RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02648
COUNSEL: NO
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his
dependents.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
While attempting to apply for benefits on-line, the Defense
Manpower Data Center (DMDC) website indicated that he may not be
eligible to transfer benefits. After inquiring further, he was
told that he had to be on active duty in order to transfer his
benefits. He was not briefed regarding the transferability prior
to his retirement. The only mandatory briefing he had to attend
was the Survivor Benefits Program (SBP) briefing. He understood
that he would have the option of either plan as well as having
the option to transfer his benefits to his dependents at any
time. He was never given any restrictions or deadlines to
transfer entitlements prior to retiring and he feels he should be
afforded the opportunity to transfer the education benefits to
his dependents. He has always intended on transferring the
education benefits to his dependents.
The applicant does not provide any supporting documentation.
The applicants complete submission is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant retired on 31 Jan 10 in the grade of master
sergeant.
The Post-9/11 GI Bill was widely publicized along with the
transferability feature. To be eligible, a member must have been
on active duty on or after 1 Aug 09 and agree to serve a
prescribed term of service.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial. The Post 9/11 Educational
Assistance referred to as the authority to transfer unused
education benefits to family members was used to promote
recruitment and retention of members of the Armed Forces. The
member was ineligible to apply for the Post-9/11 GI Bill transfer
of benefits to dependents because he had an approved retirement
in Jun 09. DPSIT further states that all members
separating/retiring from the Air Force are given a mandatory
briefing through the Airman and Family Readiness Support Center,
Transition Assistance Program (TAP).
The AFPC/DPSIT complete evaluation is at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
1. The AFPC/DPSIT evaluation statement, The fact that member was
ineligible to apply for the Post 9/11 GI bill transfer of
dependents because member had an approved retirement in June 09
is misleading as he cannot find any factual information stating
he was ineligible. If the fact that he had an approved
retirement made him ineligible, why was he not notified? What
fact regarding his ineligibility is in writing? He researched
USC 38 and Public Law 110-252 and looked for original legislation
and amendments, but could not find anything that stated
ineligibility due to an approved retirement prior to Aug 09. He
has documentation that states eligibility if member Is or
becomes retirement eligible during the period from Aug 1, 2009
through Aug 1, 2013.
2. He was retirement eligible after serving 20 years on 6 Oct 08;
however, he actually retired on 31 Jan 10. He attended the TAP
at his base on 18 Mar 09 where he received information regarding
the Post-9/11 GI Bill that was vague, plus the staff did not
offer any information regarding the eligibility to transfer the
benefit.
3. When he asked the Veterans Affairs (VA) representative whether
he would be eligible for both the traditional Montgomery GI Bill
and the Post-9/11 GI Bill, he was told that he would be eligible
for both. When he asked about the possibility of transferring
the benefit he was told that information would be forthcoming.
He did not receive any further information and assumed he would
be eligible to use either plan and have the option to transfer
whenever he wanted to. He has not found any information that
would have allowed him to adjust his retirement date in order to
transfer, nor was any information available that stated he had to
transfer benefits while still on active duty.
4. The fact that he was not offered a choice is his biggest
concern. Had he known what choices were available and what his
eligibility status was prior to his retirement effective date, he
would have exercised his right to transfer this valuable benefit.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. After reviewing the
evidence before us, we believe the applicants request should be
granted. While we note the OPR indicates the applicant was not
eligible to apply for the benefit due to having an approved
retirement as of 1 June 2009, we note the applicant did not
retire until 1 February 2010. We further note that based on
having an approved retirement date after 1 August 2009 and before
1 July 2010, the applicant was not required to serve additional
time. Although the OPR indicates the applicant received a
briefing on the transfer of benefits, we are aware there were
problems during the initial implementation of the program and
find it reasonable the applicant may not have fully understood
the requirements to transfer his benefits. At any rate, we find
the evidence submitted sufficient to resolve any doubt in this
matter in his behalf. Therefore, we recommend the applicants
records be corrected as indicated below.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 30 January
2010, he elected to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill Educational
Benefits.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2011-02648 in Executive Session on 15 May 12, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence for BC-2011-02648 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 15 Jul 11.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIT, dated 22 Jul 11.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 29 Jul 11.
Exhibit D. Letter, Applicant, undated.
Acting Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01391
________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He applied for the Post 9/11 GI Bill prior to retirement; however, the transferability portion of the benefit had not been established at that time and believes for that reason he should be given an opportunity to complete this transfer. The applicant states that he applied for the 9/11 GI Bill right before he retired (no date of when this happened), but the transferability requirement for...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04097
Therefore, he was unaware of the requirement to be on active duty to elect to transfer his benefits until Sep 11 when he read about it in the Air Force Times. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicants master personnel records, are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of responsibility which is included at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00880
However, the Board could find that there was an injustice if the members were on active duty on 1 Aug 09, were not personally counseled about the need to execute a transfer while serving in the Armed Forces, and did not have ready access to DoD and Air Force guidance because of their terminal leave status. The transfer date could be effective as early as 1 Aug 09 and there would be no need to place the member on active duty since the TEB system allows for correction of the record by Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00706
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00706 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant waived his education benefits briefing for...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02419
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02419 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03441
________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He completed the submission portion of the Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) for his daughter in Sep or Oct 09, transferring 100 percent of his benefits at that time. In Sep or Oct 09, he "transferred" his education benefits to his daughter, but there is no record of him doing the transfer. Since, he had completed that portion of the process the information was not new to him.
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-04574
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial. However, the Board could find that there was an injustice if the members were on active duty on 1 Aug 09, were not personally counseled about the need to execute a...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-04574
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial. However, the Board could find that there was an injustice if the members were on active duty on 1 Aug 09, were not personally counseled about the need to execute a...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03571
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03571 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he transferred his Post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits to his dependents while he was on active duty. The program for Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) started 1 Aug 09. On 31 August 2009, he elected to...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03171
Surprisingly, on 14 Jun 13, he received another email concerning his Post 9/11 GI bill TEB, basically stating the same; that he must meet the retainability requirements and that the application process was not complete. For those individuals eligible for retirement after 1 Aug 09, and before 1 Aug 10, 1 year of additional service after approval of transfer is required. Therefore, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the...