a trained PTL and that he would determine where the top of
the bone is located. The same issues were present during the
third and final measurement. When the PTL left the room, he
showed the fitness score sheet to a female PTL and started to
laugh.
He left the room and immediately asked who was in charge. He
also requested to be re-measured to validate the accuracy of his
measurements. The Officer in Charge (OIC) told him that it was
too late for another measurement as had already left the
measuring room. The OIC further stated if he did not agree with
the waist measurement, he could stop the test now with a zero
and submit an Air Force military corrections form. He explained
the PTLs actions, but was told there was nothing that could be
done.
He left the FAC and spoke with his superintendent. He and his
superintendent went back to the FAC and again, spoke with the
OIC. The OIC maintained there was nothing he could do because
the PTLs are in charge of the test. The OIC did confide in his
superintendent that the FAC has been having issues with the
measurements and that the Chiefs Group has brought the issue up
to the Assessment Teams attention. The OIC further stated that
PTLs are taught to get another PTL or the OIC if an issue
arises. The PTL did not follow those rules and did not get
anyone else. The policy of getting another trained person in
the room was implemented because the Minot fitness cell had
several problems since the switch from civilian to military
testers.
In his 10 years of military service, he has never failed a FA,
nor has he had any issues with the test administrator or the
abdominal circumference. His past four measurements have been
37, 36, 37 and 37 respectively. How could he have possibly
measured a 39.5 on his 24 August 2012 test when his weight for
the past 5 years has been within 4 pounds? This test was
administered significantly different than any of his previous
assessments.
In support of his appeal, the applicant submits a personal
statement, his fitness score sheet, AFFMS print out and a letter
from the FAC officer in charge.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving in the Air Force in the grade
of technical sergeant.
On 24 August 2012, the applicant participated in the contested
FA and attained an unsatisfactory score. Information extracted
from the AFFMS indicates the applicant failed the abdominal
circumference component of the contested FA.
The applicants last five FA results are as follows:
Date Composite Score Rating
16 Nov 12 95.36 Excellent
*24 Aug 12 13.00 Unsatisfactory
24 Feb 12 90.56 Excellent
15 Apr 11 N/A Exempt
15 Dec 10 81.70 Satisfactory
*Contested Fitness Assessment
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial. AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program,
states all members will complete the abdominal circumference
unless there is a composite exemption or, under rare
circumstances, a component exemption determined by the EP/FPM
upon recommendation by the provider. It further states that the
tester will determine final horizontal vertical intersection
point for landmark confirmation during the abdominal
circumference measuring.
The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at
Exhibit B.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 11 January 2013, for review and comment within
30 days (Exhibit C). As of this date, this office has received
no response.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an injustice to warrant relief. We
considered the applicants complete submission and the OPRs
recommendation not to remove the fitness assessment score.
However, we believe the applicant has provided sufficient
evidence as to whether the abdominal circumference measurement
was completed in a fair manner. In this respect, we note the
overall score of the contested assessment represents a
significant regression when compared to his scores both prior
and subsequent to the period under review. Based on the
foregoing, we recommend his records be corrected as indicated
below.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that the
fitness assessment dated 24 August 2012, be removed from the Air
Force Fitness Management System.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-04264 in Executive Session on 27 June 2013 under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Panel Chair
Member
Member
All members voted to correct the record, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 7 Sep 12, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 14 Dec 12, w/atchs.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 Jan 13.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02245
Other testers have been improperly measured at the same location. The tester will ensure tape is parallel to the floor at the level of the landmark (bottom edge of the tape just contacts landmark), is snug, but does not compress the bare skin. While the applicant has provided personal statements, a letter from her unit PTL, and an eyewitness statement from another Airman indicating that the AC measurement component of the contested FA may have been administered incorrectly, she has not met...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03418
If any of the measures differ by more than one inch from the other two, the tester will take an additional measurement. The tester will record this value as the AC measurement. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04720
The Airman may use one hand to initially assist the tester in anchoring the tape measure to the body, but must remove the hand from the tape measure before the official measurement is recorded. The tester will ensure tape is parallel to the floor at the level of the landmark (bottom edge of the tape just contacts landmark), is snug, but does not compress the bare skin. The tester will record this value as the AC measurement.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05753
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05753 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 11 Dec 12 Fitness Assessment (FA) results reflect an abdominal circumference (AC) measurement of 38 inches and a composite score of 76.2. The applicants most recent FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 21 Feb...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05629
She was re-measured a week later by a different FAC member [witnessed by the Unit Fitness Program Manager (UFPM)], and her measurements were, height (66 inches) and waist (30.5 inches). DPSIM states that the applicant has not provided sufficient evidence that would indicate the 5 Sep 12 AC measurement did not comply with the Air Force Instruction. The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03771
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03771 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 18 Jul 13 Fitness Assessment (FA) be declared void and removed from his records. Therefore, in view of the fact the evidence before us indicates the applicants AC measurement has never been above 35.5 inches (2006), and his AC measurement was recorded as 32.5 inches during an FA taking place only days after...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03388
After completing his FA, he requested his Unit Fitness Program Manager (UFPM) -re- accomplish an AC measurement. The tester will record this value as the AC measurement. The applicant did not provide his fitness score sheet nor did he provide documentation from the FAC acknowledging the error and an invalidation memorandum from the Unit Commander indicating his/her decision to invalidate the FA. While we note the applicant's stated request to have the entire FA removed, we believe the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05596
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05596 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Fitness Assessments (FA), dated 11 Jun 12 and 6 Sep 12, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). While we note the applicants stated request to have the entire FA removed, the Air Force office of primary responsibility has...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00451
When his waist was measured, the landmark was an inch above the right uppermost hip bone. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02006
His providers memorandum for record (MFR) stated he had a medical condition that prevented him from attaining a passing score on the walking component of his FA; however, the test was not removed from his records. Upon expiration of your 42 days reconditioning, you are cleared to test in all components of the AF Fitness Test. On 29 May 12, a memorandum was sent to applicant requesting additional documentation for removal of his FA dated 29 Oct 10. While he contends that he was...