Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00778
Original file (BC-2011-00778.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00778 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

___________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His records be corrected to show he was in Tan Son Nhut, Vietnam 
from 24 January 1968 to 24 March 1968. 

___________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He is applying for health benefits for exposure to Agent Orange and 
his DD Form 214, Report of Transfer or Discharge, does not show his 
duty in Vietnam. 

 

In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his 
AF Form 7, Airman Military Record, and a letter from the National 
Personnel Records Center. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

___________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant was enlisted in the Regular Air Force from 22 July 
1966 to 21 July 1970. He was progressively promoted to the grade 
of Staff Sergeant/E-5. His AF Form 7 reflects he served in the 
Philippines from 27 February 1967 to 26 March 1968. He was 
credited with 1 year and 1 month of Foreign Service during his 
enlistment. 

 

On 25 April 2011, the applicant responded to DPAPP, stating that he 
was unable to find additional documents showing his time in 
Vietnam. He states that he was assigned to 463 FMS, Marten Isle, 
Philippines and was TDY to Saigon, Tan Son Nhut Air Base from about 
24 January 1968 to 24 March 1968. 

___________________________________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 


 

AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial. DPAPP is unable to confirm the 
applicant spent any time in Vietnam based on his Master Personnel 
Records and requested additional information from the applicant. 

 

The complete DPAPP evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. 

 

___________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 20 May 2011 for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit D). As of this date, this office has received no 
response. 

 

___________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took 
notice of the applicant's complete submission and the available 
evidence of record in judging the merits of the case. However, 
we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force 
office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the 
basis for our conclusion that the applicant’s records do not 
reflect he spent time in Vietnam. In the absence of evidence to 
the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief 
sought in this application. 

 

___________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application. 

 

___________________________________________________________________ 

 

 


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 
BC-2011-00778 in Executive Session on 9 August 2011, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 24 Feb 11, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 31 Mar 11, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 20 May 11. 

 

 

 

 

 
Panel Chair 

 

 

 






Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04365

    Original file (BC-2010-04365.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04365 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he served in Vietnam and the Philippines (Philippines service administratively corrected). However, the DD Forms 1351-2, Travel Voucher or Subvoucher, was illegible and requested the applicant provide a legible...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02676

    Original file (BC-2011-02676.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of his request, the applicant submits a copy of his DD Form 214, and eight copies of his AF Forms 626, Temporary Duty Order – Military, with dates ranging from April 1966 through June 1967. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial of the request to show Vietnam service, and states, in part, they were able to verify and confirm the applicant’s foreign service at Clark Air Base, Republic of the Philippines,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02237

    Original file (BC 2013 02237.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In this respect, the applicant provides a detailed account of his temporary duty at Tan Son Nhut AB, Vietnam, in 1972 with supporting documentation showing he was issued an M-16. With respect to a comment in the DPAPP advisory opinion that the information provided by the applicant “did not contain information that reflects [the applicant] served in Vietnam,” that documentation does contain evidence that the applicant served in Vietnam: his detailed statement attached to his application. We...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00338

    Original file (BC-2007-00338.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00338 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 2 AUGUST 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect credit for a TDY to Vietnam in 1968. In support of his request, applicant provided page four of his Airman Military Record, AF Form 7, which is a...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01385

    Original file (BC-2012-01385.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility which are included at Exhibits C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends approval, indicating there is evidence of an error or injustice. The applicant’s DD Form 214 accurately reflects his Foreign Service Credit for his assignment to Clark Air Base but does not show...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-02107

    Original file (BC-2007-02107.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02107 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: Jan 06, 2009 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect service in Viet Nam. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03553

    Original file (BC 2013 03553 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    DPSID states that the Air Force Personnel Center, Directorate of Assignments was unable to verify the applicant's Foreign Service time in Vietnam. Moreover, the applicant’s TDY orders and the Foreign and/or Service time reflected on his DD Form 214 match up perfectly. _______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2002-02804

    Original file (BC-2002-02804.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He needs his DD Form 214, dated 10 April 1975, corrected to show he served in Vietnam in 1971. The Vietnam Service Medal was awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who served at any time between 4 July 1965, and 28 March 1973, in Vietnam or its contiguous waters or airspace, or, for any period of service during the same time period in Thailand, Laos, or Cambodia or the air spaces...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC 2002 02804

    Original file (BC 2002 02804.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He needs his DD Form 214, dated 10 April 1975, corrected to show he served in Vietnam in 1971. The Vietnam Service Medal was awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who served at any time between 4 July 1965, and 28 March 1973, in Vietnam or its contiguous waters or airspace, or, for any period of service during the same time period in Thailand, Laos, or Cambodia or the air spaces...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00178

    Original file (BC-2012-00178.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of his request, the applicant provides a personal statement, a copy of a document extracted from his military personnel records and a notarized letter from a former coworker attesting to his service in the Republic of Vietnam. No documentation was provided to verify the applicant served in Vietnam, or any area for which the VSM is authorized for the specified period of time. We believe a reasonable basis exists to conclude the applicant served in Vietnam based on the applicant’s...