RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04827
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code 6H, which denotes
Pending Discharge in accordance with ANGR 39-10 Involuntary
(ANG Only), be removed from his records.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was told by a recruiter that the RE Code listed on his NGB
Form 22, Report of Separation and Record of Service, is
incorrect and prevents him from reenlisting in active duty until
the code is corrected.
His RE code was not updated after his separation.
He was told that this code states he is currently in the
National Guard.
In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his
NGB Form 22.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachment, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant was honorably discharged from the Air National
Guard (ANG) effective 13 May 2012 for unsatisfactory
performance. His discharge was in accordance with AFI 36-3209, Separation and Retirement Procedures for Air National Guard and
Air Force Reserve Members.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application,
extracted from the applicants military records, are contained
in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air
Force at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
NGB/A1POE recommends denial. A1POE states the applicants
discharge was in accordance with Air Force policies and
procedures, and no evidence was provided to show an error of
injustice has occurred. The applicant was discharged for
unsatisfactory participation when his commander determined he
had no potential for useful service under conditions of full
mobilization. A1POE states, personnel may be discharged when
they have accumulated nine or more unexcused absences from Unit
Training Assembly (UTA) within a 12 month period.
The applicant was discharged for unsatisfactory participation,
and was given a reenlistment eligibility code of 6H. This code
is applied when a member is pending or approved for involuntary
separation/discharge in accordance with AFI 36-3209.
The complete A1POE evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C.
NGB/A1PS concurs with A1POEs advisory, and therefore, does not
recommend the requested relief.
The complete A1PS evaluation is at Exhibit D.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 11 May 2012, copies of the Air Force evaluations were
forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within
30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this
office (Exhibit E).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we agree with the opinions and
recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary
responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our
conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or
injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the
contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief
sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application
in Executive Session on 10 Jul 2012, under the provisions of AFI
36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC-
2011-04827:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 9 Dec 2011, w/atch.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, NGB/A1POE, dated 27 Jan 2012, w/atch.
Exhibit D. Letter, NGB/A1PS, dated 27 Jan 2012.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 May 2012.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04184
A1POE states, in accordance with the applicants point credit summary, he did not participate in enough UTA days from his initial enlistment date of 20 Sep 2008 to the date of the erroneous discharge, on 1 Aug 2010. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance;...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04692
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04692 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 6U (Not Selected for Retention by Commander) be changed to a code that would allow him to reenlist. So should he desire to enlist with another ANG unit, it will not be a barrier to his enlistment. We took notice of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00396
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00396 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of “6H” (Pending Discharge IAW ANGR 39-10 – INVOL (ANG Only)) be changed to allow her to enlist in the Army National Guard. On 12 Apr 08, the applicant’s commander notified her that he was recommending her...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04167
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04167 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. As such, the applicant was erroneously separated from the Air National Guard and incurred a debt for his reenlistment bonus. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant was a member of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00585
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00585 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The authority and reason for his separation, separation program designator (SPD) code, and reenlistment eligibility, as reflected on his NGB Form 22, National Guard Bureau Report of Separation and Record of Service, be changed so that he may...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01507
On 31 July 2007, the commander notified the member that he was being discharged from the ANG under the provisions of AFI 36-3209, Separation and Retirement Procedures for Air National Guard and Air Force Reserve Members, Substandard (Unsatisfactory) Performance. On 31 July 2007, the applicant was honorably discharged from the MI ANG because he failed his end-of-course examination for his CDC twice. ___________________________________________________________ _____ The following members of...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04134
AFI 36- 320, Paragraph 3.13.2.1.1, actually states Member may be discharged when the member has accumulated nine or more unexcused absences from UTA within a 12-month period. The documents provided indicate the applicant was given a three month leave of absence (LOA) in March of 1997 to attend to personal business and, was due to return to UTAs in July 1997. The AFI states a member may be discharged and does not state the member must be discharged. We took notice of the applicant's...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC 2009 01152
On 5 October 2005, his commander signed a Notification of Intent to Discharge letter and recommended he be discharged with a general discharge. IAW AFI 36-3209 Separation and Retirement Procedures for Air National Guard and Air Force Reserve Members, a member is discharged for unsatisfactory participation when the commander concerned determines a member has no potential for useful service under conditions of full mobilization. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01428
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01428 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His NGB Form 22, National Guard Bureau Report of Separation and Record of Service be corrected as follows: 1. There is insufficient justification to support a change of his service characterization to honorable. The complete NGB/A1POE evaluation is...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05966
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05966 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code on his NGB Form 22, Report of Separation and Record of Service, be changed from 6U (Air National Guard (ANG) Not Selected for Retention by the Commander) to 6A (ANG Eligible to Reenlist/Extend Selected by...