RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01146 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His enlistment rank be reflected as E-3 rather than E-2, effective 9 Nov 09. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was advised that he could submit his college transcripts while at basic military training (BMT) to qualify for enlistment in the grade of airman first class (E-3). He attempted to provide a copy of his official transcripts while at BMT, but the training liaison told him to wait until he returned to his base. The applicant's complete submission is at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant is currently serving on active duty in the Air Force Reserve as airman first class (E-3). On 9 Nov 09, the applicant contracted his initial enlistment in the Air Force Reserve in the grade of airman (E-2). On 9 Nov 09, the applicant executed a DD Form 1966/1, Record Military Processing – Armed Forces of the United States, where he acknowledged, among other things, the requirement to present college transcripts prior to his completion of BMT in order to be eligible for enlistment in the grade of airman first class (E-3). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFRC/A1K recommends denial stating Air Force Reserve policy reflects that service members must provide their transcripts to the recruiting staff prior to their graduation from BMT in order to be eligible for enlistment in the higher grade under the the Stripes for Education and Training Program. The complete AFRC/A1K evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EALUATION: He has provided a copy of his college transcripts in support of his request (Exhibit D). _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. The applicant 93). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Other than his own assertions, he has provided no evidence that he was precluded from providing his college transcripts while attending BMT. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. 4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel will materially add to our understanding of the issue(s) involved. Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2011-01146 in Executive Session on 6 Dec 11, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 17 Feb 11. Exhibit B. Applicant's Military Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFRC/A1K, dated 19 Jul 11, w/atchs. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 29 Jul 11. Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, undated, w/atch. Panel Chair