Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01894
Original file (BC-2010-01894.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01894 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to 
honorable. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He was in the Air Force for four months shy of his term and does 
not believe the incidents leading up to his discharge were 
conducive of anything less than an honorable discharge. The 
officer he worked with was a very difficult person and chastised 
all of her workers. He was given reprimands just because she 
disliked him. He suffered a bad head injury while on Tinker Air 
Force Base which caused a lot of trauma and affected his duties. 
After his discharge, he discovered he suffered from manic 
depression bipolar and it affected his actions and behavior. He 
has been diagnosed with severe sleep apnea and his doctor can 
verify his mental status. He has not had any alcohol in over 20 
years. He also received a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical 
Engineering from Drexel University. 

 

In support of his request, the applicant provides a personal 
statement, copies of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or 
Discharge from Active Duty; VA Form 21-4138, Statement in Support 
of Claim; VA Form 21-4142, Authorization and Consent to Release 
Information to the Department of Veterans Affairs and extracts 
from his military personnel records. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

On 14 May 1979, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force 
and was progressively promoted to the grade of senior airman. 

 

 

 

 

 


On 18 January 1983, the applicant was notified by his commander 
that he was recommending he be discharged from the Air Force 
under the provisions of AFR 39-10, Administration Separation of 
Airmen, for a pattern of misconduct; conduct prejudicial to good 
order and discipline. The specific reasons for this action were: 
1) He was placed in the Drug/Alcohol Rehabilitation Program; 2) 
He received traffic tickets for speeding and failing to have a 
driver’s license in his possession; 3) He received a ticket for 
illegal parking; 4) He was incarcerated in the Cleveland County 
Jail and charged with assault and battery on a minor; 4) He 
received a Letter of Reprimand for violation of a direct order, 
which also established an Unfavorable Information File (UIF); 5) 
He received two Article 15’s for being disrespectful toward his 
superior commissioned officer, disobeying a lawful command, 
assault and drunk and disorderly on station. 

 

The applicant acknowledged receipt of the notification of 
discharge, received advice from a military defense attorney and 
provided statements in his own behalf. On 28 January 1983, the 
discharge authority determined that a general discharge was 
appropriate in light of the applicant’s overall military record. 

 

On 31 January 1983, the applicant was discharged with a general 
discharge after completing a period of 3 years, 8 months and 
17 days total active service. 

 

Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of 
Investigation (FBI), Clarksburg, WV, provided a copy of an 
Investigation Report (Exhibit C). 

 

On 19 January 2011, the FBI investigation and a request for post-
service information were forwarded to the applicant for response 
within 30 days. As of this date, no response has been received 
by this office (Exhibit D). 

 

The applicant reviewed the FBI investigation and states he 
received a DUI after his discharge from the military. In 
response to the post-service request, the applicant states he has 
taken many courses on computer systems and software. He has given 
up alcohol and during the first ten years of his sobriety, he 
helped other alcoholics and addicts. 

 

The applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit E. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 


3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. The discharge 
appears to be in compliance with the governing directives and we 
find no evidence to indicate that his separation from the Air 
Force was inappropriate. We find no evidence of error in this 
case and after thoroughly reviewing the documentation that has 
been submitted in support of the applicant's appeal, we do not 
believe he has suffered from an injustice. In addition, based on 
his overall record of service and limited documentation related 
to his post-service activities and accomplishments, we are not 
persuaded that an upgrade of the characterization of his 
discharge on the basis of clemency is warranted. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINED THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2010-01894 in Executive Session on 24 February 2011, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

Panel Chair 

Member 

Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 10 May 2010, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. FBI Report, dated 18 Aug 10. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 19 Jan 11. 

 Exhibit E. Applicant's Response, undated. 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 

 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03270

    Original file (BC-2006-03270.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In a legal review of the discharge case file dated 10 Oct 84, the staff judge advocate found the file was legally sufficient and recommended that the applicant be separated from the service with a general discharge. On 19 Aug 82, the applicant was discharged with a general under honorable conditions discharge. DPPRS states that based on the documentation on file in the applicant’s master personnel records, the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01814

    Original file (BC-2010-01814.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 13 Nov 79, the applicant submitted a request for discharge. The applicant was discharged on 15 Nov 79 with a UOTHC discharge, with the narrative reason for separation of “request for discharge for the good of the service.” Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) provided an investigative report which is at Exhibit C. A copy of the report and a request for post- service information was forwarded to the applicant on 10 Sep 10 (Exhibit D). His addictions...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03029

    Original file (BC-2010-03029.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant is a former member of the Regular Air Force who entered active duty on 23 March 1982 in the grade of airman (E- 2). On 19 April 1983, the applicant was discharged from active duty with a general (under honorable conditions) discharge. Furthermore, we do not find clemency is appropriate in this case since the applicant has not provided any evidence concerning his post-service activities.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03532

    Original file (BC-2005-03532.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    The commander was recommending the applicant receive an UOTHC discharge based on the following: (1) On 10 April 1984, the applicant received a Letter of Reprimand for failure to report at the time prescribed to his appointed place of duty. Having found no error or injustice with regard to the actions that occurred while the applicant was a military member, we conclude that no basis exists to grant favorable action on his request. Exhibit E. FBI Investigative Report.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02169

    Original file (BC-2010-02169.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02169 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. The discharge appears to be in compliance with the governing directives and we find no evidence to indicate that his separation from the Air Force was inappropriate. We...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04674

    Original file (BC-2010-04674.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04674 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. ______________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant is a former member of the Regular Air Force who served on active duty from 24...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03953

    Original file (BC-2011-03953.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03953 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 23 July 1984, the alcohol rehabilitation committee determined the applicant failed to complete rehabilitation due to his continued use of alcohol and misconduct. On 28...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01808

    Original file (BC-2004-01808.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant in March 1982 presented for care in the mental health clinic with nervousness and depressive symptoms due to “too much stress on flight line (his crew chief).” His medical records also reflect the applicant was evaluated for alcohol abuse in March 1983, with no other details listed. The evidence in the record shows a diagnosis of a personality disorder, however, the record also shows that the applicant’s duty performance was excellent. There is no indication in the record...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03063

    Original file (BC-2010-03063.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03063 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded. The discharge authority approved the general discharge, without P&R. Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 8 Oct 10, w/atchs.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01153

    Original file (BC-2011-01153.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 26 August 1982, he received a Letter of Counseling (LOC) for dereliction of duty. When his wife who was also an active duty member had an affair he became very depressed. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2011-01153 in Executive Session on 21 June 2011, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Panel Chair Member Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form...