Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04601
Original file (BC-2011-04601.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04601 

 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His fitness assessment (FA) score recorded on 2 May 2011 be 
removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

The abdominal circumference was entered as 50.00 inches. This 
is incorrect. He has a copy of his Basic Military Training 
Student Performance Summary which shows his abdominal 
measurement as 31.00 inches earning the full 20 points for that 
portion of the FA. 

 

In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his 
AF Form 469, current AF Form 422, Notification of Air Force 
Member’s Qualification Status, and Memorandum for Record from 
his doctor. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in 
the grade of Airman (Amn), E-2. 

 

By letter dated 13 December 2011, HQ AFPC/DPSIMC requested the 
applicant provide additional supporting documentation to 
substantiate his claim; specifically, a signed memorandum 
supporting the applicant’s claim, from the commander and 
additionally a signed memorandum from the person who entered the 
fitness test results incorrectly into AFFMS. 

 

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of 
the Air Force at Exhibit B. Accordingly there is no need to 
recite these facts in this Record of Proceedings. 

 


AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial. DPSIM states the applicant did 
not provide the requested documentation to substantiate his 
claim. They recommend denial to have the fitness assessment 
dated 2 may 2011 deleted from AFFMS. 

 

The complete AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit B. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 1 March 2012 for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit C). As of this date, no response has been received by 
this office. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. After a 
thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant's 
submission, we see no evidence of error or impropriety in the 
physical fitness test and subsequent fitness assessment score. 
Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the 
Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our decision that the applicant has 
failed to sustain his burden of having suffered either an error 
or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the 
contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief 
sought in this application. 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

 


The following members of the Board considered this application 
BC-2011-04601 in Executive Session on 26 April 2012, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

, Member 

 , Member 

 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 10 November 2011, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 24 January 2012. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 March 2012. 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00946

    Original file (BC-2012-00946.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his Individual Fitness Assessment History, and a letter from his detachment chief. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that his fitness assessment dated 4 May 2011 be declared void and removed from the AFFMS. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 Sep 2012.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04963

    Original file (BC-2012-04963.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He believes this to be in error because he measured his abdominals the morning of the FA and measured at a 37.5. ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 25 April 2013, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit C). ________________________________________________________________ _ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03248

    Original file (BC-2011-03248.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits C, and D. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant's request to change or void the contested EPR. DPSID states the applicant did not file an appeal through the Evaluation Report Appeals Board...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02006

    Original file (BC-2012-02006.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His provider’s memorandum for record (MFR) stated he had a medical condition that prevented him from attaining a passing score on the walking component of his FA; however, the test was not removed from his records. Upon expiration of your 42 days reconditioning, you are cleared to test in all components of the AF Fitness Test.” On 29 May 12, a memorandum was sent to applicant requesting additional documentation for removal of his FA dated 29 Oct 10. While he contends that he was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05629

    Original file (BC 2012 05629.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    She was re-measured a week later by a different FAC member [witnessed by the Unit Fitness Program Manager (UFPM)], and her measurements were, height (66 inches) and waist (30.5 inches). DPSIM states that the applicant has not provided sufficient evidence that would indicate the 5 Sep 12 AC measurement did not comply with the Air Force Instruction. The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03182

    Original file (BC-2012-03182.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03182 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her fitness assessment (FA) dated 8 June 2012 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The complete AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04864

    Original file (BC-2012-04864.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She was unjustly given an unsatisfactory FA score for being a “No Show” at the 15 Apr 12 testing, even though she had a medical condition which should have prevented her from taking the abdominal circumference (AC) portion. On 19 Jun 12, the applicant received a Letter of Counseling from her Deputy Group Commander for receiving an unsatisfactory FA score on 15 Apr 12 and for “fitness testing integrity...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05000

    Original file (BC 2012 05000.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    DPSIM further recommends the fitness assessments dated 27 Sep 11, 30 Dec 11, and 28 Mar 12 be corrected to reflect the applicant was exempt from the waist measurement component of these FAs. The complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He was told he had to participate in the abdominal circumference for the 29 Mar 11 FA, not knowing there was an AF Form 422...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00822

    Original file (BC 2013 00822.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 30 Jul 13 85.40 Satisfactory 1 Feb 13 75.33 Satisfactory *19 Dec 12 32.50 Unsatisfactory 7 Jun 12 83.50 Satisfactory 29 Feb 12 38.10 Unsatisfactory * Contested FA In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, if an Airman becomes injured or ill during the FA and is unable to complete all required components, he/she will have the option of being evaluated at the Medical Treatment Facility (MTF) but his/her...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05794

    Original file (BC 2012 05794.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, to determine overall fitness, the Air Force uses an overall composite fitness score and minimum scores per three component areas: Aerobic Fitness (1.5 mile run), Body Composition (abdominal circumference measurement), and Muscular Fitness (number of push-ups and sit- ups completed within one minute each). On 24 Aug 12, an AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, was issued which restricted the applicant from performing activities that...