Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02291
Original file (BC-2011-02291.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02291 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

He be allowed to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his 
dependents. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

While he was still on active duty he requested assistance and 
instructions from the Barksdale AFB Education Office related to 
the Post-9/11 GI Bill transfer of benefits application process. 

 

He was guided to the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) website 
where he filled out the appropriate paperwork for eligibility and 
transfer. He submitted a transfer of benefits application and 
received confirmation a few weeks later from the DVA that said he 
was eligible for benefits. 

 

He was offered no briefings nor was he counseled that he needed 
to apply through a Department of Defense (DoD) website in order 
to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits. It was not until his 
daughter enrolled at the Art Institute of Las Vegas and financial 
aid was denied that he discovered his benefits had not been 
transferred to her. 

 

The applicant's complete submission is at Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant retired in the grade of master sergeant effective 
1 Dec 10 after serving 21 years on active duty. 

 

Additional relevant facts pertaining to this application, 
extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in 
the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at 
Exhibit B. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 


AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

HQ USAF/A1PA recommends denial. A1PA states the applicant had 
access and the opportunity to ensure he correctly transferred his 
benefits to his daughter before his 1 Dec 10 retirement date. 

 

A review of the applicant’s Preseparation Counseling Checklist 
reflects he was briefed about the Post-9/11 GI Bill and was 
referred to the Barksdale Base Education Services office for one-
on-one educational counseling. Based on education office records 
he did not take advantage of this opportunity. The Barksdale 
Education office also advised that they provided mass Post-9/11 
GI Bill Educational Benefits briefings for the base-wide 
population during the summer of 2009, but attendance was not 
mandatory and they did not keep attendance records. 

 

The applicant states he logged onto the DVA website not the 
Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC) Transfer of Educational 
Benefits (TEB) website. A1PA reviewed the DMDC’s TEB database 
that confirmed the applicant did not apply to transfer his 
benefits before his 1 Dec 10 retirement. Additionally, the DVA 
website does not have an application venue to transfer Post-9/11 
GI Bill benefits. Therefore, he could not have applied to 
transfer his benefits to his daughter through the DVA website. 
The only method for transferring benefits was through the DMDC 
TEB site. It is surmised that he applied for his own Certificate 
of Eligibility and that is the confirmation he received a few 
weeks later. 

 

The applicant did not take the required actions to transfer his 
benefits. This is not an error on the part of the Air Force. If 
the applicant had taken advantage of the mass briefings provided 
or the one-on-one counseling available he could have averted this 
unfortunate situation. 

 

The complete A1PA evaluation is at Exhibit B. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

On 5 Aug 11, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to 
the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. To date, a 
response has not been received (Exhibit C). 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 


3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. After a 
thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant’s 
submission, we are not persuaded the applicant has been the 
victim of an error or injustice. The applicant’s contentions are 
duly noted; however, we do not find these assertions, in and by 
themselves, sufficiently persuasive to override the rationale 
provided by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR). 
While the applicant indicates he was not aware of the requirement 
to make his transferability election prior to retirement, it 
appears the Air Force made every reasonable effort to ensure the 
information was available to the member prior to his retirement. 
Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the 
Air Force OPR and adopt its rationale as the basis for our 
conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error 
or injustice. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we 
find no basis to recommend favorable consideration of his 
request. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered Docket Number 
BC-2011-02291 in Executive Session on 12 Sep 11, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 16 Jun 11. 

 Exhibit B. Letter, HQ USAF/A1PA, dated 22 Jul 11. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 5 Aug 11. 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01722

    Original file (BC-2011-01722.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01722 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be entitled to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. Any member of the Armed Forces, active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted, on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, has at least 6...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02115

    Original file (BC-2011-02115.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Certificate of Eligibility the applicant received from the VA clearly details the service member's eligibility under the Post-9/11 GI Bill. He provided dates that he attended a mass briefing and individual counseling for the Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits. The Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) slide highlighted that individuals apply separately to transfer benefits using the TEB website and included a statement indicating that AFPC's Service Center will review eligibility, and approve...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00674

    Original file (BC-2011-00674.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Post-9/11 GI Bill: Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty or Selected Reserve (SelRes), officer or enlisted) on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, and: • Has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve a specified additional period in the Armed Forces from the date of election. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ USAF/A1PA makes no recommendation, but notes...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01168

    Original file (BC-2011-01168.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Post-9/11 GI Bill: Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty or Selected Reserve (SelRes), officer or enlisted) on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, and: • Has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve a specified additional • period in the Armed Forces from the date of election. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ USAF/A1PA states if the Board finds there...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00454

    Original file (BC-2010-00454.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was advised during his retirement out-processing that all he needed to do was complete the required forms to transfer his GI benefits to his dependents before he retired. The transfer date could be effective as early as 1 August 2009 and there would be no need to place the member on active duty since the TEB system allows for correction of the record by Air Force personnel. The complete HQ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03994

    Original file (BC-2010-03994.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibits C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AF/A1PA indicates that both the Department of Defense (DoD) and Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) widely publicized the Post- 9/11 GI Bill and the transferability feature. Notwithstanding the above, the Board could find there was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01900

    Original file (BC-2010-01900.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AF/A1PA indicates that both the Department of Defense (DoD) and Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) widely publicized the Post- 9/11 GI Bill and the transferability feature. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00318

    Original file (BC-2011-00318.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Post-9/11 GI Bill: Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty or Selected Reserve (SelRes), officer or enlisted) on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, and: • Has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve a specified additional period in the Armed Forces from the date of election. The Board could find that there was an injustice if members on active duty on 1 August 2009 were not sufficiently counseled about the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00110

    Original file (BC-2011-00110.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00110 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be entitled to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ USAF/A1PA makes no recommendation, but notes that if the Board finds there was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01337

    Original file (BC-2011-01337.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was not denied the opportunity to transfer benefits while on active duty, and he provided no evidence to support governmental injustice or error. Had he been counseled or warned, he would have made sure benefits were transferred before retiring from active duty. ________________________________________________________________ _ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The majority of the panel finds insufficient evidence of error or injustice and recommends the application be denied.