Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00297
Original file (BC-2012-00297.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 

 
 
DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2012-00297 
COUNSEL:  NONE 
HEARING DESIRED:  NO 

IN THE MATTER OF: 
   
   
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 
 
His uncharacterized service be changed to an honorable discharge. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 
 
He  passed  all  required  medical  tests  for  enlistment.  
Unfortunately,  during  basic  training  he  was  diagnosed  with 
costochondritis.    This  condition  automatically  disqualified  him 
for service.  He further states his personal physician has given 
him  a  clean  bill  of  health.    He  has  a  career  as  a  senior 
engineering technician and has served as a reserve deputy for his 
local sheriff’s department for four years. 
 
In  support  of  the  applicant’s  appeal,  he  provides  a  personal 
statement,  basic  jail  certification  training  certificate,  and 
other documentation. 
 
The  applicant's  complete  submission,  with  attachments,  is  at 
Exhibit A. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
STATEMENT OF FACTS: 
 
The  applicant  enlisted  in  the  Regular  Air  Force  on  11  December 
1996. 
 
The  applicant  was  notified  by  his  commander  of  his  intent  to 
recommend  that  he  be  discharged  from  the  Air  Force  under  the 
provisions  of  AFPD  36-32  and  AFI  36-3208.    The  specific  reason 
was a medical evaluation board that diagnosed the applicant with 
costochondritis  and  found  he  did  not  meet  minimum  medical 
standards to join the Air Force and should not have been allowed 
to join the Air Force. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

He was advised of his rights in this matter and elected not to 
consult  with  counsel  or  submit  a  statement  on  his  own  behalf.  
The  discharge  authority  concurred  with  the  recommendation  and 
directed an entry level separation.  The applicant was discharged 
on 15 January 1997.  He served 1 month and 5 days on active duty. 
 
Pursuant  to  the  Board's  request,  the  Federal  Bureau  of 
Investigation  (FBI),  Clarksburg,  West  Virginia,  provided  an 
arrest record which is at Exhibit C. 
 
On 24 May 2012, a copy of the FBI Report of Investigation and a 
request for information pertaining to his post-service activities 
was  forwarded  to  the  applicant  for  review  and  response  within 
30 days  (Exhibit  D).    The  applicant  provided  a  response 
indicating  he  became  ill  during  basic  training  and  was 
disqualified from serving in the Air Force.  He has worked as a 
senior engineering technician for the past 13 years.  He desires 
to  work  for  the  federal  government  and  a  vast  majority  of  the 
positions require him to have an honorable discharge (Exhibit E). 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 
 
1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 
 
2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 
 
3.  Insufficient  relevant  evidence  has  been  presented  to 
demonstrate  the  existence  of  error  or  injustice  warranting  a 
change  to  his  character  of  service.    We  took  notice  of  the 
applicant's  complete  submission  in  judging  the  merits  of  the 
case; however, we find no evidence of an error or injustice that 
occurred  in  the  discharge  processing.    Based  on  the  available 
evidence of record, it appears the discharge was consistent with 
the  substantive  requirements  of  the  discharge  regulation  and 
within  the  commander's  discretionary  authority.    The  applicant 
has  provided  no  evidence  which  would  lead  us  to  believe 
otherwise.    Therefore,  in  the  absence  of  evidence  to  the 
contrary, we find no basis upon which to recommend granting the 
relief sought. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

2 
 

 
The  applicant  be  notified  the  evidence  presented  did  not 
demonstrate  the  existence  of  an  error  or  injustice;  the 
application  was  denied  without  a  personal  appearance;  and  the 
application  will  only  be  reconsidered  upon  the  submission  of 
newly  discovered  relevant  evidence  not  considered  with  this 
application. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
The  following  members  of  the  Board  considered  AFBCMR  Docket 
Number BC-2012-00297 in Executive Session on 17 July 2012, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 
 
 
The  following  documentary  evidence  pertaining  to  AFBCMR  Docket 
Number BC-2012-00297 was considered: 
 
  Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 2 January 2012, w/atchs. 
  Exhibit B.  Applicant’s Master Personnel Records. 
  Exhibit C.  FBI Report of Investigation. 
  Exhibit D.  Letter, AFBCMR, dated 24 May 2012. 
 
 
 
 
 

 

3 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9801124

    Original file (9801124.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In his 20 April 1998 appeal to the AFBCMR, the applicant requested his honorable discharge be changed to a medical disability discharge. Also provided was a statement from an individual who asserts he saw a drill instructor assault the applicant and “signed a police report on this matter in 1975 for the airforce police.” All of these letters, with their attachments, are at Exhibit I. A copy of the complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. The Chief, Physical Disability Division, HQ AFPC/DPPD,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1998-01124

    Original file (BC-1998-01124.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In his 20 April 1998 appeal to the AFBCMR, the applicant requested his honorable discharge be changed to a medical disability discharge. Also provided was a statement from an individual who asserts he saw a drill instructor assault the applicant and “signed a police report on this matter in 1975 for the airforce police.” All of these letters, with their attachments, are at Exhibit I. A copy of the complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. The Chief, Physical Disability Division, HQ AFPC/DPPD,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-1998-01124C

    Original file (BC-1998-01124C.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The decision noted the treatment for anxiety in the service and the 22 May 04 opinion of a DVA examination that concluded the applicant suffered from schizophrenia either during his military service or, more likely, in the year following military service in 1976. In a DD Form 149 dated 2 Sep 04, the applicant requested reconsideration, and submitted his 100% DVA rating for service- connected schizophrenia, 24 years after his discharge from the Air Force. The Consultant provided additional...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01894

    Original file (BC-2010-01894.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 31 January 1983, the applicant was discharged with a general discharge after completing a period of 3 years, 8 months and 17 days total active service. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). The applicant reviewed the FBI investigation and states he received a DUI after his discharge from the military.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-1998-01144A

    Original file (BC-1998-01144A.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-1998-01144 INDEX CODE 106.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: In the applicant’s request for reconsideration, he requests his 1998 dishonorable discharge be upgraded to under-other-than-honorable-conditions (UOTHC) discharge. On 8 Jul 96, the US Air Force Court of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03066

    Original file (BC-2011-03066.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 11 October 2011, the applicant was given an opportunity to submit comments about his post service activities and in response to the FBI Report (Exhibit D). He was told by his Air Force attorney that his discharge would be upgraded automatically in six months after his discharge, but it was not. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2011-03066 in Executive Session on 15 March 2012, under the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00166

    Original file (BC-2006-00166.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, after thorough review of the evidence of record, it is our opinion that the comments of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility are supported by the evidence of record. We find no evidence of error in this case and after thoroughly reviewing the applicant's submission, we do not believe he has suffered from an injustice. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02198

    Original file (BC-2012-02198.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02198 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 25 Nov 83, the applicant was discharged with service characterized as general (under honorable conditions) in the grade of airman first class. On 2 Jul 84, the Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00456

    Original file (BC-2012-00456.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS a general discharge without AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00456 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge be upgraded to Honorable. If treatment for alcohol and narcotics were available at the time of his active duty service, he would probably still be actively serving in the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02639

    Original file (BC-2012-02639.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. According to the applicant's statement, he was a member of the Air Force Reserve for about 3 years and 3 months. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 14 Feb 2013, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Panel Chair Member Member The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR...