Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02684
Original file (BC-2012-02684.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02684 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

  HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

Her Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 28 Mar 2012, be removed from 
the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

In accordance with Air Force Guidance Memorandum (AFGM) 3 to AFI 
36-2905, Air Force Fitness Program, and per direction from her 
commander, she would like to remove her unsatisfactory FA from 
the AFFMS. 

 

In support of her request, the applicant provides a copy of a 
letter from her commander stating that he was setting aside her 
Letter of Reprimand for FA failure and would not establish a 
Unfavorable Information File since her medical situation 
probably impacted her FA. 

 

Her complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in 
the grade of staff sergeant (SSgt, E-5). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial. DPSIM states that on 3 Jul 2012, 
a memorandum was sent to the applicant requesting additional 
documentation. Specifically, a detailed memorandum stating the 
reasons why she is requesting to have her FA dated 28 Mar 
2012 removed from the AFFMS. The member did not provide the 
requested documentation. 

 

 

The complete DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit B. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

On 30 Oct 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded 
to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. As of 
this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit 
C). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. After 
thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the 
applicant’s contentions, we are not persuaded the contested FA 
is in error or unjust. The letter from her commander is noted; 
however, in the absence of a detailed memorandum stating the 
reasons why she is requesting to have her FA dated 28 Mar 
2012 removed from the AFFMS, we find insufficient evidence to 
warrant disturbing the record. However, should the applicant 
provide such evidence, we would be willing to reconsider her 
request. In view of the above and in the absence of evidence to 
the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief 
sought in this application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 


The following members of the Board considered this application 
in Executive Session on 24 Jan 2013, under the provisions of AFI 
36-2603: 

 

  Panel Chair 

  Member 

  Member 

 

The following documentary evidence pertaining to Docket number 
BC-2012-02684 was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 18 May 2012, w/atch. 

 Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 16 Oct 2012. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 Oct 2012. 

 

 

 

 

  

 Panel Chair 

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 02582

    Original file (BC 2012 02582.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The LOR dated 14 Mar 12, be removed from her records. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIM recommends approval of the applicant’s requests to remove the FA dated 13 Dec 11 and 12 Mar 12. DPSIM notes the applicant provided documentation which states she was not medically fit for her FA due to “snapping hip syndrome.” DPSIM also recommends the applicant’s LORs dated 19 Dec 11 and 14 Mar 12 be removed from her records as both...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03195

    Original file (BC 2012 03195.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03195 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessments (FAs) dated 30 Sep 11 and 23 Feb 12 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends partial approval,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03340

    Original file (BC-2012-03340.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03340 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 28 Jun 2012, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The complete DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit B. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 Oct 2012.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04967

    Original file (BC-2012-04967.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    It should be noted that the applicant was diagnosed in Dec 11 with her medical condition and was administered the FA in Mar 12, which she successfully completed the push-up component. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice with regard to the applicant’s request to remove her 12 Sep 12 FA test from the AFFMS. We note the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility; however, after reviewing the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02813

    Original file (BC-2012-02813.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends partial approval. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that the cardio, sit-up, and push-up components of her FA dated 2 Apr 2012 reflect “exempt” in the AFFMS. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 Oct 2012.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03220

    Original file (BC 2013 03220.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03220 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessments (FAs) dated 29 Oct 10, 28 Oct 11, and 16 Nov 12 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The applicant clarifies in his response to the Air Force Evaluation that the FA he is...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04933

    Original file (BC 2013 04933.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In spite of this, her profile allowed her to perform crunches, but after getting another note from her doctor, the Deployment Availability Working Group (DAWG)1 threw it out and agreed with her cardiologist that all timed events were dangerous. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In response to the Air Force evaluation, the applicant’s commander provides a memorandum, dated 13 Mar 2014, to serve as his invalidation...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01762

    Original file (BC 2013 01762.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 24 Nov 2013, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB) due to “Insufficient evidence to support contention.” ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of removal of the 4 Oct 11 FA, due to insufficient evidence to support the applicant’s contention. Her records were administratively corrected to show that she was exempt from participating in the 7 Feb 12 FA, due to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01360

    Original file (BC 2013 01360.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 24 Nov 2013, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB) due to “Insufficient evidence to support contention.” ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of removal of the 4 Oct 11 FA, due to insufficient evidence to support the applicant’s contention. Her records were administratively corrected to show that she was exempt from participating in the 7 Feb 12 FA, due to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03347

    Original file (BC 2013 03347.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Commander memorandum, medical docs, or FAC memorandum).” In accordance with (IAW) guidance at the time of contested FA, AFI 36-2905_ Fitness Program AFGM3 (3 Jan 12), Attachment 1, Section 10, “If an Airman becomes injured or ill during the FA and is unable to complete all required components, he/she will have the option of being evaluated at the Medical Treatment Facility (MTF) but his/her test will still count unless rendered invalid by the Unit Commander. The FSQ should be completed no...