ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01124
INDEX CODE 108.03 108.10
COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED: No
_________________________________________________________________
RESUME OF CASE:
The applicant had been honorably discharged from Basic Military
Training (BMT) on 5 December 1975 for disqualifying mild sustained
hypertension, a condition determined to have existed prior to
service (EPTS) and not aggravated by service. In his 20 April 1998
appeal to the AFBCMR, the applicant requested his honorable
discharge be changed to a medical disability discharge. He contended
that the medical problems which disqualified him for continued
service and the physical and mental conditions he suffers from today
are the result of beatings he allegedly received from his BMT drill
instructor. On 16 March 1999, the Board considered and denied the
applicant’s appeal due to lack of evidence. A copy of the Record of
Proceedings is attached at Exhibit H.
He has since submitted numerous letters, some of which were
addressed to various government officials and forwarded to the
AFBCMR, asking for reconsideration on the basis of additional
documents included with his letters. The applicant’s brother, an
Individual Mobilization Augmentee in the Air National Guard,
forwarded a supporting statement indicating he has spoken to two
individuals who witnessed the alleged assault and that his brother
would not lie about being beaten. Also provided was a statement from
an individual who asserts he saw a drill instructor assault the
applicant and “signed a police report on this matter in 1975 for the
airforce police.”
All of these letters, with their attachments, are at Exhibit I.
Based on the two above-mentioned supporting statements, the AFBCMR
staff attempted to obtain a report of the alleged assault. However,
the Air Force Office of Special Investigations (AFOSI) advised that
they had no record of the incident and if there had
been an investigation, the report would no longer exist because
files of this nature are routinely destroyed after 15 years in
accordance with established procedures.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
We have carefully reviewed the applicant’s numerous reconsideration
submissions, as well as the supporting statements provided in his
behalf. However, the applicant’s current physical and mental
conditions do not appear to be the result of an assault by his BMT
drill instructor in 1975. The applicant’s early discharge was based
on the finding of persistent mild hypertension, a disqualifying
condition determined to have existed prior to his entry on active duty
and not to have been aggravated by the service. The report from a
psychiatrist contained in the original appeal and the latest documents
appear incompatible with the evidence of record surrounding the
applicant’s service time. While he was profiled for hypertension as
well as costochondritis, his medical records do not appear to reflect
any treatment for traumatic abuse or injuries. The applicant has not
provided persuasive evidence that he was, in fact, assaulted and that
it was the causal effect of his medical problems while on active duty
or after his separation. Therefore, we find no compelling basis upon
which to overturn our original conclusion that this appeal does not
merit relief.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice;
that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 17 June 1999, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mrs. Barbara A. Westgate, Panel Chair
Mr. Lawrence R. Leehy, Member
Ms. Melinda J. Loftin, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit H. Record of Proceedings, dated 16 Apr 98, w/atchs.
Exhibit I. Applicant's Letters (8), dated 24 & 25 Apr 99,
5 & 19 May 99, w/atchs; Brother’s Letter, dated
18 May 99; R--- E---’s Letter, dated 10 May 99;
Mother’s Letter dated 24 Apr 99;
.
BARBARA A. WESTGATE
Panel Chair
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
Apr 16 1999
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01124
COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED: No
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His 1975 discharge be changed to a medical disability discharge.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was beaten up by his drill instructor. As a result, he sustained
back troubles, nerve damage, schizophrenia, post-traumatic-stress
disorder, hearing loss, costochondritis, blistered feet and high blood
pressure. His discharge was a cover-up and is not consistent with the
actual medical records/treatments/diagnoses.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant was honorably discharged on 5 December 1975 with a
reenlistment code of “4K” (Applicable physical standards are not met).
Pursuant to the AFBCMR Staff’s request, the Federal Bureau of
Investigation, Washington, DC, provided an investigative report, which
is attached at Exhibit C. The report indicates the applicant was
convicted in 1978 of burglary and murder committed in 1977. After
appealing, his sentence was reduced to 20 years. He apparently
escaped from the Adult Correction Institute (ACI) and was arrested as
an escapee from ACI in December 1980.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted
from the applicant's military records, are contained in the letter
prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. Accordingly,
there is no need to recite these facts in this Record of Proceedings.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The AFBCMR Medical Consultant reviewed this appeal and indicates that
applicant’s allegation that he suffered physical trauma with lasting
psychiatric disturbance during his one-month basic military training
(BMT) service is not borne out by evidence of record. His early
discharge was based on the finding of persistent mild hypertension, a
condition that was felt to have existed prior to service (EPTS) and
which was disqualifying for service. A 24-page report from a
psychiatrist dated 11 May 1998 was found incompatible with the
evidence of record surrounding the applicant’s service time. As there
is no error or injustice occurring in the disposition of this case,
denial is recommend.
A copy of the complete evaluation is at Exhibit D.
The Chief, Physical Disability Division, HQ AFPC/DPPD, also evaluated
the case and advises that a medical evaluation board (MEB) diagnosed
mild sustained hypertension and recommended the applicant be
discharged by reason of physical disability for a condition determined
to have EPTS. The MEB determined the condition had not been aggravated
by the service. A voluntary discharge on the member was initiated and
effective on 5 December 1975 for his failure to meet physical
standards for enlistment. The Chief finds no errors or injustice to
warrant changing the applicant’s records and he agrees with the
Medical Consultant’s advisory. The applicant has not submitted any
material showing he was unfit due to a physical disability acquired
while entitled to basic pay under the provisions of Title 10, USC, at
the time of his discharge. Denial is recommended.
