AFBCMR BC-2012-04213
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR
SUBJECT:
Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air
Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our
decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we
recommend that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to
APPLICANT, be corrected to show that he was not discharged from the Air Force on 24 May
2012, but was continued on active duty until 18 June 2012, on which date he was released from
active duty.
Members of the Board considered this application on 19 March 2013.
Panel Chair
Attachment:
Ltr, ARPC/DPA, dated 12 Oct 12, w/atch.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04542
AFBCMR BC-2012-04542 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02898
She transferred to the Air Force Reserve effective 29 May 2012; the date her appointment was approved by the Secretary of Defense (SecDef). The General Counsel determined the appointment date is the date the SecDef approved the appointment or the date the oath was administered, whichever is later. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01595
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01595 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His date of separation (DOS) from active duty in the Regular Air Force be adjusted to reflect the day before his appointment in the United States Air Force Reserve (USAFR) in order to eliminate his break in service. DPT states the applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04624
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04624 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His appointment into the Air Force Reserve be changed from 28 Nov 12 to 16 Oct 12 to eliminate his break-in-service. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Through no fault of his own, due to a delay in processing the scroll at the Office of the Secretary of Defense (SECDEF), he unjustly incurred a break-in-service between his...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | bc-2012-02329
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the AFBCMR BC-2012-02329 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03214
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03214 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect his Foreign Service in Korea from 30 January through 30 June 1968. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicantÂ’s complete submission, we believe a preponderance of the evidence supports...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02048
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit B. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01684
We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02407
He believes his commitment should be based on his Statement of Understanding (SOU) and the RSC on file. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 22 August 2012, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit C). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01983
He retired effective 1 August 2009, but if he had received this information during his attendance at the Transition Assistance Program (TAP), he would have transferred his benefits at that time. We note the comments of the Air Force office of primary responsibility; nonetheless, we find the applicant was not properly briefed on the extension requirements for his entitlement to the benefits of the TEB. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of...