Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03287
Original file (BC-2011-03287.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03287 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to 
honorable. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He is on a self-improvement campaign and wishes to correct or 
make amends for previously wasting his life away. He is 63 years 
old and has become a registered voter. He would like to attend 
college in the fall. If his discharge is upgraded, the state of 
Florida will issue him a high school diploma and then allow him 
to attend college. 

 

In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his 
DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer 
or Discharge, and a copy of a letter from the Florida Department 
of Education. 

 

His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant enlisted into the Regular Air Force on 22 Jun 67. 
The applicant was notified by his commander that he was 
recommending him for discharge from the Air Force under the 
provisions of AFM 39-12, paragraph 2-15a, Section B, Chapter 2, 
for unfitness. The specific reasons for this action were for 
wrongfully loitering on post; for wrongfully having possessed a 
trace of marijuana, for failing to go at the time prescribed to 
his appointed place of duty, and for being absent without 
authority. The applicant received a general discharge on 8 May 
70, after serving 2 years, 10 months, and 13 days on active duty. 

 

 

 

Pursuant to the Board's request, the Federal Bureau of 
Investigation, Clarksburg, West Virginia, was unable to identify 
an arrest record. 


 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice. After 
careful consideration of the available evidence, we found no 
indication the actions taken to effect the applicant’s discharge 
were improper or contrary to the provisions of the governing 
regulations in effect at the time, or the actions taken against 
the applicant were based on factors other than his own 
misconduct. We considered upgrading the discharge based on 
clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented is 
sufficient to recommend granting the relief sought on that basis. 
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no 
basis upon which to recommend granting the relief sought. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2011-03287 in Executive Session on 20 Oct 11, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The following documentary evidence for Docket Number BC-2011-
03287 was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 29 Jul 11, w/atchs. 


 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03287

    Original file (BC-2003-03287.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    In this respect, we note that at the time of the applicant’s enlistment in the Air Force Reserve, Delayed Enlistment Program, she listed Cedar Falls, Iowa, as her HOR. In view of this, and since she did pursue correction of this error in a timely manner following her enlistment in the Regular Air Force, we recommend her records be corrected to the extent indicated below. The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, undated, w/atchs.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03832

    Original file (BC-2011-03832.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant did not transfer his benefits to his daughter because she did not plan to attend school in the United States. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant was not denied the opportunity to transfer benefits to his daughter and he has not provided evidence...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00503

    Original file (BC-2004-00503.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00503 INDEX CODE: 131.09 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be changed to indicate he received a 5-skill level in his Air Force Specialty (AFS) and that his pay grade be changed to senior airman (SRA/E-4). DPPPWB states that although he met the time in grade and time in service...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03066

    Original file (BC-2011-03066.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 11 October 2011, the applicant was given an opportunity to submit comments about his post service activities and in response to the FBI Report (Exhibit D). He was told by his Air Force attorney that his discharge would be upgraded automatically in six months after his discharge, but it was not. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2011-03066 in Executive Session on 15 March 2012, under the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01146

    Original file (BC-2011-01146.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 9 Nov 09, the applicant executed a DD Form 1966/1, Record Military Processing – Armed Forces of the United States, where he acknowledged, among other things, the requirement to present college transcripts prior to his completion of BMT in order to be eligible for enlistment in the grade of airman first class (E-3). The complete AFRC/A1K evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EALUATION: He has provided...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03035

    Original file (BC-2011-03035.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    For these actions he received a LOR, which was placed in his UIF. On 2 Feb 12, a copy of the FBI report and a request for post- service information were forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). While the applicant only references his civilian conviction for DUI as the basis for his discharge, it was but one of several issues which formed the basis for his administrative discharge for a pattern of misconduct, to include committing carnal knowledge with a...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03740

    Original file (BC-2011-03740.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03740 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to general (under honorable conditions). On 27 Jun 86, the applicant was discharged from the Air Force with a UOTHC discharge. Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 2 Feb 12.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01757

    Original file (BC-2013-01757.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 23 Oct 1987, he was discharged from the Air Force with a general (under honorable conditions) discharge. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented is sufficient to compel us to recommend granting the relief sought on that basis. __________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 30 Jan 2014, under...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01689

    Original file (BC-2011-01689.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01689 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to an under honorable conditions (general) discharge. On 14 Nov 96, the applicant’s commander notified him that he was recommending his discharge from the Air Force for drug...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03287

    Original file (BC 2013 03287.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03287 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 4H (Serving suspended punishment to Article 15) be removed from his records. The applicant does not contend an error or injustice in his receipt of nonjudicial punishment, but rather feels the 4H RE code on his DD Form 214...