Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00586
Original file (BC-2011-00586.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00586 


 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

Thirteen days of lost leave be restored to his current leave 
balance. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

Due to an unscheduled deployment and four weeks of required 
deployment training, he had to change his leave plans for the 
remainder of the year and was unable to take leave before he 
deployed. 

 

In support of his request, the applicant submits a copy of his 
deployment order, Special Order (SO) TE-1010, dated 17 August 
2010, and a history of his 2010 leave dates. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
exhibit A. 

 

_________________ ______________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in 
the grade of MSgt Sergeant (MSgt). 

 

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application 
extracted from the applicant’s military personnel records are 
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of 
the Air Force (Exhibit B). Accordingly there is no need to 
recite these facts in this Record of Proceedings. 

 

_______________________________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 

 


AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial due to the applicant’s inability to 
provide sufficient evidence of material error or injustice. 
Members not eligible for special leave accrual (SLA) can request 
recovery of days lost through the correction of records process, 
but must clearly establish that an error or injustice by the Air 
Force caused the lost leave. 

 

The complete AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at exhibit B. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 20 May 2011 for review and comment within 30 days. 
As of this date, no response has been received by this office. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has 
not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the 
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 


The following members of the Board considered this application 
BC-2011-00586 in Executive Session on 24 January 2012, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

, Member 

 , Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 14 February 2011, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 4 May 2011. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 20 May 2011. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04460

    Original file (BC-2011-04460.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Member’s application must clearly establish that an error or injustice by the Air Force caused the member’s lost leave. If the Board restores leave to current leave account, members must use these days before the end of the current FY.” On 29 Nov 2011, DPSIMC requested additional documentation from the applicant to support his claim; specifically orders received from all deployments that prevented him from using the lost four days of leave during FY 2011. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 01775

    Original file (BC 2012 01775.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    According to the information provided by the Air Force office of primary responsibility the applicant carried forward 63.5 days of leave at the beginning of FY 2010. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Exhibit C....

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-05726

    Original file (BC-2012-05726.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 1. The guidance states “members are ineligible for SLA when the following precludes using leave: Normal PCS moves and TDYs.” AFI 36-3003, also states in paragraph 4.1.5., “unit commanders: advise members who schedule “use or lose” leave in August...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00586

    Original file (BC-2007-00586.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    During FY06, he earned 30 days of leave and used 23 days of leave. DPSO concludes the leave lost was not an error or injustice caused by the Air Force. We have noted the documents provided with the applicant’s submission; however, they do not, in our opinion, support a finding that the applicant was unable to take his accrued leave upon his return from deployment.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01302

    Original file (BC-2012-01302.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01302 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The 27 days of leave she lost at the end of fiscal year (FY) 2011 be restored. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She was unable to use 27 days of leave due to her being deployed in support of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04371

    Original file (BC-2011-04371.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his appeal, the applicant submits his Leave and Earnings Statement and an e-mail regarding AMC guidance. AFI 36-3003, Military Leave Program, states in part the member’s application must clearly establish that an error or injustice by the Air Force caused the member’s lost leave. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01333

    Original file (BC-2011-01333.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01333 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 25.5 days of leave be restored and she receive payment for those days. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04638

    Original file (BC-2011-04638.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The governing instruction states in part that the member’s application must clearly establish that an error or injustice by the Air Force caused the member’s lost leave. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 24 Jan 12 for review and comment within 30 days. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 24 Jan 12.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-01612

    Original file (BC-2012-01612.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01612 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 4 days of lost leave be restored. AFI 36-3003, Military Leave Program, explains SLA shall not be a means to authorize the accumulation of leave in excess of 60 days (75 days from 1 October 2008 through 30 September 2013) when it is a result of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01886

    Original file (BC 2013 01886.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    According to the applicant’s Master Military Pay Account statement dated 12 Dec 2012, he lost 15 days of leave in FY12. Requests must clearly establish that an error or injustice caused by the Air Force prevented the member from using the lost leave. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 9 Feb 2014.