Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03992
Original file (BC-2011-03992.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03992 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

He be placed on medical continuation (MEDCON) orders for the 
period 18 Jun 11 to 9 Sep 11 or, in the alternative, he receive 
Incapacitation Pay (INCAP Pay) for the period 18 Jun 11 to 9 Sep 
11. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

1. While deployed at Bagram Airfield, Afghanistan he sustained 
an injury to his left knee and sought medical treatment. When 
he returned home he saw his doctor and required surgery to 
repair a torn meniscus in his knee. 

 

2. He should have been placed on MEDCON orders in accordance 
with ANGI 36-3001, Air National Guard Incapacitation Benefits; 
however, because of the lengthy process, he never received 
orders. Initial request were made by Chief D on 27 Jul 11 and 
was approved by SG on 29 Aug 11; however, on 15 Sep 11 it was 
rejected by AFMOA. Chief D instructed him to file for INCAP Pay 
for the period he was denied compensation. 

 

In support of his request, the applicant provides a personal 
statement, copies of emails, command man-day allocation system 
(CMAS) summary, AF IMT 348, Line of Duty Determination (LOD), 
and other documents in support of his application. 

 

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant was mobilized from 30 Dec 10 to 18 Jun 11 in 
support of Operation ENDURING FREEDOM. 

 

On 26 May 11, a LOD determination was initiated because he had 
bilateral knee pain/right knee meniscus tear. On 27 Jun 11, the 
applicant’s injury was determined to be In the Line of Duty 
(ILOD). 

 


The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of 
the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits B through D. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

NGB/SGPA makes no recommendation. SGPA states NGB/SGPF is 
unable to make a recommendation concerning the applicant’s 
eligibility for compensation due to lack of medical 
documentation. Further, NGB recommends no action be taken until 
supporting medical documentation is received clarifying 
eligibility for compensation. 

 

The complete SGPA evaluation is at Exhibit B. 

 

NGB/A1PS concurs with the NGB subject matter expert (SME) 
advisory and therefore does not recommend relief to the 
applicant’s request unless he can provide supporting medical 
documentation clearly showing that he is eligible for 
compensation 

 

The complete A1PS evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

AFMOA/SGHI recommends granting partial relief to correct the 
record to show the applicant was retained on orders from 19 Jun 
11 to 27 Jul 11. 

 

Due to delays the applicant’s request was never validated by the 
MEDCON manager. There is no authority to back date orders, thus 
no reason to forward the request for allocation of orders. Had 
the CMAS request and documentation been submitted in a timely 
manner, the applicant may have been eligible for MEDCON. 

 

The providers progress note, dated 6 Jul 11, indicates the 
projected end date of treatment was to be in three weeks (on or 
about 27 Jul 11) and the applicant could have resumed activities 
as tolerated. No medical documentation was available past 
6 Jul 11 to confirm or deny the applicant was still undergoing 
treatment or that any medical appointments for his LOD condition 
were pending. 

 

MEDCON managers do not have any authority in 
approving/disapproving INCAP pay for service members that have 
been denied MEDCON. 

 

The complete SGHI evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit D. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

 

 


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the 
applicant on 10 Apr 12 for review and comment within 30 days. 
As of this date, this office has received no response. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice to warrant 
partial relief. In this respect, we note the applicant was on 
active duty orders in support of Operation ENDURING FREEDOM and 
was diagnosed with a medical injury. Subsequently, the injury 
was found to be In the Line of Duty (ILOD). However, contrary 
to established guidance dictating that he remain on active duty 
status until processed through the disability evaluation system, 
it appears he was released from active duty without due process. 
While the applicant requests continuation of his active duty 
orders for the period 18 Jun 11 to 9 Sep 11, we concur with the 
recommendation of AFMOA/SGHI to correct the record to reflect 
the applicant was retained on active duty orders for the period 
19 Jun 11 to 27 Jul 11. In view of the above and in the 
interest of equity and justice, we recommend his record be 
corrected to the extent indicated below. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: 

 

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air 
Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he was not 
released from active duty on 18 June 2011 but on that date he 
continued to serve on active duty until 27 July 2011. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2011-03992 in Executive Session on 22 May 2012, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 Panel Chair 

Member 

Member 

 

All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The 
following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 6 Oct 11, 

 w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. NGB/SGPA, Letter, dated 9 Feb 12. 

 Exhibit C. NGB/A1PS, Letter, dated 21 Feb 12. 

 Exhibit D. AFMOA/SGHI, Letter, dated 9 Apr 12, 

 w/atchs. 

 Exhibit E. SAF/MRBR, Letter, dated 10 Apr 12. 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03094

    Original file (BC 2013 03094.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03094 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive retirement points for the period 27 Sep 10 through 1 Apr 12 rather than Incapacitation Pay (INCAP Pay). In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a personal statement; active duty orders for the period, 2 Jun – 26 Sep...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03639

    Original file (BC-2012-03639.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence of a Command Man-Day Allocation System (CMAS) request for MEDCON during any time the applicant was on AD orders or prior to his retirement date of 1 Jun 12. While we note the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility to deny the applicant’s request, the evidence reflects the applicant was treated for a medical condition in Dec 11 and, contrary to the AF Form 348, Informal Line of Duty Determination, dated Mar 12, wherein the military medical...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00637

    Original file (BC-2013-00637.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00637 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be entitled to Medical Continuation (MEDCON) orders starting on 20 Sep 12 vice 10 Oct 12, based on his injury he sustained In the Line of Duty (INLOD). ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00996

    Original file (BC-2013-00996.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    MEDCON managed by SGHI and through CMAS does not provide orders for ADOS tours. The complete SGHI evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 5 Aug 13 for review and comment within 30 days. Exhibit C. Letter, AFMOA/SGHI, dated 8 Jul 13.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00805

    Original file (BC-2013-00805.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, the MEDCON orders were not completed. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/SGPF recommends denial. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04977

    Original file (BC-2011-04977.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04977 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her records be corrected to reflect she was not released from active duty on 2 Sep 11, but was instead retained on active duty for medical continuation (MEDCON) until 16 Nov 11. Severalattempts were made to secure MEDCON orders with no responses...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01000

    Original file (BC 2013 01000.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01000 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She receive medical continuation (MEDCON) orders for the period 17 Sep 11 to 30 Jul 12; or in the alternative she receive Incapacitation (INCAP) Pay for the period she was released from MEDCON orders. In accordance with AFRCI 36-3004, Incapacitation...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01088

    Original file (BC-2012-01088.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Medical Continuation, Eligibility for Medical continuation, the ARC member will be eligible for Medical Continuation orders when an injury, illness, or disease is incurred or aggravated while serving on active duty and that condition renders the member unable to perform military duties." We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04716

    Original file (BC-2011-04716.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    From 1 Mar 10 to 6 Oct 11, he should have been on medical continuation (MEDCON) orders for his injuries. Per SAF/AA Memo, Return to Active Duty of Air Force Reserve Component Members Unable to Perform Military Duties, dated 8 Dec 06, “Entitlement under this policy shall begin when the condition renders the Airman unable to perform military duties, not when the injury occurred or when the Airman was released from active duty.” In this instance, the surgical date would be considered the date...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00118

    Original file (BC 2013 00118.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Medical Consultant states that the applicant may be eligible for at least periodic restoration of active duty orders to receive treatment for his medical condition on the dates he was required to take leave from his civilian employment, but finds the evidence insufficient to establish MEDCON orders along the entire continuum requested; noting the evidence suggesting that his medical condition waxed and waned while under treatment with epidural and sacroiliac steroid injections; allowing...