Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01105
Original file (BC-2011-01105.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01105 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: YES 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

1. Her Active Duty Service Commitment (ADSC) date, based on her 
Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB), be adjusted to match her 
original retirement eligibility date of September 2014. 

 

2. She be allowed to transfer her Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to 
her dependent with an effective date of 20 September 2009. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

In August 2009, the Education Center on Bolling AFB briefed that 
active duty members may only transfer Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits 
to dependents. In accordance with DVA instruction, said benefits 
may be assigned to any person(s) associated with a member’s DEERS 
record, regardless of military dependency status. The Education 
Center recognized their error and recommended that she petition 
for a waiver. Had she the correct information, she would have 
initiated the TEB in September 2009, incurring no additional 
service. 

 

In support of her request, the applicant submits a personal 
statement and copies of a 2009 Bolling AFB Education Center 
briefing. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant is currently serving on extended active duty in the 
grade of lieutenant colonel. MilPDS reflects her ADSC as 
17 January 2015. 

 

On 18 January 2011, the applicant applied to transfer benefits to 
her son and the application was approved with a service 
obligation end date of 17 January 2015. 

 


The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, 
extracted from the applicant’s military personnel records, are 
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the 
Air Force at Exhibit C. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

USAF/A1PA recommends approval. A1PA states it is reasonable to 
believe the briefer provided erroneous information to the 
applicant during the 12 August 2009 briefing. If the Board finds 
there is sufficient evidence the applicant did not receive 
accurate counseling, the Air Force has the technical/operational 
capability to adjust the applicant’s TEB Web Application Military 
Service Obligation End Date and associated Military Personnel 
Data System (MilPDS) ADSC to 19 September 2013, which is when her 
ADSC would have expired had she transferred education benefits on 
the child’s date of birth. (NOTE: the applicant requested her 
ADSC be adjusted to match her September 2014 retirement 
eligibility date; however, her ADSC would have only run until 
2013 had she transferred benefits when the baby was born). 

 

The A1PA complete evaluation is at Exhibit B. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

On 13 May 2011, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded 
to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit 
C). As of this date, this office has received no response. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. Based on the 
determination by A1PA that it is reasonable the applicant was 
miscounseled regarding the transfer of her 9/11 GI Bill benefits, 
we agree with their recommendation to grant the requested relief. 
Accordingly, we recommend the applicant’s records be corrected as 
indicated below. 

 

 

 

 

 


 

4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not 
been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel 
will materially add to our understanding of the issues involved. 
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: 

 

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force 
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that: 

 

 a. On 20 September 2009, she elected to transfer his Post 
9/11 GI Bill Educational Benefits. 

 

 b. Her active duty service commitment date (ADSC) reflect 
19 September 2013 rather than 17 January 2015. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2011-01005 in Executive Session on 10 November 2011, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 

All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The 
following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number 
BC-2011-01005 was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 23 February 2011, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, USAF/A1PA, dated 27 April 2011. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 May 2011. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00081

    Original file (BC-2011-00081.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00081 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Active Duty Service Commitment (ADSC) that was incurred as a result of the Post 9/11 GI Bill transfer of education benefits (TEB) to his dependent children be changed from 8 April 2014 to 19 August 2013. The complete AF/A1PA evaluation is at...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00536

    Original file (BC-2011-00536.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Additionally, A1PA notes that if the applicant desires to retire as soon as he completes 20 years of service, he may request an ADSC waiver. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant's submission, we do not find his uncorroborated assertions, in and by themselves, sufficiently persuasive to override the rationale provided by the Air Force. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00917

    Original file (BC-2010-00917.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Post-9/11 GI Bill: Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted) on or after August 1, 2009, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, and: • Has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve 4 additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election. A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of reserve service....

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00880

    Original file (BC-2010-00880.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, the Board could find that there was an injustice if the members were on active duty on 1 Aug 09, were not personally counseled about the need to execute a transfer while serving in the Armed Forces, and did not have ready access to DoD and Air Force guidance because of their terminal leave status. The transfer date could be effective as early as 1 Aug 09 and there would be no need to place the member on active duty since the TEB system allows for correction of the record by Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01180

    Original file (BC-2010-01180.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A1PA states that members may have had the impression that being on active duty or in the Selected Reserve (SELRES) on the effective date of the law, 1 Aug 09, was sufficient to “vest” them with the right to transfer benefits at some time in the future. However, the Board could find that there was an injustice if the members were on active duty on 1 Aug 09, were not personally counseled about the need to execute a transfer while serving in the Armed Forces, and did not have ready access to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00042

    Original file (BC-2011-00042.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, he did not provide any documentation supporting that contention, and based on his earliest retirement eligibility date, the applicant was not eligible to transfer benefits without an additional service commitment at the programs’s 1 Aug 09 inception. Had he known his ADSC waiver would have been disapproved, he would have applied for the TEB in Oct 09 with plenty of time to fulfill the requisite ADSC by the time he eventually retired in Jan 11. We took notice of the applicant's...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-04574

    Original file (BC-2009-04574.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial. However, the Board could find that there was an injustice if the members were on active duty on 1 Aug 09, were not personally counseled about the need to execute a...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-04574

    Original file (BC-2009-04574.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial. However, the Board could find that there was an injustice if the members were on active duty on 1 Aug 09, were not personally counseled about the need to execute a...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00815

    Original file (BC-2011-00815.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00815 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His active duty service commitment (ADSC) for transferring his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents be corrected to reflect an expiration date of 24 Jun 11. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01943

    Original file (BC-2010-01943.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01943 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Active Duty Service Commitment (ADSC) that was incurred as a result of the Post 9/11 GI Bill transfer of education benefits (TEB) to his dependents be removed. The applicant executed the TEB Application and an Air Force Form 4406, Post 9/11 GI...