A copy of the complete evaluation is at Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant responded with letters to the Medical Consultant, the
AFBCMR, AFPC/DPPD, and the Secretary of the Air Force. He contends the
Air Force is still covering up [the mistreatment he sustained at the
hands of his drill instructor] and the diagnosis of his actual medical
condition. He warns that “heads will roll” if the matter is not
cleared up.
A complete copy of applicant’s responses, with attachments, are at
Exhibit G.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of probable error or injustice. After a thorough review
of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not
persuaded his 1975 discharge should be changed to a disability
discharge. Applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however, we do not
find these uncorroborated assertions, in and by themselves,
sufficiently persuasive to override the rationale provided by the Air
Force. Other than his own statements, he provides no evidence that he
suffered physical trauma at the hands of his drill instructor which
left lasting psychiatric disturbances and/or physical disability. The
MEB recommended the applicant be discharged from the service by reason
of physical disability for a condition determined to have existed
prior to service and which was not aggravated by the service.
Therefore, we agree with the recommendations and rationale of the Air
Force that the applicant has failed to sustain his burden of having
suffered either an error or an injustice. In view of the above and
absent persuasive evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling
basis to recommend granting the relief sought.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice;
that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 16 March 1999 under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mrs. Barbara A. Westgate, Panel Chair
Mr. Lawrence R. Leehy, Member
Ms. Melinda J. Loftin, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 20 Apr 98, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, FBI Report.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR Medical Consultant, dated 26 Aug 98.
Exhibit E. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPD, dated 28 Sep 98.
Exhibit F. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 12 Oct 98.
Exhibit G. Letters (7), Applicant, dated 15, 16, and
28 Oct 98, w/atchs.
SIGNED
BARBARA A. WESTGATE
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1998-01124
In his 20 April 1998 appeal to the AFBCMR, the applicant requested his honorable discharge be changed to a medical disability discharge. Also provided was a statement from an individual who asserts he saw a drill instructor assault the applicant and “signed a police report on this matter in 1975 for the airforce police.” All of these letters, with their attachments, are at Exhibit I. A copy of the complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. The Chief, Physical Disability Division, HQ AFPC/DPPD,...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-1998-01124C
The decision noted the treatment for anxiety in the service and the 22 May 04 opinion of a DVA examination that concluded the applicant suffered from schizophrenia either during his military service or, more likely, in the year following military service in 1976. In a DD Form 149 dated 2 Sep 04, the applicant requested reconsideration, and submitted his 100% DVA rating for service- connected schizophrenia, 24 years after his discharge from the Air Force. The Consultant provided additional...
Based on the preponderance of evidence, and after a thorough review of the entire case file, the IPEB found that had these conditions been identified and presented to the board in the form of a special review prior to his discharge, they would have acknowledged their existence; however, they would not have considered them unfitting, ratable, or compensable under the provisions of military disability law and policy. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit...
On 30 Jan 98, the applicant was given an entry level separation from the Air National Guard and as a Reserve of the Air Force under the provisions of AFI 36-3209 (Erroneous Enlistment). After a thorough review of the available evidence, we are not persuaded that the applicant’s entry level separation based on the termination of her initial active duty training should be changed to a disability discharge. Therefore, we recommend that the applicant’s narrative reason for separation from the...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03604
Title 38 USC governs the DVA compensation system in awarding disability percentage ratings for conditions that are not unfitting for military service. A complete copy of the BCMR Medical Consultant evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPPD states the medical disability evaluation system is used to determine if the servicemember’s medical condition renders him fit or unfit for continued military service. They further state that under military disability laws and policy, the boards...
The AFBCMR Medical Consultant is of the opinion that no change in the records is warranted and the application should be denied (Exhibit C). Prior to that date, an evaluation of 30% was assigned for severe, frequent attacks. Accordingly, in view of the foregoing, I believe the applicant’s medical condition at the time of his retirement warrants a higher disability rating.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-00949 INDEX CODE 108.02 COUNSEL: American Legion HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 1997 administrative discharge for failure in the Weight Management Program (WMP) be changed to a medical retirement or, in the alternative, he be given a medical discharge with a 20% rating for severance pay. ...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1998-00949
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-00949 INDEX CODE 108.02 COUNSEL: American Legion HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 1997 administrative discharge for failure in the Weight Management Program (WMP) be changed to a medical retirement or, in the alternative, he be given a medical discharge with a 20% rating for severance pay. ...
In DPPD’s view, the applicant has not submitted any material or documentation to show he was improperly rated or processed under the provisions of the military disability laws and policy at the time of his permanent disability retirement. Accordingly, a majority of the Board finds no basis to recommend favorable action on the applicant’s requests. A majority found that applicant had not provided sufficient evidence of error or injustice regarding the applicant’s requests that the Article...
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant’s response to the Air Force evaluation and a letter received from his physician are at Exhibit E. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The law governing the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) provides that a member who is married at the time of retirement and fails to...