Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03563
Original file (BC-2011-03563.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03563 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of 
Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect his service in 
Vietnam. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

His DD Form 214 acknowledges his Foreign Service; however, it 
does not specify his service in Vietnam. He served at Bien Hoa 
Air Base in Vietnam. 

 

The copies of the envelopes are from letters he sent to his wife 
while he was in Vietnam. The photographs were also taken while 
he was in Vietnam. 

 

The applicant’s complete response, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant served on active duty in the Regular Air Force from 
1 Feb 62 to 31 Jan 66. His DD Form 214 reflects a total of 
4 years of active military service, with 4 months and 29 days of 
Foreign Service. 

 

His AF Form 7, Airman Military Record reflects 150 days temporary 
duty (TDY), from 6 May 65 to 3 Oct 65, which is reflected on his 
DD Form 214. DPAPP was unable to verify the location of this 
TDY. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial of the applicant’s request to 
correct his record to reflect service in Vietnam. DPAPP states 
they were unable to find documentation that reflects the 
applicant served in Vietnam. 

 

The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 


 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

On 23 Nov 11, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to 
the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. To date, a 
response has not been received (Exhibit D). 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. After a 
through review of the evidence of record and the applicant’s 
complete submission, we find no evidence which would persuade us 
that his records should be corrected to reflect service in 
Vietnam. We note the applicant has provided copies of post-
marked envelopes and photos as evidence he served in Vietnam; 
however, we do not find this sufficient to change the record. 
Therefore, without documentary evidence to substantiate his 
claim, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air 
Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as 
the basis for our conclusion the applicant has failed to sustain 
his burden of showing he suffered either an error or injustice. 
In view of the above, and in the absence of evidence to the 
contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief 
sought in this application 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered Docket Number 
BC-2011-03563 in Executive Session on 8 Mar 12, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 


The following documentary evidence pertaining to Docket Number 
BC-2011-03563 was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 12 Sep 11. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 8 Nov 11. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 23 Nov 11. 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00316

    Original file (BC-2011-00316.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant served on active duty in the Air Force from 28 Jun 68 to 8 Apr 72. On 19 Apr 11, AFPC/DPAPP sent a letter to the applicant requesting documentation such as travel vouchers, evaluation reports, letters of evaluation, decorations, or other official military document that reflects that travel was completed and the inclusive periods of the travel; however he has not responded to this request. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03251

    Original file (BC-2011-03251.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect his TDY to Vietnam. We note the applicant’s records have been administratively corrected to reflect his foreign service in Thailand. In this regard, we took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02058

    Original file (BC-2011-02058.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His AF Form 7, Airman Military Record, Item 2, Foreign Service Summary be corrected to reflect Da Nang AB, South Vietnam. DPAPP states that based upon review of the applicant’s military records and the documentation provided they were unable to verify Foreign Service time in Vietnam. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show his race...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03067

    Original file (BC-2011-03067.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His military service record be corrected to reflect the time he served in Vietnam. The DVA stated the evidence of record showed he served in the Republic of Vietnam during the Vietnam Era, therefore, exposure to herbicides is conceded. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial of his request for service in Vietnam.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03636

    Original file (BC-2011-03636.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial of the applicant’s request to reflect foreign service in Vietnam. DPAPP states a review of the applicant’s master personnel records and documentation he submitted failed to provide any documents to substantiate foreign service time in Vietnam. The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPSIDRA recommends denial of the applicant’s request to add the VSM to his records.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03152

    Original file (BC-2011-03152.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03152 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _____________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect his service in Vietnam. The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02674

    Original file (BC-2011-02674.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP cannot verify the applicant was TDY to Vietnam, nor verify that the author of the supporting statement provided with his submission was assigned with him at Clark AFB or in Vietnam. We note the comments of the Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00709

    Original file (BC-2011-00709.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00709 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect service in Vietnam. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The time he spent in Vietnam is not recorded accurately. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01864

    Original file (BC-2011-01864.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPAPP could not verify any time served in Vietnam or Thailand. DPSIDR states that based upon review of the applicant’s military records they were unable to verify that he served on Temporary Duty (TDY) in Vietnam from Apr 72 to Aug 72. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04125

    Original file (BC-2011-04125.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The VSM is awarded to all members of the U.S. Armed Forces serving at any time between 4 Jul 65 and 28 Mar 73, in Vietnam, its contiguous waters, or the airspace there-over, and in direct support of operations in Vietnam. While the applicant’s record indicates that he provided in-flight services to passengers/troops and he was credited foreign service for at least two extensive TDYs, and noting that he has provided two witnesses statements attesting to his service, after considering the...