DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
WASHINGTON, DC
Office of the Assistant Secretary
Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the
AFBCMR BC-2012-02329
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR
SUBJECT:
Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our
decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we
recommend the former member’s records be corrected to show that:
APPLICANT, be corrected to show that he was not discharged from the Air Force on 1 March
2011, but on that date he was continued on active duty until 16 March 2011, on which date he
was discharged from active duty.
Attachment:
ARPC/DPA dtd 10 July 2012
Members of the Board, and considered this application on 12 March 2013.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | bc-2012-02118
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the AFBCMR BC-2012-02118 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02390
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the AFBCMR BC-2012-02390 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-01257
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 29 November 2011 and was discharged on 16 December 2011. The Medical Consultant’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. 2 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states he was misled by a fraudulent promise by Air Force personnel. Exhibit C. Letter, AFBCMR Medical...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01820
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01820 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His date of rank (DOR) for promotion to major (O-4) be adjusted to 14 March 2012 rather than 1 September 2012. If he had met and been selected by the CY11 ROPMA board in 2011, his commander could have requested his promotion be accelerated after...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04532
AFBCMR BC-2011-04532 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected to show that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03184
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03184 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be reinstated into the Air Force or have his reentry (RE) code changed to allow him to reenter the military. We also note the Air Force office of primary responsibility asserts that had the Air Force been made aware of the applicants arrest, it...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-04161
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility and SAF/MRB Legal Advisor attached at Exhibits B and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1PF recommends approval. While we note the comments of the SAF/MRB Legal Advisor indicating an applicant must prove by sufficient evidence that he or she is the victim of a serious injustice not...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 04161
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility and SAF/MRB Legal Advisor attached at Exhibits B and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1PF recommends approval. While we note the comments of the SAF/MRB Legal Advisor indicating an applicant must prove by sufficient evidence that he or she is the victim of a serious injustice not...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02809
AFBCMR BC-2011-02809 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, the applicant's records should be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff or his designee....
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01084
In support of her request, the applicant provides a letter from the flight surgeon, a Report of Individual Fitness, AF Forms 422, Notification of Air Force Member’s Qualification Status and AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report. The applicant’s overall composite score will reflect 80.25 (Satisfactory) The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B. We believe the documentation provided by the applicant provides a reasonable basis to conclude the applicant should...