RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03630
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reentry code (RE) 2X (First-term, second-term or career
airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under SRP)
be changed to allow him to reenlist.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He requests his RE code be changed because the record is unjust.
He is trying to rejoin the Air Force but is ineligible because
of his RE code. He was honorably discharged under the DOS
Rollback.
He was handpicked for a deployment to Kunsan AB, South Korea.
He was chosen because of his hard work and dedication. While
there, he was interrogated regarding synthetic cannabis also
known as spice. He admitted to using spice on 31 November 2009
with other Airmen. He was later separated as part of the DOS
roll back. He was told he would have the opportunity to rejoin
so he took the punishment without a fight.
He understands using spice was wrong, but it was a mistake. He
would like his hard work and dedication to make a positive
impact. If given this chance he will not let anyone down and
will be completely grateful.
In support of his appeal, the applicant submits a personal
statement, a copy of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, excerpts from his master personnel
record, a copy of his REDD Report, a list of references and a
copy of his completed background check.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 30 March
2009. He was separated on 31 August 2010 as a part of the Air
Force Force Shaping Program. His service was characterized as
honorable and his RE code was listed as 2X. He was credited
with 1 year, 5 months and 1 day of active duty service.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. While there is no AF Form 418, Selective Reenlistment Program Consideration, in the applicants
file, it was confirmed that he was on the Force Shaping Roll
Back list. All members on the Roll Back list were non-selected
for reenlistment which required the 2X RE code. It was also
confirmed the member was on a Control Roster and had an
Unfavorable Information File.
The applicant has not provided any evidence of an error or
injustice that warrants a change to his RE code.
The complete DPSOA evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 20 October 2011, for review and comment within
30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, this office has received
no response.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we are not persuaded by the evidence
submitted in his appeal that a change in his RE code is
warranted. Therefore, we agree with the opinion and
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary
responsibility, and adopt is rationale as the basis for our
conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an
error or injustice. In the absence of evidence to the contrary,
we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2011-03630 in Executive Session on 23 February 2012
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 11 Sep 11, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 20 Oct 11, w/atch.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 4 Nov 11.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03414
________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial stating, in part, the applicant did not provide any evidence of an error or injustice that would warrant a change of his RE code. At the time members are separated from the Air Force, they are furnished an RE code predicated upon the quality of their service and the circumstances of their separation. ________________________________________________________________ The...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05829
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05829 XXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 2X, which denotes "1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)," be changed to allow him reentry into the Air Force. On 29 September 2012, the applicant was honorably discharged from the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00845
The applicants complete submission is at Exhibit A. His supervisor non-recommended him for the selective reenlistment program and his commander non-selected him for reenlistment on 26 March 2010. As of this date, this office has received no response.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02848
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02848 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 2X (first-term, second term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) be upgraded so that he can reenlist in the US Marine Corps (USMC). ...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2010 02655
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02655 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2X (first-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the [Selected Reenlistment Program] SRP) be changed to 1J (Eligible to reenlist, but elects separation). Although there is...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00625
The applicants commander non-selected him for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP); which, resulted in the 2X RE Code. As of this date, no response has been received by this office. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been a...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05133
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05133 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code 2X (first-term or second-term or career airman not selected for reenlistment) be changed. He was honorably discharged on 31 March 2012 after serving 5 years, 5 months and 7 days. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02391
On 7 September 2010, he was notified that his supervisor not recommended him for reenlistment. The applicant was discharged on 31 May 2011 under the FY11 Air Force Shaping Rollback Program after serving 3 years, 9 months and 3 days. The applicant provides no proof of an error or injustice in reference to his RE code and his non-selection for reenlistment was in accordance with current guidance.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02475
The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit B. He has never done any of the actions he was accused of by the three airmen. Moreover, he has not provided substantial evidence that but for the Article 15 he would have been selected for reenlistment.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04106
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04106 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2X First-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the SRP, be changed to allow him to reenter the military. ...